- Test - lists.nanog.org

Presentation Archives
by Betty Burke 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Great news!! The NANOG presentation archive is once again working properly. Additionally, very soon, the NANOG 52 Video Presentations will also be linked. Again, we are sorry for the interruption and access to the archives and appreciate your patience as we continue to move through the transition of NANOG services. If you should have any further problems or concerns, please do let us know by sending a note to nanog-support(a)nanog.org. Sincerely, Betty -- Betty Burke NewNOG/NANOG Executive Director

1 0

IPv6 Linux Server Support
by Paul Stewart 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Hi there. Has anyone compiled a list of pros/cons on various flavors of Linux specific to IPv6? I realize that's a really broad question.. Specific example would be that we're primarily a CentOS shop - during some testing today found out that connection tracking is broken in 5.6 version (after all kinds of Google hits). I understand 6.0 (recently released) fixes this issue. I have not seen this issue in Debian for example to date. Any input would be appreciated - my question isn't regarding which version folks like better, it's specifically what version works best in an IPv6 server related environment. Thanks, Paul

3 2

Re: dynamic or static IPv6 prefixes to residential customers
by Daniel Espejel 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Just like the song: "...you know is sad but true..". ISPs and a few vendors offers IPv6 cappabilities as an add-on on its commercial portfolios. For the static v6 address assignment, applies the same. Even if for users represents advantages on having it's own unique address (i.e. in order to enter the Web or apps service providers world for their own), as so for ISPs to perform some network administrative tasks. I favor static prefix assignation over dynamic, but also I think that for some time (more or less until vendors and providers recovers invertion and operation costs) this will be a "expensive product" to adquire. *Daniel Espejel Perez *

1 0

re: Comcast Bussiness Class and GRE Tunnels
by Nick Olsen 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

I had to deal with this Exact problem last week. Never got EOIP to work, Spent hours on it. I had to use a "GRE Tunnel" Which is the same thing. And is only available under RouterOS 5.x+. Came right up when EOIP wouldn't. I don't know how to peg the problem. As PPTP, EOIP, GRE...etc All use the GRE protocol 47. So you would think they all would show the same problem. I never even attempted to contact comcast support as I wasn't about to spend another 3 hours explaining my problem only for them to say they aren't blocking anything and it must be my side.. Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106 ---------------------------------------- From: "Nate Burke" <nate(a)blastcomm.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 11:07 AM To: "NANOG list" <nanog(a)nanog.org> Subject: Comcast Bussiness Class and GRE Tunnels Hello, I'm hoping that someone here might have run into a similar issue and might be able to offer me some pointers. I have a customer that I am providing redundant paths to, one link over a microwave connection, and a backup link over a Comcast Business Class Connection. Everything on the Microwave link is working fine. On the Comcast Connection, I have a Static IP from Comcast, and I want to setup a vendor specific GRE tunnel (Mikrotik EoIP) from my NOC to the Comcast Static IP Address. It looks like the SPI Firewall inside the SMC Gateway required by comcast is blocking the GRE packets, I'm basing this on the fact that when I power cycle the modem, I get 1 ICMP Packet through the GRE Tunnel while the modem is booting up, then it stops again. I have gotten to Tier2 support who swears that all Firewalls on the SMC Gateway are disabled. As a workaround, I was able to establish a PPTP tunnel to my NOC, however it seems like the tunnel will only run for a few hours, then becomes slow to the point of being unusable. In my mind this would be no different than setting up a permanent VPN back to a corporate office, which I would think happens all the time, so I'm not sure why I'm running into issues with it. Anyone with Insights or comments would be appreciated. Thanks, Nate Burke

1 0

nanog presentations archive
by Jensen Tyler 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

See Below Jensen Tyler Sr Engineering Manager Fiberutilities Group, LLC (319) 297-6915 (office) *NEW (319) 364-8100 (fax) (319) 329-8578 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: Betty Burke [mailto:betty@newnog.org] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 1:54 PM To: NANOG(a)nanog.org Subject: Problems with the NANOG Meeting Archives Colleagues: Unfortunately, it is true the archives are not working properly. As part of the NANOG Service transition, the code which supports the meeting(s) presentation archive stopped working. We have all the data, and staff are currently working quickly to repair the code and return to normal operations of the archive. We understand the importance of the NANOG meeting history, and are sorry for the delay in access. I do not yet have an eta, however I will be sure to keep the community posted. Please accept my apology for the interruption. Betty -- Betty Burke NewNOG/NANOG Executive Director Office (810) 214-1218 _____ NANOG mailing list NANOG(a)nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

1 0

nanog presentations archive
by Andrei Popa 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Hello, >From two weeks the archive presentation files from nanog meetings aren't available anymore http://www.nanog.org/presentations/archive/index.php I've tried contacting nanog site maintainers with no luck. Can somebody give me some contact details from nanog site maintainers for reporting this issue ? Thank you, Andrei

1 0

Change in NANOG IPv6 Address
by Michael K. Smith - Adhost 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Hello Everyone: The correct and updated IPv6 address for the NANOG list is 2001:1838::cc5d:d48a. Forward and reverse records are updated and the other address will continue to work while the DNS change propagates. Regards, Mike

1 0

NANOG List Cutover Schedule - COMPLETE
by Michael K. Smith - Adhost 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

Hello: We have moved the NANOG mailing list to its new location. I've sent and received a test message successfully. If anyone is having issue after they have confirmed they have the correct DNS settings, please send me an email directly. 204.93.212.138 And 2001:1838:2001:3:2a0:d1ff:fee9:4f94 Regards, Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith(a)adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksmith@adhost.com] > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 12:21 PM > To: NANOG list (nanog(a)nanog.org) > Subject: RE: NANOG List Cutover Schedule > > We are holding on this conversion at the moment and running on the existing > configuration. I will update the list shortly with a revised schedule. > > Regards, > > Mike > > -- > Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP > Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith(a)adhost.com > w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 > PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael K. Smith - Adhost [mailto:mksmith@adhost.com] > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 11:44 AM > > To: NANOG list (nanog(a)nanog.org) > > Subject: NANOG List Cutover Schedule > > > > Hello All: > > > > We will be moving the mailing list at 12:00 PDT (GMT -7). The following is > the > > cutover schedule and expected issues during the cutover. > > > > 1) 12:00 - move DNS for mailman.nanog.org (the MX for nanog.org) > > 2) 12:00 - shut down Mailman on s0.nanog.org (mailman.nanog.org) > > 3) 12:01 - final rsync of list data over to new server > > 4) 12:05 - send out a "TEST" message to the NANOG list > > 5) 12:30 - if message is not seen on list and no correctable errors are > detected > > in the logfiles, revert to s0.nanog.org, troubleshoot, report and reschedule. > > > > If anyone has any questions or concerns please let me know. > > > > Mike > > > > -- > > Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP > > Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith(a)adhost.com > > w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 > > PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) > > > > > > > > _____ > > NANOG mailing list > > NANOG(a)nanog.org > > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > > _____ > NANOG mailing list > NANOG(a)nanog.org > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

1 0

TEST
by Michael K. Smith - Adhost 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

This message is testing the new list server configuration. Please ignore. Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith(a)adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)

1 0

NANOG List Cutover Schedule
by Michael K. Smith - Adhost 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

Hello All: We will be moving the mailing list at 12:00 PDT (GMT -7). The following is the cutover schedule and expected issues during the cutover. 1) 12:00 - move DNS for mailman.nanog.org (the MX for nanog.org) 2) 12:00 - shut down Mailman on s0.nanog.org (mailman.nanog.org) 3) 12:01 - final rsync of list data over to new server 4) 12:05 - send out a "TEST" message to the NANOG list 5) 12:30 - if message is not seen on list and no correctable errors are detected in the logfiles, revert to s0.nanog.org, troubleshoot, report and reschedule. If anyone has any questions or concerns please let me know. Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith(a)adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)

1 1