- Test - lists.nanog.org

US internet providers hijacking users' search queries
by Bino Gopal 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20768-us-internet-providers-hijacking… Thoughts?

18 27

[Fwd: [v6ops] RFC 6343 on Advisory Guidelines for 6to4 Deployment]
by Brian E Carpenter 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

This is principally addressed to Internet Service Providers (ISPs), including those that do not yet support IPv6, and to Content Providers. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [v6ops] RFC 6343 on Advisory Guidelines for 6to4 Deployment Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:21:00 -0700 (PDT) From: rfc-editor(a)rfc-editor.org To: ietf-announce(a)ietf.org, rfc-dist(a)rfc-editor.org CC: v6ops(a)ietf.org, rfc-editor(a)rfc-editor.org A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6343 Title: Advisory Guidelines for 6to4 Deployment Author: B. Carpenter Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: August 2011 Mailbox: brian.e.carpenter(a)gmail.com Pages: 20 Characters: 51496 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-advisory-02.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6343.txt This document provides advice to network operators about deployment of the 6to4 technique for automatic tunneling of IPv6 over IPv4. It is principally addressed to Internet Service Providers (ISPs), including those that do not yet support IPv6, and to Content Providers. Some advice to implementers is also included. The intention of the advice is to minimize both user dissatisfaction and help-desk calls. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor(a)rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops(a)ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

1 0

AS376
by Zaid Ali 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

Can someone from AS 376 contact me offline? s'il vous plaît? I am seeing a routing issue in your AS. Merci, Zaid

1 0

Errant Advertisement - 128.1/16
by Rick Altmann 09 Aug '11

09 Aug '11

Is there anyone from AT&T on the list that could help with a likely misconfiguration? I have not received any response yet to my complaint (see below) submitted to the abuse address on July 26. We have since started advertising this space and would like to resolve the MOAS condition we have created. //////////////// The 128.1.0.0/16 address block is registered to BBN Technologies (AS11488) but is currently unused on any BBN networks. BBN would like to begin using this address space however AS7018 is currently originating public BGP routes for this address block. We believe this to be a configuration error. Please help us resolve this. A traceroute to 128.1.0.1 shows the following routers as the last 4 responding hops: cr1.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.81.106) cr81.nw2nj.ip.att.net (12.122.105.30) gar18.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.122.105.101) 12.89.231.190 //////////////// Thanks, Rick

5 5

AT&T/SBC Global to AS13285 routing issue
by dlr＠bungi.com 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

If someone from AT&T or SBC global could contact me off list, please? 2.96.0.0/13 is pretty much unreachable from portions of the Bay Area from the sbcglobal network. I've opened a couple of tickets on this, but no joy yet. Thank you --

1 0

Corporation for Sale with IPv4 Assets
by IPv4 Brokers 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

North American Corporation (domiciled in Nevada) is for sale. All non-IPv4 assets and debts (and other liabilities) have been transferred to another related corporation. IPv4 Assets include: 1 - ASN; and 3 - /20 networks (12,288 IP Addresses) direct allocations (non-legacy). Multiple options available for sale/purchase. Motivated sellers. Please e-mail: ipv4brokers(a)gmail.com or call/text: (404) 532-9535. Available on Saturday and Sunday for discussion.

2 1

AT&T -> Qwest ... Localpref issue?
by Graham Wooden 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Hi folks, Anyone else noticed a localpref change on Qwest network in regards to AT&T prefixes? I noticed my AT&T assigned prefixes dropping to 80, causing my backup transit peering with Centurylink to take preference with Qwest originators ... All was working fine with my prepends .. But not anymore... Any insight would be great. I haven¹t reached out to AT&T or Qwest yet. Curious if this is a bigger change than just me. Thanks, -graham

5 7

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 43, Issue 24
by Artis Schlossberg 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

unsubscribe On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 00:55, <nanog-request(a)nanog.org> wrote: > Send NANOG mailing list submissions to > nanog(a)nanog.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > nanog-request(a)nanog.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > nanog-owner(a)nanog.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: IPv6 end user addressing (Joel Jaeggli) > 2. Re: AT&T -> Qwest ... Localpref issue? (Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu) > 3. Re: AT&T -> Qwest ... Localpref issue? (Joel Jaeggli) > 4. Re: US internet providers hijacking users' search queries > (Joe Provo) > 5. Re: IPv6 end user addressing (Jeff Wheeler) > 6. RE: IPv6 end user addressing (Jonathon Exley) > 7. Re: IPv6 end user addressing (Joel Jaeggli) > 8. Re: IPv6 end user addressing (David Conrad) > 9. Re: STRIKE: VZN (Matthew S. Crocker) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 08:26:09 -0700 > From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja(a)bogus.com> > To: Brian Mengel <bmengel(a)gmail.com> > Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: Re: IPv6 end user addressing > Message-ID: <404AD93A-F84C-4ABD-8954-216109F22C60(a)bogus.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > On Aug 5, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Brian Mengel wrote: > >> In reviewing IPv6 end user allocation policies, I can find little >> agreement on what prefix length is appropriate for residential end >> users. /64 and /56 seem to be the favorite candidates, with /56 being >> slightly preferred. >> >> I am most curious as to why a /60 prefix is not considered when trying >> to address this problem. It provides 16 /64 subnetworks, which seems >> like an adequate amount for an end user. >> >> Does anyone have opinions on the BCP for end user addressing in IPv6? > > When you have a device that delegates, e.g. a cpe taking it's assigned prefix, and delegating a fraction of it to a downstream device, you need enough bits that you can make them out, possibly more than once. if you want that to happen automatically you want enough bits that user-intervention is never (for small values of never) required in to subnet when connecting devices together... > > the homenet wg is exploring how devices in the home might address the issue of topology discovery in conjunction with delegation, which realistically home networks are going to have to do... > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:39:31 -0400 > From: Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu > To: Graham Wooden <graham(a)g-rock.net> > Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: Re: AT&T -> Qwest ... Localpref issue? > Message-ID: <121127.1312731571(a)turing-police.cc.vt.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Sun, 07 Aug 2011 08:53:05 CDT, Graham Wooden said: >> I should also note that Centurylink has been less than cooperative on even >> thinking about changing my routes to a pref of 70 on our behalf (they don't >> accept communities). I think time to get the account rep involved ... > > "they don't accept communities"??!? Just... wow. ;) > > (That's if they flat out don't support it - there's a separate ring of Hell > reserved for the ones who do support it but forget to document the part > about singing the Zimbabwe national anthem backwards while standing on > your head...) >

1 0

Re: US internet providers hijacking users' search queries
by Anthony Pardini 06 Aug '11

06 Aug '11

Not surprising.. Ten years ago a vender pitched inserting referral cookies when customers visted shopping sites. We ultimately convinced management that collecting comissions in this manner wasn't the best of ideas. On Aug 5, 2011 7:05 PM, "Bino Gopal" <Bino.Gopal(a)citrix.com> wrote:

1 0

BGP Update Report
by cidr-report＠potaroo.net 05 Aug '11

05 Aug '11

BGP Update Report Interval: 28-Jul-11 -to- 04-Aug-11 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASN Upds % Upds/Pfx AS-Name 1 - AS45899 90492 5.6% 323.2 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 2 - AS9829 59250 3.7% 59.7 -- BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone 3 - AS4755 29848 1.9% 31.9 -- TATACOMM-AS TATA Communications formerly VSNL is Leading ISP 4 - AS17974 26006 1.6% 15.7 -- TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia 5 - AS35819 24471 1.5% 86.8 -- MOBILY-AS Etihad Etisalat Company (Mobily) 6 - AS6316 18418 1.1% 184.2 -- AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec Communications, Inc. 7 - AS38511 16832 1.0% 271.5 -- TACHYON-AS-ID PT Remala Abadi 8 - AS38040 15476 1.0% 1289.7 -- GLOBAL-TRANSIT-TOT-IIG-TH TOT Public Company Limited 9 - AS7552 14765 0.9% 10.5 -- VIETEL-AS-AP Vietel Corporation 10 - AS9498 13830 0.9% 16.6 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd. 11 - AS24863 10041 0.6% 13.9 -- LINKdotNET-AS 12 - AS28573 9955 0.6% 7.2 -- NET Servicos de Comunicao S.A. 13 - AS9534 9876 0.6% 167.4 -- MAXIS-AS1-AP Binariang Berhad 14 - AS45528 9842 0.6% 30.9 -- TDN Tikona Digital Networks Pvt Ltd. 15 - AS45595 9042 0.6% 25.1 -- PKTELECOM-AS-PK Pakistan Telecom Company Limited 16 - AS8452 9012 0.6% 14.2 -- TE-AS TE-AS 17 - AS36958 8887 0.6% 202.0 -- Atlas-AS 18 - AS8151 8450 0.5% 9.8 -- Uninet S.A. de C.V. 19 - AS5976 8292 0.5% 76.1 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD Network Information Center 20 - AS17726 8119 0.5% 541.3 -- CAMNET-AS CAMNET is an ISP of Ministry of Posts TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS (Updates per announced prefix) Rank ASN Upds % Upds/Pfx AS-Name 1 - AS44609 7579 0.5% 2526.3 -- FNA Fars News Agency Cultural Arts Institute 2 - AS22793 1974 0.1% 1974.0 -- CASSOCORP - CASSO Corporation 3 - AS7586 1815 0.1% 1815.0 -- PDOX-AS-AP Paradox Digital Pty Ltd 4 - AS38040 15476 1.0% 1289.7 -- GLOBAL-TRANSIT-TOT-IIG-TH TOT Public Company Limited 5 - AS17408 3707 0.2% 1235.7 -- ABOVE-AS-AP AboveNet Communications Taiwan 6 - AS3454 7582 0.5% 947.8 -- Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon 7 - AS32528 5528 0.3% 921.3 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs 8 - AS44145 574 0.0% 574.0 -- PRINTDESIGN-AS Print and Design LTD 9 - AS44025 562 0.0% 562.0 -- KAMTELEKOM-NET Kamtelekom Ltd. 10 - AS17726 8119 0.5% 541.3 -- CAMNET-AS CAMNET is an ISP of Ministry of Posts 11 - AS32323 517 0.0% 517.0 -- EQUINIX-EDMA-CHI-ASN - Equinix, Inc. 12 - AS49987 414 0.0% 414.0 -- SPARK-AS Stroy Park - R Ltd 13 - AS8491 1487 0.1% 371.8 -- BSH-AS Business Sviaz Inc. 14 - AS38518 4955 0.3% 353.9 -- LINTASWAVENET-AS-ID Lintas Wave Network Solution, PT. 15 - AS12170 346 0.0% 346.0 -- PENTELOFAMERICA - Pentel of America, LTD. 16 - AS9476 340 0.0% 340.0 -- INTRAPOWER-AS-AP IntraPower Pty. Ltd. 17 - AS45899 90492 5.6% 323.2 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 18 - AS38528 320 0.0% 320.0 -- LANIC-AS-AP Lao National Internet Committee 19 - AS55764 319 0.0% 319.0 -- HGSL-IN HGSL House, No.614, 20 - AS38167 2731 0.2% 303.4 -- ANITTEL-AS-AP Anittel Communications Pty Ltd TOP 20 Unstable Prefixes Rank Prefix Upds % Origin AS -- AS Name 1 - 202.92.235.0/24 9235 0.5% AS9498 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd. 2 - 200.23.202.0/24 7561 0.4% AS3454 -- Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon 3 - 178.22.72.0/21 7444 0.4% AS44609 -- FNA Fars News Agency Cultural Arts Institute 4 - 66.248.104.0/21 6805 0.4% AS6316 -- AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec Communications, Inc. 5 - 180.180.248.0/24 6517 0.4% AS38040 -- GLOBAL-TRANSIT-TOT-IIG-TH TOT Public Company Limited 6 - 66.248.120.0/21 5943 0.3% AS6316 -- AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec Communications, Inc. 7 - 66.248.96.0/21 5442 0.3% AS6316 -- AS-PAETEC-NET - PaeTec Communications, Inc. 8 - 202.54.86.0/24 4876 0.3% AS4755 -- TATACOMM-AS TATA Communications formerly VSNL is Leading ISP 9 - 202.153.174.0/24 3703 0.2% AS17408 -- ABOVE-AS-AP AboveNet Communications Taiwan 10 - 180.180.253.0/24 2978 0.2% AS38040 -- GLOBAL-TRANSIT-TOT-IIG-TH TOT Public Company Limited 11 - 180.180.255.0/24 2974 0.2% AS38040 -- GLOBAL-TRANSIT-TOT-IIG-TH TOT Public Company Limited 12 - 130.36.34.0/24 2744 0.2% AS32528 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs 13 - 130.36.35.0/24 2744 0.2% AS32528 -- ABBOTT Abbot Labs 14 - 202.41.70.0/24 2704 0.2% AS2697 -- ERX-ERNET-AS Education and Research Network 15 - 123.17.240.0/20 2293 0.1% AS45899 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 16 - 123.17.160.0/20 2292 0.1% AS45899 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 17 - 123.18.160.0/19 2292 0.1% AS45899 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 18 - 123.18.224.0/19 2290 0.1% AS45899 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 19 - 123.18.96.0/19 2290 0.1% AS45899 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp 20 - 123.18.128.0/19 2290 0.1% AS45899 -- VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp Details at http://bgpupdates.potaroo.net ------------------------------------ Copies of this report are mailed to: nanog(a)nanog.org eof-list(a)ripe.net apops(a)apops.net routing-wg(a)ripe.net afnog(a)afnog.org

1 0