June 2020 - NANOG - lists.nanog.org

lol reddit
by Michael Thomas 25 Jun '20

25 Jun '20

Apparently they've completely melted down. But them crapping out is almost a daily occurrence anyway. Does anybody have any insight as to why they are unable to keep the lights on? I mean from the outside what they do is not particularly complicated. At least Usenet had an inter-domain flood fill problem to contend with. Mike

1 0

Re: [c-nsp] Devil's Advocate - Segment Routing, Why?
by Mark Tinka 24 Jun '20

24 Jun '20

On 19/Jun/20 09:32, Saku Ytti wrote: > We need to decide if we are discussing a specific market situation or > fundamentals. Ideally we'd drive the market to what is fundamentally > most efficient, so that we pay the least amount of the kit that we > use. If we drive SRv6, we drive cost up, if we drive MPLS, we drive > cost down. > > Even today in many cases you can take a cheap L2 chip, and make it an > MPLS switch, due to them supporting VLAN swap! Which has no clue of > IPV6 or IPV4. We need a new toy. MPLS has been around far too long, and if you post web site content still talking about it or show up at conferences still talking about it, you fear that you can't sell more boxes and line cards on the back of "just" broadening carriage pipes. So we need to invent a new toy around which we can wrap a story about "adding value to your network" to "drive new business" and "reduce operating costs", to entice money to leave wallets, when all that's really still happening is the selling of more boxes and line cards, so that we can continue to broaden carriage pipes. There are very few things that have been designed well from scratch, and stand the test of time regardless of how much wind is thrown at them. MPLS is one of those things, IMHO. Nearly 20 years to the day since inception, and I still can't find another packet forwarding technology that remains as relevant and versatile as it is simple. Mark.

11 75

FCC Seeks Comment on Effects of June 15 T-Mobile Outage
by Sean Donelan 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

FCC Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau Seeks Comment on Effects of June 15, 2020 T-Mobile Outage on Public Safety Entities, Government Entities, and Consumers https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-seeks-comment-effects-june-15-t-mobile-out… >From T-Mobile's statement: https://www.t-mobile.com/news/update-for-customers-on-network-issues "The trigger event is known to be a leased fiber circuit failure from a third party provider in the Southeast. This is something that happens on every mobile network, so we’ve worked with our vendors to build redundancy and resiliency to make sure that these types of circuit failures don’t affect customers. This redundancy failed us and resulted in an overload situation that was then compounded by other factors. This overload resulted in an IP traffic storm that spread from the Southeast to create significant capacity issues across the IMS (IP multimedia Subsystem) core network that supports VoLTE calls." Other notable national telecommunication failures AT&T - January 15 1990, AT&T Long Distance Network Collapse MCI Worldcom - August 1999, Multi-day frame-relay network failure Centurylink - December 27, 2018, 37-hour nationwide outage

1 0

Fiber in the power space
by Fletcher Kittredge 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

We are looking for an engineering firm with significant experience in FTTX in the power space. Extra points if you have worked with Co-ops. -- Fletcher Kittredge GWI 207-602-1134 www.gwi.net

1 0

Is there any data on packet duplication?
by Hal Murray 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

How often do packets magically get duplicated within the network so that the target receives 2 copies? That seems like something somebody at NANOG might have studied and given a talk on. Any suggestions for other places to look? Context is NTP. If a client gets an answer, should it keep the socket around for a short time so that any late responses or duplicates from the network don't turn into ICMP port unreachable back at the server. Nothing critical, just general clutter reduction. I have packet captures from a NTP server. I'm trying to sort things out. There are a surprising (to me) number of duplicates that arrive back-to-back, sometimes the timestamp is the same microsecond. They could come from buggy clients, but that seems like an unlikely sort of bug. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

7 17

60 ms cross-continent
by William Herrin 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

Howdy, Why is latency between the east and west coasts so bad? Speed of light accounts for about 15ms each direction for a 30ms round trip. Where does the other 30ms come from and why haven't we gotten rid of it? c = 186,282 miles/second 2742 miles from Seattle to Washington DC mainly driving I-90 2742/186282 ~= 0.015 seconds Thanks, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill(a)herrin.us https://bill.herrin.us/

23 30

Re: Is there any data on packet duplication?
by Hal Murray 23 Jun '20

23 Jun '20

bill(a)herrin.us said: > NTP you say? How does iburst work during initial sync up? How does it work, or how should it work? 1/2 :) NTP has been around for a long time. It looks very simple, so anybody thinks they can toss off an implementation without much thought. It will probably work, mostly. The response from an NTP server includes a timestamp that the client put into the request. The client can use that to reject delayed responses to a previous request. When I first started looking for duplicates, I found lots of them. They were NTP version 1 requests. NTP is up to version 4. Version 1 came out in 1988, RFC 1059. Since the requests are identical, there is no way for the client to separate expected responses from delayed responses from a previous request. Does anybody happen to know what equipment or software or OS/distro is sending version 1 requests? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

1 0

infrastructure focused interviews and questions
by Mehmet Akcin 22 Jun '20

22 Jun '20

hi there, I've started a few weeks ago hosting a youtube/twitch/twitter live video show (simultaneous stream) hosting key people who are involved in the exec/operations/engineering of internet infrastructure companies either as consumer or service providers. my idea is to create a platform where questions/concerns can be asked directly to executives/key decision-makers and hopefully get answers. Very similar to Reddit AMA but with focus on telecom/datacenter/infrastructure/DNS/etc. For example, I will have execs from zayo, Windstream, aqua comms, packet fabric this week as my guests where you will be able to ask questions directly. There will be also a 1-1 discussion with APNIC's Chief Scientist Geoff Houston about internet growth during lockdowns, and more. you can watch the shows live, ask questions and be part of the conversation from all these platforms. example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ff4x9IwBHEI starting in 15 minutes with Windstream. fblive https://www.facebook.com/infrapediainc/videos/270701217367462/ twitter https://twitter.com/mhm7kcn if you have recommendation on speakers you want to see, ask questions, you can contact me offlist. I thought I would share this here, I am sorry if this is off-topic. Invite people to participate, ask questions, and more. mehmet

1 0

Re: Hurricane Electric has reached 0 RPKI INVALIDs in our routing table
by Jon Lewis 21 Jun '20

21 Jun '20

On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, Richa wrote: > Job, > > >> RPKI ROA creation is a big hammer. Everyone needs to think carefully >> about each ROA they create and if it will positively or negatively >> impact their network. > > Could you please shed some more light on the above? > > How would ROA negatively impact if ROA(s) is created such that the entire prefix set is covered? Just like I said, if you create an ROA for an aggregate, forgetting that you have customers using subnets of that aggregate (or didn't create ROAs for customer subnets with the right origin ASNs), you're literally telling those using RPKI to verify routes "don't accept our customers' routes." That might not be bad for "your network", but it's probably bad for someone's. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________

2 1

A spammer is harvesting email addresses from the NANOG list.
by Tim Pozar 21 Jun '20

21 Jun '20

Looks like a spammer is harvesting email addresses from the NANOG list. i I will be unscribing as I don't need this additional noise in my mailbox. Tim ----- Forwarded message from Michele Jemmi <datinggirl09(a)randoml.fun> ----- Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 16:06:05 -0500 From: Michele Jemmi <datinggirl09(a)randoml.fun> To: pozar(a)lns.com Subject: Re: Re: 60 ms cross-continent So, where did u leave? ----- End forwarded message ----- -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Re: 60 ms cross-continent Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:59:05 -0500 From: Michele Jemmi <datinggirl09(a)randoml.fun> Reply-To: Michele Jemmi <datinggirl09(a)randoml.fun> To: pozar(a)lns.com hiyaa u made my kittyyyyy sad ----- End forwarded message ----- -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: 60 ms cross-continent Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:52:05 -0500 From: Michele Jemmi <lovelygirl09(a)rammy.pw> Reply-To: Michele Jemmi <datinggirl09(a)randoml.fun> To: pozar(a)lns.com hey Having u so close is what I need the most, =?UTF-8?Q?Tim_Po=C5=BE=C3=A1r?= I want to feel yur love completely. Do u want me to go or will u come for me? .. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- GPG Fingerprint: 4821 CFDA 06E7 49F3 BF05 3F02 11E3 390F 8338 5B04 https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x11E3390F83385B04 https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=pozar%40lns.com

3 3