May 2012 - NANOG - lists.nanog.org

SNMP/TCP probes from critical.io
by Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] 23 May '12

23 May '12

hi! during the last couple of days, i noticed probes from some hosts that present themselves as critical.io probe hosts, including but not limited to, the following IP addresses: * 184.154.42.194 / critical.io * 69.64.43.135 / research1.critical.io * 69.64.43.137 / research2.critical.io * 69.64.43.142 / research3.critical.io * 50.116.22.209 The systems present the following information via http: > This system is coordinating an internet-wide survey of open TCP > ports, service banners, SNMP system descriptions, and NetBIOS name > queries. The results of this survey will be used to uncover > systematic vulnerabilities in the equipment provided by ISPs to their > customers. Have you noticed these probes and what are your thoughts on them? Cheers, Raoul -- ____________________________________________________________________ DI (FH) Raoul Bhatia M.Sc. email. r.bhatia(a)ipax.at Technischer Leiter IPAX - Aloy Bhatia Hava OG web. http://www.ipax.at Barawitzkagasse 10/2/2/11 email. office(a)ipax.at 1190 Wien tel. +43 1 3670030 FN 277995t HG Wien fax. +43 1 3670030 15 ____________________________________________________________________

2 1

RE: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
by David Hubbard 23 May '12

23 May '12

I have the "4GLTE" LG VL600 usb modem from Verizon on a consumer data-only $50/month plan and it gives my Windows 7 laptop a v6 address on both 3G and "4G" connections. I noticed it recently when I was logged into the ARIN website since their site puts a banner across the top when you're accessing via ipv6; then I tried other sites to confirm it was working. David > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Carpenter [mailto:rcarpen@network1.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:07 PM > To: PC > Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers > > > Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, > they also do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 > crap that changes your IP address every couple minutes. The > only way to get a stable connection is to pay them $500 to > get a static public IP address. > > thanks, > -Randy > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > IPV6 is present, to my knowledge, on all devices on the Verizon IPV6 > > LTE network. I noticed its using it to communicate to Google for > > many > > of it's services when I ran a netstat. I believe they mandated > > support for it from any certified device. > > > > Unfortunately, it's still firewalled. > > > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Paul Graydon > > <paul(a)paulgraydon.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 05/22/2012 01:21 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > > >> > > >> On May 22, 2012 4:00 PM, "Paul Porter"<paul.porter(a)gree.co.jp> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi NANOG, > > >>> > > >>> I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile > > >>> phone > > >>> carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure. > > >>> Specifically, > > >>> we are trying to figure out: > > >>> > > >>> 1. How much of the carrier core and edge for AT&T, Verizon. > > >>> T-Mobile, > > >>> and > > >>> Sprint are on IPv6 now? > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> T-Mobile USA has native ipv6 to all subscribers in all of it's > > >> coverage > > >> area. But, less than 1% of subscribers use IPv6 because they do > > >> not have > > >> an > > >> IPv6 capable phone. The Nexus S and Galaxy Nexus work well. > > >> > > >> This device challenge will improve in time. Samsung is doing a > > >> good job > > >> of > > >> bringing IPv6 to Android devices. More info here > > > > > > That's interesting. I have a Galaxy Nexus on T-Mobile USA and it > > > doesn't > > > get an IPv6 address, only IPv4. Works fine with IPv6 over my > > > wireless > > > network at home. Doesn't seem to be anything obvious in the > > > settings to > > > enable or disable that. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers
by Cameron Byrne 23 May '12

23 May '12

On May 22, 2012 7:14 PM, "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" < wolfgang.rupprecht(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Cameron Byrne writes: > > From what you wrote, guess is you are using a phone that does not > > have IPv6 support (only Nexus phones have support today... Other phones > > do not have the correct radio / RIL capabilities) > > I'm using the Galaxy Nexus GSM bought directly from google a few weeks > ago. The firmware is up to date as are the apps. > > The instructions mention settings and pages that are slightly wrong > for this phone. I went to the "Mobile network settings" -> "Access > Point names" -> "T-Mobile US, epc.tmobile.com" -> "APN Protocol". It > was "IPv4" and I changed it to "IPv4/IPv6" and then rebooted. There > was no "save" button or menu item. After reboot the ipv4/ipv6 setting > was still active (so it was saved), but no connection took place. The > cell tower I'm using is in Fremont, CA (CID 47052 LAC321). Might it > not be v6 connected? > For the sake of the archive and documenting the confirmed fix, the correct APN setting for T-Mobile is "IPv6" not "IPv4 /IPv6" CB > -wolfgang > -- > g+: https://plus.google.com/114566345864337108516/about

2 1

APNIC 34 Conference - Call for Papers
by Randy Bush 23 May '12

23 May '12

________________________________________________________________________ APNIC 34 Conference - Call for Papers ________________________________________________________________________ The APNIC 34 Programme Committee is now seeking tutorials and presentations for the APNIC 34 Conference to be held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia from 27 - 31 August 2012. We are looking for content which would suit the technical conference sessions and the tutorials. Key Dates --------- The timeline for submissions is: Call for Papers Opens Now First Round Paper Acceptance 2 July 2012 Final Deadline for Submissions 13 August 2012 Final Round Paper Acceptance 20 August 2012 Final Slides Received 25 August 2012 Submitting Proposals -------------------- http://submission.apnic.net Programme Material ------------------ The technical sessions at APNIC 34 will include presentations relevant to Internet operations and technologies. The following topics are examples of possible areas of interest. - IPv4 exhaustion / IPv6 deployment and operations - NAT64/444, 6rd, DSLite, A+P - ISP and Carrier Services - IXPs and Peering - Network security - Access and Transport Technologies - Content and Service Delivery If you have any another ideas or proposals for panel or Birds of Feather sessions, please feel free to submit your ideas via the submission system. If you have any questions, please email the Programme Committee at: apnic-pc(a)apnic.net For more information about APNIC 34, please visit: http://conference.apnic.net/34 On behalf of: APNIC 34 Programme Committee Co-chairs: Philip Smith & Mark Tinka

1 0

Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers
by Anurag Bhatia 23 May '12

23 May '12

Hello everyone Was wondering if there's anyone from Server Beach/Peer1 here. We have a dedicated server with them which we primarily use for DNS. I am adding support for anycasting on that one but seems like Peer1 is not supporting BGP at all. NOC support told me that they can announce our block and statically pass us but cannot hear BGP announcement from our router. Was wondering if someone else had similar issue? This is important and if doesn't works then I would have to find a new place for dedicated server somewhere in California. Thanks! -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com or simply - http://[2001:470:26:78f::5] if you are on IPv6 connected network! Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>| Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>

11 12

IPv6 aggregation tool
by Rafael Rodriguez 22 May '12

22 May '12

Hi list, I can't seem to find any tools that'll aggregate a list of IPv6 prefixes. Used to 'aggregate' for IPv4, looking for something similar for IPv6. Thanks!

5 6

this NANOG wiki is getting spammed
by Tei 22 May '12

22 May '12

I don't think this is the official nanog wiki, but anyway probably the owners are on this mail list. Spammers is wasting everyone time by filling it with crap. http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Special:RecentChanges -- -- ℱin del ℳensaje. . . . . . postdata: Blizzard is getting strange slower speeds for some customers (300ms ping, wen other have a normal of 100ms). I blame this in evil ISP's doing evil things, or routing problems. Ignore this line.

1 0

Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog"
by Jay Hennigan 22 May '12

22 May '12

Anyone else just get this? Curious if they're scraping this list for addresses. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - jay(a)impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV

3 2

(no subject)
by joseph guerra 22 May '12

22 May '12

1 0

(no subject)
by joseph guerra 22 May '12

22 May '12

1 0