January 2009 - NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Re: Google search results leading to google "This site may harm your computer"
by aljuhani 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Thanks for the notice. Possibly because of the URL contained in the message and/or as appear to be in html format as composed initially under OE and the copied to another mail client. Gmail support notice: http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=8253 If our system flags a message as phishing, but you've validated the source from which the message originated, click the down arrow next to Reply at the top-right of the message pane, and select Report Not Phishing to let us know the message is legitimate. And if you receive a message that our phishing detection system doesn't pick up on, click Report Phishing to send a copy of the message to the Gmail Team. -aljuhani ----- Original Message ----- From: Alexander Harrowell To: info(a)linuxmount.com Cc: nanog Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 19:12 Subject: Re: Google search results leading to google "This site may harm your computer" GMail classified this as phishing. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:34 PM, aljuhani <info(a)linuxmount.com> wrote: Now clicking search results forward to "service unavailable" page within google. The error message about the site may harm your computer is also displayed in Arabic on google Saudi Arabia, www.google.com.sa image here: http://ns.mx04.com/google-sa.jpg looks like the whole database is gone! ..... Yahoo! search engine seem to be working fine as looks have no affiliation with google

1 0

Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
by aljuhani 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia. Just wondering, how could something of this nature goes un-monitored by google.... ! -aljuhani ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nathan Malynn" <neito(a)nerdramblingz.com> To: "Murtaza" <leothelion.murtaza(a)gmail.com> Cc: <nanog(a)nanog.org> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 18:37 Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer." | Google's back on my connection on Verizon in the Northeast US. | | On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Murtaza <leothelion.murtaza(a)gmail.com> wrote: | > fine in Pakistan..... | > | > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:15 PM, S, Somasundaram (Somasundaram) < | > somasundaram.s(a)alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: | > | >> confirmed..here in India too... | >> | >> -----Original Message----- | >> From: Frank [mailto:fsmendoza@gmail.com] | >> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 8:36 PM | >> To: Adam Young | >> Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org | >> Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer." | >> | >> confirmed. same here manila, philippines. | >> | >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Adam Young < | >> adam.young(a)mountaincable.on.ca | >> > wrote: | >> | >> > Peter Beckman wrote: | >> > > This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" | >> > > to "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google. | >> > > | >> > > Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your | >> > > computer." | >> > > | >> > > Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as | >> > > broken, broken? | >> > | >> > Confirmed in Southern Ontario, Canada. | >> > | >> > -- | >> > Adam Young | >> > | >> > | >> > | >> | >> | > | > | > -- | > Ghulam Murtaza | > Lahore University of Management Sciences | > | |

3 3

Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
by aljuhani 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

----- Original Message ----- From: "Suresh Ramasubramanian" <ops.lists(a)gmail.com> To: <info(a)linuxmount.com> Cc: "nanog" <nanog(a)nanog.org> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 18:56 Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer." | On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 9:22 PM, aljuhani <info(a)linuxmount.com> wrote: | > Google back to norms here, Saudi Arabia. | > | > Just wondering, how could something of this nature goes un-monitored by google.... ! | | If it was unmonitored .. what do you think, would it have got fixed | within minutes? | | --srs | The meaning was that the root cause "which went un-monitored" that led to this condition. I was surprised by such given the company size, experience and resources available but will wait and see if press release comes up explaining this issue. cheers -aljuhani

1 0

Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
by Steven.Glogger＠swisscom.com 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

seems to be a global problem. even here in switzerland... i barely hear already "the internet is broken":) -steven > > Am 31.01.2009 um 16:02 schrieb "Adam Young" <adam.young(a)mountaincable.on.ca >> : > >> Peter Beckman wrote: >>> This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" >>> to >>> "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google. >>> >>> Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your >>> computer." >>> >>> Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as >>> broken, >>> broken? >> >> Confirmed in Southern Ontario, Canada. >> >> -- >> Adam Young >> >>

3 2

Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
by Bourbon.Odenthal＠sce.com 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Interesting...its happening in Los Angeles using my Verizon Blackberry but not on the ATT iPhone. -bb ----- Original Message ----- From: Frank [fsmendoza(a)gmail.com] Sent: 01/31/2009 11:06 PM ZE8 To: Adam Young <adam.young(a)mountaincable.on.ca> Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer." confirmed. same here manila, philippines. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Adam Young <adam.young(a)mountaincable.on.ca > wrote: > Peter Beckman wrote: > > This morning whilest Googling, I got a bunch of "Permission Denied" to > > "/interstitial?..." URLs on Google. > > > > Then all my search results got listed as "This site may harm your > > computer." > > > > Is Google broken, or is the functionality of listing sites as broken, > > broken? > > Confirmed in Southern Ontario, Canada. > > -- > Adam Young > > >

1 0

Google search results leading to google "This site may harm your computer"
by aljuhani 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Hi. Just trying to search for website then presented with all search each have under the text "This site may harm your computer", when any of search result clicked that lead to a google page headed with "This site may harm your computer" and no further option to proceed. I even tried entering google.com in search and first result of the search was the google search engine with again "This site may harm your computer". any ideas.

2 1

OT: After dozents of spam reportings , still spam from
by marc 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

i still get spam from ualadys.com hosted at ServerBeach PEER1-SERVERBEACH-08A (NET-76-74-166-0-1) I mentioned that some isps in .cz npt even allow me to send Abuse mail to them, because the block the complette ip range , rediculous , huh ? what else can i do ? thanks marc Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > Von: ualadys mailing <mailing(a)ualadys.com> > Datum: 31. Januar 2009 08:30:04 MEZ > An: marc <marc(a)let.de> > Betreff: Weekly Special > Return-Path: <ccusa(a)main.iispp.com> > Received: from mx1.mail.vrmd.de ([10.0.1.20]) by vm42.mail.vrmd.de > (Cyrus v2.2.12-Invoca-RPM-2.2.12-9.RHEL4) with LMTPA; Sat, 31 Jan > 2009 08:30:06 +0100 > Received: from mx3.iispp.com ([76.74.167.190]) by mx1.mail.vrmd.de > with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <ccusa(a)main.iispp.com>) id > 1LTAIo-0005l7-DA for marc(a)let.de; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:30:06 +0100 > Received: by mail.iispp.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id > A9CC5B7BF05; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:30:04 -0500 (EST) > X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 > Envelope-To: marc(a)let.de > Delivery-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:30:06 +0100 > Message-Id: <2d1440035a3dcbfc66693621daf32f78(a)localhost.localdomain> > X-Priority: 3 > X-Mailer: PHPMailer (phpmailer.codeworxtech.com) [version 2.2] > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="b1_2d1440035a3dcbfc66693621daf32f78" > X-Spam-Suspicion: No > X-Purgate: Clean X-purgate-ID: 150741::090131083006-569C86C0- > ACFC0CF4/2502755973-0/0-1 X-purgate-Ad: For more information about > eXpurgate please visit http://www.expurgate.net/ > > > > > Weekly Special! > > Thank you for using our services! We would like to make a special > price offer for our services: > > Please choose one of our weekly special offers and get 1 video > credit for free > > This Special Offer will be available for 1 week ONLY! Don’t miss > your chance to urchase our service for better price! > > Ladies' New Videos > > -- Les Enfants Terribles - WWW.LET.DE Marc Manthey 50672 Köln - Germany Hildeboldplatz 1a Tel.:0049-221-3558032 Mobil:0049-1577-3329231 mail: marc(a)let.de jabber :marc@kgraff.net IRC: #opencu freenode.net PGP/GnuPG: 0x1ac02f3296b12b4d twitter: http://twitter.com/macbroadcast web: http://www.let.de Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise). Please note that according to the German law on data retention, information on every electronic information exchange with me is retained for a period of six months.

2 2

Shaping on a large scale
by Bruce Grobler 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

Hi, Does anyone know of any Shaping appliances to shape customers based on IP, allow for a quota per IP and qos mechanisms like LLQ?, This is should be something that can sit in between two border router's and support a small ISP (20000 customers), also an opensource solution would be great! Regards, Bruce

7 6

Re: Shaping on a large scale
by bert hubert 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:25:49AM -0500, Scott Berkman wrote: > http://lartc.org/. Also I'm not sure if someone has built this into any > of the firewall specific linux distros yet, so you may want to explore > those a little. They have. Many Linux appliances come with a 'Linux Wonder Shaper' http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ or an equivalent. In general, the Linux packet shaping infrastructure is overly powerful, if very weakly documented - despite the LARTC efforts. I do have to add that shaping is rarely an exact science, and that achieving very high accuracies may prove impossible on general (timer interrupt based) hardware & operating systems. Stochastic results will be good however. Bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services

2 1

Re: ISP Unbundling circuits
by Mark Kent 31 Jan '09

31 Jan '09

On a slightly related topic, a US-based colo outfit used by a company I work with wants a fee to disconnect power to the cage. The tenant had been there for years and, at contract renewal time, was lobbied hard ($$) by the colo company to reduce power consumption. The tenant worked for a few months and freed up 20 power circuits. The colo then said that they had a disconnect fee for each power circuit. Now, I think a reasonable fee is $0. The colo wants considerably more. I won't bias you with the figure yet... please let me know what you think is reasonable, either by experience or just as a thought exercise. Thanks, -mark

5 4