- Test - lists.nanog.org

compaq.com no longer resolveable
by Rodney Joffe 08 Jun '00

08 Jun '00

For those of you who may have missed it, it appears that compaq.com has disappeared from the .com root. Not only a.root, but f.gtld etc... [rjoffe@zephyr rjoffe]$ dig @a.root-servers.net compaq.com ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @a.root-servers.net compaq.com ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10 ;; flags: qr aa rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; compaq.com, type = A, class = IN ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: COM. 1D IN SOA A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. hostmaster.internic.NET. ( 2000060700 ; serial 30M ; refresh 15M ; retry 1W ; expiry 1D ) ; minimum ;; Total query time: 97 msec ;; FROM: centergate.com to SERVER: a.root-servers.net 198.41.0.4 ;; WHEN: Wed Jun 7 21:31:40 2000 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 28 rcvd: 105 It appears not to be a payment problem... $ swhois compaq.com Query: compaq.com Registry: whois.networksolutions.com Results: Registrant: Compaq Computer Corporation (COMPAQ-DOM) 20555 State Highway 249, M020303 Houston, TX 77070 Domain Name: COMPAQ.COM <snip> Record last updated on 15-May-2000. Record expires on 21-Apr-2001. Record created on 20-Apr-1995. Database last updated on 7-Jun-2000 15:54:38 EDT. Domain servers in listed order: NS1-PUBLIC.ZTX.COMPAQ.COM 161.114.1.204 NS1-PUBLIC.ZMA.COMPAQ.COM 161.114.64.24 I found a recursive server with the ttl not yet expired showing C:\>nslookup www.compaq.com Server: vnsc-pri.sys.gtei.net Address: 4.2.2.1 DNS request timed out. timeout was 2 seconds. Non-authoritative answer: Name: www.compaq.com Address: 207.18.199.3 You may want to warn your customer service reps... and use 207.18.199.3 -- Rodney Joffe CenterGate Research Group, LLC. http://www.centergate.com "Technology so advanced, even we don't understand it!"(SM)

2 1

Interesting DSL anecdote.
by Steve Sobol 08 Jun '00

08 Jun '00

Apropos of the recent DSL discussion: I'm looking for a DSL wholesale provider so I can resell to end-users. I called both Covad and Rhythms today. There are exactly two menu options on Covad's auto-attendant: sales and customer service. I didn't think either was appropriate, as I'm looking for the department that deals with resellers and channel partners (and the sales option was to "become a Covad customer", implying that that option was for end-user sales). But that's all there is. There isn't even an option to be forwarded to an operator. I hit the number for sales, waited five minutes, decided I didn't feel like waiting and hung up. I then called Rhythms, dialed zero for the operator, asked for someone who handles resellers, got a human within thirty seconds of being transferred, and started chatting. He asked me a couple questions, found out who the sales rep is that handles my territory, and I expect to get a call back from the sales rep by the end of business tomorrow. I guess Rhythms is more interested in my business than Covad is. -- North Shore Technologies, Cleveland, OH http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net Steve Sobol, BOFH - President, Chief Website Architect and Janitor Spammers and Net-abusers: Don't bother asking me for service. See http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net/go/policy/ for more information.

2 1

RE: Interesting DSL anecdote.
by Vadim Antonov 08 Jun '00

08 Jun '00

To be fair to Concentric, they do return calls, and getting to a live person is not that complicated. Co-ordination with local carriers is an entirely different story... --vadim From: Michael Medwid <Michael.Medwid(a)ariba.com> To: "'Steve Sobol'" <sjsobol(a)NorthShoreTechnologies.net>, nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: Interesting DSL anecdote. Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 15:57:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Reminds me of Concentric's inane auto-attendant system. I was trying to reach tech support as my DSL line had gone down (Covad/Concentric.) Concentric's voice prompt says "To find out about our technical support please visit our web site at www.concentric.com." Ahhhhhhhhhhgh! I wrote them and complained. They apologized. Nothing changed.

2 1

RE: Interesting DSL anecdote.
by Michael Medwid 07 Jun '00

07 Jun '00

Reminds me of Concentric's inane auto-attendant system. I was trying to reach tech support as my DSL line had gone down (Covad/Concentric.) Concentric's voice prompt says "To find out about our technical support please visit our web site at www.concentric.com." Ahhhhhhhhhhgh! I wrote them and complained. They apologized. Nothing changed. It's all part of a vast call-avoidance conspiracy. If there were truth in some of these auto-attendant systems there'd be two prompts: To buy stuff from us press one. To get out of our face and stop costing us money press any other key. Or stay on the line and we'll disconnect you shortly. -Michael -----Original Message----- From: Steve Sobol [mailto:sjsobol@NorthShoreTechnologies.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 3:43 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Interesting DSL anecdote. Apropos of the recent DSL discussion: I'm looking for a DSL wholesale provider so I can resell to end-users. I called both Covad and Rhythms today. There are exactly two menu options on Covad's auto-attendant: sales and customer service. I didn't think either was appropriate, as I'm looking for the department that deals with resellers and channel partners (and the sales option was to "become a Covad customer", implying that that option was for end-user sales). But that's all there is. There isn't even an option to be forwarded to an operator. I hit the number for sales, waited five minutes, decided I didn't feel like waiting and hung up. I then called Rhythms, dialed zero for the operator, asked for someone who handles resellers, got a human within thirty seconds of being transferred, and started chatting. He asked me a couple questions, found out who the sales rep is that handles my territory, and I expect to get a call back from the sales rep by the end of business tomorrow. I guess Rhythms is more interested in my business than Covad is. -- North Shore Technologies, Cleveland, OH http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net Steve Sobol, BOFH - President, Chief Website Architect and Janitor Spammers and Net-abusers: Don't bother asking me for service. See http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net/go/policy/ for more information.

1 0

RE: DSL (was shopping for NOCs)
by Vadim Antonov 07 Jun '00

07 Jun '00

Roland Dobbins <rdobbins(a)netmore.net> wrote: > I used to work for Bell Atlantic - it was like working for the Soviet Union. As someone who used to work for both the Soviet Union and an (unnamed here, but well-known otherwise) American phone company i can only confirm the rather conspicious similarity. --vadim

2 1

RE: DSL (was shopping for NOCs)
by rdobbins＠netmore.net 07 Jun '00

07 Jun '00

I used to work for Bell Atlantic - it was like working for the Soviet Union. --------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins(a)netmore.net> // 818.535.5024 voice -----Original Message----- From: Julian Eccli [mailto:jeccli@ubnetworks.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 10:30 PM To: chris.williams(a)third-rail.net Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs) >Doesn't this have more to do with the philosophy of the company >providing service than the technology being deployed (DSL)? >Maybe the problem is that DSL tends to involve LEC people who are >infected with the obsolete lazy-monopoly attitude of the incumbents. Hey! I used to work for a LEC in the Frozen East! I take absolutely no offense to the above comment :-) ! Regards, Julian >In any case, are there unique operational challenges posed by DSL that >are causing some of these problems? Is there anything we can do as a >community to address them (or encourage the people who need to address >them, to do so)? > >Maybe this discussion could evolve into something a little more useful >than "my DSL provider sucks"..."me too", since there seems to be a lot >of interest (or at least a lot of unhappy voices)..

1 0

June 6 2000 UUNET phone problems
by Sean Donelan 07 Jun '00

07 Jun '00

UUNET operations is having telephone problems. UUNET's web page says more information will be provided when it is available. What is the traditional backup plan providers use when their phone systems have problems?

5 4

Re: DSL (was shopping for NOCs)
by Julian Eccli 07 Jun '00

07 Jun '00

>Doesn't this have more to do with the philosophy of the company >providing service than the technology being deployed (DSL)? >Maybe the problem is that DSL tends to involve LEC people who are >infected with the obsolete lazy-monopoly attitude of the incumbents. Hey! I used to work for a LEC in the Frozen East! I take absolutely no offense to the above comment :-) ! Regards, Julian >In any case, are there unique operational challenges posed by DSL that >are causing some of these problems? Is there anything we can do as a >community to address them (or encourage the people who need to address >them, to do so)? > >Maybe this discussion could evolve into something a little more useful >than "my DSL provider sucks"..."me too", since there seems to be a lot >of interest (or at least a lot of unhappy voices)..

2 1

June 6 2000 Sprintlink network problem
by Sean Donelan 06 Jun '00

06 Jun '00

Since I mentioned I hadn't seen any messages about Sprint outages, several folks forwarded me Sprint's message today. Sprintlink experienced a network problem affecting the eastern portion of the United States starting at 7am June 6 2000. The cause of the problem or the estimated time to repair wasn't known.

1 0

Re: Class B Address
by Matt Cramer 06 Jun '00

06 Jun '00

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On 20 May 2000, Sean Donelan wrote: > On Sat, 20 May 2000, Patrick Evans wrote: > > And then watch certain tier-Ns filter out your routes? > > As far as I know, every provider has relented and will accept > announcements on ARIN/RIPE/APNIC allocation bounderies. Even > the original Sprint access-list 112 was modified to match the > allocations. > > The problem was people wanted to announce smaller blocks than > the allocation, e.g. /24's out of traditional class B/16 space. Could I ask a question related to this topic? I have been getting varying answers and presume the accurate answer will come from this list. My company has a /20 out of the traditional Class C space. We want to use those addresses rather than the addresses our ISP would give us. We have asked the ISP if they can announce a /24 out of that block, and they have said "sure". However, I have read here about announcement filtering. Will certain providers filter that /24? We have two reasons for using our own space. First, we can get redundancy by connecting with two ISPs and having them both announce the network (or have one announce if the other dies). Second, we can carve up our /20 in /24s and use them for different Internet POPs for our company (e.g. one in the states, one in Europe, one in the Pacific Rim, etc.). I am primarily a security person but unfortunately our LAN and WAN people know less about this than I so I am trying to decide what we should do. Any help or information about the logical design I mentioned would be greatly appreciated. Matt - -- Matthew S. Cramer <mscramer(a)armstrong.com> Office: 717-396-5032 Lead Security Analyst Fax: 717-396-5590 Armstrong Information Technology Services Pager: 888-769-9367 Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Cell: 717-951-0141 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: ascii iQEVAwUBOT0viQdAU78fakRxAQFHkwf9E2+o+eae5wJLebN2yvTtOeMwY1feV47j lc59rDE00CFa0ABjWZMVIkam0mkpnk98oazBcx5WVs3iJEOJz0C1/Au34ehoFB5H NHV0nYci0+eDxqBaTvb4RElevnrihR0zuQntXyrRsAXYszblC56PiZzcguJ9p62p bO/ddK46bV3TVlhWgAFhtIrdSMRE2OpkgkUCS2CahMnytqGLrLwx4PpUAVv7Smcf XJedFFYrpkxHFgwfK1jGyTNwFMZIzwXZ1zkH3dnYv61hd52rEnSMFZCBuMUn3/+1 E7QryTbkanG7Sl3LyEDSS3LqaiOeEtatLxKxaIQHYayMAcFKylJerw== =xsOu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2