- Test - lists.nanog.org

Real Media feed down
by Bora Akyol 12 Jun '00

12 Jun '00

Hi all The real media feed is down. Bora

1 0

Re: GAO report on outages at online trading sites
by Steven M. Bellovin 12 Jun '00

12 Jun '00

In message <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006120053450.25904-100000(a)redhat1.mmaero.com>, jlew is(a)lewis.org writes: > >But what does any of this have to do with operating a network? Are you >saying we're next and will eventually have to report all outages to the >man? Yes. There's a lot of interest in Washington in Internet outage reporting, as soon as they can figure out what an outage is and who should report it. But defining the criteria is very hard, as I'm sure I don't have to tell people on this list. --Steve Bellovin

2 1

Broken 3640?
by Jason Slagle 12 Jun '00

12 Jun '00

We have a 3640 on the edge running 12.0(9.6)S. It has 2 2W1E's with T1-DSU WIC's in it and 1 1FE NM. About once every minute, the FE card stops sending packets for about 10 seconds resulting in a HIGH and very annoying packet loss. Tries 12.0(10.x)S and replacing the FE cards to no avail. Also, the card has stuck 5 or 6 times with the output queue at 240/240 with no network activity until I reboot it. I'm at a loss here. Any ideas? Jason --- Jason Slagle - CCNA - CCDA Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio - raistlin(a)tacorp.net - jslagle(a)toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GE d-- s:+ a-- C++ UL+++ P--- L+++ E- W- N+ o-- K- w--- O M- V PS+ PE+++ Y+ PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv+ b+ DI+ D G e+ h! r++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

1 0

GAO report on outages at online trading sites
by Sean Donelan 12 Jun '00

12 Jun '00

Another government agency weighs in on the lack of public reporting of outage information. Early this year the FCC was working on a "voluntary" method for ISPs to report outages. So far, I haven't heard of a single ISP voluntering. This week the General Accounting Office issued a report on online trading web sites, and the lack of disclosure about network problems and system outages. http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/is/20000609/bs/watching_the_stock_watchers_1.h… > Watching the Stock Watchers > (The Industry Standard) > When a system outage occurs at your online brokerage, the only way you might > find out is if you're stuck in the middle of a trade or if the media reports > the outage. But it happens more frequently than is reported. > > Many outages occur in small geographic areas and for just a short amount of > time. But brokerages aren't required to disclose these outages to customers, > the Securities and Exchange Commission or to any other regulatory body. Many > times they don't even keep records of their own on small outages. > > The U.S. General Accounting Office has a problem with that. [...] The full GAO report is http://www.gao.gov/new.items/gg00043.pdf One interesting statistic was 11 firms reported a total of 88 outages between January and September 1999. About 40 percent of the outages lasted for less than 25 minutes, but some firms didn't track any outage lasting less than 25 minutes. So there may be a statistical problem with the data. For comparison, the telephone industry reported a total of 170 outages between July 1998 and June 1999. The telephone industry doesn't track most outages lasting less than 30 minutes (except for a few special catagories). Even if you normalize for 3/4 of a year, it seems the Internet is actually more reliable than the telephone network. Or, what I suspect is really happening, both the telephone industries and the online brokers statistics are measuring the wrong stuff. But the real $64000 question is during periods of market volitility, would you be able to reach a broker by telephone easier than you would be able to access an online trading web site. The GAO didn't really answer that question.

2 1

Traditional traffic engineering tools/model
by Yu Ning 12 Jun '00

12 Jun '00

Hi nanog, Can any friend tell me that how the major NSP/ISPs do the traffic engineering work, i.e. how do they adjust their traffic to fit their physical bandwidth? I know there are several papers on this issue by Awduche of UUNet, and some engineers of Juniper. Most of them suggest MPLS is the final solution, but I just want to know if there is any best practice to adjust the traffic in a pure igp/metric fashion ? Any handy tools to figure out, or calculate the proper metric value? I tried Netsys, but any better one ? We use i-isis as igp, so any isis specific method ? thanks for any input. best regards, Yu Ning ------------------------------------------- (Mr.) Yu(2) Ning(2) ChinaNet Backbone Operation +86-10-66418105/66418121/66418123(fax) -------------------------------------------

1 0

two articles
by Gregory Soo 11 Jun '00

11 Jun '00

-------------------------------------- BUSINESS SPECIAL: The Consensus Machine http://www.economist.com/editorial/freeforall/current/sf4096.html The Internet has matured to the point where people are increasingly asking: who runs it, and on whose behalf? The Economist, June 10th - 16th 2000 -------------------------------------- Beneath the Internet's happy communal culture, a cadre of giant carriers is mercilessly squeezing every last dime it can out of smaller players. Users are picking up the tab. BACKBONE BULLIES http://www.forbes.com/forbesglobal/00/0612/0312056a.htm By Neil Weinberg, Forbes, June 12 2000 John M. Brown runs IHighway, an Internet access firm in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He'd like to give his clients the fastest possible link to the rest of the web world--but he can't. That is because UUnet and the few other giant data haulers that dominate Internet traffic don't have the fat, 45-megabit lines Brown would like in Albuquerque. And Brown can't afford $120,000 a year to lease a pipe running 530 kilometers to the UUnet hub in Phoenix, Arizona.... --------------------------------------

2 1

RE: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls)
by Vadim Antonov 11 Jun '00

11 Jun '00

Rich Sena <ras(a)poppa.thick.net> wrote: > > Ya know I thought of trying to snap off yet another funny quip, quiping > is of course what I do best.... > > [the rest is skipped] This is getting stale. Would you, please, move the thread to a place which has no requirement to have content relevant to running networks? --vadim

1 0

OT: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls)
by rdobbins＠netmore.net 11 Jun '00

11 Jun '00

Gee, I thought that IP, BGP, DNS, ACLs, and so on worked the same for women as for men. One of the main reasons I'm on this list is to learn from the experiences and expertise of others - male -and- female. You're of course free to do as you wish, but I personally think the whole idea of a 'Women in Networking' list is absurd, revanchist, and sexist (to use the politically correct terminology currently in vogue amongst those who claim to be striving for 'equality', yet who seem to do everything they can to claim that they themselves have 'special needs' and so on, which of course undermines the rationale their supposedly egalitarian agenda). Technology works the same for everyone, regardless of gender, race, creed, or color; that's one of the beautiful things about it. Consciously erecting artificial boundaries where none need exist strikes me as being laughably archaic, and ultimately counterproductive. But, hey, what do I know? After all, I'm just a member of the oppressive patriachy, dedicated to keeping females barefoot, naked, and in the wiring-closet, right? Talk about your stereotyping. Sorry for the rant, but this sort of thing strikes me as being inimical to the spirit of the Net in general, and this list in particular. I'll shut up, now. --------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins(a)netmore.net> // 818.535.5024 voice -----Original Message----- From: abha [mailto:ahuja@wibh.net] Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 1:56 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: attention net-grrls Hi NANOG! Sorry for the spam, but this seemed like the best place to post this message.... :) Some of us have been talking about this for years.... And it has been a long time in the making, but it is finally here... A mailing list for Women in Networking... Whoohoo... :) I hope this list develops into a useful forum and resource for all of us... A place to discuss, network, complain, vent, coordinate... Whatever... :) Thanks to many gracious folks, this list is now possible (Thanks, Steve. Thanks, Paul. And to my co-conspirators... Hi Cathy! Hi Eve!) Send "subscribe net-grrls" to Majordomo(a)wibh.net Please send me any comments, complaints, etc.... //abha ;)

10 10

Re: net-loss (was RE: attention net-grrls)
by Matt Ranney 10 Jun '00

10 Jun '00

"Rachel Luxemburg" <rslux(a)link-net.com> writes: [...] > If you feel threatened or offended by the fact that some women feel a need > to have some space for themselves, I'm sorry for you. But to call it sexist > or counterproductive just shows how little you understand the issue. This, of course, has nothing to do with the charter of NANOG. However, I can't agree more with Rachel's post. The number of people out there who think there is no gender equality problem is staggering. -- Matt Ranney - mjr(a)ranney.com

1 0

Good news from NERC
by Sean Donelan 10 Jun '00

10 Jun '00

The North American Electric Reliability Council has announced "Generation and transmission resources are expected to be adequate to meet projected customer electricy demands in most areas in North America this summer." However areas of concern for this summer are New England, New York and the southwestern area of the United States - California, Arizona, New Mexico and southern Nevada.

1 0