- Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: how is cold-potato done?
by Gustavus, Wayne 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Ultimately there won't be any ties, since BGP will eventually have to select a best path. If necessary, the decision will come down to RID. If the metrics really are the same then theoretically it doesn't matter which path it takes. If it does matter, you will have to modify your policy to make a decision based on some other criteria that you are also influencing via policy. ___________________________________________________________ Wayne Gustavus, CCIE #7426 Operations Engineering Verizon Internet Services ___________________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Doncaster [mailto:ralph@istop.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:08 PM To: Jared Mauch Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: how is cold-potato done? > > If I peer with network X in cities A and B, and receive the same route in > > both cities with an AS-path of X, how do I know which city to use for an > > exit? I can understand how if X uses communities to tag the geographic > > origin of the traffic, but I'm not aware of many networks that do > > this. Lots of networks claim to use cold-potato routing though, so how do > > they do it? > > they use the MED sent on the route (aka metric) from the > other provider to determine which exit where they both interconnect > is the "shortest". > > this can at times provide undesired results because of > aggregation. Besides aggregation, wouldn't this lead to a lot of ties? Let's say the cities are LA & Manhattan, and the route from X originates in Chicago. I would think that it would be a common occurrance for the route to have the same metric in LA & Manhattan. -Ralph

1 0

RE: Big meetings should never be held at noon!
by Gustavus, Wayne 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Jane, Couldn't you just use a full BGP feed from a provider and configure your inbound route-map/policy with the necessary parameters to obtain the part of the BGP table that you want? Or if this is just to populate something in a lab with a specific set of BGP info, you could obtain a copy of the table from someplace like route-views and load up the lab router or MRT (or equiv) in the lab and massage the table data within the lab. If this is for a customer/production router, I suppose you could coordinate with the upstream provider to do something similar with their outbound route-map/policy so that you only get a partial table. ___________________________________________________________ Wayne Gustavus, CCIE #7426 Operations Engineering Verizon Internet Services ___________________________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [mailto:pawlukiewicz_jane@bah.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:54 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Big meetings should never be held at noon! Hi, We ran out of time. Anyway, question for the best network operators in America, and beyond. Is there a way to download _part_ of a BGP table from a router? Can I use something like logic, sql to download just a piece, a specific piece of the BGP table? I can't believe this is impossible... Thanks for any help on this, Jane

1 0

GT files for CCAA
by Mark Segal 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

For those of you that attended NANOG 25 in Toronto, the Host GT (Group Telecom) just filed for CCAA (Canadian version of Chapter 11). http://www.newswire.ca/releases/June2002/26/c0199.html Just the messenger no need to shoot me.. :). Regards, Mark

1 0

RE: Fwd: WorldCom Investor News: WorldCom Announces IntentiontoRe state 2001 and First Quarter 2002 Financial Statements
by Rowland, Alan D 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

RoadRunner is also involved in supplying TWC service (Time Warner Cable). As a former RoadRunner then MediaOne then ATTBI customer, I believe RoadRunner best fits as a sort of Covad in Cable land. Just my WAG (Wild Axx Guess) Best, Al -----Original Message----- From: Pawlukiewicz Jane [mailto:pawlukiewicz_jane@bah.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 8:53 AM To: Andy Warner; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Fwd: WorldCom Investor News: WorldCom Announces IntentiontoRestate 2001 and First Quarter 2002 Financial Statements Andy Warner wrote: > > Neither WCOM, nor T owns Cox. Cox is independent. T recently acquired > Comcast which may be the source of your confusion. I am always confused. No, I think the source of my confusion is RoadRunner. Its all over their website, and that's a AT&T name. isn't it? at least it was... Jane > > -- > Andy Warner > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > dumb question. Does WCOM own Cox? Or is that AT&T? > > > > Just curious. > > > > Jane > > <snip>

1 0

Testing Bandwidth performance
by Alan Sato 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

What are some tools to test bandwidth perfomance? I've used iperf, but are there other tools or ways to generate traffic for testing purposes to see a links maximum capacity? Especially greater than a 100mb. Alan

9 11

How low can Worldcom stock go?
by Eric Germann 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Any bets where they will bottom out at? Lets see if they can beat Adelphia at $0.05 on 6/21/02 ---- >From WSJ Tech alerts. WORLDCOM UNCOVERED what appears to be one of the largest corporate frauds in history with the discovery of more than $3 billion in expenses that were improperly booked as capital expenditures. For more information, see: http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1025044139757626480,00.html ========================================================================== Eric Germann CCTec ekgermann(a)cctec.com Van Wert OH 45801 http://www.cctec.com Ph: 419 968 2640 Fax: 603 825 5893 "The fact that there are actually ways of knowing and characterizing the extent of one’s ignorance, while still remaining ignorant, may ultimately be more interesting and useful to people than Yarkovsky" -- Jon Giorgini of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory

16 20

Re: How low can Worldcom stock go?
by Eric Brandwine 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

>>>>> "b" == blitz <blitz(a)macronet.net> writes: b> This is at least the second purge of that many bodies, maybe third...they b> just let 20k go a month or so ago.. Um.... When? Where? This will be the largest layoff so far. Ash Wednesday was much smaller than this. ericb -- Eric Brandwine | There is no memory with less satisfaction in it than the UUNetwork Security | memory of some temptaion we resisted. ericb(a)uu.net | +1 703 886 6038 | - James Branch Cabell Key fingerprint = 3A39 2C2F D5A0 FC7C 5F60 4118 A84A BD5D 59D7 4E3E

1 0

ICANN & .org hearing
by Lucy E. Lynch 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

All - WARNING: possibly irritating content below The current ICANN hearing can be viewed at: vic -C "ICANN Meetings Bucharest - 24 to 28 June 2002" 224.2.179.43/65302 vat -C "ICANN Meetings Bucharest - 24 to 28 June 2002" 224.2.164.153/21580 see: http://videolab.uoregon.edu/events/ICANN/icann_bucharest.html for more information/Real streams/etc. Lucy E. Lynch Academic User Services Computing Center University of Oregon llynch(a)darkwing.uoregon.edu (541) 346-1774/Cell: 912-7998

1 0

COX
by Pawlukiewicz Jane 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

This just in: "RoadRunner is a service of AOL Time Warner, but AFAIK, it's only an ISP that has cable companies ("MSO's") as affiliates. Road Runner isn't a cable television provider, itself." I believe, however that Andy is right. I think my confusion is that COX bought the AT&T @home groups, which includes roadrunner. usually AT&T is the one buying. Thanks for the info. Jane

1 0

Re: Fwd: WorldCom Investor News: WorldCom Announces IntentiontoRestate 2001 and First Quarter 2002 Financial Statements
by Pawlukiewicz Jane 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Andy Warner wrote: > > Neither WCOM, nor T owns Cox. Cox is independent. T recently acquired > Comcast which may be the source of your confusion. I am always confused. No, I think the source of my confusion is RoadRunner. Its all over their website, and that's a AT&T name. isn't it? at least it was... Jane > > -- > Andy Warner > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Pawlukiewicz Jane wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > dumb question. Does WCOM own Cox? Or is that AT&T? > > > > Just curious. > > > > Jane > > > > blitz wrote: > > > > > > From their own press report: > > > > > > >WorldCom Announces Intention to Restate 2001 and First Quarter 2002 > > > >Financial Statements > > > > > > > >CLINTON, Miss., June 25, 2002 - WorldCom, Inc. (Nasdaq: WCOM, MCIT) today > > > >announced it intends to restate its financial statements for 2001 and the > > > >first quarter of 2002. As a result of an internal audit of the company's > > > >capital expenditure accounting, it was determined that certain transfers > > > >from line cost expenses to capital accounts during this period were not > > > >made in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). > > > >The amount of these transfers was $3.055 billion for 2001 and $797 million > > > >for first quarter 2002. Without these transfers, the company's reported > > > >EBITDA would be reduced to $6.339 billion for 2001 and $1.368 billion for > > > >first quarter 2002, and the company would have reported a net loss for > > > >2001 and for the first quarter of 2002. > > > > > > > >The company promptly notified its recently engaged external auditors, KPMG > > > >LLP, and has asked KPMG to undertake a comprehensive audit of the > > > >company's financial statements for 2001 and 2002. The company also > > > >notified Andersen LLP, which had audited the company's financial > > > >statements for 2001 and reviewed such statements for first quarter 2002, > > > >promptly upon discovering these transfers. On June 24, 2002, Andersen > > > >advised WorldCom that in light of the inappropriate transfers of line > > > >costs, Andersen's audit report on the company's financial statements for > > > >2001 and Andersen's review of the company's financial statements for the > > > >first quarter of 2002 could not be relied upon. > > > > > > > >The company will issue unaudited financial statements for 2001 and for the > > > >first quarter of 2002 as soon as practicable. When an audit is completed, > > > >the company will provide new audited financial statements for all required > > > >periods. Also, WorldCom is reviewing its financial guidance. > > > > > > > >The company has terminated Scott Sullivan as chief financial officer and > > > >secretary. The company has accepted the resignation of David Myers as > > > >senior vice president and controller. > > > > > > > >WorldCom has notified the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of > > > >these events. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has retained > > > >William R. McLucas, of the law firm of Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, former > > > >Chief of the Enforcement Division of the SEC, to conduct an independent > > > >investigation of the matter. This evening, WorldCom also notified its lead > > > >bank lenders of these events. > > > > > > > >The expected restatement of operating results for 2001 and 2002 is not > > > >expected to have an impact on the Company's cash position and will not > > > >affect WorldCom's customers or services. WorldCom has no debt maturing > > > >during the next two quarters. > > > > > > > >"Our senior management team is shocked by these discoveries," said John > > > >Sidgmore, appointed WorldCom CEO on April 29, 2002. "We are committed to > > > >operating WorldCom in accordance with the highest ethical standards." > > > > > > > >"I want to assure our customers and employees that the company remains > > > >viable and committed to a long-term future. Our services are in no way > > > >affected by this matter, and our dedication to meeting customer needs > > > >remains unwavering," added Sidgmore. "I have made a commitment to driving > > > >fundamental change at WorldCom, and this matter will not deter the new > > > >management team from fulfilling our plans." > > > > > > > >Actions to Improve Liquidity and Operational Performance > > > > > > > >As Sidgmore previously announced, WorldCom will continue its efforts to > > > >restructure the company to better position itself for future growth. These > > > >efforts include: > > > > > > > >Cutting capital expenditures significantly in 2002. We intend 2003 capital > > > >expenditures will be $2.1 billion on an annual basis. > > > > > > > >Downsizing our workforce by 17,000, beginning this Friday, which is > > > >expected to save $900 million on an annual basis. This downsizing is > > > >primarily composed of discontinued operations, operations & technology > > > >functions, attrition and contractor terminations. > > > > > > > >Selling a series of non-core businesses, including exiting the wireless > > > >resale business, which alone will save $700 million annually. The company > > > >is also exploring the sale of other wireless assets and certain South > > > >American assets. These sales will reduce losses associated with these > > > >operations and allow the company to focus on its core businesses. > > > > > > > >Paying Series D, E and F preferred stock dividends in common stock rather > > > >than cash, deferring dividends on MCI QUIPS, and discontinuing the MCI > > > >tracker dividend, saving approximately $375 million annually. > > > > > > > >Continuing discussions with our bank lenders. > > > > > > > >Creating a new position of Chief Service and Quality Officer to keep an > > > >eye focused on our customer services during this restructuring. > > > > > > > >"We intend to create $2 billion a year in cash savings in addition to any > > > >cash generated from our business operations," said Sidgmore. "By focusing > > > >on these steps, I am convinced WorldCom will emerge a stronger, more > > > >competitive player." > > > > > > > >About WorldCom, Inc. > > > >WorldCom, Inc. (NASDAQ: WCOM, MCIT) is a pre-eminent global communications > > > >provider for the digital generation, operating in more than 65 countries. > > > >With one of the most expansive, wholly-owned IP networks in the world, > > > >WorldCom provides innovative data and Internet services for businesses to > > > >communicate in today's market. In April 2002, WorldCom launched The > > > >Neighborhood built by MCI - the industry's first truly any-distance, > > > >all-inclusive local and long-distance offering to consumers for one fixed > > > >monthly price. Effective as of the close of regular trading on July 12, > > > >2002, WorldCom will eliminate its tracking stock structure and have one > > > >class of common stock with the NASDAQ ticker symbol WCOM. For more > > > >information, go to http://www.worldcom.com. > > > > > > > >Forward-Looking Statements > > > >This document includes certain "forward-looking statements" within the > > > >meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These > > > >statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject > > > >to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ > > > >materially from these expectations due to economic uncertainty; the > > > >effects of vigorous competition; the impact of technological change on our > > > >business, alternative technologies, and dependence on availability of > > > >transmission facilities; risks of international business; regulatory risks > > > >in the United States and internationally; contingent liabilities; > > > >uncertainties regarding the collectibility of receivables; risks > > > >associated with debt service requirements and; our financial leverage; > > > >uncertainties associated with the success of acquisitions; and the ongoing > > > >war on terrorism. More detailed information about those factors is > > > >contained in WorldCom's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commi! > > > >ssion.

2 1