- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: Fwd: WorldCom Investor News: WorldCom Announces IntentiontoRestate 2001 and First Quarter 2002 Financial Statements
by Rizzo Frank 27 Jun '02

27 Jun '02

> I am always confused. We know all too well. > No, I think the source of my confusion is RoadRunner. Its all over their > website, and that's a AT&T name. isn't it? at least it was... No Jane, the source of confusion is you mistook this list for people who give a hoot. This information could have been gleaned from Google in five seconds. If you feel the need to blabber endlessly, get yourself a diary or livejournal account. Frank Rizzo

2 1

Bet on with my boss
by Rizzo Frank 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Hello Jane, My boss and I had a bet you'd post to NANOG at least five times today without contributing anything worthwhile. Thanks to you, I'm $20 richer. You can ignore me if you want. That's okay. Frank

1 0

Sprint peering policy
by Ralph Doncaster 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

While many other tier-1's have publicly listed their peering policies, I've never seen anything for 1239. Not that I'd stand a chance, but does anyone know what their peering requirements are? Ralph Doncaster principal, IStop.com

6 6

Re: How low can Worldcom stock go?
by Scott Weeks 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Vivien: Don't get me started on what C&W did to the Exodus backbone. OK, I won't EVEN get started on what C&W did to Digital Island... :( :( :( (five years of heart-n-soul gone) blitz: IF you got a job, be thankful.. this isn't over yet. randy: some of the motivation is large players very consciously trying randy: to squeeze out smaller or competitive players in the chaos of randy: all the other noise. <B><U> yes, yes, YES!!! </U></B> dammit... scott ps. That's not html email. I use pine.

6 5

ARIN IP allocation policy, ip vs. name website hosting
by matthew zeier 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

I recall reading that ARIN was preferring the use of hostname based virtual websites over IP based, however I can't find that wording on ARIN's site. Anyone have points to it? -- matthew zeier - "In mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them." - Johann von Neumann

4 3

RE: Hotel in Seattle area w- internet access ?
by Stafford, Todd 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Joe, May I recommend the following: Crowne Plaza Seattle Hotel 1113 Sixth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 206-464-1980 Here is a link to information including room rates: http://www.seattle-downtown.com/crowneplaza/ Let me know if you need any additional info regarding our city, Todd ---- At 11:16 AM 6/26/2002 -0700, joe mcguckin wrote: >I'm leaving for Seattle this evening. Can anyone recommend a hotel that has >internet access in the rooms? > >Thanks, > >joe

1 0

Hotel in Seattle area w- internet access ?
by joe mcguckin 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

I'm leaving for Seattle this evening. Can anyone recommend a hotel that has internet access in the rooms? Thanks, joe

5 4

RE: Hotel in Seattle area w- internet access ?
by Mansey, Jon 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Not listed at GeekTels, I used broadband at the W in Seattle one time, nice. Jm > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Nelson [mailto:jnelson@rackspace.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 11:36 AM > To: Bill Woodcock; joe mcguckin > Cc: NANOG > Subject: Re: Hotel in Seattle area w- internet access ? > > > > > This is the 'classic' list: http://www.geektools.com/geektels/ > (worldwide)... but call to confirm. I've stayed at the Four > Seasons and was pleased with everything but the price. > > "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you > send." --Jon Postel > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Woodcock" <woody(a)zocalo.net> > To: "joe mcguckin" <joe(a)via.net> > Cc: "NANOG" <nanog(a)merit.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:28 PM > Subject: Re: Hotel in Seattle area w- internet access ? > > > > > > > I'm leaving for Seattle this evening. Can anyone recommend a > > hotel > that has > > > internet access in the rooms? > > > > > http://www.geektools.com/geektels/showhotels.php?country=USA&s tate=Washingto n&city=Seattle > > -Bill > >

1 0

RE: Sprint peering policy
by Mitchell, Dan 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

Alex, *I* can't make any claims, since that would be making a forward-looking statement, y'know... and after today's WorldCom "events", I can hardly say that trusting analysts is a good thing, but if you take the time to do some research on ALGX, you'll probably see things like: consistency in meeting Wall St. expectations, a stong management team (after all, they *did* build MFS), and a conservative balance sheet. We're talking about some experienced, reputable good ol' boys who know enough only acquire profitable businesses for pennies on the dollar, and only build from success-based capital. If you take a good, hard look at the company as a whole, you'll see a company that has yet to deviate from its original plan, regardless of economic climate, and will tell you is still on target for profitability. These are all things I've learned from my own due dilligence via research on the web, and I'm sure you'll find the same. -Dan -----Original Message----- From: alex(a)yuriev.com [mailto:alex@yuriev.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 1:08 PM To: Mitchell, Dan Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: Sprint peering policy > But that's just what I've "heard". > > On a side note: Folks should keep an eye on Allegiance Internet (the folks > I work for). They picked up the old Digex / Intermedia Business Internet > backbone and are in the process of integrating it (under AS2548). > Financially solid company, very easy to work with, and have some strong > uptimes. On what basis do you claim that Allegiance Internet is going to be in business by end of the summer? Alex

3 2

RE: Sprint peering policy
by Mitchell, Dan 26 Jun '02

26 Jun '02

RE: Majdi -- I just wanted to thoroughly address Alex's question. Besides, Allegiance *has* to make it, because I certainly can't go get a job at WCom anymore, can I? :-) dem -----Original Message----- From: Majdi S. Abbas [mailto:msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:48 PM To: Mitchell, Dan Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Sprint peering policy On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:34:42PM -0400, Mitchell, Dan wrote: > a strong management team (after all, they *did* build MFS) ^ `- I think you have mistaken this for an endorsement. And in the age of cooked books, stated revenue can be misleading, particularly when it looks too good to be true. I would be very wary of anyone in this business right now, particularly a CLEC. Regardless, I don't think shameless corporate plugs really belong on NANOG, but I'll allow that perhaps I am in the minority. --msa

1 0