dam, i think this got more replies then the original thread in 10 minutes.
lol
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Robert Bonomi <bonomi(a)mail.r-bonomi.com>wrote:
> > From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com(a)nanog.org Tue May 15
> 16:53:50 2012
> > From: "A. Pishdadi" <apishdadi(a)gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:51:20 -0500
> > Subject: Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth
> > To: Nicolai <nicolai-nanog(a)chocolatine.org>
> > Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org
> >
> > last time i checked .75 x 1000 = 750
>
> 0.75 CENTS (as previously claimed) per meg is 750 CENTS per gig, or
> $7.50/gig.
>
> I suspect you 'meant '75 cents' (or '$0.75') per meg, but that is -not-
> what
> you said. :)
> >
> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Nicolai <nicolai-nanog(a)chocolatine.org
> >wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Ameen Pishdadi wrote:
> > > > No way they stack up against level3 or any of the other 4 big tier 1s
> > > > but if you throw them in a blend with level3 there shouldn't be any
> > > > issue and I wouldn't pay more the .75 cents a meg for a gig
> > >
> > > That's $7.50 per 1000mbps. Sign me up!
> > >
> > > Nicolai
> > >
> > >
> >
>
