July 2004 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: 2511 line break
by sthaug＠nethelp.no 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

> on a 2511, which i am using as a serial console server for a bunch > of boxes, how do i send a <break> on one of the lines? If you telnet into 2511 port 2000+line#, you can escape to command mode of your telnet client and tell the client to "send break". Works here. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug(a)nethelp.no

1 0

RE: Google?
by Claydon, Tom 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

http://money.cnn.com/2004/07/26/technology/google_site/index.htm -----Original Message----- From: Eric Brown [mailto:ebrown@simstar.com] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 11:14 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: Google? Google is failing on everything for me. Other search engines like a9 seem to work ok. 503 Server Error from Google, with an internal service error of 27: Your request not available at this time. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Shultz Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 11:40 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Google? ** Reply to message from "Marco Davids (SARA)" <marco(a)sara.nl> on Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:28:00 +0200 > Google seems to fail on every search containing the word 'mail' ? > -- > Marco Davids > SARA High Performance Networking - Amsterdam Not for me: http://www.google.com/search?q=mail&sourceid=firefox&start=0&start=0&ie= utf-8&oe=utf-8 Results 1 - 10 of about 318,000,000 for mail [definition]. (0.27 seconds) News results for mail - View today's top stories E-mail turns the Smith and Spencer rivalry into a personal ... - Telegraph.co.uk - Jul 24, 2004 Mail on Sunday - The Scotsman - Jul 24, 2004 Web-based e-mail serves individuals better than corporations - Newsday - Jul 24, 2004 Mail.com Full e-mail address Password Member Login Select Site: Mail.com Mail.com Beta Forgot Your Password? Click here to sign up: ... Copyright 2004 mail.com Corp. ... www.mail.com/ - 10k - Cached - Similar pages - Stock quotes: EASY Yahoo! Mail - The best web-based email! Yahoo! Mail helps me stay in touch. New to Yahoo!? Get a free Yahoo! Mail account ? it's a breeze to stay connected and manage your busy life. ... mail.yahoo.com/ - 24k - Cached - Similar pages Sign-in Access Error Free web-based e-mail. 2MB e-mail storage, signatures, stationery, HTML compatible. www.hotmail.com/ - 11k - Cached - Similar pages -- Jeff Shultz A railfan pulls up to a RR crossing hoping that there will be a train.

1 0

Re: 2511 line break
by Randy Bush 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

> clear line x >> on a 2511, which i am using as a serial console server for a bunch >> of boxes, how do i send a <break> on one of the lines? sends a <break> code to line x? are you sure? randy --- Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top posting frowned upon?

1 0

RE: 2511 line break
by Michel Py 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

ctrl-shift-6 then b -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 9:46 AM To: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: 2511 line break on a 2511, which i am using as a serial console server for a bunch of boxes, how do i send a <break> on one of the lines? randy

1 0

Re: Google?
by jgraun＠comcast.net 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

I disagree by e-mailing nanog, it helps support orgs determine weather the issue is with their infrastructure or the Internet. Jason -------------- Original message -------------- > > On 26/07/2004 11:28 AM Marco Davids (SARA) wrote: > > > Google seems to fail on every search containing the word 'mail' ? > > hhmmm...is this somehow related to network operational issues? Have a > problem with google....email google not nanog. > > Todd > > -- >

1 0

Mydoom versus Google (and others)
by Sean Donelan 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

It appears the latest Mydoom variant is clogging the search engines. Stop clicking on unsolicited attachements

1 0

RE: Google?
by Eric Brown 26 Jul '04

26 Jul '04

Google is failing on everything for me. Other search engines like a9 seem to work ok. 503 Server Error from Google, with an internal service error of 27: Your request not available at this time. -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Shultz Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 11:40 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Google? ** Reply to message from "Marco Davids (SARA)" <marco(a)sara.nl> on Mon, 26 Jul 2004 17:28:00 +0200 > Google seems to fail on every search containing the word 'mail' ? > -- > Marco Davids > SARA High Performance Networking - Amsterdam Not for me: http://www.google.com/search?q=mail&sourceid=firefox&start=0&start=0&ie= utf-8&oe=utf-8 Results 1 - 10 of about 318,000,000 for mail [definition]. (0.27 seconds) News results for mail - View today's top stories E-mail turns the Smith and Spencer rivalry into a personal ... - Telegraph.co.uk - Jul 24, 2004 Mail on Sunday - The Scotsman - Jul 24, 2004 Web-based e-mail serves individuals better than corporations - Newsday - Jul 24, 2004 Mail.com Full e-mail address Password Member Login Select Site: Mail.com Mail.com Beta Forgot Your Password? Click here to sign up: ... Copyright 2004 mail.com Corp. ... www.mail.com/ - 10k - Cached - Similar pages - Stock quotes: EASY Yahoo! Mail - The best web-based email! Yahoo! Mail helps me stay in touch. New to Yahoo!? Get a free Yahoo! Mail account ? it's a breeze to stay connected and manage your busy life. ... mail.yahoo.com/ - 24k - Cached - Similar pages Sign-in Access Error Free web-based e-mail. 2MB e-mail storage, signatures, stationery, HTML compatible. www.hotmail.com/ - 11k - Cached - Similar pages -- Jeff Shultz A railfan pulls up to a RR crossing hoping that there will be a train.

2 1

Network Solutions, Inc. Registrar (R122-LRMS) Status: INACTIVE ?
by Pete Schroebel 24 Jul '04

24 Jul '04

Hey Folks, It appears that NSI isn't talking to the GTLD, got any ideas? Sponsoring Registrar: Network Solutions, Inc. Registrar (R122-LRMS) Status: INACTIVE ? Status: OK All the best, Peter Schroebel

1 0

Re: VeriSign's rapid DNS updates in .com/.net
by Paul Vixie 24 Jul '04

24 Jul '04

> > the primary beneficiaries of this new functionality are spammers and > > other malfeasants > > ... The primary beneficiaries are all ^ intended > current and future .com/.net domain holders: I'm not talking about intended beneficiaries. I agree with your statement when applied to intended beneficiaries. I'm talking about the character of the preponderance of actual beneficiaries, whether measured by number of domain registration events per unit time, or number of dollars of income enabled by the speediness of the "fast update" VeriSign is now announcing. > ... I also stated in that message that VeriSign has no intention of > changing the current 48-hour TTL on delegation NS RRsets in .com/.net. Right. And I hope you are able to stick to that plan in the face of what I think will be gigantic pressure, from both registrants and competitors, to lower it. > I agree with Daniel's earlier statement that this is an education > issue. Does anyone want to co-author an Internet-Draft on the topic > of choosing appropriate TTLs? I can't think of anyone who could do it better than you could, Matt. I know I offered to help a while back, but we never really got started on it, and after being named as a "sitefinder co-conspirator" in your lawsuit against ICANN, I think I'll hold off on co-authoring anything with any VeriSign employee for the time being.

3 2

RE: T1 short-haul vs. long-haul - jack terminology
by Michel Py 24 Jul '04

24 Jul '04

> frank(a)dticonsulting.com wrote: > I've seen where STP (shielded twisted-pair cabling) purists have > succeeded in having shielded cabling used, only to screw it up by > mis-applying the necessary grounding connections causing more > problems than they solved. I have also seen funny issues with RJ48C or RJ48X UTP, where the 7-8 pair is used for grounding. Same as STP when the shielding and/or the equipment are not properly grounded, it can be a lot of fun. Makes a real good antenna, to begin with. > At one point the vendor's rep pointed to the fine print in the > operator's manual. It stipulated that the only cabling that would > be supported between the gateway and the telco demarc was > individually shielded twisted pairs. When it was discovered that > the client had chosen to use UTP patch cords to extend their T1 > demarcs some fifteen or so feet, the vendor would not even begin > to diagnose the problem further in depth until the client replaced > those cables with shielded ones. Which emphasizes the need of having the demarc extended to the same room where the equipment is, as replacing fifteen footers is easy, when replacing a 300-ft run over ten floors is another story. > as much as it is the significance of abiding by vendor warranty > conditions (if you've agreed to them initially, even tacitly, in > your contracts and SLAs) when selecting a T1 cabling solution. Indeed. Michel.

1 0