- Test - lists.nanog.org

subscribe
by dmadlan＠uswest.com 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

subscribe

1 0

Re: Next Meeting
by Kent W. England 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

At 06:59 PM 1/3/96 -0800, Dave O'Leary wrote: > >We've had a couple of meetings in San Diego before. I expect it is >at the Supercomputing center, which is on the UCSD campus in La Jolla. >I don't know what the recommended hotel is, but anything is La Jolla >or Del Mar is close. > >The meeting usually start early the first day (15th in this case), >so you should probably plan to arrive the night before, and then >the meeting ends just before lunch on the second day, at which point >we all go out for a Very Fine Lunch. > > dave > >p.s. no I'm not buying for everyone :-) > > > You have a choice of various hotels in La Jolla and Torrey Pines. Someone from SDSC should be able to post the details of several Sheratons, Marriotts, etc in the vicinity. You will need a car to get back and forth from hotel to restaurant to SDSC. For anyone who likes something off the beaten path, there is an old but very nice hotel in Del Mar about 15 minutes drive up the coast from UCSD called the Hotel L'Auberge. Not only is the hotel different from a chain hotel, it is located right in Del Mar, so if you have a minute you can actually walk around old Del Mar. There is a Starbuck's across the street and a great bookstore down the block. The L'Auberge was built for folks coming to the Del Mar racetrack from Los Angeles. They used to come by train and walk up the hill to the hotel. The train still runs, but doesn't stop at Del Mar. Couple of great restaurants, Jakes and Poseidon, down on the beach by the train station. Call 619.259.1515. --Kent

1 0

Re: Next Meeting
by Dave O'Leary 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

We've had a couple of meetings in San Diego before. I expect it is at the Supercomputing center, which is on the UCSD campus in La Jolla. I don't know what the recommended hotel is, but anything is La Jolla or Del Mar is close. The meeting usually start early the first day (15th in this case), so you should probably plan to arrive the night before, and then the meeting ends just before lunch on the second day, at which point we all go out for a Very Fine Lunch. dave p.s. no I'm not buying for everyone :-)

2 1

Re: 208/8 announcements
by Sean Doran 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

Hm, interesting, Rob. So what happens when we register something the NIC hasn't allocated yet in the IRR? Sean.

4 3

Re: Naming MAE-EAST
by swolff＠cisco.com 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

At 04:05 96-01-04, Mike O'Dell wrote: >that name was picked to facilitate another choice later. That is my recollection as well. -s

1 0

RFC 1999
by Pat McQueen 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

I apologige for the annoying message but I have been unable to unsubscribe from this list. I have repeatedly attempted to send mail to list-admin(a)merit.edu with no avail. If anyone could assist it would be greatly appreciated. Pat Ps. Unsubscribe patrick(a)verity.com Pat McQueen | 810-646-5903 (Phone) Verity, Inc. | 810-646-6403 (Fax) pat_mcqueen(a)verity.com | http://www.verity.com/

1 0

Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?
by Peter Lothberg 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

> So if they were supposed to use the services of the routing arbiter and > appear to have renigged on this, what can anyone do?? Are they determined > to make it painfully obvious for all to see that there are no enforcement > teeth left at the NSF? The RA is broken, just relabeling work of Ripe and mess it upp is not very usefull for the Global Internet. Ripe-81 (that most of this is based on) was supposed to be a start of a toolkit for ISP's, not a tol for someone who think they are the network Police. -Peter

8 8

Naming MAE-EAST
by Mike O'Dell 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

that name was picked to facilitate another choice later.

1 0

Re: Interconnects at NANOG
by Jonathan Heiliger 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

On Jan 3, 3:43pm, Dave Siegel wrote: > When the TLA's are expanded into their actual meanings, Metropolitan Area > Exchange, and Network Access Point, there does not appear to be a great deal > of difference between the two, except that one is a term that MFS Datanet > started, and the other is one that the government sited as the term for the > exchanges they were helping to fund/promote. I've also heard a rumor that at least part of the convention was due to the MAE being called Metropolitan Area Ethernet which was, again, I believe coined by Andrew Partan of UUNET. Perhaps term IXP, IntereXchange Point could be used. Too many acronyms has long been a trend in technology. :-) -jh-

3 2

None
by agolden＠cyberramp.net 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

1 0