- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: 208/8 announcements
by Sean Doran 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

Hm, interesting, Rob. So what happens when we register something the NIC hasn't allocated yet in the IRR? Sean.

4 3

Re: Naming MAE-EAST
by swolff＠cisco.com 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

At 04:05 96-01-04, Mike O'Dell wrote: >that name was picked to facilitate another choice later. That is my recollection as well. -s

1 0

RFC 1999
by Pat McQueen 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

I apologige for the annoying message but I have been unable to unsubscribe from this list. I have repeatedly attempted to send mail to list-admin(a)merit.edu with no avail. If anyone could assist it would be greatly appreciated. Pat Ps. Unsubscribe patrick(a)verity.com Pat McQueen | 810-646-5903 (Phone) Verity, Inc. | 810-646-6403 (Fax) pat_mcqueen(a)verity.com | http://www.verity.com/

1 0

Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?
by Peter Lothberg 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

> So if they were supposed to use the services of the routing arbiter and > appear to have renigged on this, what can anyone do?? Are they determined > to make it painfully obvious for all to see that there are no enforcement > teeth left at the NSF? The RA is broken, just relabeling work of Ripe and mess it upp is not very usefull for the Global Internet. Ripe-81 (that most of this is based on) was supposed to be a start of a toolkit for ISP's, not a tol for someone who think they are the network Police. -Peter

8 8

Naming MAE-EAST
by Mike O'Dell 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

that name was picked to facilitate another choice later.

1 0

Re: Interconnects at NANOG
by Jonathan Heiliger 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

On Jan 3, 3:43pm, Dave Siegel wrote: > When the TLA's are expanded into their actual meanings, Metropolitan Area > Exchange, and Network Access Point, there does not appear to be a great deal > of difference between the two, except that one is a term that MFS Datanet > started, and the other is one that the government sited as the term for the > exchanges they were helping to fund/promote. I've also heard a rumor that at least part of the convention was due to the MAE being called Metropolitan Area Ethernet which was, again, I believe coined by Andrew Partan of UUNET. Perhaps term IXP, IntereXchange Point could be used. Too many acronyms has long been a trend in technology. :-) -jh-

3 2

None
by agolden＠cyberramp.net 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

1 0

Next Meeting
by Christian Nielsen 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

I was looking at the NANOG home page and looking for information on the next NANOG meeting. The only thing I could find was http://www.merit.edu/routing.arbiter/NANOG/mtg-9602/.index.html Update on the Next NANOG Meeting The next NANOG meeting will be hosted by the San Diego Supercomputer Center and held February 15-16 in San Diego. Watch this space for further details! I would like to go and also get my reservations in now to save $$. If anyone has more information or could point me to a better page, that would be good. thanks Christian Nielsen Vyzynz International Inc. cnielsen(a)vii.com,CN46,KB7HAP Phone 801-568-0999 Fax 801-568-0953 PS :) Private Email christian(a)nielsen.net ********************************************************************* * Unsolicited Commercial E-Mail will cost $500/message under USC 47 * * which can be found online at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/47/* *********************************************************************

1 0

Re: Interconnects at NANOG
by Eric Kozowski 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

>As for the original topic, other regional exchanges, perhaps Eric at >Structured would like to talk about the Northwest Internet eXchange? (NIX) > >Eric? The prospects for me being able to attend the next NANOG are marginal right now, so I cannot commit to doing so. Some other things take higher precidence. -- Eric Kozowski Structured Network Systems, Inc. kozowski(a)structured.net Better, Cheaper, Faster -- pick any two. (503)656-3530 Voice "Providing High Quality, Reliable Internet Service" (800)881-0962 Voice 56k to DS1

1 0

Re: Interconnects at NANOG
by hwb＠upeksa.sdsc.edu 03 Jan '96

03 Jan '96

>Can we agree that there's no longer any difference between MAE, NAP, and >Interconnect? [with the exception of ``the four priority NAPs''] There never has been, I think.

1 0