- Test - lists.nanog.org

Info (fwd)
by Patrick J. Chicas 08 Jan '96

08 Jan '96

Aloha, I am trying a somewhat broad aproach this time. My first message to nanog was returned from some bbn planet site.. Patrick J. Chicas, CIO * Hawaii OnLine * Hawaii's Statewide Internet Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.aloha.net http://www.planet-hawaii.com http://www.aloha.net/~pjc ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 1996 14:51:26 -1000 (HST) From: Patrick J. Chicas <pjc(a)aloha.net> To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Info Aloha, Could you provide information on the NANOG group for my clarification, i.e. purpose, objectives, next meeting? Mahalo Patrick J. Chicas, CIO * Hawaii OnLine * Hawaii's Statewide Internet Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.aloha.net http://www.planet-hawaii.com http://www.aloha.net/~pjc

1 0

Info
by Patrick J. Chicas 08 Jan '96

08 Jan '96

Aloha, Could you provide information on the NANOG group for my clarification, i.e. purpose, objectives, next meeting? Mahalo Patrick J. Chicas, CIO * Hawaii OnLine * Hawaii's Statewide Internet Service ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.aloha.net http://www.planet-hawaii.com http://www.aloha.net/~pjc

1 0

Transportation to NANOG
by owen＠DeLong.SJ.CA.US 05 Jan '96

05 Jan '96

I was wondering if anyone else going to NANOG from the Bay Area was interested in flying a small plane down. Specifically, I'm hoping to find an Instrument rated Pilot. I'm a private pilot, but do not hold an Instrument rating. Planes available to me are PA28 series, including Warrior (PA28-161), Archer (PA28-181), Dakota (PA28-236) and Arrow (PA28R-201). By that time, I should also have access to a couple of T-tail Arrows (PA28RT-201) as well. Even if you are not a pilot, but are interested in sharing expenses, this can probably work out. My plan is to leave around 3PM on Wednesday, and return during daylight hours after the meeting. The schedule on the return can be somewhat flexible. Please respond by email to owen(a)delong.sj.ca.us. Thanks, Owen

1 0

Re: Question on % of good routes and plea for an RA mail list was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x?
by Steven J. Richardson 05 Jan '96

05 Jan '96

>From list-admin(a)merit.edu Thu Jan 4 05:03:27 1996 >Message-Id: <9601040929.AA14593(a)ncc.ripe.net> >To: hwb(a)upeksa.sdsc.edu (Hans-Werner Braun) >Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu, RIPE Routing WG <routing-wg(a)ripe.net> >Subject: Question on % of good routes and plea for an RA mail list was Re: Routing registry was Re: Sprint BGP filters in 207.x.x.x? >In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 03 Jan 1996 15:21:50 PST. > <199601032321.PAA24966(a)upeksa.sdsc.edu> >References: <199601032321.PAA24966(a)upeksa.sdsc.edu> >From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg(a)ripe.net> >Date: Thu, 04 Jan 1996 10:29:49 +0100 >Sender: Daniel.Karrenberg(a)ripe.net >The early NSFnet one was done to configure a single backbone. Remember >that EGP was the state-of-the-art. NSFNet provided last resort routing >and everyone was happy. More complex registries were not needed to keep >track of this even when "back doors" appeared. > >In Europe the situation was not like that at all. Despite great efforts >we were never blessed with a single pan-European backbone or even a >last-resort routing service. This is why RIPE developed a routing >registry that was capable of being useful in a general topology of >indepoendent ISPs. FYI: Lest anyone think that the PRDB was single-backbone-specific in _design_ or capability (it pretty much was in terms of data), let me note that, when Andy Adams and I rewrote the PRDB from a SPIRES DB to a RDBMS (with help from Tom Libert and Sue Hares), we explicitly designed in the ability to include data from other backbones. This was initially done to support both the T1 and T3 backbones, but it could easily have supported other backbones as well. >Daniel Steve Richardson/Merit

2 1

None
by Robert F. Oyler 05 Jan '96

05 Jan '96

subscribe bob oyler Bob Oyler INTERNET KANSAS oyler(a)ixks.com IXKS.Inc. Voice 913-842-966 FAX 913-842-3888

1 0

Re: Interconnects at NANOG
by salo＠msc.edu 05 Jan '96

05 Jan '96

> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 96 00:08:12 GMT > From: "William Allen Simpson" <bsimpson(a)morningstar.com> > To: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: Interconnects at NANOG > [...] > I have always liked Deering's MIX (Metropolitan Internet eXchange), > since the acronym also described the activity (MIXing). > [...] Minnesota Supercomputer Center (NET-MIXNET) 1200 Washington Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415 Netname: MIXNET Netnumber: 192.122.253.0 -tjs

1 0

naming interconnection points....
by mo＠uunet.uu.net 05 Jan '96

05 Jan '96

how about something simple like tangency

1 0

Re: Interconnects at NANOG
by rcraig＠cisco.com 05 Jan '96

05 Jan '96

At 20:08 96/1/4, William Allen Simpson wrote: >> From: "Jonathan Heiliger" <loco(a)mfsdatanet.com> >> Perhaps term IXP, IntereXchange Point could be used. Too many acronyms has >> long been a trend in technology. :-) >> >I have always liked Deering's MIX (Metropolitan Internet eXchange), >since the acronym also described the activity (MIXing). > >Perhaps have the region/location: LA-MIX, Chicago-MIX, et alia. > >NB: NAP has always struck me as overly generic ("access point"), and a >description of sedentary inactivity. > >Bill.Simpson(a)um.cc.umich.edu > Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2 Funny, I've always thought of diapers. Robert.

1 0

Re: Interconnects at NANOG
by William Allen Simpson 05 Jan '96

05 Jan '96

> From: "Jonathan Heiliger" <loco(a)mfsdatanet.com> > Perhaps term IXP, IntereXchange Point could be used. Too many acronyms has > long been a trend in technology. :-) > I have always liked Deering's MIX (Metropolitan Internet eXchange), since the acronym also described the activity (MIXing). Perhaps have the region/location: LA-MIX, Chicago-MIX, et alia. NB: NAP has always struck me as overly generic ("access point"), and a description of sedentary inactivity. Bill.Simpson(a)um.cc.umich.edu Key fingerprint = 2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3 59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2

1 0

Re: Next Meeting
by Paul Ferguson 04 Jan '96

04 Jan '96

At 12:29 PM 1/4/96 -0500, Elise Gerich wrote: >The NANOG meetings begin at 09:00 (maybe earlier depending on how >full the agenda is ) on Thursday, February 15 and >will end approximately at 13:00 on Friday, February 16. The two >folks who are in the know about the exact logistics are on vacation >(one returns tomorrow and the other on the 9th). > >The location is La Jolla, CA (SDSC and UCSD), and we will try to >get a list of hotels/motels distributed as soon as possible. > > --Elise > That's cool, and everything, but is it really wise to equate Dave O'Leary [gasp] with list-admin? :-) - paul -- Paul Ferguson || || Consulting Engineering || || Reston, Virginia USA |||| |||| tel: +1.703.716.9538 ..:||||||:..:||||||:.. e-mail: pferguso(a)cisco.com c i s c o S y s t e m s

1 0