- Test - lists.nanog.org

Fraud Dept. Contact at T-Mobile
by Dovid Bender 14 Jun '18

14 Jun '18

Does anyone have a contact and TMobiles Telco fraud department?

3 2

Re: FWIW... Re: TEST Help? TEST
by Scott Weeks 13 Jun '18

13 Jun '18

--- niels=nanog(a)bakker.net wrote: From: niels=nanog(a)bakker.net Then perhaps that thread was killed by the moderators. Please heed the list charter. Also, please get a mail client that generates proper In-Reply-To headers and knows how to quote... it's 2018. ----------------------------------------- Don't they tell us if the thread is moderated? Or, do they kill it silently? re: "Please heed the list charter" You mean the one written in clay tablets or: >>>>>>>> emacs! >>>>>>> vim! >>>>>> ed! >>>>> TECO! >>>> cat >>> IBM 029. >> Youngster. IBM 026. > Infants! Hollerith (IBM Type 1). I still own it. There's room for a certain amount of fun here. scott

1 0

Re: FWIW... Re: TEST Help? TEST
by Scott Weeks 13 Jun '18

13 Jun '18

On 06/12/2018 01:10 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > Apologies for the noise. Please hit delete... ---------------------------------------- Turns out that it's only the "Re: IPv6 faster/better proof?" thread I can't reply to. I still can't. All I wanted to say was: --- cb.list6(a)gmail.com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.list6(a)gmail.com> I hear transit is dead https://blog.apnic.net/2016/10/28/the-death-of-transit/ -------------------------------------------- Funny that he also seems to take indirect aim at IPv6: "In this case, then in such a collection of service cones, is there any residual value in a globally consistent address space? If all the traffic flows are constrained to sit within each service cone, then the residual addressing requirement is at best a requirement to uniquely distinguish end points just within the scope of the cone without any particular requirement for network-wide uniqueness " That seems to point to John Day's architecture; RINA: https://www.slideshare.net/ictpristine/rina-introduction-part-i scott

5 4

Need /24 (arin) asap
by Stan Ouchakov 13 Jun '18

13 Jun '18

Hi, Can anyone recommend transfer market brokers for ipv4 addresses? Need clean /24 asap. ARIN's waiting list is too long... Thanks! -Stan

13 18

RE: What are people using for IPAM these days?
by Scott Weeks 13 Jun '18

13 Jun '18

--- C-Mack.McBride(a)charter.com wrote: From: "McBride, Mack" <C-Mack.McBride(a)charter.com> If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations spreadsheets are not manageable for IPv4. ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------- I managed a /15, two /16s and several /24s (so, well over a quarter million IPs) on a spreadsheet for years. So, that's an 'it depends' answer. ---------------------------------- --- C-Mack.McBride(a)charter.com wrote: From: "McBride, Mack" <C-Mack.McBride(a)charter.com> Allocations, not IPs. And yes if they are reasonably static an excel spreadsheet can go higher. --------------------------------- Yes, an "it depends" answer. But I was well in excess of 1000 IPs. Sure everyone's correct on the limits in a rapidly growing company with lots of churn, but I was responding to the "If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations spreadsheets are not manageable for IPv4" comment. scott

1 0

RE: What are people using for IPAM these days?
by Scott Weeks 12 Jun '18

12 Jun '18

--- C-Mack.McBride(a)charter.com wrote: From: "McBride, Mack" <C-Mack.McBride(a)charter.com> If you are managing more than a thousand IPs allocations spreadsheets are not manageable for IPv4. ----------------------------------------- I managed a /15, two /16s and several /24s (so, well over a quarter million IPs) on a spreadsheet for years. So, that's an 'it depends' answer. scott

19 24

TEST Help? TEST
by Scott Weeks 12 Jun '18

12 Jun '18

Apologies for the noise. Please hit delete... Once again I am not able to send email to the list and have either been moderated off again (for some mistake or some unknown reason why) or something else is going on. Sent email to admins@, but no response, so this is just a test to see if anything gets through. scott

2 1

Google Email Contact --- security issue
by j k 11 Jun '18

11 Jun '18

Can anyone send me a contact to Gmail security --- off list? Found something bad, that need to be resolved. Joe Klein "inveniet viam, aut faciet" --- Seneca's Hercules Furens (Act II, Scene 1) PGP Fingerprint: 295E 2691 F377 C87D 2841 00C1 4174 FEDF 8ECF 0CC8

1 0

Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?
by Alex Brooks 10 Jun '18

10 Jun '18

On Sun, 10 Jun 2018 at 21:50, Mike Lyon <mike.lyon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Title says it all... Currently using IPPlan, but it is kinda antiquated.. I am told by someone who has used it that Diamond IP is fantastic (https://www.globalservices.bt.com/btfederal/en/products/diamondip) But good luck getting your jaw off the floor after they tell you the price. Alex

1 0

3rd party QSFP-100G-LR4-S for Cisco
by Ryugo Kikuchi 10 Jun '18

10 Jun '18

Hey all, Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" for Cisco ASR and Nexus? Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we want to try to use 3rd party 100g SFP. But we are not sure which manufacturer's SFP is reliable or has good performance. Does anyone have experience? Many thanks, Roy

9 9