- Test - lists.nanog.org

courtesy
by Scott Weeks 28 Jun '18

28 Jun '18

--- job(a)instituut.net wrote: People - please just stop the off topic chatter. It is ludicrous that a thread about bgp hijacks morphed into font discussions. Either contribute to the operational issue at hand by evaluating your terms & conditions (or abuse policies) and applying them to your operations, or remain silent. ------------------------------------- While I have to agree with what you said in the first paragraph (there was too much of off topic chatter on this thread), I disagree with the second paragraph. You are not the King of NANOG where you can demand folks contribute in the manner you expect or "remain silent". The "Please" is acceptable and we'd likely all comply. The "remain silent" demand is not and it's likely to not gain compliance. scott

2 1

General survey about situation of website blocking in your country/economy <by July 10th>
by Akira Shibuya 28 Jun '18

28 Jun '18

Dear nanog members, JPNIC - Japan Network Information Center is now soliciting your input about the situation of website blocking all over the world, especially from the viewpoint of copyright infringement. In order to cope with vicious infringements, the Japanese government is considering countermeasures including the legislation of website blocking, alleging that blocking technologies are already being operated in many countries and regions of the world(*). JPNIC wants to grasp the real situation of the world. We would be grateful if you could answer the survey below by July 10th. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfgxaDgDwHbWOv7RNbHYTRbNHQa_HFCPv0… It would be highly appreciated if you could kindly provide us with your input. (*)Background: Japan calls for 'emergency measure’blocking access to websites that pirate manga and anime https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/04/13/national/japan-calls-emergency… If you have any question about the survey, please feel free to email us at: web-blocking(a)nic.ad.jp All the Best, Akira Shibuya (on behalf of JPNIC secretariat)

1 0

Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of Cogent, GTT, and Level3
by Scott Weeks 27 Jun '18

27 Jun '18

On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 22:49, Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg(a)tristatelogic.com> wrote: > Without the generous support of Cogent, GTT, and Level3 this dumbass > lowlife IP address space thief would be largely if not entirely toast. > So what are they waiting for? Why don't their turf this jackass? Are > they waiting for an engraved invitation or what? > > As I always ask, retorically, in cases like this: Where are the grownups? --- ops.lists(a)gmail.com wrote: From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists(a)gmail.com> "we are not the internet police" right? ( ----------------------------- So your answer is to let them hijack whatever/whenever they want? scott

6 5

Microsoft Express Routes woes...
by Craig 27 Jun '18

27 Jun '18

This is classic....... We have a direct BGP peering session to Microsoft using Express Routes for the public peering session for services like Email, one drive, etc. this uses MS Public. We also have/use MS Azure Public as well as MS Azure Private in place for a few years now. We have had this happen a few times already where one team at MS makes a routing change, and the other team is either not aware of the change, or else doesn't communicate the change properly. So late last night, while a change was being made to a completely different area of our network, they asked that I back out my change due to our entire organization not being able to access share-point online, or MS One drive. I had zero evidence it was our change. further investigation on our border routers, revealed all four (4) of our ISP's were advertising the MS block as a /24 prefix: A:MY_NAME_CHANGED# show router 1053 bgp routes 13.107.136.0/24 ======================================================================== BGP Router ID:10.11.0.29 AS:122 Local AS:122 ======================================================================== Legend - Status codes : u - used, s - suppressed, h - history, d - decayed, * - valid l - leaked, x - stale, > - best, b - backup, p - purge Origin codes : i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete ======================================================================== BGP IPv4 Routes ======================================================================== Flag Network LocalPref MED Nexthop (Router) Path-Id Label As-Path ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- u*>? 13.107.136.0/24 250 10450 4.49.118.153 None - 3356 8075 8068 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Routes : 1 HOWEVER MS Express Routes was advertising this: A:MY_NAME_CHANGED# show router 1053 bgp routes 13.107.136.0/22 ======================================================================== BGP Router ID:10.11.0.29 AS:122 Local AS:122 ======================================================================== Legend - Status codes : u - used, s - suppressed, h - history, d - decayed, * - valid l - leaked, x - stale, > - best, b - backup, p - purge Origin codes : i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete ======================================================================== BGP IPv4 Routes ======================================================================== Flag Network LocalPref MED Nexthop (Router) Path-Id Label As-Path ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i 13.107.136.0/22 300 0 157.229.11.66 None - 12076 So another call to MS support and escalations to get this more specific prefix fixed or if Express routes can advertise this more specific vs the /22 block. *Questions:* Has anyone else ran into this with MS if you have a direct peering session to them? Has anyone did an audit on the route table's received from MS over express routes, vs what they receive from their ISP's and noticed the differences? MS needs to seriously think about: Careful coordination of routing changes Policies to prevent specific routes being advertised while larger blocks are advertised over express routes. Anyway I am tired, as I have not had much sleep, any comments on this, would like to hear from you. -Craig

2 1

AS2386 / INS-AS - AT&T Data Communications Services contact off list
by André Keller 27 Jun '18

27 Jun '18

Hi, could somebody of AS2386 contact me off-list? It seems that you accept prefixes 12.139.62.0/24 / 12.139.63.0/24 with a wrong origin AS. Regards André

1 1

TCP TIMELY implementation guide
by Yifeng Zhou 26 Jun '18

26 Jun '18

Hi There, May I know if there's any TCP TIMELY implementation guide? Want to play with it.. Thanks!

2 2

Verizon\MCI Real Estate Department
by Mike Hammett 26 Jun '18

26 Jun '18

Does anyone have a contact at Verizon\MCI's Real Estate department? Their web site is rather consumer-focused and has no mention of anything related to that. Nagging them on Twitter has been a dud as well. They have a fiber route through my family's property (from a Williams pipeline) and I'm trying to verify the easement information on record is what they have as well. Multiple Williams pipes from the same original builder now in different hands makes things a bit more tricky. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com

1 0

Call For Presentations - Joint CENTR-Tech / DNS-OARC Workshop, Amsterdam, NL, 13th/14th October 2018
by Jacques Latour 26 Jun '18

26 Jun '18

Hi All! The 29th DNS-OARC Workshop will be a joint workshop combined with CENTR-Tech and will take place at the Hotel Okura, Amsterdam, Netherlands, on October 13th and 14th 2018. The Workshop's Program Committee is now requesting proposals for presentations. All DNS-related subjects are welcome. A timeslot will also be available for lightning talks (5-10 minutes) on day two of the workshop for which submissions will be accepted on the first day of the workshop, until 4pm. The second afternoon of the workshop will start with a Members-only session which will include reports on DNS-OARC's activities. If you are an OARC member and have a sensitive topic that you wish to present during that session those can be accommodated. The Members-only session will be followed by the AGM. Workshop Milestones: * 15 Jun 2018 - Submissions and Registrations open via Indico * 13 Jul 2018 - Deadline for submission * 17 Aug 2018 - Contribution list published * 14 Sep 2018 - Full agenda published * 06 Oct 2018 - Deadline for slideset submission * 13 Oct 2018 - Workshop Details for presentation submission are published here: https://indico.dns-oarc.net/event/29/call-for-abstracts/ The workshop presentations will be organized by common themes, depending on the topics and the timing of each presentation. There are 30-minute and 15-minute slots, let us know your preference in your submission. To allow the Programme Committee to make objective assessments of submissions, so as to ensure the quality of the workshop, submissions SHOULD include slides. Draft slides are acceptable on submission. OARC depends on sponsorship to fund its workshops and associated social events. Please contact <sponsor(a)dns-oarc.net> if your organization is interested in becoming a sponsor. (Please note that OARC is run on a non-profit basis, and is not in a position to reimburse expenses or time for speakers at its meetings.) If you have questions or concerns you can contact the Programme Committee: https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/programme via submissions(a)dns-oarc.net<mailto:submissions@dns-oarc.net> Jacques, for the joint Programme Committee

1 0

Tunable QSFP Optics
by Lewis,Mitchell T. 26 Jun '18

26 Jun '18

Does anyone know if any Single Mode QSFPs exist on the market that use wavelengths other than 1310nm (either self tunable or factory tuned)? I am looking to put more than one 40gb link on a fiber pair similar to using DWDM OADMs for 1g & 10g but can't seem to find any qsfp optics that don't use 1310nm. Thanks. Regards, Mitchell T. Lewis [ mailto:MLewis@TechCompute.Net | MLewis(a)TechCompute.Net ] [ http://linkedin.com/in/mlewiscc ] |203-816-0371 PGP Fingerprint: 79F2A12BAC77827581C734212AFA805732A1394E [ https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2AFA805732A1394E | Public PGP Key ]

10 17

Call for presentations RIPE 77
by Benno Overeinder 25 Jun '18

25 Jun '18

Dear colleagues, Please find the CFP for RIPE 77 below or at: https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/cfp/. The deadline for submissions is *26 August 2018*. Please also note that speakers do not receive any extra reduction or funding towards the meeting fee at the RIPE Meetings, see the "Speakers" paragraph in CFP for more information. Kind regards, Benno Overeinder RIPE PC Chair https://ripe77.ripe.net/ripe-pc/ -------------------->>><<<-------------------- Call for Presentations A RIPE Meeting is an open event where Internet Service Providers, network operators and other interested parties get together. Although the meeting is mostly technical, it is also a chance for people to meet and network with others in their field. *RIPE 77 will take place from 15-19 October in Amsterdam, The Netherlands* The RIPE Programme Committee (PC) is now seeking content proposals from the RIPE community for the plenary sessions, BoFs (Birds of a Feather sessions), panels, workshops, tutorials and lightning talks at RIPE 77. See the full descriptions of the different presentation formats: https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/ Proposals for plenary sessions, BoFs, panels, workshops and tutorials must be submitted for full consideration no later than *26 August 2018*. Proposals submitted after this date will be considered depending on the slots still available in the programme. The PC is looking for presentations covering the topics of network engineering and operations, including but not limited to: - IPv6 deployment - Managing IPv4 scarcity - Data centre technologies - Network and DNS operations - Internet governance and regulatory practices - Network and routing security - Content delivery - Internet peering and mobile data exchange - Connected Things (aka. Internet of Things - IoT) ---- Speakers ---- Presenters, RIPE Working Group Chairs and the RIPE Programme Committee are required to cover their own costs to attend a RIPE Meeting (meeting ticket, travel and accommodation). We have various ticket options available depending on your needs. In extraordinary circumstances, the RIPE Chair can waive the meeting fee for presenters. These requests are dealt with on a case-by-case basis via pc(a)ripe.net. Also note that, on an individual basis, participants can apply for a RIPE Fellowship or RACI to develop their professional or academic career. For more information, please visit: https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/ripe-fellowship https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/raci ---- Submissions ---- Presenters should be clear on whether they wish to submit a presentation for a plenary or working group (WG) session. At present, most working groups will solicit policy proposals, discussion points or other content directly via their mailing lists. If you’re not sure what kind of session you should be presenting at, please visit: https://ripe77.ripe.net/plenary-or-wg/ RIPE Meeting attendees are quite sensitive to keeping presentations non-commercial, and product marketing talks are strongly discouraged. Repeated audience feedback shows that the most successful talks focus on operational experience, research results, or case studies. For example, presenters wishing to describe a commercial solution should focus on the underlying technology and should not attempt a product demonstration. Presenters should indicate how much time they will require. In general, the time allocated for the different presentation formats is as follows: - Plenary presentations: 20-25 minutes presentation with 5-10 minutes discussion - Tutorials: up to two hours (Monday morning) - Workshops: one hour (during evening sessions) to two hours (Monday morning) - BoFs: approximately one hour (during evening sessions) - Lightning talks: 10 minutes in total for both the presentation and any discussion The following general requirements apply: - Proposals must be submitted using the meeting submission system, https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/ - Lightning talks should also be submitted using the meeting submission system (https://ripe77.ripe.net/submit-topic/) and can be submitted any time up to and including the meeting week. The allocation of lightning talks will be announced on short notice, in some cases on the same day but often one day prior to the time slot allocated. - Presenters who propose a panel or BoF are encouraged to include speakers from several (perhaps even competing) companies and/or a neutral facilitator. - All presentation proposals will only be considered by the PC if they contain at least draft presentation slides (slides may be updated later on). For panels, proposals must contain a clear description, as well as the names of invited panellists, presenters and moderators. ---- Diversity and Inclusion - On-Site Childcare and the RIPE Meeting Code of Conduct ---- Did you know that RIPE Meetings now have on-site childcare? You can reserve a spot for your child (age 6 months – 10 years) during the registration process for the meeting. Registrations for RIPE 77 will open mid-July. Childcare places are limited, so please be quick to reserve a spot for your child! Read about the experiences of our next generation of engineers at: https://labs.ripe.net/Members/agowland/ripe-meeting-diversity-efforts-on-si… Ensuring that RIPE Meeting values are upheld and that attendees experience a professional, respectful and safe meeting is a priority. Please do read the RIPE Meeting Code of Conduct: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/ripe-meetings/ripe-meeting-code-o… --- If you have any questions or requests concerning content submissions, please email pc(a)ripe.net.

1 0