Ahem: > > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it.
I'm reporting 20% loss THROUGH the MAE, not *TO* the MAE.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Adam Rothschild wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit confused here. You're reporting 20% packet loss, and then
> pasted ping output indicating zero packet loss. What's the dilly?
>
> -adam
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 02:38:19PM -0500, NANOG Mailing List wrote:
> >
> >
> > Is anyone else having problems with packet-loss through MAE-EAST? We're
> > down 20% to MAE-E and I'm almost certain it is as result of packet-loss.
> >
> > No problems getting to MAE-East. Just getting things THROUGH it.
> >
> > core1-Col>en
> > Password:
> > core1-Col#term length 20
> > core1-Col#ping
> > Protocol [ip]:
> > Target IP address: vie1
> > Translating "vie1"...domain server (206.183.224.8) [OK]
> >
> > Repeat count [5]: 250
> > Datagram size [100]:
> > Timeout in seconds [2]:
> > Extended commands [n]:
> > Sweep range of sizes [n]:
> > Type escape sequence to abort.
> > Sending 250, 100-byte ICMP Echoes to 206.183.226.36, timeout is 2 seconds:
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > Success rate is 100 percent (250/250), round-trip min/avg/max = 20/25/36
> > ms
> >
> >
> > John Fraizer
> > EnterZone, Inc
> >
>
