- Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: Seattle Earthquake
by Matthew Schlegel 01 Mar '01

01 Mar '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bellevue/Redmond area went for a ride, but no damage from my perspective. No land line interruption and T1 service stayed solid into the Westin. My sprint PCS service was getting fast busy dialing out to a land line, but wireless web browsing still worked fine. I had fully working cell service back by 12:30PM. As of 1:50PM, all service seems to be normal. Our service providers phones are currently non-op however, but no outages noticed so far. Reports I've seen so far are saying that this was not the big quake predicted for this area, so I'm wondering what effects this quake will have on the one building. Matthew Schlegel Network Engineer Crossgain Corporation - -----Original Message----- From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork@inch.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:13 PM To: Wilson, David Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: RE: Seattle Earthquake Hey all, We have some ATT cell phones for paging, and the number we dial for TAP is 1-800-841-8837. Currently we get a recording that "due to an earthquake in the area you are calling we cannot complete the call"... Anyone have alternate TAP numbers for ATT wireless? This one has been problematic pre-earthquake as well... Thanks, Charles | Charles Sprickman | Internet Channel | INCH System Administration Team | (212)243-5200 | spork(a)inch.com | access(a)inch.com On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Wilson, David wrote: > > > When it hits 8.0 SELL!! > > -----Original Message----- > Subject: Re: Seattle Earthquake > > > The US Geological Survey has revised the magnitude to 7.0. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOp1z7CtAKYXwpQg1EQKbTQCgzbcqGijNA8KvMSH0LPxP3nTms1EAoLxO SjR9bO+x6BR9yS6rKH7KHbYR =zImT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

9 8

CANIX contact
by burgan＠corp.home.net 01 Mar '01

01 Mar '01

Does anyone have an operational contact for the CANIX ethernet switch located at 151 Front Street in Toronto? Our port is down. A private email would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jeff

1 0

RE: Seattle Earthquake
by Mathew Butler 01 Mar '01

01 Mar '01

Yeah, that's why it got numbered I405 instead of I450. I always knew there was something wrong with that... :) -Mat Butler -----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy@psg.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 4:54 PM To: Chris Kilbourn Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Seattle Earthquake >>> Major routes, such as I95 over Mercer Island are open and operating >> I5, you mean? > Nope, I-90 crosses Mercer Island and is East-West towards Boston. > I-5 is North-South and runs through downtown Seattle. and i95 is where they meet. locals know it as the additive interchange. we tried a multiplicative interchange, but the packet loss was too great due to the limited size of the signs. randy

1 0

Re: Seattle Earthquake
by Steven M. Bellovin 01 Mar '01

01 Mar '01

In message <E14YHLs-000Hh8-00(a)rip.psg.com>, Randy Bush writes: > >>>> Major routes, such as I95 over Mercer Island are open and operating >>> I5, you mean? >> Nope, I-90 crosses Mercer Island and is East-West towards Boston. >> I-5 is North-South and runs through downtown Seattle. > >and i95 is where they meet. locals know it as the additive interchange. >we tried a multiplicative interchange, but the packet loss was too great >due to the limited size of the signs. > But what tunneling protocol do they use to reach the east coast's I95? Or is there some form of address translation? --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb

1 0

DOE Review of Criticality Accidents
by Sean Donelan 01 Mar '01

01 Mar '01

Although published last year, I only learned about this report this year. Las Alamos National Labs published an update to the 1967 publication Review of Criticality Accidents. Ok, I know, what does a study about nuclear reactions has to do with Internet network operations. The answer is found by looking at the underlying causes of the accidents. Unless you are a nuclear engineer, you can skip directly to the chapter "C.OBSERVATIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED FROM PROCESS CRITICALITY ACCIDENTS" It is important to note that there have been no accidents that were caused by a single failure.That is, there were always multiple causes for each of the 22 accidents.It is also noteworthy that equipment failure or malfunction was either a minor or a non-contribut- ing factor in all of the accidents. All accidents have been dominated by design, managerial, and operational failures. The focus for accident prevention should be on these issues. http://lib-www.lanl.gov/la-pubs/00538245.pdf

1 0

RE: Seattle Earthquake
by Wilson, David 01 Mar '01

01 Mar '01

When it hits 8.0 SELL!! -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Seattle Earthquake The US Geological Survey has revised the magnitude to 7.0.

3 2

RE: Seattle Earthquake
by Matthew Schlegel 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Latest word on Sea-Tac's website is that they are now operational in limited capacity. There is no runway damage reported. They are currently operating with 20 mile separation instead of the normal 3-5 mile separation. Boeing field, which is about 5-10 miles north of SEATAC, has a cracked runway and is expected to be offline for a couple of days. - -----Original Message----- From: Jake Khuon [mailto:khuon@GBLX.Net] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:42 PM To: Wayne Bouchard Cc: Matthew Schlegel; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Seattle Earthquake ### On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:15:54 -0700, Wayne Bouchard <web(a)typo.org> ### casually decided to expound upon Matthew Schlegel ### <matthewsc(a)crossgain.com> the following thoughts about "Re: Seattle ### Earthquake": WB> SEATAC is still closed Control tower damage and cracks in the runway. - -- /*====================[ Jake Khuon <khuon(a)GBLX.Net> ]======================+ | Senior Manager and Chief Architect, Net-Eng/NSM /~_ |_ () |3 /-\ |_ | | VOX: +1 (206) 910-8328 Fax: +1 (425) 415-1443 \_| C R O S S I N G | +=============[ 900 4th. Ave., Floor 12, Seattle, WA 98164 ]=============*/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBOp2CSStAKYXwpQg1EQJHJQCeNGxYfyPSyRRPmtLphmdz3yxxL0cAnjtl F9UIjbdtca7N6rGxi+VC0YoW =GeDz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

RE: Seattle Earthquake
by Mathew Butler 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

I90, probably -- it goes over Lake Washington. -Mat Butler -----Original Message----- From: Steven J. Sobol [mailto:sjsobol@NorthShoreTechnologies.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:50 PM To: Wayne Bouchard Cc: Matthew Schlegel; nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Seattle Earthquake On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Wayne Bouchard wrote: > Major routes, such as I95 over Mercer Island are open and operating I5, you mean? I95 is on the other coast. -- Steven J. Sobol/CTO/JustThe.net LLC | sjsobol(a)NorthShoreTechnologies.net SAY IT LOUD: I'M GEEK AND I'M PROUD! | 888.480.4NET (4638) 216.619.2NET (2638) http://NorthShoreTechnologies.net | http://ClevelandProductions.com http://JustThe.net | Powered by Linux, pizza, Coke, Cuervo, and cheap beer.

2 1

Re: Seattle Earthquake
by Sean Donelan 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

On Wed, 28 February 2001, Kevin Day wrote: > According to ABC News, there was just a 6.2 magnitude earthquake, with the > epicenter about 35 miles away from Seattle. It appears that Sprint is having > some connectivity issues in the Seattle area, several Seattle routers in > sprint's network are unreachable at the moment. The Tsunami Warning Center reports the quake occured at 10:44 PST, with an estimated magintude of 6.2. Some web sites are down, such as www.seattletimes.com, but it appears to be a localized issue. Seattle Public Library, King County Library, Amazon.COM and Microsoft.COM all appear to be functioning. I couldn't find any traceroutes through Sprint's network in the northwest, but I don't know of any sites with only Sprint connectivity, so I don't know about Sprint. ATT, Cable & Wireless, and PSI appear normal. I could reach parts of Qwest/USWEST, but I don't know their physical network topography, so I couldn't tell if I was reaching Seattle or somewhere else.

2 1

Re: Next NANOG
by ren 28 Feb '01

28 Feb '01

Heya Pete, Nope, no announcement. It would be nice to have one in Miami so that both NAPs (BellSouth & NAP of the Americas) can be explored. Cheers, -Ren At 10:34 AM 2/26/01 -0700, you wrote: >Was the date/place of the next NANOG announced in Atlanta? > >Pete. > >

5 4