- Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: nlayer.net Abuse and Security contact
by Mike Damm 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Some folks might want to jump on the IRC server in question and issue a /who. There appear to be some infected machines members of this list may be interested in cleaning. Aside from the usual spew of cable/dsl I noticed: *.nyu.edu *.bu.edu *.northwestern.edu *.corp.yahoo.com *.tufts.edu *.uncwil.edu -Mike -----Original Message----- From: John Obi [mailto:dalnetuzer@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:10 AM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: nlayer.net Abuse and Security contact Folks, I have sent many emails to abuse(a)nlayer.net and security(a)nlayer.net reporting a security abuse by one of their users but nothing done up to now. If there is real person from nlayer.net please contact me offline. Thanks, -J __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/

2 1

pon's and ethernet to the home
by Miguel Mata-Cardona 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hi, I've been reading a little about passive optic networks and the idea is very good from my stand point. As far as I have understood, the idea is to use the fiber as it was coax, doing some kind of FDM (frequency division multiplexing) with the lambdas (somehow the same). This would give us the capability to move at leat n x 10mbps ethernet on the same fiber using diferent lambdas for each customer, until power budget goes down. If the idea is correct, this would mean "next jump" on bandwidth. Who would be making this "ethernet/lambda multiplexors" right now? Is it feasible to do it today? or should we wait a little more? I mean, there are solutions using packet over sonet or alike, but pure ethernet? -- Miguel Mata-Cardona Intercom El Salvador mmata(a)intercom.com.sv voz: ++(503) 278-5068 fax: ++(503) 265-7024

5 5

nlayer.net Abuse and Security contact
by John Obi 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Folks, I have sent many emails to abuse(a)nlayer.net and security(a)nlayer.net reporting a security abuse by one of their users but nothing done up to now. If there is real person from nlayer.net please contact me offline. Thanks, -J __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/

3 2

OT: AOL contact needed
by Rich Sena 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Can someone from AOL please contact me re: a blocked email domain. -- Rich Sena - ras(a)thick.net ThickNET Consulting "On the way to understanding; you understand, and forget."

2 1

Most up to date packet size distribution info
by Rob Healey 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

Hi, I was wondering what the best sources for up to date info on current packet size distribution on the Internet might be? i.e. X% of Internet packets are of size Y bytes to Z bytes. I remember seeing this 2+ years ago but that was many disk failures/backup fiascos ago... Thanks! -Rob

10 10

OpenBSD + new bgpd (Fw: cvs.openbsd.org: src)
by Peter Galbavy 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

For those interested in this sort of thing: (I glanced at the early code a while back, and like anything Henning has written, seemed clean and neat). Henning Brauer wrote: > CVSROOT: /cvs > Module name: src > Changes by: henning(a)cvs.openbsd.org 2003/12/17 04:46:54 > > Added files: > usr.sbin/bgpd : Makefile bgpd.c bgpd.h buffer.c config.c > ensure.h imsg.c log.c mrt.c mrt.h parse.y rde.c > rde.h rde_decide.c rde_prefix.c rde_rib.c > session.c session.h > > Log message: > welcome, bgpd > started by me some time ago with moral support from theo, the > proceeded up to the point where the session engine worked correctly. > claudio jeker joined then and did a lot of work in the RDE. > it is not particulary usefull as application right now as parts are > still missing but is imported to enable more people to work on it. > status: > BGP sessions get established fine, OPEN messages and then KEEPALIVEs > exchanged etc. session FSM works fine; NOTIFICATIONs are handled > fine, and all connection drops etc I provoked get handled fine. > Incoming UPDATE messgages are parsed well and the data entered to the > RIB, the decision process is not yet there, neither is outgoing > UPDATEs or sync to the kernel routing table. > > not connected to the builds yet.

1 0

FW: Internet Priority Services RFI Announcement
by Nolan, David 18 Dec '03

18 Dec '03

The National Communications System issued a Request for Information (RFI) concerning Internet Priority Services for National Security and Emergency Preparedness (NS/EP) communications. The RFI announcement appears on the Federal Business Opportunities website at the url: http://www.fbodaily.com/archive/2003/11-November/23-Nov-2003/FBO-0047473 6.htm The NCS welcomes any input, including both formal and informal submissions. Please consider providing a response, or notifying other persons, groups or businesses you know who might be interested in this topic. David J. Nolan National Communications System Technology & Programs Division (N2) email: noland(a)ncs.gov The National Communications System is now part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection (IAIP) Directorate. <<00 Pri Svc RFI final.pdf>>

1 0

Security/DDOS contact for Level3 US ?
by Jan Czmok 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Can somebody who is responsible on blocking IP's on "unknown.level3.net" ports contact me off-list ? I have a DDOS attack against one of my customers from a customer of level3. --jan -- Jan Czmok, Network Engineering & Support, Global Access Telecomm, Inc. Ph.: +49 69 299896-35 - fax: +49 69 299896-40 - sip:13129*522@inoc-dba.pch.net

1 0

Broadwing
by Timothy Brown 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Anyone have anything positive or negative to say about Broadwing on the transit side? Private e-mail only please; i'll summarize to the list if there's interest. Tim

1 0

Re: Request for submissions: messy cabling and other broken things
by Richard Irving 16 Dec '03

16 Dec '03

Sharif Torpis wrote: > uh-oh, what's this? > > http://new.onecall.net/timages/wanrack.jpg Hehehe.. :} The -old- building, and Telecom WAN room, circa early 1990's, late 1980's, and a bank of auto-ops from before the time when there was such a thing as a 1U server. "new".onecall.net is actually a misnomer, the actual -new- site (www) has minimal detail.... Programmers keep the old web site around, under the name "new", (Programmer Humor, eh ?) which has a few pictures snapped during the building of the -=new=- facility. :P

1 0