- Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: Verio Routing
by Joe Johnson 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

Everything did come back up before I sent the email (otherwise I wouldn't have been able to unless I dialed in). I was a little disappointed about their blanket "temporary major network issues" statement from Level 3 support. Normally they are really good about support. Joe Johnson JMDN.net -----Original Message----- From: Richard J. Sears [mailto:rsears@adnc.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 5:27 PM To: Joe Johnson Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: Verio Routing We have an OC3 with Verio and took a hit as well.. On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:06:02 -0500 "Joe Johnson" <jjohnson(a)jmdn.net> wrote: > > Did anyone else just get a hiccup on Verio circuits? Lost routing in > small 2-5 second bursts incrementally over the past 10 minutes. > > Joe Johnson > JMDN.net ****************************************** Richard J. Sears Vice President American Digital Network ---------------------------------------------------- rsears(a)adnc.com http://www.adnc.com ---------------------------------------------------- 858.576.4272 - Phone 858.427.2401 - Fax INOC-DBA - 6130 ---------------------------------------------------- I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . "Work like you don't need the money, love like you've never been hurt and dance like you do when nobody's watching."

1 0

Verio Routing
by Joe Johnson 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

Did anyone else just get a hiccup on Verio circuits? Lost routing in small 2-5 second bursts incrementally over the past 10 minutes. Joe Johnson JMDN.net

2 1

Updated monitoring pages from Team Cymru
by Rob Thomas 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

[ Apologies to those of you who receive this note in multiple forums. ] Hi, team. We are pleased to announce some updated monitoring, as well as some new monitoring, on our web site. This includes aesthetic fixes as well as increased visibility. Our DNS monitoring now has increased visibility as well as a new look and feel. Gone are the multiple pages for each zone, replaced with a single page that will have additional zones soon. You'll find it at the following URL. <http://www.cymru.com/DNS/dns.html> The times are DNS query response times, and the query responses are checked for correctness. Clicking on the query response time will bring you to a more detailed, graphical view of the query responses for the given pod and name server combination. We've updated our network monitoring to include several new components. This includes pod to pod ICMP, TCP, and UDP monitoring. It also includes traffic graphs for a select few Darknet pods, and our new Internet Garbage Meter. :) <http://www.cymru.com/Reach/index.html> For more on Darknets, from which our Darknet monitoring and Internet Garbage Meter are generated, please see our Darknet Project page at the following URL. <http://www.cymru.com/Darknet/> We hope you find this of use. Comments and suggestions are always welcome! Thanks! Rob, for Team Cymru. -- Rob Thomas http://www.cymru.com ASSERT(coffee != empty);

1 0

FW: Verio Routing
by James Laszko 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

We saw a hiccup in San Diego. Routes towards a lot of our monitored customers vanished and starting going out other providers... James Laszko Pipeline Communications, Inc. james(a)pcipros.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Joe Johnson Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:06 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Verio Routing Did anyone else just get a hiccup on Verio circuits? Lost routing in small 2-5 second bursts incrementally over the past 10 minutes. Joe Johnson JMDN.net

1 0

NANOG censorship
by Sichard Reenbergen 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

|On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Husan Sarris wrote: |> |> NANOG, |> |> It is with great sadness that I inform you that Richard Steenbergen, |> long-time NANOG contributor and colleague, has been censored by |Dr. ETC. finally! i just want to say how disappointed I am that people have been posting notes using our names with the letters mixed around over the last few years. thanks doc for finally kicking one of these trangressors off the list. sincerely, -- Bandy Rush, Dean Soran, Husan Sarris, and Sichard Reenbergen 3 more to go!!

2 1

NANOG Posting
by Husan Sarris 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

NANOG, It is with great sadness that I inform you that Richard Steenbergen, long-time NANOG contributor and colleague, has been censored by Dr. Harris this morning. Richard will be barred from posting to this list until such a time when the Doctor deems it appropriate. Those who take issue with this decision are encouraged to contact Susan and ask for leniency. Richard's family has asked that contributions be sent to the ACLU "free speech fund" and Trustees of the University of Michigan in his honor.

5 4

Reminder: Who has VA "INET GOD"?
by Deepak Jain 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

I seem to remember someone telling me they had this license plate. Saw it today, not sure I recognized the driver. Would someone mind refreshing my poor little memory? Thanks, Deepak

1 0

website to display AS No and ip info also
by adrian kok 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

Hi all ls there any websites to provide the information about AS no and IP? When typing the AS no, it can display all the information fo the company and IP belongs to this company also Thank you

6 7

Re: website to display AS No and ip info also
by Bubba Parker 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

Um, no. That site is a dud, and I have no idea why "Crack" would be related to ASNs. On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 03:29:04PM -0400, Brant.Stevens(a)barclayscapital.com wrote: > http://www.smartwhois.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bubba Parker [mailto:sysadmin@citynetwireless.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:21 PM > To: adrian kok > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: website to display AS No and ip info also > > > > www.cidr-report.org > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 03:19:58AM +0800, adrian kok wrote: > > > > Hi all > > > > ls there any websites to provide the information > > > > about AS no and IP? > > > > When typing the AS no, it can display all the > > information fo the company > > and IP belongs to this company also > > > > Thank you > > -- > Bubba Parker > sysadmin(a)citynetwireless.net > CityNet LLC > http://www.citynetinfo.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For more information about Barclays Capital, please > visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com. > > > Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays > Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this > message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes, > it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is > caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are > solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the > Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays > Group for operational or business reasons. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- Bubba Parker sysadmin(a)citynetwireless.net CityNet LLC http://www.citynetinfo.com/

1 0

Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems
by Robert Bonomi 13 Oct '04

13 Oct '04

> From owner-nanog(a)merit.edu Tue Oct 12 20:41:45 2004 > Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 07:09:10 +0530 > From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh(a)outblaze.com> > To: alex(a)yuriev.com > Cc: Steven Champeon <schampeo(a)hesketh.com>, nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: BCP38 making it work, solving problems > > > alex(a)yuriev.com [12/10/04 13:16 -0400]: > > > > > If I, and my little 7-man company, can afford to have me solve the > > > problem on our end, why the heck can't you do the same? > > > > You can do it because you are a 7-man company. So can I. However, companies > > the size of Sprint cannot do it. > > > > Most filtering that I've seen (email, router, whatever) that just works great > for a 7 man company will not work when you serve several million users, > that's a fact. Certain _basics_ *are* applicable, regardless of scale. e.g. perimeter filtering of inbound packets w/ RFC-1918 a _source_ address, except for specific ICMP status/response messages. e.g. perimeter filtering of inbound packets with a _source_ address that is in *your* assigned address-space. Some medium-big (and up) operators implement 'RFC-1918 source' filters on their gateways to the 'external internet', but *not* on their customer interfaces. Which means that one of their customers can be attacked via such means, by *another* of their customers. And, after the fact, they can't even tell =which= of their customers done the deed. Similarly, one customer can 'spoof' another customer of that same provider. > One false positive report per week from 7 users. How many per week - or per > day - when you have 40 million users, is a question that gets answered real > fast. > > A lot of the bad filtering (or lack of filtering, for that matter) decisions > I've seen at large network providers and ISPs is generally where they are > also unresponsive to their users and to the internet community that reports > stuff to them (quite a few places I could name where most role accounts seem > to funnel straight to /dev/null) > > srs >

2 1