- Test - lists.nanog.org

Level 3 US east coast "issues"
by Grant A. Kirkwood 18 Oct '04

18 Oct '04

Level 3 experiencing widespread "unspecified routing issues" on the US east coast. Master ticket 1086844. Anyone have more specific information? -- Grant A. Kirkwood - grant(at)tnarg.org Fingerprint = D337 48C4 4D00 232D 3444 1D5D 27F6 055A BF0C 4AED

3 2

WISP Coordination in California
by Charlie Khanna - NextWeb 18 Oct '04

18 Oct '04

For those interested in unlicensed spectrum coordination for deploying wireless networks, here is the web site I mentioned after Tim Pozar's speech (Good Engineering Practices as it Applies to Unlicensed Wireless Networks): http://www.wbanc.com <http://www.wbanc.com/> (Mailing Lists) SF-BANC (San Francisco): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SF-BANC/ LA-BANC (Los Angeles): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LA-BANC/ SD-BANC (San Diego): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/SD-BANC/ Thank you, ______________________________ Charlie Khanna Tel: (510) 661-0900 Cell: (510) 520-9481 <BLOCKED::mailto:charlie@nextweb.net> charlie(a)nextweb.net NextWeb, Inc. 48820 Kato Road, Suite 101B Fremont, CA 94538 <BLOCKED::http://www.nextweb.net/> www.nextweb.net Support: (888) 565-5463 or support(a)nextweb.net The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

1 0

in memoriam
by Randy Bush 16 Oct '04

16 Oct '04

six years ago today, dr. jon postel died

1 0

i've got an extra hotel room for nanog-dc -- anybody need it?
by Paul Vixie 15 Oct '04

15 Oct '04

i got the room just before the deadline, it's in the nanog/arin hotel, but i'm not going to make it to DC after all. first come first served; if you wanted to be in the conference hotel but missed the deadline, i can tell the hotel to put the room in your name and you can call them and give them a credit card number. as-of: Fri Oct 15 18:11:14 GMT 2004.

3 2

Re: aggregation & table entries
by Paul Vixie 15 Oct '04

15 Oct '04

> > > > And what do you do with a BGP customer which sends you traffic > > > > from prefixes he doesn't want to announce to you? There are such > > > > customers. Fail filter ACL? > > > > > > This has been my question with uRPF from the beginning. You can > > > solve this on for some networks, but it doesn't scale very > > > well. Especially where you really don't know that your customer's > > > customer is doing this. > > > > It's 2004, and so, your customers who want to do this have to > > explain why, and you have to maintain extra-ordinary filters for > > such customers, at either your cost or the customer's cost. > > ah-ha! Patriot-Act! not nearly. i'm not asking you to take your shoes off before you get on an airplane, nor fingerprinting you before you enter the country, nor secretly searching your residence while you're at work. the closest analogue would be wanting your body to be on the plane if your luggage is, and wanting the name on your ticket to be the same as the name on your photo-id. in san francisco before the gold rush, it was absolutely common to see citizens carrying firearms, or to know that they were carrying concealed firearms. by the end of the gold rush this was no longer common because a "carry permit" was required. same city + more people = different laws. you can say that you hate this kind of change, but what you'll really be hating is either the laws of human nature or the laws of thermodynamics. either way, your hate is irrelevant to the final outcome.

2 1

Informal public hotspot BoF/lunch at 12:15 Monday in the RegencyFoyer (we'll try to move to a local eatery after we gather)
by Dan Ellis 15 Oct '04

15 Oct '04

Hi all. I am Dan Ellis, CTO of PenTeleData. We are a regional ISP/communications company owned by 7 cable and telephone companies, responsible for 150k+ broadband subscribers and associated IP infrastructures. Like many MSO's, we are looking at rolling out a large (300-500+ AP) distributed public hotspot infrastructure and have seen the following issues with both commercial and open source solutions: - Lack of subscriber accountability (NAT translations). - Inability to see per subscriber "ip accounting/netflow" statistics. - Lack of strong MAC and IP security (easily hijackable) - Inability to control subscriber speeds. - Poor OS implementations (no ssh, non robust upgrades) - Limited or no radius accounting records. - Limited subscriber time/max-transfer control. - Inability to perform internal or external IDS (quarantining). - Limited best practices guides dealing with the above items. - Numerous issues with operator deployment methods. At the BoF, we hope to compile a list of requirements for vendors in order to get a better set of gear we can build a manageable hotspot infrastructure from. We'll present our requirements along with any other sets people have, then throw the floor open for discussion. I will attempt to steer vendors towards these requirements, work on a best practices guide, and then present my results to the Nanog community. Tim Pozar, Avi Freedman and I will gather for this informal BoF in the Regency Foyer at 12:15pm on Monday, 10/18/04. If the crowd is of an appropriate size, we'll then move to a local eatery. Hope to see you there, --Dan -- Daniel Ellis, CTO, PenTeleData (610)826-9293

1 0

Seeking Technical Input from Metro Ethernet Providers and MAN-like Enterprise Users
by Robert Hayden 15 Oct '04

15 Oct '04

Good day, As many of you know, I am a network engineer at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. We are currently in the preliminary planning stages of our next generation campus network and would like to get some ideas on what the "real world" is actively doing to focus in on the appropriate technologies and equipment. Our campus consists of approximately 200 buildings over a few square miles as will as a fairly traditional hub-and-spoke fiber plant. Currently, we use Cisco ethernet equipment (primarily 6500s/Sup720 for core aggregation and routing, and 3750s for edge connectivity) and 802.1Q VLANS to provide per-department layer-2 connectivity. Each department gets their own VLAN(s) with some departments spanning throughout the campus to many buildings and some networks as small as a handful of ports. When our current buildout is completed we'll have about 4500 network elements and about 140,000 edge ports. What we have been seeing with our current implementation is problems of scalability. 802.1Q simply seems to fall down when implemented wide-scale in a MAN/WAN environment (especially when using a redundant connectivity model). We want to look into newer MAN technologies (likely some variation on the MPLS theme). What I am looking for are some engineering contacts at some ethernet metro-type providers as well as large enterprise and academic campus that have moved beyond 802.1Q for L2 VPNs. My hope is that you might be willing to be available for a brief conference call and/or to provide other insight as to how you handle very-large and scalable ethernet networks with a variety of service requirements. We've gotten a variety of information from our vendors, but we tend to take a lot of that as marketing and would much-prefer to discuss this with "real" people. If you'd be willing to be of assistance, please drop me an email and I'll follow up privately. Thanks much for your time. Robert Hayden Senior Network Engineer and Packet Wrangler University of Wisconsin Madison (CCed to NANOG and Cisco-NSP)

1 0

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Table Analysis 15 Oct '04

15 Oct '04

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 16 Oct, 2004 Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 148961 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 88009 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 71207 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18259 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 15851 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 7439 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2408 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 72 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.7 Max AS path length visible: 28 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 60 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 16 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1344544620 Equivalent to 80 /8s, 36 /16s and 31 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 36.3 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 58.6 Percentage of available address space allocated: 61.9 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 68570 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 28814 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 14309 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 27056 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 14287 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2155 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 651 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 327 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.8 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 22 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 164826496 Equivalent to 9 /8s, 211 /16s and 13 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 75.2 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 23552-24575 APNIC Address Blocks 58/7, 60/7, 202/7, 210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8 ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 84631 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 51391 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 64589 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 23039 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 9632 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3463 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 927 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 234033664 Equivalent to 13 /8s, 243 /16s and 18 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 69.7 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647,29695-30719, 31744-33791 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/6, 68/7, 70/7, 72/8, 198/7, 204/6, 208/7 and 216/8 RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 27759 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 19265 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 24592 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 16116 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 5918 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3194 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1026 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 5.4 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 28 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 173698176 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 90 /16s and 108 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 60.9 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-34815 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 80/5, 88/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/7, 212/7 and 217/8 LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 6473 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 2354 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 6319 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 3774 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 393 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 111 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 82 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.1 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 18 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 16288256 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 248 /16s and 138 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 48.5 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671 LACNIC Address Blocks 200/7 Emerging AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 1274 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 690 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 890 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 680 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 93 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 20 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 12 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.7 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 2069248 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 31 /16s and 147 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 12.3 AfriNIC AS Blocks <none> AfriNIC Address Blocks 196/8 APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4134 838 4407 163 Data Communications Bureau 1221 806 1183 580 Telstra Pty Ltd 4766 547 3407 266 Korea Internet Exchange for " 9583 535 41 104 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 4755 373 133 53 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 17676 369 5516 54 XTAGE CORPORATION 2907 354 1857 328 SINET Japan 9443 353 69 79 Primus Telecommunications 9929 345 161 33 China Netcom Corp. 17557 317 23 158 Pakistan Telecom 703 311 342 240 UUNET 2764 284 272 232 connect.com.au pty ltd 7474 262 268 197 Optus Communications Pty Ltd 9942 236 73 128 COMindico Australia 4802 234 28 142 Wantree Development 9498 230 50 49 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 9800 230 374 67 CHINA UNICOM 7563 221 48 163 Korea Internet Infrastructure 10036 204 19 185 C&M Communication Co. Ltd. 17974 203 62 10 PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 7018 1417 6749 986 AT&T WorldNet Services 701 1258 8437 905 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 1239 935 2867 622 Sprint 2386 847 532 610 AT&T Data Communications Serv 6197 808 370 348 BellSouth Network Solutions, 4323 795 638 216 Time Warner Telecom 18566 746 208 6 Covad Communications 721 723 21036 298 DLA Systems Automation Center 3356 641 10954 441 Level 3 Communications, LLC 209 631 3465 499 Qwest 20115 591 427 303 Charter Communications 3561 545 2430 408 Cable & Wireless USA 852 512 1142 398 Telus Advanced Communications 7843 493 698 104 Adelphia Corp. 7132 447 8287 376 SBC Internet Services 6198 433 347 208 BellSouth Network Solutions, 705 431 163 273 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 6478 412 722 93 AT&T Worldnet Services 27364 411 36 19 Armstrong Cable Services 5668 403 87 18 Century Telephone RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 702 629 2013 520 UUNET - Commercial IP service 3320 302 2486 239 Deutsche Telekom AG 3301 280 1100 270 TeliaNet Sweden 8220 279 461 265 COLT Internet - International 21502 269 40 3 NUMERICABLE is a cabled netwo 680 251 2025 239 DFN-IP service G-WiN 3246 218 476 215 Song Networks 13083 217 51 8 Mannesmann Datenverarbeitung 1257 208 743 180 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network 8708 205 114 183 Romania Data Systems S.A. 5515 201 843 147 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 786 176 1794 176 The JANET IP Service 719 157 288 102 LANLINK autonomous system 3215 156 908 76 France Telecom Transpac 6746 155 30 129 Dynamic Network Technologies, 8866 153 20 7 Bulgarian Telecommunication C 3269 150 1259 67 TELECOM ITALIA 5400 149 207 120 BT Ignite European Backbone 25186 149 154 105 France Telecom Transpac's Tra 3303 147 610 129 Swisscom Ltd LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6140 346 138 66 ImpSat 8151 305 440 130 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 16814 212 13 7 NSS, S.A. 11172 206 100 54 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 6147 185 94 20 Telefonica Del Peru 11664 165 12 30 Keytech SA 6505 137 90 94 Global One Communicaoes Ltda 7303 134 60 24 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 6503 124 164 85 AVANTEL, S.A. 11992 101 9 31 Integrated Systems 14117 97 6 8 Telefonica del Sur S.A. 11311 86 8 25 Sinectis S.A. 6535 85 7 19 Chilesat Servicios Empresari 11556 81 41 3 Cable-Wireless Panama 10481 80 32 7 Prima S.A. 14420 80 5 33 ANDINATEL S.A. 4270 79 18 9 Red de Interconexion Universi 15311 76 21 36 Telefonica Empresas 5639 75 8 8 Telecommunications Services o 27716 73 9 16 Eveloz AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 3741 251 631 218 The Internet Solution 5536 113 16 4 Internet Egypt Network 2018 94 297 92 Tertiary Education Network 2905 93 276 81 The Internetworking Company o 20928 57 16 1 Noor Advanced Technologies AS 22750 50 3 2 >>UNKNOWN<< 24835 34 34 7 RAYA Telecom - Egypt 9129 33 3 4 UUNET Kenya 6713 31 42 10 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 5713 26 125 24 Telkom SA Ltd 14988 26 16 1 Botswana Telecommunications C 8524 25 1 4 AUCEGYPT Autonomous System 16637 22 10 19 Johnnic e-Ventures 10798 18 1 12 Standard Bank of South Africa 12258 18 3 12 Vodacom Internet Company 12455 17 4 2 Jambonet Autonomous system 8346 15 7 14 SONATEL-AS Autonomous System 15706 15 4 2 Sudatel Internet Exchange Aut 21491 15 1 4 UTL On-line is RF broadband I 21280 14 2 3 Swift Global Kenya Ltd.Is an Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 18566 746 740 Covad Communications 4134 838 675 Data Communications Bureau 4323 795 579 Time Warner Telecom 6197 808 460 BellSouth Network Solutions, 9583 535 431 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 721 723 425 DLA Systems Automation Center 27364 411 392 Armstrong Cable Services 7843 493 389 Adelphia Corp. 5668 403 385 Century Telephone 22773 391 373 Cox Communications, Inc. Atla 22909 394 369 Comcast Cable Corporation 6467 388 357 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 701 1258 353 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 4755 373 320 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 6478 412 319 AT&T Worldnet Services 17676 369 315 XTAGE CORPORATION 1239 935 313 Sprint 9929 345 312 China Netcom Corp. 4355 389 290 EarthLink, Inc. 20115 591 288 Charter Communications List of Unregistered ASNs (Global) ---------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 64512 PRIVATE 24.249.231.0/24 15218 COX Communications 64512 PRIVATE 24.249.232.0/24 15218 COX Communications 64512 PRIVATE 24.249.233.0/24 15218 COX Communications 64512 PRIVATE 24.249.234.0/24 15218 COX Communications 64512 PRIVATE 24.249.235.0/24 15218 COX Communications 65006 PRIVATE 84.18.32.0/19 33831 * 65217 PRIVATE 192.102.236.0/24 217 University of Minnes 1877 UNALLOCATED 192.108.199.0/24 1876 Southern Methodist U 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.64.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.64.0/19 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.65.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.66.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.67.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.68.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.69.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.70.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.71.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.72.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.73.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.74.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.75.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.76.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.77.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.78.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.79.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.80.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.81.0/24 3741 The Internet Solutio 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.82.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.83.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.84.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.85.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.86.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.87.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.88.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.89.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.90.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.91.0/24 3741 The Internet Solutio 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.92.0/24 3741 The Internet Solutio 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.93.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.94.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.95.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.224.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.224.0/20 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.225.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.226.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.227.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.228.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.229.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.230.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.231.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.232.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.233.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.234.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.235.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.236.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.237.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.238.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 22750 UNALLOCATED 196.44.239.0/24 2905 The Internetworking 65000 PRIVATE 217.68.56.0/22 29263 HAAGnet, municipalit 65456 PRIVATE 220.112.14.0/24 17430 Great Wall Broadband Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 132.0.0.0/10 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 137.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 158.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.44.0.0/19 702 UUNET - Commercial IP service 192.70.164.0/24 25689 National Research Council of 192.83.16.0/20 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.32.0/19 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.96.0/22 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.100.0/24 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.84.205.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.119.135.0/24 270 NASA 192.135.50.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 192.136.79.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.169.171.0/24 10704 Laboratorio Nacional de Compu 192.172.0.0/19 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.172.11.0/24 721 DLA Systems Automation Center Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:19 /9:3 /10:6 /11:15 /12:61 /13:137 /14:310 /15:555 /16:8102 /17:2259 /18:3892 /19:9735 /20:10367 /21:7896 /22:10897 /23:12586 /24:81338 /25:235 /26:214 /27:113 /28:53 /29:32 /30:102 /31:0 /32:34 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 18566 731 746 Covad Communications 6197 657 808 BellSouth Network Solutions, 2386 613 847 AT&T Data Communications Serv 7018 567 1417 AT&T WorldNet Services 27364 395 411 Armstrong Cable Services 702 381 629 UUNET - Commercial IP service 1239 375 935 Sprint 9583 372 535 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 4766 367 547 Korea Internet Exchange for " 5668 350 403 Century Telephone 701 346 1258 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 6198 317 433 BellSouth Network Solutions, 20115 301 591 Charter Communications 6467 286 388 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 6517 276 299 Yipes Communications, Inc. 9929 276 345 China Netcom Corp. 13609 266 309 Choice One Communications Inc 21502 266 269 NUMERICABLE is a cabled netwo 4323 252 795 Time Warner Telecom 3320 247 302 Deutsche Telekom AG Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:4 8:8 12:1421 13:1 15:5 16:2 17:3 18:1 20:5 24:744 32:138 33:2 38:80 40:54 44:3 47:2 52:3 55:1 56:3 57:20 60:3 61:574 62:509 63:1842 64:2405 65:2071 66:2468 67:438 68:554 69:735 70:88 80:522 81:552 82:312 83:183 84:40 128:127 129:165 130:86 131:183 132:34 134:188 135:17 136:187 137:54 138:181 139:38 140:184 141:108 142:122 143:69 144:164 145:42 146:291 147:94 148:328 149:111 150:87 151:65 152:164 153:67 154:2 155:128 156:57 157:66 158:142 159:163 160:60 161:73 162:375 163:80 164:214 165:158 166:120 167:222 168:369 169:120 170:283 171:9 192:5579 193:2900 194:2154 195:1489 196:647 198:3670 199:3309 200:3808 201:20 202:4971 203:5759 204:3407 205:2087 206:2294 207:2578 208:2130 209:2972 210:1500 211:638 212:1116 213:1202 214:131 215:30 216:3657 217:1054 218:180 219:102 220:263 221:55 222:43 End of report

1 0

VoIP peering technology review: request for information
by John Todd 15 Oct '04

15 Oct '04

I'd like to review any methods by which operators are currently exchanging e.164 telephony route information between VoIP systems (excluding SS7.) In the last ~1 year, I have not heard of any significant changes in the manner in which routes are exchanged; the typical method still seems to be Excel spreadsheets or CSV files. ENUM seems to be gaining some ground, with providers populating their own root servers, but I haven't heard of or seen a complete specification from anyone - it's been mostly rumor, so detailed implementation examples of ENUM use would be appreciated. Bonus points for telling me how this scales without a single root to bind them. If you are using an automated method to inform your VoIP telephony "peers" of new VoIP-enabled DIDs or (more importantly) routes that you offer, I would like to hear about it, even if it's just a sentence or a link to go find more information. Do you use TRIP? XML exchanges? SQL over TCP? LDAP? I am especially interested in "accessible" methods that don't require significant capital investment in proprietary technology, hardware, or service provider products. Just as important would be the topics of non-disclosure between peering entities and other political issues surrounding exchange of customer (specific) or route (general) data and the threat of unveiling your customer base details to your competitors. That discussion makes me think of the same arguments 10 years ago with BGP... I am often asked to speak and write on the topic of VoIP peering (if there is such a thing) and I am trying to prevent being out-of-date on this quickly changing environment. I am not able to keep up with digging through the marketing foam to find the good information underneath, so I'm probably missing some interesting trends. All answers will be anonymized unless you specifically request the answers to be publicly attributed. Please reply privately; a summary of useful data will be sent back to the list(s). JT

1 0

NANOG 32 PGP key signing announcement
by John Kristoff 15 Oct '04

15 Oct '04

For those that have added your PGP key to the keyring at biglumber, thank you. If you have not yet submitted your key, please do so, and know that you can safely ignore the remainder of this message. At NANOG 32 we will be trying out a new, hopefully greatly improved method for signing keys for those who have submitted their key in advance. It is our hope that this will greatly expedite the signing process in order to minimize time away from any beer BoF. To partake in this new process, you must do the following: 1. Download the early submission NANOG 32 key list from here: <http://aharp.ittns.northwestern.edu/tmp/nanog32-earlykeys> 2. Verify the MD5 and SHA-1 message digest for the above file. Your calculation of those values should be as follows: MD5: b008f14388cb2abbf1c695808a40b1eb SHA-1: 22737af62b1278590074bdabebb0b3d9f57d53b0 3. Bring a hard copy of the key list and your calculated message digest values with you to the keysigning event on Monday night. The file above is a snapshot from the keyring on biglumber at UTC 14:00, Friday, October 15. There were a total of 27 keys on the keyring at that time. After a brief PGP introduction Monday night, I'll read aloud the message digest values for the file in the link above (they should match the values in this message shown above). Each participant in the early key list simply has to confirm or deny that the fingerprint from the file is indeed their's. For those in this group, there is no need to read aloud your entire fingerprint. Of course, you still need to go around and verify identities as we've always done. This is done according to your own policy, but it is recommended that you have at least two trustworthy forms of picture identification (e.g. driver's license and passport). Additionally I will bring the hard copies of the key list, as of 6:00 p.m., local event time, to the keysigning event. This will include all keys, including those submitted after UTC 14:00, Friday, October 15. Signing keys between early and later submission groups will occur in the traditional fashion. If you have any trouble obtaining the key list, verifying the message digest values above or even have general questions about the process feel free to shoot me an email off list. References: NANOG 32 PGP key signing event page <http://www.nanog.org/pgp.html> NANOG 32 keyring <https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?keyring=7840> Efficient Group Key Signing Method <http://sion.quickie.net/keysigning.txt> GnuPG Keysigning Party HOWTO <http://www.cryptnet.net/fdp/crypto/gpg-party.html> John

1 0