- Test - lists.nanog.org

colo price matrix
by Vicky Rode 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Just wondering if anyone has any links and /or price matrix for colos? Any pointers will be appreciated. regards, /vicky -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCwt+ypbZvCIJx1bcRAotTAJ0f17A0qfo+ysueR3GRpB4+yCXmXgCZAczY fRVgNFEOB3oUiP3KBt9p3hk= =AdGf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 2

RE: ATM
by Kuhtz, Christian 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, James Laszko wrote: > > > Most MPLS networks use a combination of point to point, frame and ATM > > facilities as the infrastructure. The phone companies use ATM just > > about everywhere to deliver voice across their networks. I don't see > > ATM/FR equipment being EOL'd anytime in the near future. > > > > really, that is interesting. Thanks. I just snorted my soda. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 163

1 0

RE: ATM
by Kuhtz, Christian 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

EOL? What do you mean EOL? Come Again? What you say? Phone companies EOL stuff? ;-) Just because it's not EOL, doesn't mean you can't do better either. Rather than saying "I want this type of MAC" technology and posting it (as a troll) to a forum concerned primarily with IP operations, one should probably step back and worry about what you're trying to accomplish. Mentioning ATM (and saying you want it for IP QoS) on NANOG is in my book much like screaming "Fire!" or "Free beer!" in a crowded place. ;) Ah, nice to see how the NANOG Chain(TM) can still be yanked quite easily. ;).. Define the problem you're trying to solve. Assess the tool chest. Implement. Observe. Rinse. Repeat. Best regards, Christian > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of > James Laszko > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 1:34 PM > To: Christopher L. Morrow; Jason Frisvold > Cc: Petri Helenius; Philip Lavine; nanog > Subject: RE: ATM > > > Most MPLS networks use a combination of point to point, frame and ATM > facilities as the infrastructure. The phone companies use ATM just > about everywhere to deliver voice across their networks. I don't see > ATM/FR equipment being EOL'd anytime in the near future. > > > > James Laszko > Pipeline Communications, Inc. > james(a)pcipros.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of > Christopher L. Morrow > Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:25 AM > To: Jason Frisvold > Cc: Petri Helenius; Philip Lavine; nanog > Subject: Re: ATM > > > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Jason Frisvold wrote: > > > > > On 6/29/05, Petri Helenius <pete(a)he.iki.fi> wrote: > > > Maybe the small fact that ATM is fading away and building new > networks > > > with technology going away is going to explode your operational cost > in > > > a few years time. Business grade IP networks will provide you with > equal > > > if not better performance than a "dedicated" ATM WAN. > > > > And being replaced with .... ? GigE? DPT/RPR? MPLS? > > > > ATM is a great technology... Unfortunately, I don't think it was ever > > fully utilized.. From what I understand, MPLS takes some of the good > > bits and combines it with traditional routing.. But I don't see a lot > > of MPLS implementations either... > > look to the private networks luke... Seriously, many large private > ATM/Frame networks are transitioning to MPLS networks because the ATM or > Frame gear is/was/will-be-shortly EOL/EOS from the vendors. The costs to > run these networks don't jibe well with the alternatives. > > Now, start the discussion on: "private network" and "mpls vpn" and > "oops, > hey, that runs over the same routers as that bad-old Internet thing with > the haxors and such!" > > :) ***** "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers." 118

1 0

RE: ATM
by Richmond, Jeff (ELI) 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

Well, also keep in mind that pure ATM/FR is becoming more and more of an edge service, where it is actually transported as MPLS in the core. Thus, an MPLS VPN does make more sense in some cases (why would I want to take a beating on cell tax if I don't have to?) -Jeff -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Jason Frisvold Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:19 AM To: Petri Helenius Cc: Philip Lavine; nanog Subject: Re: ATM On 6/29/05, Petri Helenius <pete(a)he.iki.fi> wrote: > Maybe the small fact that ATM is fading away and building new networks > with technology going away is going to explode your operational cost in > a few years time. Business grade IP networks will provide you with equal > if not better performance than a "dedicated" ATM WAN. And being replaced with .... ? GigE? DPT/RPR? MPLS? ATM is a great technology... Unfortunately, I don't think it was ever fully utilized.. From what I understand, MPLS takes some of the good bits and combines it with traditional routing.. But I don't see a lot of MPLS implementations either... > Pete -- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold XenoPhage0(a)gmail.com

1 0

FCC to probe DSL regulations
by Fergie (Paul Ferguson) 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

Via Red Herring: "Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the cable operators right to bar competitors from their lines, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission is taking up the obvious question of whether the same rules should apply to telephone companies that sell DSL service." http://www.redherring.com/article.aspx?a=12580 - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

3 2

VoIP-in-a-can: Sysco IP Phone Model TC-04 by BubbaTel
by Fergie (Paul Ferguson) 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

Sorry. Couldn't resist a little humor. :-) http://www.boingboing.net/2005/06/28/voipinacan_sysco_ip_.html - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

2 1

Cisco Security Advisory: RADIUS Authentication Bypass
by Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Cisco Security Advisory: RADIUS Authentication Bypass Revision 1.0 For Public Release 2005 June 29 1600 UTC - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contents Summary Affected Products Details Impact Software Versions and Fixes Obtaining Fixed Software Workarounds Exploitation and Public Announcements Status of This Notice: FINAL Distribution Revision History Cisco Security Procedures - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary ======= Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) authentication on a device that is running certain versions of Cisco Internetworking Operating System (IOS) and configured with a fallback method to none can be bypassed. Systems that are configured for other authentication methods or that are not configured with a fallback method to none are not affected. Only the systems that are running certain versions of Cisco IOS are affected. Not all configurations using RADIUS and none are vulnerable to this issue. Some configurations using RADIUS, none and an additional method are not affected. Cisco has made free software available to address this vulnerability. There are workarounds available to mitigate the effects of the vulnerability. The vulnerabilities are documented as the following Cisco Bug IDs: * CSCee45312 -- Radius authentication bypass when configured with a none fallback method This advisory will be posted at http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050629-aaa.shtml. Affected Products ================= Vulnerable Products Systems that are running the following release trains of Cisco IOS are affected if configured with RADIUS authentication and a none fallback method. * 12.2T based trains * 12.3 based trains * 12.3T based trains * 12.4 based trains A system configured for RADIUS authentication and none fallback method will have a command line in show running-configuration output which is similar to the following . aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius none (This is an affected configuration) aaa authentication ppp xxxxxx group radius none (This is an affected configuration) A system that is configured for RADIUS authentication with local and none fallback methods is also affected. An example to this configuration may look like similar to the following. aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius local none (This is an affected configuration) aaa authentication ppp xxxxxx group radius local none (This is an affected configuration) A system is only vulnerable if none method is used as a fallback to RADIUS without any other method in between, or if only local method is used in between. Systems that are configured for RADIUS authentication with a fallback method other than local prior to none method are not affected. Refer to the Details section for more information about affected and unaffected configurations. Products Confirmed Not Vulnerable * Products that are not running Cisco IOS are not affected. * Products running Cisco IOS versions 12.1 and earlier (including 12.0S) and 12.2 mainline are not affected. * Products that are running Cisco IOS are not affected unless they are configured for RADIUS authentication with a fallback method to none. No other Cisco products are currently known to be affected by this vulnerability. Details ======= Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) network security services provide the primary framework through which access control is set up on a device. AAA authentication services are used to control access to different services on a system. Multiple AAA authentication services can be configured on a system to fall back to a backup authentication method in case the primary authentication method is unavailable. AAA authentication can be used for different purposes (controlling access to the routers, authenticating remote subscribers etc.). Refer to the following URL for more information on AAA: http://www.cisco.com/ univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fsecur_c/fsaaa/index.htm Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) is defined in RFC2865 and describes a protocol for carrying authentication, authorization, and configuration information. There is a vulnerability in AAA RADIUS authentication if none is used as a fallback method. Sending a sufficiently long username will bypass the RADIUS authentication and succeed. Following algorithm can be used to determine whether a configuration is vulnerable: 1. Are you using an affected version of IOS? No: You are not vulnerable. Yes: Go to step 2. 2. Is AAA RADIUS Authentication used? No: You are not vulnerable. Yes: Go to step 3. 3. Is none used as an alternative to RADIUS? No: You are not vulnerable. Yes: Go to step 4. 4. Is there any other method between RADIUS and none? No: You are vulnerable. Yes: Go to step 5. 5. Is the other authentication method local? No: You are not vulnerable. Yes: Go to step 4. Based on the algorithm above sample affected and unaffected configurations are given below. aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius none (This is an affected configuration) aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius local none (This is an affected configuration) aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius group tacacs+ none (This is an unaffected configuration) aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius enable none (This is an unaffected configuration) aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius line none (This is an unaffected configuration) aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius local line none (This is an unaffected configuration) Removing the none fallback method or putting at least one additional method other than local between RADIUS and none will mitigate this vulnerability. Impact ====== Successful exploitation of the vulnerability may result in bypassing the RADIUS authentication. Software Versions and Fixes =========================== When considering software upgrades, please also consult http://www.cisco.com/en /US/products/products_security_advisories_listing.html and any subsequent advisories to determine exposure and a complete upgrade solution. In all cases, customers should exercise caution to be certain the devices to be upgraded contain sufficient memory and that current hardware and software configurations will continue to be supported properly by the new release. If the information is not clear, contact the Cisco Technical Assistance Center ("TAC") for assistance. Each row of the Cisco IOS software table (below) describes a release train and the platforms or products for which it is intended. If a given release train is vulnerable, then the earliest possible releases that contain the fix (the "First Fixed Release") and the anticipated date of availability for each are listed in the "Rebuild" and "Maintenance" columns. A device running a release in the given train that is earlier than the release in a specific column (less than the First Fixed Release) is known to be vulnerable. The release should be upgraded at least to the indicated release or a later version (greater than or equal to the First Fixed Release label). For further information on the terms "Rebuild" and "Maintenance, " please consult the following URL: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/620/1.html +---------------------------------------------+ | Major | Availability of Repaired | | Release | Releases | |-------------+-------------------------------| | Affected | | | | 12.2-Based | Rebuild | Maintenance | | Release | | | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2B | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2BC | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (13)BC, available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2BW | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2BX | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (7)XI6, available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2BY | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2BZ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (7)XI6, available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2CX | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (13)BC, available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2CY | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (13)BC, available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2CZ | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2EW | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.2 | | | (25)EWA2, available 7-July-05 | |-------------+-------------------------------| | | 12.2(25)EWA2, | | | 12.2EWA | available | | | | 7-July-05 | | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.2EY | 12.2(25)EY2 | | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2EZ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.2 | | | (25)SEC, available 21-July-05 | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2JA | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (7)JA, available on 08-Aug-05 | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2JK | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2MB | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.2SW | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2MC | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2MX | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | | 12.2(25)SEB2 | | | |---------------+---------------| | 12.2SE | | 12.2(25)SEC, | | | | available | | | | 21-July-05 | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.2SXD | 12.2(18)SXD5 | | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | | 12.2(18)SXE2, | | | 12.2SXE | available | | | | 18-July-05 | | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2T | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XB | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XC | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XD | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XE | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XF | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (13)BC, available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XG | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XH | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XI | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XJ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XK | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XL | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XM | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XQ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XT | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2XW | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YA | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YB | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YC | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YD | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YF | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YG | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YH | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YJ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YL | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YM | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YN | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YP | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YQ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YR | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YT | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YU | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YV | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YW | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2YY | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZB | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZC | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZD | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZE | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZF | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZG | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZH | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZJ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZL | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZN | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZO | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (10) or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.2ZP | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | Affected | | | | 12.3-Based | Rebuild | Maintenance | | Release | | | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3 | | 12.3(10) | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3B | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3BC | | 12.3(13)BC, | | | | available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3BW | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3JA | 12.3(7)JA, available on | | | 08-Aug-05 | |-------------+-------------------------------| | | 12.3(7)T11, | | | 12.3T | available TBD | 12.3(11) | | |---------------| | | | 12.3(8)T4 | | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XA | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XB | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XC | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XD | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XE | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XF | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XG | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XH | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XI | 12.3(7)XI6, available TBD | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XJ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XK | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (14)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XL | | 12.3(11)XL | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XM | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (14)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XN | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (14)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XQ | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (14)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XR | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XS | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (14)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XT | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XU | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XW | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (11)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XX | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (14)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3XY | 12.3(8)XY5 | | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3YA | Vulnerable; migrate to 12.3 | | | (14)T or later | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3YB | Vulnerable; contact TAC | |-------------+-------------------------------| | 12.3YD | | 12.3(8)YD | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YF | | 12.3(11)YF | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YG | | 12.3(8)YG | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YH | | 12.3(8)YH | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YI | | 12.3(8)YI | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YJ | | 12.3(11)YJ | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YK | | 12.3(11)YK | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YL | | 12.3(11)YL | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YN | | 12.3(11)YN | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YR | | 12.3(11)YR | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YS | | 12.3(11)YS | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.3YQ | | 12.3(14)YQ | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | Affected | | | | 12.4-Based | Rebuild | Maintenance | | Release | | | |-------------+---------------+---------------| | 12.4 | | 12.4(1) | +---------------------------------------------+ Obtaining Fixed Software ======================== Customers with Service Contracts Customers with contracts should obtain upgraded software through their regular update channels. For most customers, this means that upgrades should be obtained through the Software Center on Cisco's worldwide website at http:// www.cisco.com. Customers using Third-party Support Organizations Customers whose Cisco products are provided or maintained through prior or existing agreement with third-party support organizations such as Cisco Partners, authorized resellers, or service providers should contact that support organization for assistance with the upgrade, which should be free of charge. Customers without Service Contracts Customers who purchase direct from Cisco but who do not hold a Cisco service contract and customers who purchase through third-party vendors but are unsuccessful at obtaining fixed software through their point of sale should get their upgrades by contacting the Cisco Technical Assistance Center (TAC). TAC contacts are as follows. * +1 800 553 2447 (toll free from within North America) * +1 408 526 7209 (toll call from anywhere in the world) * e-mail: tac(a)cisco.com Please have your product serial number available and give the URL of this notice as evidence of your entitlement to a free upgrade. Free upgrades for non-contract customers must be requested through the TAC. Please do not contact either "psirt(a)cisco.com" or "security-alert(a)cisco.com" for software upgrades. Customers may only install and expect support for the feature sets they have purchased. By installing, downloading, accessing or otherwise using such software upgrades, customers agree to be bound by the terms of Cisco's software license terms found at http://www.cisco.com/public/sw-license-agreement.html, or as otherwise set forth at Cisco.com Downloads at http://www.cisco.com/public /sw-center/sw-usingswc.shtml. Workarounds =========== The effectiveness of any workaround is dependent on specific customer situations such as product mix, network topology, traffic behavior, and organizational mission. Due to the variety of affected products and releases, customers should consult with their service provider or support organization to ensure any applied workaround is the most appropriate for use in the intended network before it is deployed. * Removing none as a fallback to RADIUS or putting an additional method other than local between RADIUS and none will mitigate this vulnerability. For example, an affected system which has a configuration similar to the following aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius none can be changed to one of the followingaaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius enable aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius enable none aaa authentication login xxxxxx group radius line none as a workaround. warning Warning: Removing none as a fallback method may create problems if the RADIUS server becomes unavailable. With a none fallback in place, all authentication requests will succeed when the RADIUS server is unavailable. Removing none fallback method or replacing it with enable or another mechanism may result in authentication failure if RADIUS server becomes unavailable. Exploitation and Public Announcements ===================================== The Cisco PSIRT is not aware of any public announcements or malicious use of the vulnerability described in this advisory. Status of This Notice: FINAL ============================ THIS ADVISORY IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND DOES NOT IMPLY ANY KIND OF GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY, INCLUDING THE WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY. YOUR USE OF THE INFORMATION ON THE ADVISORY OR MATERIALS LINKED FROM THE ADVISORY IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. CISCO RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CHANGE OR UPDATE THIS NOTICE AT ANY TIME. A stand-alone copy or paraphrase of the text of this security advisory that omits the distribution URL in the following section is an uncontrolled copy, and may lack important information or contain factual errors. Distribution ============ This advisory will be posted on Cisco's worldwide website at http:// www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20050629-aaa.shtml. In addition to worldwide web posting, a text version of this notice is clear-signed with the Cisco PSIRT PGP key and is posted to the following e-mail and Usenet news recipients. * cust-security-announce(a)cisco.com * first-teams(a)first.org (includes CERT/CC) * bugtraq(a)securityfocus.com * vulnwatch(a)vulnwatch.org * cisco(a)spot.colorado.edu * cisco-nsp(a)puck.nether.net * full-disclosure(a)lists.grok.org.uk * comp.dcom.sys.cisco(a)newsgate.cisco.com Future updates of this advisory, if any, will be placed on Cisco's worldwide website, but may or may not be actively announced on mailing lists or newsgroups. Users concerned about this problem are encouraged to check the above URL for any updates. Revision History ================ +---------------------------------------------+ | Revision | 2005-Jun-29 | Initial public | | 1.0 | | release. | +---------------------------------------------+ Cisco Security Procedures ========================= Complete information on reporting security vulnerabilities in Cisco products, obtaining assistance with security incidents, and registering to receive security information from Cisco, is available on Cisco's worldwide website at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_vulnerability_policy.… . This includes instructions for press inquiries regarding Cisco security notices. All Cisco security advisories are available at http://www.cisco.com/go /psirt. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCwrQMezGozzK2tZARApZJAJ9vZkjT06wwLCjC0D7Dh6ZEzMV2TQCgu4XJ fd2kYuwjFT0EW1Q8fxc93ug= =fKLn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

DHCP and aliases
by Eric Frazier 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

Hi, I am hoping this is an ok question for this list. I believe it is. I have just never thought about doing something like this before and it is likely totally child's play to many of you guys. :) I am using a FreeBSD 4.11 IPFW firewall on a ADSL connection. I want to be able to take advantage of "Static NAT" So as I understand it I need this firewall machine to have another external IP that I can use to hard tie in with a local machine. But can I do this without setting up another nic? So is it possible to use DHCP to get an IP alias? In the case of our DSL provider I am guessing it would not be possible because of just having one MAC address. But I know just enough about networking to get by, so I could be totaly wrong about that. Is there a better way to allow this internal machine to have its own IP but still be firewalled? But then if I am doing this, am I really firewalling anything anyway if all of the ports are redirected to the internal machine anyway? More specifics on what I am talking about is on http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html under the the heading "25.8.5 Address Redirection" Thanks, Eric Lead Programmer D.M. Contact Management 250.383.8267 ext 229

3 2

sprintsvc.com mailops contact please?
by Suresh Ramasubramanian 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

As the subject says. Please email me offlist regards -srs -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists(a)gmail.com)

1 0

Brand X decision could mean widespread VoIP blocking
by Fergie (Paul Ferguson) 29 Jun '05

29 Jun '05

Jeff Pulver makes a good point in a Forbes article when he says "I believe it's a matter of when, not if" providers start blocking VoIP traffic from competitors across their own infrastructure, especially on the heels of the Brand X SCOTUS ruling. "If I'm a service provider offering my own voice over broadband offering, and I've got the ability to block my competition, why not?" http://www.forbes.com/technology/2005/06/28/voip-cable-blocked-cx_de_0628vo… - ferg -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(a)netzero.net or fergdawg(a)sbcglobal.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

6 5