- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: [NANOG-Admins] Options et. al. on admins@ list
by Martin Hannigan 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

They're not points, Alex. They should be agenda items. On Nov 14, 2007 7:13 PM, Alex Pilosov <alex(a)pilosoft.com> wrote: > Thanks Marty, I'll bring both points up. > > -alex > > On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > Folks: > > > > We should be able to see subscribers to admins so that we know who is > > on the list. Can we get a current listing so that we can see who is > > receiving our mail? > > > > We should also use Merit's conference bridge if it's toll-free. We pay > > for this stuff through our fees so we should not be tied to a members > > service since it could be disrupted if that person does not attend or > > is no longer on the MLC. > > > > Also, proposals > > > > Meeting Etiquette: > > > > Roberts Rules of Order > > Quorum: 51% or more, depending upon membership make up. > > Required to hold official Meeting: majority of voting members (4 as of current) > > > > > > > > 1. Adding people to admins(a)nanog.org > > > > When an individual is being proposed to be added to the MLC mailing > > list, the proppsal will be discussed on admins(a)nanog.org. In the event > > of any objection, the issue will be discussed and voted on at the next > > MLC call. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Admins mailing list > > Admins(a)nanog.org > > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/admins > > > >

1 1

Re: FCC rules for backup power
by Jerry Dixon 14 Nov '07

14 Nov '07

Jared> and all this time I thought you just wanted to attend those meetings to see all of our bright faces and partake of the chocolate chip cookies :) In all seriousness, it is very good to get involved in these meetings and stay on top of what is going on. Plus it helps the gubment types out on what is reality or what is doable versus going off on a wild tangent. Especially with recovery, understanding what the real vulnerabilities or exposures are, and of course planning response activities. I can't thank many of you enough that have taken an active role in helping USG out over the last few years and also the insights that you've shared with many of us that have worked these issues in the past. So with that said, get involved and let your opinions be known. Also you have a great opportunity coming up with new elections about to take place to help shape or influence the way ahead but you've got to get involved. Another good link on current documents on national level response and preparedness can be found here: http://www.dhs.gov/xprepresp/publications/ Also recommend setting up the usual google alerts on some keywords like: "cyber and homeland" "communications and homeland" Lastly there is a great effort underway led by a bi-partisan Congressional Commission. See http://www.csis.org/tech/cyber/ Congressman & Chairman Langevin & Ranking Member McCaul are two good people to send letters to or communicate with related to many of these issues if you have concerns. There office is real responsive to Cyber & Communication issues. They're the ones that setup the Congressional Cyber Commission. http://homeland.house.gov/about/subcommittees.asp?subcommittee=12 -Jerry -----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 04:44 PM To: 'Mike Lyon' Cc: 'Wayne E. Bouchard', 'Sean Donelan', nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: FCC rules for backup power On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:15:53PM -0800, Mike Lyon wrote: > What? The gov't putting their nose in where it shouldn't be? NEVER! I must say, if you're a provider with US presence and you're not paying attention to the FCC, DHS (NCS, NCSD) and possibly that thing called NSTAC you may wake up one day and be amazed what is going on. Take an example - Unregulated chemical industry becomes regulated under DHS. (One of the 17 sectors that the govvies track). There's stuff to track that doesn't involve having a full time employee to associate with it, but some allocation of time is valuable. If you don't, who knows, you may have Senator Stevens setting policy that is relevant to you. http://hsgac.senate.gov/ http://homeland.house.gov/ There's all sorts of interesting stuff in this space to track. What if your network traffic doubled tomorrow due to a pandemic outbreak and everyone starts telecommuting? http://www.dhs.gov/xprevprot/programs/editorial_0760.shtm Perhaps it's wrong, or maybe they're right? I think continuing to watch the activities in this space are going to be critical to our evolution as providers of these ip packets. - Jared ps. other stuff of interest: www.it-scc.org (free) www.pcis.org (us, ca) -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared(a)puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.

1 0

cpu needed to NAT 45mbs
by Carl Karsten 13 Nov '07

13 Nov '07

I do the networking in my house, and hang out with guys that do networking in small offices that have a few T1s. Now I am talking to people about a DS3 connection for 500 laptops*, and I am bing told "a p4 linux box with 2 nics doing NAT will not be able to handle the load." I am not really qualified to say one way or the other. I bet someone here is. * for wifi, going to be using this system: http://wavonline.com/vendorpages/extricom.htm March 13-17 (testing a week or 2 before) for PyCon in Chicago. If anyone wants to see it in action, etc. drop me a line. Carl K

17 23

Comcast SMTP problems
by up＠3.am 13 Nov '07

13 Nov '07

This is probably just regional, but here in SE PA, I've had a few customers who send their outgoing mail through smtp.comcast.net getting "internal queueing error". Anybody find what it is or was and when/if it was fixed? TIA, James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up(a)3.am http://3.am =========================================================================

1 0

RE: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs]
by Tom Grenier 13 Nov '07

13 Nov '07

Aruba has some pretty large implementations under their belt including Microsoft Corp. Check them out. Tom -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Niels Bakker Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 12:35 PM To: nanog(a)merit.edu Subject: Re: large-scale wireless [was: cpu needed to NAT 45mbs] * frnkblk(a)iname.com (Frank Bulk) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 14:24 CET]: >If you're going with Extricom you don't need to worry about channel >planning beyond adding more "channel blankets". I understand Foundry's wireless products do the same thing. Seems to work ok but have not heard about larger test cases than a hundred or so clients. * carl(a)personnelware.com (Carl Karsten) [Tue 13 Nov 2007, 05:56 CET]: >On Wifi for 1000: [..] In the context of that, you may wish to peruse the proceedings of the last few CCC Congresses in Berlin, which had pretty much working wireless - even with thousands of attendees: http://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/Fahrplan/attachments/1347-Camp07-NetworkR eview.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2006/Fahrplan/attachments/1247-23c3-noc-re view-corrected.pdf http://events.ccc.de/congress/2005/fahrplan/attachments/652-slides_netwo rk_review.pdf (They're still looking for a sponsor of wireless equipment for this year's edition, by the way) Regards, -- Niels. -- "The Mac doesn't have a one-button mouse, it has a five-button mouse, with four of the buttons on the keyboard." -- Peter da Silva <peter(a)taronga.com>

1 0

Re: General question on rfc1918
by Paul Ferguson 13 Nov '07

13 Nov '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Joe Greco <jgreco(a)ns.sol.net> wrote: >[pick-a-random-BCP38-snipe ...] > >It's a feature: You can tell which of your providers does BCP38 this way. > Don't get me started... ;-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHOd4Bq1pz9mNUZTMRAnp1AKC/TauxcxjtxjMozpnfGplnMNlSkwCguJF9 MeNbuE1zBjMCBsOtR7me4sU= =AGZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

1 0

Re: General question on rfc1918
by Robert Bonomi 13 Nov '07

13 Nov '07

> From owner-nanog(a)merit.edu Tue Nov 13 09:12:04 2007 > Cc: "nanog(a)merit.edu" <nanog(a)merit.edu> > From: Joe Abley <jabley(a)ca.afilias.info> > To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver(a)thenap.com> > Subject: Re: General question on rfc1918 > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:10:26 -0500 > > > > On 13-Nov-2007, at 10:08, Drew Weaver wrote: > > > Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is > > found to be on topic. > > > > Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from > > transit carriers? > > You should not send packets with RFC1918 source or destination > addresses to the Internet. Everybody should follow this advice. If > everybody did follow that advice, you wouldn't see the packets you are > seeing. Really? What do you do if a 'network internal' device -- a legitimate use of RFC1918 addresses -- discovers 'host/network unreachable' for an external-origin packet transitinng that device? <evil grin> Your comment _is_ "generally correct", but there are some significant 'corner cases' that do complicate life. Packets that could conceivably generate a reply/response and have an RFC 1918 address (source -or- dest) should be ingress *and* egress filtered -- unless there is specific agreement with the adjacent network with regard to coordinated use of specific portions of that space. Packets which are strictly error/status reporting -- e.g. IMP 'unreachable', 'ttl exceeded', 'redirect', etc. -- should *NOT* be filtered at network boundaries _solely_ because of an RFC1918 source address.

3 2

Cable capacity Japan - US
by James Spenceley 12 Nov '07

12 Nov '07

G'day, Is there anyone on the list buying capacity from on PC1 (Japan - US) ? If so could you contact me off list. Thanks, -- James

1 0

Returned mail: 21 Delivery failures on Fri, 09 Nov 2007
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 10 Nov '07

10 Nov '07

On this date, there were delivery failures where the associated deliver status notification messages were suppressed. --- The following addresses had suppressed delivery status notifications --- nanog(a)trapdoor.merit.edu ----- Transcript of session is unavailable ----- No information is available on specific messages.

1 0

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Analysis Role Account 09 Nov '07

09 Nov '07

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 10 Nov, 2007 Report Website: http://thyme.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 237341 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 122449 Deaggregation factor: 1.94 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 115597 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 26637 Prefixes per ASN: 8.91 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 23181 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 11299 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3456 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 82 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 3.6 Max AS path length visible: 28 Max AS path prepend of ASN (35389) 25 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 13 Unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 7 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 8 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 12 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1789588096 Equivalent to 106 /8s, 170 /16s and 242 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 48.3 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 61.8 Percentage of available address space allocated: 78.2 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 110282 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 55382 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 21135 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 2.62 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 52274 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 23121 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3082 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 16.96 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 808 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 473 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.7 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 323915200 Equivalent to 19 /8s, 78 /16s and 141 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 74.1 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911 APNIC Address Blocks 58/7, 60/7, 114/7, 116/6, 120/6, 124/7, 126/8 202/7, 210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8 ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 111414 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 63761 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 1.75 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 82332 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 32690 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 11930 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 6.90 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 4591 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1118 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.4 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 14 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 352392704 Equivalent to 21 /8s, 1 /16s and 22 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 77.8 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/5, 72/6, 76/8, 96/6, 199/8, 204/6, 208/7 and 216/8 RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 49571 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 31892 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 1.55 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 46437 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 30624 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 10456 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 4.44 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 5544 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1646 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.0 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 28 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 335900672 Equivalent to 20 /8s, 5 /16s and 112 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 77.0 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 77/8, 78/7, 80/4, 193/8, 194/7, 212/7 and 217/8 LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 17770 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 4565 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 3.89 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 15670 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 8680 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 871 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 17.99 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 284 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 149 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.0 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 19 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 45985792 Equivalent to 2 /8s, 189 /16s and 176 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 45.7 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, plus ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 186/7, 189/8, 190/8, 200/7 AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 3182 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 1080 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 2.95 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 2375 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 1398 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 215 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 11.05 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 72 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 39 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 3.7 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 14 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 7636224 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 116 /16s and 133 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 22.8 AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 196/8 APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4755 1482 383 70 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 9583 1101 81 419 Sify Limited 4134 1100 11563 301 CHINANET-BACKBONE 9498 1046 549 64 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 17488 879 57 70 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 4766 815 5474 328 Korea Telecom (KIX) 23577 776 34 681 Korea Telecom (ATM-MPLS) 7545 721 159 123 TPG Internet Pty Ltd 18101 608 119 52 Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet 1221 543 1951 423 Telstra Pty Ltd 9829 530 1312 9 BSNL National Internet Backbo 4812 524 866 77 China Telecom (Shanghai) 4668 521 68 10 LG-EDS Systems Inc. 17676 504 10919 64 Softbank BB Corp. 4808 499 797 121 CNCGROUP IP network: China169 4802 481 130 141 Wantree Development 9443 440 121 70 Primus Telecommunications 7474 383 202 269 SingTel Optus Pty Ltd 17974 383 146 14 PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA 4837 356 5050 168 chinanet IDC center beijing n ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 7018 1498 6146 1005 AT&T WorldNet Services 4323 1362 1014 358 Time Warner Telecom 2386 1259 630 769 AT&T Data Communications Serv 11492 1164 120 48 Cable One 6478 1121 329 184 AT&T Worldnet Services 18566 1030 288 9 Covad Communications 6197 1029 718 508 BellSouth Network Solutions, 174 981 6882 846 Cogent Communications 7011 981 290 564 Citizens Utilities 701 902 6569 706 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 20115 851 773 461 Charter Communications 3356 827 10887 411 Level 3 Communications, LLC 22773 806 2133 54 Cox Communications, Inc. 19262 802 2893 184 Verizon Global Networks 1239 801 2713 557 Sprint 209 729 3784 573 Qwest 5668 664 176 17 CenturyTel Internet Holdings, 15270 598 161 41 PaeTec.net -a division of Pae 3561 592 2324 374 Savvis 6517 585 163 33 Yipes Communications, Inc. RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 702 470 1917 383 UUNET - Commercial IP service 9116 335 168 28 Goldenlines main autonomous s 3301 316 1441 293 TeliaNet Sweden 3320 316 6035 262 Deutsche Telekom AG 8551 311 298 41 Bezeq International 6746 276 130 254 Dynamic Network Technologies, 8708 274 421 245 Romania Data Systems S.A. 8866 271 62 25 Bulgarian Telecommunication C 680 268 2045 254 DFN-IP service G-WiN 3215 263 2503 98 France Telecom Transpac 8220 255 444 237 COLT Telecommunications 8452 249 188 7 TEDATA 3352 235 1932 41 Ibernet, Internet Access Netw 3269 229 2967 71 TELECOM ITALIA 9121 212 1442 25 TTnet Autonomous System 3300 198 171 93 AUCS Communications Services 12479 195 578 6 Uni2 Autonomous System 1257 194 1195 177 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network 3292 193 1380 177 TDC Tele Danmark 3246 185 256 175 Song Networks LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 8151 1162 2419 216 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 11830 539 299 9 Instituto Costarricense de El 16814 427 27 10 NSS, S.A. 14522 381 33 8 SatNet S.A. 11172 376 114 60 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 7303 373 180 56 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 6471 353 77 37 ENTEL CHILE S.A. 22047 317 246 13 VTR PUNTO NET S.A. 10481 301 120 10 Prima S.A. 14117 285 19 15 Telefonica del Sur S.A. 10620 253 70 44 TVCABLE BOGOTA 6147 242 182 20 Telefonica Del Peru 11556 236 128 4 Cable-Wireless Panama 23216 218 17 46 RAMtelecom Telecomunicaciones 6503 216 187 85 AVANTEL, S.A. 28573 214 314 27 NET Servicos de Comunicao S.A 7738 206 538 24 Telecomunicacoes da Bahia S.A 20299 187 33 30 NEWCOM AMERICAS 21826 186 33 47 INTERCABLE 19169 182 12 19 Telconet AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 24863 380 60 40 LINKdotNET AS number 3741 281 869 226 The Internet Solution 20858 195 34 3 EgyNet 6713 143 135 11 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 2018 140 299 115 Tertiary Education Network 5536 124 8 10 Internet Egypt Network 33776 100 6 3 Starcomms Nigeria Limited 24835 88 48 6 RAYA Telecom - Egypt 15475 81 84 4 Nile Online 2905 75 174 72 The Internetworking Company o 23889 75 24 15 MAURITIUS TELECOM 33783 68 8 14 EEPAD TISP TELECOM & INTERNET 20484 63 5 5 Yalla Online Autonomous Syste 16637 62 21 29 Johnnic e-Ventures 15706 57 12 4 Sudatel Internet Exchange Aut 29571 56 11 7 Ci Telecom Autonomous system 33774 47 32 27 AS Number for Telecom Algeria 5713 45 294 35 Telkom SA Ltd 12455 36 6 3 Jambonet Autonomous system 8524 32 2 10 AUCEGYPT Autonomous System Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 4755 1482 1412 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 11492 1164 1116 Cable One 18566 1030 1021 Covad Communications 4323 1362 1004 Time Warner Telecom 9498 1046 982 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 8151 1162 946 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 6478 1121 937 AT&T Worldnet Services 17488 879 809 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 4134 1100 799 CHINANET-BACKBONE 22773 806 752 Cox Communications, Inc. 9583 1101 682 Sify Limited 5668 664 647 CenturyTel Internet Holdings, 19262 802 618 Verizon Global Networks 7545 721 598 TPG Internet Pty Ltd 15270 598 557 PaeTec.net -a division of Pae 18101 608 556 Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet 6517 585 552 Yipes Communications, Inc. 11830 539 530 Instituto Costarricense de El 19916 569 522 OLM LLC 6197 1029 521 BellSouth Network Solutions, List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 64999 PRIVATE 78.24.120.0/23 3257 Tiscali Intl Network 64999 PRIVATE 78.24.122.0/23 3257 Tiscali Intl Network 64999 PRIVATE 78.24.124.0/24 3257 Tiscali Intl Network 64999 PRIVATE 78.24.125.0/24 3257 Tiscali Intl Network 64999 PRIVATE 78.24.126.0/24 3257 Tiscali Intl Network 64999 PRIVATE 78.24.127.0/24 3257 Tiscali Intl Network 65068 PRIVATE 79.171.184.0/21 43895 * 64718 PRIVATE 81.200.197.0/24 25325 AS of Deutsche Bahn 64718 PRIVATE 81.200.198.0/23 25325 AS of Deutsche Bahn 64719 PRIVATE 81.200.204.0/24 25325 AS of Deutsche Bahn 65300 PRIVATE 216.243.221.0/24 11320 Internet Express, In 65300 PRIVATE 216.243.222.0/24 11320 Internet Express, In 65300 PRIVATE 216.243.223.0/24 11320 Internet Express, In Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 132.0.0.0/10 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 137.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 158.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 172.14.254.0/24 20312 CNTI-REACCIUN "Centro Naciona 172.15.254.0/24 20312 CNTI-REACCIUN "Centro Naciona 172.33.1.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 192.0.10.0/24 9498 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 192.44.0.0/24 5501 Fraunhofer Gesellschaft 192.44.0.0/19 702 UUNET - Commercial IP service 192.70.164.0/24 25689 National Research Council of 192.153.136.0/21 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.172.0.0/19 721 DLA Systems Automation Center Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:18 /9:9 /10:16 /11:39 /12:136 /13:270 /14:483 /15:948 /16:9704 /17:4190 /18:6746 /19:14663 /20:16756 /21:15647 /22:19842 /23:20840 /24:124539 /25:807 /26:1018 /27:543 /28:114 /29:5 /30:0 /31:0 /32:8 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 11492 1155 1164 Cable One 6478 1120 1121 AT&T Worldnet Services 18566 1012 1030 Covad Communications 2386 950 1259 AT&T Data Communications Serv 9583 946 1101 Sify Limited 7011 868 981 Citizens Utilities 4755 850 1482 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 7018 826 1498 AT&T WorldNet Services 6197 773 1029 BellSouth Network Solutions, 23577 767 776 Korea Telecom (ATM-MPLS) 9498 730 1046 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 17488 694 879 Hathway IP Over Cable Interne 4766 606 815 Korea Telecom (KIX) 4323 575 1362 Time Warner Telecom 19916 564 569 OLM LLC 15270 560 598 PaeTec.net -a division of Pae 6517 541 585 Yipes Communications, Inc. 5668 522 664 CenturyTel Internet Holdings, 4668 511 521 LG-EDS Systems Inc. 18101 509 608 Reliance Infocom Ltd Internet Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:9 8:89 12:1826 15:19 16:3 17:6 18:13 20:35 24:993 25:1 32:57 33:3 38:360 40:64 41:396 44:2 47:8 52:3 55:3 56:3 57:21 58:480 59:414 60:384 61:987 62:940 63:1981 64:3304 65:2375 66:3569 67:906 68:677 69:2012 70:466 71:106 72:1434 73:7 74:750 75:263 76:151 77:416 78:271 79:11 80:873 81:787 82:535 83:350 84:617 85:827 86:356 87:590 88:281 89:1019 90:38 91:729 92:5 96:2 97:6 98:9 116:428 117:224 118:43 121:337 122:643 123:208 124:700 125:1041 128:309 129:194 130:141 131:369 132:57 133:9 134:193 135:34 136:192 137:82 138:152 139:76 140:519 141:145 142:372 143:254 144:324 145:50 146:326 147:127 148:485 149:184 150:167 151:137 152:93 153:121 154:11 155:261 156:164 157:222 158:160 159:187 160:132 161:100 162:190 163:184 164:498 165:397 166:291 167:308 168:515 169:129 170:419 171:24 172:5 189:115 190:1206 192:5727 193:4031 194:3203 195:2463 196:924 198:3799 199:3227 200:5234 201:1254 202:7474 203:7812 204:3983 205:1996 206:2437 207:2785 208:2942 209:3596 210:2501 211:1078 212:1306 213:1523 214:419 215:44 216:4093 217:1190 218:320 219:396 220:1012 221:407 222:267 End of report

1 0