- Test - lists.nanog.org

nanog precursors
by bmanning＠vacation.karoshi.com 29 Nov '07

29 Nov '07

http://www.nsfnet-legacy.org/webcast --bill

1 0

Any earthlink mail admins?
by Barry Shein 28 Nov '07

28 Nov '07

I can't get thru via their abuse. Your email servers have been pounding us (theworld.com / std.com) with a non-stop dictionary attack for about a week. Logs available upon request. Nov 28 13:37:46 pcls5 sendmail[26487]: NOUSER: jbart1 relay=elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61] Nov 28 13:37:49 pcls5 sendmail[26487]: NOUSER: jbart10 relay=elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61] Nov 28 13:37:53 pcls5 sendmail[26487]: NOUSER: jbart2 relay=elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61] Nov 28 13:37:56 pcls5 sendmail[26487]: NOUSER: jbart3 relay=elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61] Nov 28 13:37:59 pcls5 sendmail[26487]: NOUSER: jbart4 relay=elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61] ...etc etc etc... -- -Barry Shein The World | bzs(a)TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Login: Nationwide Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*

2 1

XO outage in minneapolis?
by Erik Amundson 28 Nov '07

28 Nov '07

Anyone having XO problems in Minneapolis? We have an OC-3 down, all services. - Erik

1 0

RE: Running Application when Network Connection Detected
by Raymond L. Corbin 28 Nov '07

28 Nov '07

Ah. Sorry, guess that would be important. Win XP Thanks, -Ray -----Original Message----- From: Paul Fleming [mailto:paul.f@hostdime.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:28 PM To: Raymond L. Corbin Cc: nanog Subject: Re: Running Application when Network Connection Detected -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What OS? Raymond L. Corbin wrote: > Hey, > > Fairly certain this isn't the place for this but I've exhausted my > googling and I'm sure someone here may know. I was looking for an > application that will detect when you connect to a specific wireless > network that when connected automatically run a specified application. > Any ideas? > > Thanks! > > -Ray > - -- Paul Fleming Network Operations Hostdime.com Inc Cell:407.468.4646 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) iD8DBQFHTOA5wlPOUqXUp3MRAh4cAKCL5opxZehwnZ07nv+JcljjlvV+nACfavPk ja8Y+SKxJDN78EyffHk94q4= =KXXf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

NeXT Default Network
by JAKO Andras 28 Nov '07

28 Nov '07

Hi, Could someone please tell me what 192.42.172.0/24 is or why it should be handled as a special prefix? ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/cons/isp/security/Ingress-Prefix-Filter-Templates/T… Thanks, Andras

4 4

Re: [Nanog-futures] nanog AUP wrt subject evolution (was: Creating a crystal clear and pure Internet)
by Martin Hannigan 28 Nov '07

28 Nov '07

On Nov 27, 2007 5:36 PM, James R. Cutler <james.cutler(a)consultant.com> wrote: > Amen to the concern regarding wandering topic vs subject header. We've mentioned this before and I think it's a very worthy change to the NANOG AUP and wish it had been included in the new version. It was discussed, but nobody thought of adding it. I will see about including it in the next version. > WRT "operations content", I can make a strong case that managing > naming and addressing assignments is equally important to network > operations (and design, and re-design, ad infinitum) as is BGP > communities or router configurations or traffic monitoring or... > But, when I speak of this, I try to keep to the subject header or > start a new topic. It would seem prudent for NANOG list monitors to > assign effort more to staying on track in a discussion than trying to > limit the absolute scope of discussion topics. > This is a trend that is occurring. Most of the notes that I have sent out to users have been as a result of straying from topic with some irrelevant posting and I appreciate that you (some of you) acknowledge that this may be prudent. I also hope that folks understand we aren't just picking people off willy nilly based on a single post, rather, there is usually a trend established by the poster before they get noticed. A single off topic or irrelevant remark is not nearly enough to get a note from any admin as far as I am aware. To date, we also have not issued any warnings. I personally frown upon it as a method of supporting the AUP, but I did recommend one today. We haven't got 100% support so I'm not planning on pursuing it unless we do. May take on a life of it's own, but I'm all for overwhelming consensus. As far as subject evolution goes, we are seeing that happen here and I support it 100%. We don't need an AUP change for list posters to talk about internet network operations. We need people to not pay too much attention to some of the minds and voices that are stuck in the 80's and not evolving with the network or the culture. Let's face it, gopher and archie are not used as much as they used to be. To paraphrase someone I know, 'bgp has been talked to death'. I'm interested in making things more cohesive which means broader, and more interesting, discussions. Thanks in advance, and if a discussion does ensue, please don't change the subject so people can decide what they want to read or not read on their own. Marty (Who isn't posting to futures because he is not subscribed to it)

2 1

need help with global ipv6 topology measurement
by k claffy 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

if you have ipv6 connectivity and are willing to volunteer some (low bandwidth) v6 traceroute data to a good cause (== a topology map of observed ipv6 connectivity), please help us out for a few ( estimated < 15) min with: http://www.caida.org/data/how-to/scamper/ipv6-collection-2007/ please share w all your ipv6friends, k

1 0

Cisco outage
by J. Oquendo 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

In re: previous post http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9823196-7.html So much for self healing networks eh -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1) SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1) echo c2lsQGluZmlsdHJhdGVkLm5ldAo=|\ python -c "import sys; print sys.stdin.read().decode('base64')" http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E

5 4

Re: Creating a crystal clear and pure Internet
by Paul Ferguson 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Sean Donelan <sean(a)donelan.com> wrote: >Some people have compared unwanted Internet traffic to water pollution, and proposed that ISPs should be required to be like water utilities and be responsible for keeping the Internet water crystal clear and pure. > >Several new projects have started around the world to achieve those goals. > > >ITU anti-botnet initiative > >http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/cybersecurity/projects/botnet.html > >France anti-piracy initiative > >http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/index-olivennes231107.htm > Sean, Are you purposefully trolling the list? ;-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFHTD1Zq1pz9mNUZTMRAkhQAKD4Am49VJFPMQVIu3W1NvVbZ3a7fgCffC7d Fl1bTvyHzkiaVPGUAapjYeQ= =/xQQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

1 0

Re: Cisco outage
by J. Oquendo 27 Nov '07

27 Nov '07

Martin Hannigan wrote: > Can someone please indirectly email Mr. Oquendo and advise him that we > would like to have a word with him? He seems to have blocked Google > and has made us unable to have a chat. Blocked Google? Strange I got this message. But since you wanted to direct this back to the list when I responded to you, let me level the playing ground and post my direct response to you. Since after all I did follow procedures and leave it off the list. // BEGIN > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:50:24 -0600 > From: "J. Oquendo" <sil(a)infiltrated.net> > To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan(a)gmail.com> > Cc: admins(a)nanog.org > Subject: Re: Cisco outage > Message-ID: <20071126235024.GA39489(a)infiltrated.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Martin Hannigan wrote: >> We don't mind seeing reports on important parts of the overall >> critical infrastructure being impacted, but we could probably do >> without the off-topic remark that seems to be inaccurate as well. This > I've made four posts in about three months... Is this a targeted > "shut up" http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/ >> In the future, please help us to make sure NANOG is operational by >> being on topic -- and accurate -- wherenever posting. > The link was/is relevant, comment is just a comment. Should I in > turn complain about someone's signatures? Take a look at my four > posts. Their comments and their all relevant to someone else's > comment as are everyone's comments and responses. > How many posts have I made? 12 in seven months... > http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/index2.html >> >> http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9823196-7.html >> >> So much for self healing networks eh > Something personal you have to say, say it. But bitching and > whining about me being off topic according to your personal > taste and you'd have a hell of a lot of bitching to do about > a hell of alot of other people. // END > Hopefully, this won't bounce like our private message did. We'll be > forced to throw him off the list, sadly. Now to be on topic, you state I bounced mail from Gmail? Why didn't you include the SMTP error, I'd be curious to see where I blocked it to correct it. sudo grep -i hanni /var/log/maillog Nov 27 00:01:14 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: D5BB73F420: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2582, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:15 kryptonite postfix/pickup[73054]: 675043F43F: uid=1006 from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com> Nov 27 00:01:15 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 675043F43F: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2878, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:15 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 763723F443: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=3061, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:36 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: CA1DB3F445: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2544, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:37 kryptonite postfix/pickup[73054]: 2815A3F449: uid=1006 from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com> Nov 27 00:01:37 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 2815A3F449: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=2840, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Nov 27 00:01:37 kryptonite postfix/qmgr[81759]: 470EA3F44B: from=<hannigan(a)gmail.com>, size=3023, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Funny, I don't see a rejection from me to you. If there were though, how does a private domain come into a NANOG thread. Its not like Infiltrated is an ISP, NSP, NAP or any other peer or provider. So again I ask you to look at my postings for the last 6 or 7 months where my responses are minimal. Operational you state? Was this something akin to me posting about Botnets but operators stating that 10gigs of malware laced traffic is not operational? J. Oquendo SIGNATURE REMOVED TO AVOID BREAKING POLICY http://www.infiltrated.net/nanogpolice.jpg ----- End forwarded message ----- -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA #579 (FW+VPN v4.1) SGFE #574 (FW+VPN v4.1) echo c2lsQGluZmlsdHJhdGVkLm5ldAo=|\ python -c "import sys; print sys.stdin.read().decode('base64')" http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF684C42E

2 1