- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: SkypeSetup Rogue Download
by Mari Nichols 20 Apr '09

20 Apr '09

I believe the file is originating directly from Skype. Our writer stated that he had tried download.com's version and it was clean against VT. I'm on ISC handler duty today, just wondering if anyone had seen this happening. Mari Nichols HoD ________________________________ From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster(a)gmail.com> To: Mari Nichols <mari(a)imarsolutions.com> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 4:31:06 PM Subject: Re: SkypeSetup Rogue Download -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Mari Nichols <mari(a)imarsolutions.com> wrote: > Has anyone seen anything like this? > > http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/f58203f8d5cb98628eaa785e27c9e059 > Hi, Could you provide the URL where that file is located? Thanks, - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003) wj8DBQFJ64oEq1pz9mNUZTMRAs4MAJ9x8vwDJzMEnci72jEK7hNEd2NmdQCfRUgE B4Se4ZXdcTaoT4h1SHfmC4Q= =wXNG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawgster(at)gmail.com ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/

4 3

Re: google noc
by John Martinez 20 Apr '09

20 Apr '09

issue has been resolved. Thanks to all that responded. Stephen Stuart wrote: >> Anyone have any contact information for the google noc or adsense noc? >> Thanks in advance. > > Did you send email <noc(a)google.com>?

1 0

SkypeSetup Rogue Download
by Mari Nichols 19 Apr '09

19 Apr '09

Has anyone seen anything like this? http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/f58203f8d5cb98628eaa785e27c9e059

1 0

Re: IXP
by Deepak Jain 19 Apr '09

19 Apr '09

Remember when you didn't want to put in ACLs because you'd blow out the cpu on the router/card? Ahhhhh... That made networking fun! Deepak ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff Young <young(a)jsyoung.net> To: Nick Hilliard <nick(a)foobar.org> Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie(a)isc.org>; nanog(a)merit.edu <nanog(a)merit.edu> Sent: Sat Apr 18 20:45:48 2009 Subject: Re: IXP Best solution I ever saw to an 'unintended' third-party peering was devised by a pretty brilliant guy (who can pipe up if he's listening). When he discovered traffic loads coming from non-peers he'd drop in an ACL that blocked everything except ICMP - then tell the NOC to route the call to his desk with the third party finally gave up troubleshooting and called in... fun memories of the NAPs... jy On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 18/04/2009 01:08, Paul Vixie wrote: >> i've spent more than several late nights and long weekends dealing >> with >> the problems of shared multiaccess IXP networks. broadcast storms, >> poisoned ARP, pointing default, unintended third party BGP, >> unintended >> spanning tree, semitranslucent loops, unauthorized IXP LAN >> extension... >> all to watch the largest flows move off to PNI as soon as somebody's >> port was getting full. >

2 1

Re: IXP
by Stephen Stuart 18 Apr '09

18 Apr '09

> Stephen, that's a straw-man argument. Nobody's arguing against > VLANs. Paul's argument was that VLANs rendered shared subnets > obsolete, and everybody else has been rebutting that. Not saying that > VLANs shouldn't be used. I believe shared VLANs for IXP interconnect are obsolete. Whether they get retired in favor of modern technology is another question, a business question. About a year and a half ago, I built something much like the alternative being discussed as a community service project; pseudo-wire services for VNIs (participants can encrypt or not depending on their need), and a shared L3 cloud with private ASN numbering to provide inter-participant IP connectivity and some shared transit. The fabric survives fiber cuts without any disruption in connectivity (I didn't get to spec the fiber paths, so there are some places where the "ring" collapses into a single fiber bundle); everyone's HIPAA and FERPA concerns were met at the design phase; user-visible problems have been few, and problem diagnosis has been simple. There aren't a lot of participants, so I didn't do much in the way of self-service automation for provisioning, but I can see where it would be fairly straightforward and nicely scalable. If I were back in the IXP business, building a distributed metro-area fabric, that's how I'd do it, and I'd invest in automated, self-service provisioning. There would be no shared VLAN. I predict that the network would be more reliable, and could be operated more cost-efficiently as a result.

1 0

Michael Mooney releases another worm: Law Enforcement / Intelligence Agency's do nothing
by andrew.wallace 18 Apr '09

18 Apr '09

by n3td3v April 17, 2009 5:43 PM PDT "The teenager who takes credit for the worms that hit Twitter earlier this week has been hired by a Web application development firm and on Friday released a fifth worm on the microblogging site, he said." I hope the FBI nip him in the bud, this cannot continue, this needs to be made an example of. I want Law enforcement / Intelligence agency's to take control of the situation, now. http://news.cnet.com/8618-1009_3-10222373.html?communityId=2114&targetCommu… I want this individual made an example of and im not joking. Many thanks, Andrew Intelligencer & Founder of n3td3v British

6 8

Lease4web abuse contact
by bdwarr6 18 Apr '09

18 Apr '09

Does anyone have an abuse contact for lease4web that they can contact me off list about, the normal channels don't seem to be working here in regards to some pesky hackers. Regards, Nick Rose

1 0

US west coast personal colo
by Sean Donelan 18 Apr '09

18 Apr '09

Is anyone still doing personal colo on the west coast? I'm looking for a new home for my personal server on the west coast, and it seems like the economy has taken out most of the old personal colo offers. Even the old web page on www.vix.com/personalcolo is gone.

4 3

Re: downloading speed
by Scott Weeks 17 Apr '09

17 Apr '09

--- learn.chandra(a)gmail.com wrote: From: chandrashakher pawar <learn.chandra(a)gmail.com> We are level one ISP. one of my customer is connected to fast ethernet. His link speed 100,000 kbps. while downloading any thing from net he downloading speed donot go above 200 kbps. While doing multiple download he get aroung 200 kbps in every window. But when he close all the windows no change in downloading speed is observed. --------------------------------------------- You would need to add more info for any meaningful troubleshooting to occur. Do you see errors on the interface? Clear the counters and watch for a while. scott

6 5

Re: Personal Colo Referral
by Eddy Martinez 17 Apr '09

17 Apr '09

Here is place for good rates and a good colo facility - http://unixmechanix.com/ And Nathan's personal blog - http://mybrainhurts.com/blog/ Eddy On Apr 17, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Eddy Martinez wrote: > Hi Sean, > > I saw your request on the Nanog list. > > I use and know Nathan in San diego - > > Nathan Hubbard - nathan(a)unixmechanix.com > > And his personal site - http://mybrainhurts.com/blog/ > > Good rates and good colo. > > Eddy

1 0