- Test - lists.nanog.org

FW: [ipv6-wg] 2010 IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey Now Underway
by Mark Kosters 24 Jun '10

24 Jun '10

<Apologies for duplicate emails. If you have already participated, thank you very much. And for you who have not, please consider doing so.> ARIN encourages its community to participate in the 2010 Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey being conducted by GNKS Consult and TNO and sponsored by the RIPE NCC. The survey is now available at: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/IPv6deploymentmonitoring2010 The survey will close on 1 July 2010. All five Regional Internet Registries have committed to soliciting participation in this survey in order to compile the most complete global IPv6 deployment data possible. The survey results will provide a better understanding of current IPv6 deployment, and what still needs to be done to ensure the Internet community is ready for the widespread adoption of IPv6. ARIN/CAIDA performed a similar survey in 2008, and it was repeated in 2009 in the RIPE and APNIC regions. The 2010 survey will allow for some comparison of progress, which will be extremely valuable in determining the necessary next steps. The goal is to establish a comprehensive view of present IPv6 penetration and future plans for IPv6 deployment. The survey is composed of 23 questions and can be completed in about 15 minutes. For those without IPv6 allocations or assignments, or who have not yet deployed IPv6, the questions will be fewer in number. Results of the IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey will be made public in the fall. All participants that provide their name and contact information on the survey form will receive the draft survey analysis when available. Please also indicate if you are willing to share additional data with the TNO and GNKS Consult IPv6 Deployment Monitoring team. Any questions concerning the survey itself should be addressed to <info at gnksconsult.com>. Regards, Mark Kosters ARIN CTO

1 0

Reputable VPS provider with Dutch static IPs
by Jeroen van Aart 24 Jun '10

24 Jun '10

Does anyone know a reputable virtual private server provider in the Netherlands, which provides static IPs that are located in the Netherlands according to those pesky geoIP checkers. It also should provide Debian stable (Lenny right now) and not cost more than ~$30 a month. Of course the company should not have problems dealing with international customers (Dutch organisations can be a bit anal sometimes :-). Thank you, Jeroen -- http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/

1 1

40/100GbEthernet standard ratified
by Chris Woodfield 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

So let us commence the shipping of stupidly overpriced silicon...802.3ba is an official IEEE standard. http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view… -C

1 0

pls help about mtu setting again
by Deric Kwok 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

Hi Thank you for your reply about DSL mtu Now I have question about internet cable connection. ls it same as DSL? I tested it in my friend cable connection. 1470 is fine but 1480 is problem. Why it needs header in cable connection also? C:\Documents and Settings\deric>ping yahoo.com -f -l 1470 Pinging yahoo.com [98.137.149.56] with 1470 bytes of data: Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1470 time=96ms TTL=50 Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1470 time=91ms TTL=50 Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1470 time=92ms TTL=50 Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1470 time=89ms TTL=50 Ping statistics for 98.137.149.56: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 89ms, Maximum = 96ms, Average = 92ms C:\Documents and Settings\deric>ping yahoo.com -f -l 1480 Pinging yahoo.com [98.137.149.56] with 1480 bytes of data: Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Ping statistics for 98.137.149.56: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), Thank you for your help

2 1

Re: no you can't configure your router w/ this
by Adam LaFountain 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

> > sigh... where was this useful data 10 years ago! > > http://www.fcc.gov/worldtravel/ Even more entertaining is the "reboot.fcc.gov (Beta)" in the top right corner. I wonder if they have a reboot.ftc.gov link as well; that might actually be more useful.

3 3

Go Grid take two
by J. Oquendo 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

Thanks to all who responded, I was put in contact with someone. Apologies for the news. "We know return to our irregularly scheduled (de)programming. -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." - Warren Buffett 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E

1 0

GoGrid ... Going once... Going twice...
by J. Oquendo 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

After trying the usual channels (abuse@, security@) and LinkedIn, I decided to ask if anyone here has a security point of contact or network point of contact at GoGrid. Apologies for the low-level offtopic post. -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP, CPT "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." - Warren Buffett 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E

1 0

Recommendation in Australia for ISPs to force user security?
by Gadi Evron 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

http://www.zdnet.com.au/make-zombie-code-mandatory-govt-report-339304001.htm "A government report into cybercrime has recommended that internet service providers (ISPs) force customers to use antivirus and firewall software or risk being disconnected. security Committee chair Belinda Neal said in her introduction to the 262-page report titled "Hackers, Fraudsters and Botnets: Tackling the Problem of Cyber Crime" that due to the exponential growth of malware and other forms of cybercrime in recent years, "the expectation that end users should or can bear the sole responsibility for their own personal online security is no longer a tenable proposition". "We need to apply the same energy and commitment given to national security and the protection of critical infrastructure to the cybercrime threats that impact on society more generally," she said."

8 7

Re: Recommendation in Australia for ISPs to force user security?
by Scott Weeks 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

--- ge(a)linuxbox.org wrote: From: Gadi Evron <ge(a)linuxbox.org> http://www.zdnet.com.au/make-zombie-code-mandatory-govt-report-339304001.htm "A government report into cybercrime has recommended that internet service providers (ISPs) force customers to use antivirus and firewall software or risk being disconnected. security <snip> ---------------------------------------- This is being discussed extensively on AUSNOG and is but one link in a long chain of gov't trying to control the internet there with little realization of how ineffective the proposals are. Seems to be politicians playing to a certain part of the populace so votes can be obtained. scott

1 0

ls my modem or DSL company issue? 1300 not good but 1200 is fine
by Deric Kwok 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

Hi It is very nice that Ina replied me about mtu help Now I am using ping to check but not sure it is my modem or DSL company issue? C:\Documents and Settings\derek>ping yahoo.com -f -l 1300 Pinging yahoo.com [98.137.149.56] with 1300 bytes of data: Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set. Ping statistics for 98.137.149.56: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss), C:\Documents and Settings\derek>ping yahoo.com -f -l 1200 Pinging yahoo.com [98.137.149.56] with 1200 bytes of data: Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1200 time=141ms TTL=55 Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1200 time=141ms TTL=55 Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1200 time=145ms TTL=55 Reply from 98.137.149.56: bytes=1200 time=141ms TTL=55 Ping statistics for 98.137.149.56: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 141ms, Maximum = 145ms, Average = 142ms Thank you for your help

2 1