- Test - lists.nanog.org

Anyone seeing issues with Abovenet/Zayo in Northeast US?
by Jeffrey Negro 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

We have two MPLS circuits malfunctioning, one from DE to NJ, and another from DE to CA. Both are showing high latency and packet loss. Curious to hear if anyone else is having issues. Thanks

1 0

Time to stopy saying there is no IPv6 traffice: was Re: ddos attacks
by cb.list6 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Jon Lewis <jlewis(a)lewis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:12:28 -0800, "cb.list6" said: >> >> I am strongly considering having my upstreams to simply rate limit ipv4 >>> UDP. It is the simplest solution that is proactive. >>> >> >> What are the prospects for ipv6 UDP not suffering the same fate? >> > > Roughly 0%, but there's so little v6 traffic compared to v4, you probably > don't have to worry about v6 attack traffic yet...particularly if you're > not dual stack yet. :) > > I understand that your answer about nil IPv6 traffic may be appropriate for your network, but for many of us IPv6 is currently a non-trivial amount of traffic that is growing quickly. And, in some cases, IPv6 is the dominate amount of traffic. Here are some quick stats of a few select familiar names from http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ Google Fiber 70% Virginia Tech 61% Verizon Wireless 40% Comcast 20% AT&T Wireline 15% T-Mobile US 6% > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route > | therefore you are > _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ >

1 0

IPv6 /48 advertisements
by Cliff Bowles 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

I accidentally sent this to nanog-request yesterday. I could use some feedback from anyone that can help, please. Question: will carriers accept IPv6 advertisements smaller than /48? Our org was approved a /36 based on number of locations. The bulk of those IPs will be in the data centers. As we were chopping up the address space, it was determined that the remote campus locations would be fine with a /60 per site. (16 networks of /64). There are usually less than 50 people at the majority of these locations and only about 10 different functional VLANs (Voice, Data, Local Services, Wireless, Guest Wireless, etc...). Now, there has been talk about putting an internet link in every campus rather than back hauling it all to the data centers via MPLS. However, if we do this, then would we need a /48 per campus? That is massively wasteful, at 65,536 networks per location. Is the /48 requirement set in stone? Will any carriers consider longer prefixes? I know some people are always saying that the old mentality of conserving space needs to go away, but I was bitten by that IPv4 issue back in the day and have done a few VLSM network overhauls. I'd rather not massively allocate unless it's a requirement. Thanks in advance. CWB ________________________________ This message is private and confidential. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system.

10 13

Re: wireless ISP in Santa Fe
by Tri Tran 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

Great site. Thank you sir! On 12/18/2013 12:14 PM, Jerimiah Cole wrote: > On 12/18/2013 11:14 AM, Tri Tran wrote: >> The only known option is with Cibola for 7M/1M. >> If anyone know of an alternate provider with higher bandwidth please >> advise. > http://nmbbmapping.org/mapping/ > > Jerimiah > > --Tri Tran

1 0

wireless ISP in Santa Fe
by Tri Tran 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

The only known option is with Cibola for 7M/1M. If anyone know of an alternate provider with higher bandwidth please advise. --Tri Tran

4 3

Re: wireless ISP in Santa Fe
by Tri Tran 18 Dec '13

18 Dec '13

Thanks Brandon. I'll give them a call. On 12/18/2013 10:22 AM, Brandon Galbraith wrote: > Have you talked to Cybermesa[1] or LC Wireless (co-op)[2]? > > [1] http://www.cybermesa.com/ > > [2] http://www.lcwireless.us/ > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Tri Tran <tritran(a)cox.net > <mailto:tritran@cox.net>> wrote: > > The only known option is with Cibola for 7M/1M. > If anyone know of an alternate provider with higher bandwidth > please advise. > > --Tri Tran > > > --Tri Tran

1 0

do ISPs keep track of end-user IP changes within thier network?
by Carlos Kamtha 17 Dec '13

17 Dec '13

Hi, just a general curiousity question. it's been a long time since ive worked at an ISP. back then it was non-expiring DHCP leases and in some cases static IP for all.. (yes it was long ago..) Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.. Carlos.

21 26

AS209 / Qwest / CenturyLink
by Kenny Kant 16 Dec '13

16 Dec '13

Could someone from Qwest/CenturyLink AS209 contact me off list. We have two prefixes which are incorrectly being announced from this AS. I'm sure its an old configuration from days gone by. If there is a better / correct procedure to request help for this please let me know. Thanks! Kenny

1 0

Telx Atlanta
by Nick Olsen 16 Dec '13

16 Dec '13

Greetings, We're looking at getting access to the peering fabric/internet exchange in Telx's Atlanta facility. Looking for feedback from anyone willing to share their experiences with Telx, Participating in "TIE"...etc. As well as if anyone is aware of their third party cross connect policy. The sales rep told me that in order to participate in "TIE" we had to purchase colocation space for our equipment from them, Then cross connect into tie. And that purchasing space from anyone else located in the same building, or purchasing a point to point from $teir1carrier to patch us into the exchange was not possible. Even though their website clearly states "Telx will then run a cross connect to your equipment if you are located inside a Telx facility. If you need a third party cross connect, Telx will provide a Letter of Authorization and a Facility assignment for the third party." On or off list. Thanks! Nick Olsen Network Operations (855) FLSPEED x106

1 0

Charter Contact
by Scott Noel-Hemming 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

Is anyone from Charter in the Walla Walla area looking for some hardware that was supposed to be delivered today? -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments

2 1