- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: OpenNTPProject.org
by Scott Weeks 17 Jan '14

17 Jan '14

--- dougb(a)dougbarton.us wrote: From: Doug Barton <dougb(a)dougbarton.us> On 01/16/2014 03:45 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > Many/most CEOs would not have an understanding of what a BCP is and > their first response likely would be to ask, "What's the business > case?" What I've tried to explain to people is that not being used as a botnet will reduce their outbound traffic. It's not much, but it's something. ---------------------------------------------- Maybe it's just Hawaii, but many managers I've had would not be able to understand the importance of that. CEOs? ferget it! Plus I've done only eyeball networks since the early 2000s, so outbound is orders of magnitude lower than inbound and that also means I'm probably biased. I do those things trying to be a good netizen, but I don't tell the managers. It's not even on their radars. Further, I have met a lot of enterprise-level network folks along the way that don't know and/or just don't care. > Government regulation is also not the answer. They can't all agree > on basic crap, much less on some esoteric (in their opinion) netgeekery > thingie... Just have the NSA paint it as a national security issue. :) -------------------------------------------------------------- Since they're p0wning the entire internet globally that's one way to get it implemented, I suppose... :) scott

1 0

Experiences with Spamhaus BGP DROP, EDROP and BGPCC BGP feeds
by ISP Services 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Hi, I am wondering if anyone here has experiences with the Spamhaus DROP, EDROP and BGPCC BGP feeds, for null routing hijacked prefixes, and prefixes which contain (only) mallicious users. http://www.spamhaus.org/bgpf/ We currently already use a Team Cymru feed for null routing bogons. Would you reckon that the Spamhaus lists offer many valid additions to the Team Cymru feeds? Did you have any disputes about prefixes that are announced as malicious use by Spamhaus with customers or other ISP's? Any responses, on or off list are appreciated. Thanks, Dennis Hagens Network Engineer AS 24875

9 11

Re: Internet Routing Registries - RADb, etc
by courtneysmith＠comcast.net 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

On 16/01/2014 14:32, Blake Hudson wrote: > Thanks for the responses, these objects are all older. However, none of > them are stale or from previous owners, allocations, etc. Each of these > objects were posted to their respective IRR's after the IP space was > allocated to us. This leads me to believe that the individual IRR's really > do very little checking for accuracy and their usefulness is then > questionable. Oh yeah. I got hit by that sort of thing a week or two back. It wasn't origin: AS14179 / mnt-by: MAINT-AS28071, by any chance? AS14179 have been hijacking chunks of space from the various registries. Nick ------------------------------ Another possible scenario. a.b.c.d/24->small_isp->regional_isp->Level3 Imagine a regional ISP is a customer of Level3. Level3 filters the regional ISP based on Regional ISP's IRR objects. Small ISP buys access from Regional. Small ISP doesn't maintain their own objects. Regional ISP wants Small's business so doesn't force the issue. Regional manually maintains the filters. Regional adds objects under Regional's maintainer whenever Small request a filter change. If they don’t, Level3 wont accept the announcement from them. Customer with a.b.c.d/24 has no idea about any of this. Now we are years later. Customer has either moved to another small ISP or Small ISP found a different regional ISP. a.b.c.d/24->small_isp->new_regional_isp->Level3 or a.b.c.d/24->new_small_isp->new_regional_isp->Level3 The original Regional ISP didnt remember to delete all the objects related to Small ISP's customers. The objects just sit there until one day customer has interest in registring their own object. Customer sees entries for their /24 under Regional ISP's objects. Customer knows they have never done business with Regional. Also the objects are newer than the customer's allocation from their RIR. Customer comes to the conclusion that Regional ISP must have been hi-jacking their space or doing some other naughtiness. Proxy registering objects isn't a good idea. However, the number of networks with allocations from ARIN registering objects in any IRR appears to be extremely low. ARIN doesn’t charge you more to use rr.arin.net. Folks seem to not be aware of IRR or perceive it provides no benefit to them. Will RPKI adoption suffer the same fate?

2 1

[NANOG-announce] NANOG Reminders
by Betty Burke <betty＠nanog.org> 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Colleagues: A few reminders regarding the Education Series, Routing Fundamentals<https://www.nanog.org/meetings/education/routing_fundamentals_class/home>, class Sunday, February 9, 2014 and NANOG 60<https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog60/home>, February 10-12, 2014 in Atlanta, GA. In addition to the exciting NANOG 60 activities, NANOG is offering an Educational Series class "Routing Fundamentals" on Sunday, February 9, 2014. This is a great opportunity for folks who would like to advance their Network Operations Career. Registration remains open, and does include a One (1) day NANOG 60 meeting registration. The Program Committee delivered another great NANOG meeting agenda<https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog60/agenda>. The NANOG 60 program includes a Keynote address Monday morning, presentations on Security, BGP, Performance Measurement, IPv6, and the ever popular Data Center and Peering tracks. Don't delay, register soon as early Registration<https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog60/registration>ends on January 24, 2014, (non-member $450, member $425, student $100), If you, or someone you know, might benefit from a bit of help with travel to attend NANOG 60, please be sure to check out the NANOG Fellowship program<https://www.nanog.org/resources/fellowships>. Don't delay, NANOG 60 selections will be awarded soon. The Education class and NANOG 60 will take place at the Westin Peachtree Plaza. Make your room reservations<https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog60/hotelinformation> soon, the room rate of $169. expires, Friday, January 24, 2014. There are a few NANOG 60 Sponsorship Opportunities<https://www.nanog.org/sponsors/opportunities> remaining. Be sure to contact the NANOG Development Committee via marketing(a)nanog.orgto reserve your opportunity. Should you have any questions regarding NANOG activities, feel free to send your message to NANOG-Support(a)nanog.org. We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! Sincerely, Betty -- Betty Burke NANOG Executive Director 48377 Fremont Boulevard, Suite 117 Fremont, CA 94538 Tel: +1 510 492 4030 _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)mailman.nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

gmail.com - 550 error for ipv6/PTR ?
by Brandon Applegate 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Just saw this in a message tonight. No idea if this is a transient error or not. --- host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com][2607:f8b0:4002:c01::1a] said: 550-5.7.1 [2607:ff70:11::11] Our system has detected that this message does not 550-5.7.1 meet IPv6 sending guidelines regarding PTR records and authentication 550-5.7.1 . Please review 550-5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=ipv6_authentication_error [support.google.com] for more 550 5.7.1 information. t26si2290895yhl.255 - gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command) --- That URL's relevant section says: Additional guidelines for IPv6 The sending IP must have a PTR record (i.e., a reverse DNS of the sending IP) and it should match the IP obtained via the forward DNS resolution of the hostname specified in the PTR record. Otherwise, mail will be marked as spam or possibly rejected. The sending domain should pass either SPF check or DKIM check. Otherwise, mail might be marked as spam. --- I have both of these (PTR's RR has matching AAAA, and I have SPF (but not DKIM)). I'm guessing that something on google's side is misinterpreting some data or other busted logic. I meet all the requirements laid out, and have been sending mail to gmail addresses (via ipv6) since $forever. Off-list replies are fine to minimize noise, and if there is an answer or any meaningful correlation I will reply on-list. Thanks in advance for any info/feedback. -- Brandon Applegate - CCIE 10273 PGP Key fingerprint: 830B 4802 1DD4 F4F9 63FE B966 C0A7 189E 9EC0 3A74 "SH1-0151. This is the serial number, of our orbital gun."

10 14

Re: Question re: WordPress
by Ilissa Miller 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

THANK YOU! On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Peter Thimmesch wrote: > http://en.support.wordpress.com/deceased-user/ > > > > On Jan 15, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Ilissa Miller <ilissa(a)imillerpr.com> wrote: > >> Wondering if anyone in the community could kindly advise. How can someone get a deceased person's blog removed/taken down from WordPress? >> >> Please contact me directly offline if you can assist. >> >> Thank you >> Ilissa >> >> eMail: ilissa(a)imillerpr.com >> >> >> >> >> Ilissa Miller CEO, iMiller Public Relations President, Northeast DAS + Small Cell Association Tel: 914.315.6424 Cel: 917.743.0931 eMail: ilissa(a)imillerpr.com www.imillerpr.com www.northeastdas.com

1 0

Question re: WordPress
by Ilissa Miller 16 Jan '14

16 Jan '14

Wondering if anyone in the community could kindly advise. How can someone get a deceased person's blog removed/taken down from WordPress? Please contact me directly offline if you can assist. Thank you Ilissa eMail: ilissa(a)imillerpr.com

2 1

Amazon AWS Engineer
by Ryan Harden 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

Could an Amazon AWS Engineer contact me off list. We're seeing what is perceived to be performance issues and I'd like to discuss what the expected performance should be. The Amazon AWS support channels don't appear to be meant for network type question. Thanks /Ryan Ryan Harden Senior Network Engineer University of Chicago - AS160 P: 773-834-5441

1 0

Re: [VoiceOps] (cross post) VoIP heat charts...
by Hal Murray 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

> http://www.nanpa.com/nanp1/allutlzd.zip lists NPANXX and Ratecentre. How does number portability interact with this? What fraction of numbers have been ported? (Where should I look/google to find the answer?) -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

1 0

Re: [VoiceOps] (cross post) VoIP heat charts...
by Derek Andrew 14 Jan '14

14 Jan '14

http://www.nanpa.com/nanp1/allutlzd.zip lists NPANXX and Ratecentre. derek On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:33 PM, Paul Timmins <paul(a)telcodata.us> wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Jay Ashworth <jra(a)baylink.com> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > >> > >> Looking to "heat chart" where fraudelent calls are going. > > > > So you want to be able to feed "NPANXX Count" to something that will map > > the call counts on a US map. > > > > You have anything that does NPANXX to H&V, or directly to Lat Lon, > already? > > > > Cause that's the hard part. > > Telcodata has this available. > > city-county-zip-byratecenter TelcoData - Advanced Membership Area code, > exchange, State, City, County, Zip - By Ratecenter (Requires Advanced > Subscription) > > -- Copyright 2014 Derek Andrew (excluding quotations) +1 306 966 4808 Information and Communications Technology University of Saskatchewan Peterson 120; 54 Innovation Boulevard Saskatoon,Saskatchewan,Canada. S7N 2V3 Timezone GMT-6 Typed but not read.

1 0