August 2015 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Management Network / Backup Network @ One Wilshire LA
by James Braunegg 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

Dear Nanog I am looking for a cost effective 100mbit commit burst to 1gbit service with a /28 to be used as a management backup network within LA @ Core Site 624 Grand / One Wilshire Also looking for the same service in Evo Switch Amsterdam and Equinix SG1 Singapore if anyone can provide this. Happy to also trade for the same service (IE we provide you with a backup management Network in return for your service), please contact me if you can provide such a service cost Kindest Regards James Braunegg P: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616 E: james.braunegg(a)micron21.com<mailto:james.braunegg@micron21.com> | ABN: 12 109 977 666 W: www.micron21.com/ddos-protection<http://www.micron21.com/ddos-protection> T: @micron21 Follow us on Twitter<http://www.twitter.com/micron21> for important service and system updates. [M21.jpg] This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message in error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your computer.

1 0

Re: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real?
by Edwin Mallette 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

Yeah, so not a Bright House Networks email administrator but I am affiliated with Bright House Networks. I have forwarded the thread to our email administration team. Cheers! Ed >On 8/2/15, 3:53 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Jay Ashworth" ><nanog-bounces(a)nanog.org on behalf of jra(a)baylink.com> wrote: > >>I think the body text of the message should identify it as coming from >>the Bright House email system? I think it should be written in standard >>USAdian English, which that is decidedly not. >> >>Or perhaps the problem is that that subject line was supposed to be >>parameterized, and the number of bytes is missing for some reason. But in >>any event that is a common message to spoof, and the more bits of >>identity that are in it the harder it is to do so. That message format >>has almost zero bit of provider-identifiable data. >> >>""" >>Your Bright House Networks IMAP email storage for user(a)domain.com is at >>490MB, approaching your quota of 500MB. >> >>IMAP email permits you to access all your mail folders by storing them on >>the mail server, but because of this, all mail in your folders >>contributes to your storage limit. >> >>You can delete messages to reduce your storage, or move them to your PC. >>If you delete them, or have already deleted them, you usually must >>'compact' each folder to reclaim the extra space. >> >>Alternatively, you can contact Customer Care to see about having your >>quota increased. >>""" >> >>Cheers, >>-- jra >> >>On August 2, 2015 3:44:35 PM EDT, Frank Bulk <frnkblk(a)iname.com> wrote: >>>What do you think their message should say? We struggled over this, >>>too, and settled on some soft language, included information on how to >>>purchase more storage, and also provided our email address and phone >>>numbers. >>> >>>Frank >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jay Ashworth >>>Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2015 1:55 PM >>>To: nanog(a)nanog.org >>>Subject: Bright House IMAP highwater warning real? >>> >>>Any brighthouse email admins on the list? My sister got the following >>>high water warning message, with the included headers which, since they >>>appear to include no Received: headers, look like they actually came >>>from brighthouse's email cluster. >>> >>>If this is a real Bright House warning message, somebody should be >>>flogged. Teaching people which messages is to believe is hard enough... >>> >>>Cheers, >>>-- jra >>> >>> >>>-------- Original Message -------- >>>Subject: Re: Fwd: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the >>>mailbox! >>> >>>I lied. The header to yours - which I finally found - is nice and long. >>> the header on this one is >>> >>>Return-Path: <> >>>From: admin >>>Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the mailbox! >>>Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 06:22:44 +0000 >>>Message-ID: e31468ce-38de-11e5-b0a6-17507733086b >>> >>>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>>From: admin >>>>>Sent: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 2:22 AM >>>>>Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the >>>>mailbox! >>>>> >>>>>Your mailbox is over the high water mark. >>>>>Please delete some messages from your mailbox. >>>-- >>>Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> >>-- >>Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >

1 0

[NANOG-announce] UPDATE - 2015 NANOG Elections General Information
by Valerie Wittkop 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

Hello NANOG Members, It has come to my attention there was a bad link in the message sent last week announcing the opening of the 2015 Election Process. I apologize for not catching the error before the message was sent and causing more noise to your inbox now. Please note the corrected link (relating to completing the Online Process) below. Why? If you care about NANOG and think that you would like to take a turn at volunteering your time to help make it better please consider joining as a member and running for a position. If you know someone else that you believe would be interested, nominate them by completing the Online Process <https://www.bigpulse.com/112537/register>. Any questions should be submitted to elections(a)nanog.org. <mailto:elections@nanog.org> Cheers, Valerie Valerie Wittkop NANOG Program Director Tel: +1 866 902 1336, ext 103 _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)mailman.nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

Bright House IMAP highwater warning real?
by Jay Ashworth 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

Any brighthouse email admins on the list? My sister got the following high water warning message, with the included headers which, since they appear to include no Received: headers, look like they actually came from brighthouse's email cluster. If this is a real Bright House warning message, somebody should be flogged. Teaching people which messages is to believe is hard enough... Cheers, -- jra -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Fwd: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the mailbox! I lied. The header to yours - which I finally found - is nice and long. the header on this one is Return-Path: <> From: admin Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the mailbox! Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 06:22:44 +0000 Message-ID: e31468ce-38de-11e5-b0a6-17507733086b >>-----Original Message----- >>From: admin >>Sent: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 2:22 AM >>Subject: ATTENTION: High Water Mark Notification, bytes in the >mailbox! >> >>Your mailbox is over the high water mark. >>Please delete some messages from your mailbox. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

4 4

Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California
by Andrew Carey 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

> On Aug 3, 2015, at 10:09, Matthew Black <Matthew.Black(a)csulb.edu> wrote: > > I ran a few Google searches and came across a trove of complaints against Frontier. Seems they are far worse than GTE/Verizon. On the few occasions I have called for FIOS support, always reached someone knowledgeable and helpful. Not looking forward to the changeover, as the new owners have to pay off debts from their acquisition. That can only be accomplished through rate increases. I see a Verizon tech outside my kitchen window every two to three days as he replaces two nitrogen tanks keeping copper trunks pressurized against water intrusion. Cutting expenses is another (well, and selling more too). Properly engineered/maintained cable should not require that level of constant attention.

2 1

DropBox peering issue in SF bay area ? Rare and Odd
by Bob Evans 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

Anyone from dropbox please contact noc(a)fiberInternetCenter.com Multiple peering session - peering sessions are up/established - prefixes are received - but no website and customers complaining to us. Thank You Bob Evans CTO

1 0

multipath tcp now in production use for linux based mobile devices
by Colin Johnston 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

http://blog.multipath-tcp.org/blog/html/2015/07/24/korea.html

3 2

Someone from Bell Canada (Bell.net / Sympatico.ca) Offlist Request
by Michael Morris 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

Can someone from Bell (Bell.net / Sympatico.ca) contact me offlist. We have many, several hundred clients on either of those services and since the first week of July we have not been able to send email through the primary MX (mxmta.owm.bell.net) The secondary MX was accepting and now is not, I have been told by the tech that this was by design and all is now funnelling through the one point. I have a ticket opened on two of our customer accounts and that ticket information available, and the tech informs me that the issue has been replicated, acknowledged and with the vendor for patching which was supposed to be last week but that was delayed. Just looking for an update as we are not a customer, but we do need to communicate with our clients. Thanks in advance, Michael Morris mmorris(a)cavalluzzo.com

1 0

Verizon exiting California
by Matthew Black 03 Aug '15

03 Aug '15

Verizon sent me a letter the other day stating that they are selling their landline business to Frontier Communications. It was a very terse letter and as a customer I don't know if it affects me. While stating they aren't exiting the Wireless business, I want to know which parts are being sold off. Just the copper lines, POTS, DSL, FIOS (TV, Internet, phone)? Some clarity would be great. I am a FIOS only customer. Can anyone recall if GTE was blocked from doing the same thing a few decades ago? matthew black california state university, long beach

8 14

ISPs/Carriers in LATA 138
by kb3ien+nanog＠databit7.com 03 Aug '15

03 Aug '15

I'm looking for a solution to provide one-weekend per year access in a rural area 20 km outside Binghamton NY, LATA 138 Can anyone provide any recomendations? Robin kb3ien

3 2