July 2014 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Call for Presentations RIPE 69
by Filiz Yilmaz 09 Sep '14

09 Sep '14

Dear colleagues, Please find the CFP for RIPE 69 in London below. The deadline for submissions is 31 August 2014. Please also note that speakers do not receive any extra reduction or funding towards the meeting fee at the RIPE Meetings. Kind regards Filiz Yilmaz RIPE PC Chair http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-meetings/pc --------------------- Call for Presentations A RIPE Meeting is an open event where Internet Service Providers, network operators and other interested parties get together. Although the meeting is mostly technical, it is also a chance for people to meet and network with others in their field. RIPE 69 will take place from 3- November 2014 in London, UK. The RIPE Programme Committee (PC) is now seeking content proposals from the RIPE community for the plenary session presentations, BoFs (Birds of a Feather sessions), panels, workshops, tutorials and lightning talks at RIPE 69. The PC is looking for presentations covering topics of network engineering and operations, including but not limited to: • IPv6 deployment • Managing IPv4 scarcity in operations • Commercial transactions of IPv4 addresses • Data centre technologies • Network and DNS operations • Internet governance and regulatory practices • Network and routing security • Content delivery • Internet peering and mobile data exchange Submissions RIPE Meeting attendees are quite sensitive to keeping presentations non-commercial, and product marketing talks are strongly discouraged. Repeated audience feedback shows that the most successful talks focus on operational experience, research results, or case studies. For example, presenters wishing to describe a commercial solution should focus on the underlying technology and not attempt a product demonstration. The RIPE PC accepts proposals for different presentation formats, including plenary session presentations, tutorials, workshops, BoFs (Birds of a Feather sessions) and lightning talks. See the full descriptions of these formats at https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/ Presenters who are proposing a panel or BoF are encouraged to include speakers from several (perhaps even competing) companies and/or a neutral facilitator. In addition to presentations selected in advance for the plenary, the RIPE PC also offers several time slots for “lightning talks”, which are selected immediately before or during the conference. The following general requirements apply: - Proposals for plenary session presentations, BoFs, panels, workshops and tutorials must be submitted for full consideration no later than 31 August 2014, using the meeting submission system at https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/guidelines/. Proposals submitted after this date will be considered on a space-available basis. - Lightning talks should also be submitted using the meeting submission system (https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/submission-form/) and can be submitted just days before the RIPE Meeting starts or even during the meeting week. The allocation of lightning talk slots will be announced in short notice – in some cases on the same day but often one day prior to the relevant session. - Presenters should indicate how much time they will require. See more information on time slot allocations per presentation format at https://ripe69.ripe.net/submit-topic/presentation-formats/ - Proposals for talks will only be considered by the PC if they contain at least draft presentation slides (slides may be updated later on). For panels, proposals must contain a clear description, as well as the names of invited panelists, presenters and moderators. - Due to potential technical issues, it is expected that most, if not all, presenters/panelists will be physically present at the RIPE Meeting. If you have any questions or requests concerning content submissions, please email pc [at] ripe [dot] net. ---------------------

1 3

Muni Fiber and Politics
by Jay Ashworth 15 Aug '14

15 Aug '14

Over the last decade, 19 states have made it illegal for municipalities to own fiber networks -- encouraged largely, I am told, by Verizon and other cable companies/MSOs[1]. Verizon, of course, isn't doing any new FiOS deployments, per a 2010 press release[2]. FCC Chair Tom Wheeler has been making noises lately that he wants the FCC to preempt the field on this topic, making such deployments legal. Congressional Republicans think that's a bad idea: http://www.vox.com/2014/7/20/5913363/house-republicans-and-obamas-fcc-are-a… [ and here's the backgrounder on the amendment: http://www.broadcastingcable.com/news/washington/blackburn-bill-would-block… ] While I generally try to avoid bringing up topics on NANOG that are political; this one seems to be directly in our wheelhouse, and unavoidably political. My apologies in advance; let's all try to be grownups, shall we? Cheers, -- jra [1] http://motherboard.vice.com/read/hundreds-of-cities-are-wired-with-fiberbut… [2] https://secure.dslreports.com/shownews/Verizon-Again-Confirms-FiOS-Expansio… -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274

49 199

Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
by Paul WALL 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

Provided without comment: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/news/comcast-astroturfing-net-neutrality Drive Slow, Paul Wall

22 55

Netflix And AT&T Sign Peering Agreement
by Doug Barton 05 Aug '14

05 Aug '14

Seems germane to recent conversations ... Netflix has signed a peering agreement with AT&T that will see the video streaming service pay the ISP for direct connection to its network. Previously, Netflix signed similar agreements with Comcast and Verizon. http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/29/netflix-and-att-sign-peering-agreement/

5 5

Recommendations for a decent DWDM optical power meter.
by Timothy Kaufman 04 Aug '14

04 Aug '14

I have been looking into DWDM light meters. The JDSU looks good, but I see other brands out there. Does anyone have some recommendations, things to look out for? Thanks, Tim Kaufman

4 6

Comcast IPv6 Milestone
by Brzozowski, John 02 Aug '14

02 Aug '14

FYI – please feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions: http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-reaches-key-milestone-i… Thank you, John ========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable w) www.comcast6.net e) john_brzozowski(a)cable.comcast.com =========================================

6 6

Carrier Grade NAT
by Colton Conor 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

We are looking for recommendations for a carrier grade nat solution. Who is the leaders in this space? How do carrier grade NAT platforms integrate with DHCP and DNS solutions? How do you keep track of copyright violations in a CGNAT solution if multiple customers are sharing the same public IP address?

26 50

Greenfield Access Network
by Colton Conor 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

If a new operator or city is building a greenfield access network from the ground up, what software and hardware is needed in the core network to provide and manage residential and business internet services similar to the likes of AT&T, Comcast, and Google Fiber? Television and Telephone services are not to be considered only internet. Assume hypothetically the operator already has the following in place: 10 GPON OLTs Chassis from an access vendor in 10 POPs around town (each POP has 1 Chassis). Each OLT Chassis has 4 10G Uplinks back to the core. Dark fiber going from the POP locations back to the core location Assume a 32:1 way split, and each OLT chassis has enough ports populated to serve the area. 10,000 GPON ONTs. The ONTs can be put in routed gateway or bridged mode. Assume you are building a network designed to serve 10,000 subs All the fiber splitters, ducts, fiber, etc connecting the OLTs to the ONTs is already in place ASN from ARIN /20 of IPv4 space and /32 of IPv6 space from ARIN 4 burstable 10G internet connections from 4 tier 1 internet providers Questions are: What is the ideal way to aggregate the 40 10G connections from the uplinks of the chassis? I would guess a 10G switch since 10G ports on a router would be much more expensive? Which router is recommended to handle 4 10G internet connections with full tables, and then at least 4 10G ports going back to the 10G aggregation switch? How do you handle IP address management? a /20 is only 4096 IP addresses, but the network would have potentially 10,000 customers. Assume that getting more space from ARIN is not an option. Is CGN an option? Dynamic IP addresses? DHCP? How do you separate users and traffic? VLANs, Service VLANs, Per Customer VLANs, Usernames? Passwords? PPPoE? MAC Separation? Is a BRAS or BGN functionally really needed or are these older concepts? If CGNAT or DHCP is needed, what will host the CGNAT or DHCP service? The core router, a linux box, or something else? What about DNS? Is a firewall needed in the core? What else is needed? Is there a guide out there somewhere? I know many cities are looking at building their own network, and have similar questions. Access vendors are willing to sell gear all day long, but then they leave it up to the operator/city to answer these harder questions. How would you build a access network from the ground up if you had the resources and time to do so? Would you even use GPON? Even if GPON was not used and another access technology like AE, VDSL2, or wireless was used I think many of these questions would be the same.

5 10

Netflix To Cogent To World
by Jay Ashworth 01 Aug '14

01 Aug '14

While thinking about this double play over the weekend, a very interesting chain of thoughts occurred to me. If I were Netflix, why would I buy all my transit from Cogent[1], given Cogent's propensity for getting into peering fights with people *already*, even before *I* start sending them 1000:1 asymmetric outbound traffic? Presumably because they're offering me a helluva deal on the bandwidth. So why would Cogent offer Netflix a helluva deal? Perhaps because they were smart enough to see how popular NF would become... and thought it would make an excellent stalking horse in their own peering fights? Who's gonna depeer Cogent *now*? Cheers, -- jra [1] This is my understanding, though of course I'm not privy. -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274

15 22

EBAY reachability issues
by Drew Weaver 31 Jul '14

31 Jul '14

We've been seeing some issues with getting to Ebay this morning, only a very select few of their GSLB sites in DNS seem to be responding (to us at least)... Connecting to www.ebay.com|66.135.210.181|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Connecting to www.ebay.com|66.211.181.161|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response...timed out Connecting to www.ebay.com|66.211.181.181|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response...timed out Tried reaching out to them but can't contact anyone if anyone has a contact there please forward. Thanks, -Drew

3 3