October 2014 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: NIST NTP Server List
by Brian Christopher Raaen 30 Oct '14

30 Oct '14

I'm still getting a 404. I am using a Windstream backbone, is this maybe path/server specific. Here is a dig. dig tf.nist.gov ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-3-Ubuntu <<>> tf.nist.gov ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 46860 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;tf.nist.gov. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: tf.nist.gov. 1784 IN CNAME tf.boulder.nist.gov. tf.boulder.nist.gov. 86384 IN CNAME ftp.boulder.nist.gov. ftp.boulder.nist.gov. 86384 IN A 132.163.4.45 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: boulder.nist.gov. 1485 IN NS dns-y.boulder.nist.gov. boulder.nist.gov. 1485 IN NS gdnsea.nist.gov. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: dns-y.boulder.nist.gov. 1485 IN AAAA 2610:20:6b01:4::10 ;; Query time: 6 msec ;; SERVER: 68.70.255.9#53(68.70.255.9) ;; WHEN: Wed Oct 29 13:25:15 EDT 2014 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 168 On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Brian Christopher Raaen < mailing-lists(a)brianraaen.com> wrote: > I'm still getting a 404. I am using a Windstream backbone, is this maybe > path/server specific. Here is a dig. > > dig tf.nist.gov > > ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-3-Ubuntu <<>> tf.nist.gov > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 46860 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;tf.nist.gov. IN A > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > tf.nist.gov. 1784 IN CNAME tf.boulder.nist.gov. > tf.boulder.nist.gov. 86384 IN CNAME ftp.boulder.nist.gov. > ftp.boulder.nist.gov. 86384 IN A 132.163.4.45 > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > boulder.nist.gov. 1485 IN NS dns-y.boulder.nist.gov. > boulder.nist.gov. 1485 IN NS gdnsea.nist.gov. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > dns-y.boulder.nist.gov. 1485 IN AAAA 2610:20:6b01:4::10 > > ;; Query time: 6 msec > ;; SERVER: 68.70.255.9#53(68.70.255.9) > ;; WHEN: Wed Oct 29 13:25:15 EDT 2014 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 168 > > > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Chris Patsalou < > chrispatsalou(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Appears up from here (London, UK) >> >> *NameIP AddressLocationStatusnist1-pa.ustiming.org >> <http://nist1-pa.ustiming.org>206.246.122.250Hatfield, PAAll services >> availabletime-a.nist.gov <http://time-a.nist.gov>129.6.15.28NIST, >> Gaithersburg, MarylandAll services busy, not recommendedtime-b.nist.gov >> <http://time-b.nist.gov>129.6.15.29NIST, Gaithersburg, MarylandAll services >> busy, not recommendedtime-c.nist.gov >> <http://time-c.nist.gov>129.6.15.30NIST, Gaithersburg, MarylandAll services >> availabletime-d.nist.gov <http://time-d.nist.gov>2610:20:6F15:15::27NIST, >> Gaithersburg, MarylandAll services via IPV6nist1-macon.macon.ga.us >> <http://nist1-macon.macon.ga.us>98.175.203.200Macon, GeorgiaAll services >> availablewolfnisttime.com >> <http://wolfnisttime.com>207.223.123.18Birmingham, AlabamaAll services >> availablenist.time.nosc.us >> <http://nist.time.nosc.us>96.226.242.9Carrollton, TexasAll services >> availablenist.expertsmi.com >> <http://nist.expertsmi.com>50.245.103.198Monroe, Michigantemporary >> failurenist.netservicesgroup.com >> <http://nist.netservicesgroup.com>64.113.32.5Southfield, MichiganAll >> services availablenisttime.carsoncity.k12.mi.us >> <http://nisttime.carsoncity.k12.mi.us>66.219.116.140Carson City, >> MichiganAll services availablenist1-lnk.binary.net >> <http://nist1-lnk.binary.net>216.229.0.179Lincoln, NebraskaAll services >> availablewwv.nist.gov <http://wwv.nist.gov>24.56.178.140WWV, Fort Collins, >> ColoradoAll services availabletime-a.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov >> <http://time-a.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov>132.163.4.101NIST, Boulder, Coloradontp >> ok; time, daytime busytime-b.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov >> <http://time-b.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov>132.163.4.102NIST, Boulder, ColoradoAll >> services busytime-c.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov >> <http://time-c.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov>132.163.4.103NIST, Boulder, Coloradontp >> ok; time, daytime busytime.nist.gov <http://time.nist.gov>global address >> for all serversMultiple locationsAll services availableutcnist.colorado.edu >> <http://utcnist.colorado.edu>128.138.140.44University of Colorado, >> BoulderAll services availableutcnist2.colorado.edu >> <http://utcnist2.colorado.edu>128.138.141.172University of Colorado, >> BoulderAll services availablentp-nist.ldsbc.edu >> <http://ntp-nist.ldsbc.edu>198.60.73.8LDSBC, Salt Lake City, UtahAll >> services availablenist1-lv.ustiming.org >> <http://nist1-lv.ustiming.org>64.250.229.100Las Vegas, NevadaAll services >> availabletime-nw.nist.gov <http://time-nw.nist.gov>131.107.13.100Microsoft, >> Redmond, WashingtonAll services very busynist-time-server.eoni.com >> <http://nist-time-server.eoni.com>216.228.192.69La Grande, OregonAll >> services availableHope this helps?* >> >> On 29 October 2014 17:14, Brian Christopher Raaen < >> mailing-lists(a)brianraaen.com> wrote: >> >>> The list of NIST NTP servers is down for me, is anyone else seeing this? >>> I'm getting a 404 error >>> http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi >>> >>> -- >>> Brian Christopher Raaen >>> Network Architect >>> Zcorum >>> >> >> > > > -- > Brian Christopher Raaen > Network Architect > Zcorum > -- Brian Christopher Raaen Network Architect Zcorum

7 14

AWS Contact
by Blair Trosper 30 Oct '14

30 Oct '14

Could someone from AWS contact me off-list.

1 0

Seeking VPS providers for low volume network probe
by Eric Germann 30 Oct '14

30 Oct '14

Greetings, I'm looking for recommendations on a reliable VPS Provider(s) who can provide 1. Centos 6 2. IPv4 and IPv6 (preferably) physically in the regions of African Continent, Eastern Europe/Russia, Middle East, South America and Canada. I've already deployed some globally with Vultr and Amazon (Brazil region). Basically doing a low volume test point probe (512MB-1GB RAM, < 20GB disk) for latency measurements. Would prefer to have a secure (logically and financially) and reliable host. Thanks in advance, EKG

6 5

.mil postmaster Contacts?
by Ray Van Dolson 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from off-network as well. Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start with? navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to be having issues. Ray

6 8

cidr-report
by D'Alleva, Ron 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

We noticed a large increase in prefixes this morning. Has anyone noticed any issues resulting from the increase? http://www.cidr-report.org/as2.0/#General_Status Thanks, Ron

3 2

NIST NTP Server List
by Brian Christopher Raaen 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

The list of NIST NTP servers is down for me, is anyone else seeing this? I'm getting a 404 error http://tf.nist.gov/tf-cgi/servers.cgi -- Brian Christopher Raaen Network Architect Zcorum

8 7

An update from the ICANN ISPCP meeting...
by Warren Kumari 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

Those of y'all who were at NANOG62 may remember a presentation from the ICANN Internet Service Provider and Connectivity Providers Constituency (ISPCP). I feel somewhat bad because I misunderstood what they were sayingin, and kinda lost my cool during the preso. Anyway, the ISPCP met at ICANN 51 last week. Unfortunately I was not able to attend, but the meeting audio stream is posted at: http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule/tue-ispcp If you'd rather read than listen, the transcript is posted here: http://la51.icann.org/en/schedule/tue-ispcp/transcript-ispcp-14oct14-en.pdf I snipped a bit that mentions NANOG: The next outreach experience that we had was at NANOG. NANOG, as you may know, is the North American Network Operators Group, an area where we really wanted to make an impact because it is the network operators groups that can really bring the insight that we need to act on being a unique and special voice within the ICANN community on issues that matter to ISPs around some of the things that are on our agenda today, such as universal access, such as name collisions. And we wanted to get more technical voices in the mix and more resources in the door so that we could make a better impact there. A lot of what we received when we stood up to give our presentation were messages from people who had attempted to engage in ICANN in the past or attempted to engage in the ISPCP in the past and had had very difficult time doing. They said when you come into this arena you spend so much time talking about process, so much time talking about Whois and what board seats, about what needs to happen around transparency. I'm a technical guy, I want to focus on technical issues and I don't have a unique venue for being able to do that. So we spent some time as a group trying to figure out how we can address that because we do need those voices. Our goal has been to take the feedback that we receive from NANOG and create an action plan to make sure that we can pull in voices like that and go back to the NOG community, go back to the technical operators community, bring them on board and say we've got a different path for you. Anyway, go listen / read the full transcript if you are so inclined... W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf

8 22

t-mobile help
by Jeremy Knapp 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

Would someone from T-Mobile be willing to contact me offline about some abuse issues we are having? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jeremy

1 0

Packet Loss in Atlanta
by N M 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

Hello nanog, I am getting reports from friends of mine in the ISP community that there are some issues in Atlanta with high latency and packet loss.. I don't see anything on my link to 56 Marietta but I was wondering if anyone else saw any problems out that way? Thanks in advance Nathan

1 0

OT: FOLO: LWN on Debian on multiple inits (systemd, etc)
by Jay Ashworth 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

Pursuant to our other ongoing WW thread: http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/ The comments on this come down rather solidly on both sides of the fence, and most of them are relatively thoughful. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274

1 0