September 2012 - Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: ipv6mon v1.0 released! (IPv6 address monitoring daemon)
by Paul Kelly :: Blacknight 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

> > > > You mean, like what NDPMon has been delivering for several years > already: > > > > > Having a choice is never a bad thing(tm). > +1

1 0

Softlayer/Network layer partial outage in Asian region?
by Anurag Bhatia 13 Sep '12

13 Sep '12

Seems like Softlayer/Network layer having rouitng glitches in Asia. Their prefix 216.12.192.0/19 is not working in South East. Route goes till Singapore router and times out there. traceroute to hostgator.com (216.12.194.67), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 router.local (192.168.1.1) 1.576 ms 2.025 ms 2.508 ms 2 117.212.40.1 (117.212.40.1) 26.500 ms 29.397 ms 31.717 ms 3 218.248.173.46 (218.248.173.46) 35.014 ms 36.184 ms 38.806 ms 4 115.249.245.198 (115.249.245.198) 50.224 ms 54.037 ms 56.476 ms 5 115.255.252.149 (115.255.252.149) 100.129 ms 101.235 ms 106.338 ms 6 62.216.147.249 (62.216.147.249) 115.066 ms 116.228 ms 118.407 ms 7 ge-1-0-0.0.cjr02.chn001.flagtel.com (62.216.135.226) 121.183 ms 83.215 ms so-7-0-0.0.ejr03.sin001.flagtel.com (62.216.128.73) 116.212 ms 8 so-7-1-0.0.ejr04.sin001.flagtel.com (62.216.128.153) 116.677 ms 118.551 ms 62.216.128.246 (62.216.128.246) 121.665 ms 9 p6453.sgw.equinix.com (202.79.197.19) 162.612 ms 163.006 ms 163.631 ms 10 ae12.bbr01.eq01.sng02.networklayer.com (120.29.215.102) 167.409 ms 169.761 ms 173.955 ms 11 ae6.dar02.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.203) 177.675 ms 180.009 ms ae5.dar02.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (50.97.18.199) 171.207 ms 12 po2.fcr01.sr03.sng01.networklayer.com (174.133.118.133) 180.555 ms * * 13 * * * 14 * * * I wonder what causes such issues? Clearly issue is within Softlayer's AS 36351. So is it like broken OSPF inside or iBGP? -- Anurag Bhatia anuragbhatia.com Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>| Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>

2 1

Re: Heads-Up: GoDaddy Broke the Interwebs...
by Operations Dallas 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

I thought I saw an article on routergod.com from Dance Patrick regarding anycast DNS...... ~oliver Sent via DynaTAC. Please forgive spelling and grammar. -----Original Message----- From: Bill.Ingrum(a)t-systems.com Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:13:27 To: <aaron(a)heyaaron.com>; <nanog(a)nanog.org> Subject: RE: Heads-Up: GoDaddy Broke the Interwebs... Looks like this may be a DDoS attack from Anonymous: http://techcrunch.com/2012/09/10/godaddy-outage-takes-down-millions-of-site… -----Original Message----- From: Aaron C. de Bruyn [mailto:aaron@heyaaron.com] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 1:07 PM To: NANOG mailing list Subject: Heads-Up: GoDaddy Broke the Interwebs... For the last ~15 minutes I've been receiving complaints about DNS issues. GoDaddy DNS is apparently b0rked. I'm also seeing a lot of tweets about their hosting and VPS being down. I'm unable to access the control panel for one of my customer accounts. -A

17 23

[NANOG-announce] REMINDER: Upcoming NANOG mail list maintenance notification - 13-Sept-2012
by Randy Epstein 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

Reminder of the upcoming Mail List service scheduled for Thursday, September 13, 2012 beginning at 6 am Eastern, expected to last no more than 30 minutes. Regards, Randy Epstein NANOG CC Chair On behalf of the NANOG Communications Committee _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

Google / Gmail SSL write errors
by Paul Kelly :: Blacknight 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

Hi All, Are any of you (that use Exim as their MTA) having SSL write errors in your exim logs when delivering e-mail to Gmail or Google addresses? it seems limited to Exim as we've got a lot of other MTAs that have no issues. it also appears to be specific to emails with attachments... Anyone aware of changes G have made regarding TLS delivery? Ta, Paul Paul Kelly Technical Director Microsoft Certified Partner Blacknight Internet Solutions ltd Cloud Hosting, Colocation, Dedicated servers IP Transit Services Tel: +353(0)599183072 Lo-call: 1850 929 929 DDI: +353 (0) 59 9183091 e-mail: paul(a)blacknight.com web: http://www.blacknight.com Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park, Sleaty Road, Graiguecullen, Carlow, Ireland Company No.: 370845

3 2

(no subject)
by flower tailor 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

Delete me

4 3

RE: Google / Gmail SSL write errors
by Harry Hoffman 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

1 0

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)
by Jay Ashworth 12 Sep '12

12 Sep '12

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Owen DeLong" <owen(a)delong.com> > I am confused... I don't understand your comment. It is regularly alleged, on this mailing list, that NAT is bad *because it violates the end-to-end principle of the Internet*, where each host is a full-fledged host, able to connect to any other host to perform transactions. We see it now alleged that the opposite is true: that a laptop, say, like mine, which runs Linux and postfix, and does not require a smarthost to deliver mail to a remote server *is a bad actor* *precisely because it does that* (in attempting to send mail directly to a domain's MX server) *from behind a NAT router*, and possibly different ones at different times. I find these conflicting reports very conflicting. Either the end-to-end principle *is* the Prime Directive... or it is *not*. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274

18 46

above.net issues
by Joe Williams 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

Anyone experiencing packet loss on abovenet (to/from Ashburn)? We first got a round of packet loss around 8:45 PDT and then again just a few minutes ago. Thanks. -Joe -- Name: Joseph A. Williams Email: williams.joe(a)gmail.com

2 2

SAVVIS IPv6 Status
by Christopher J. Pilkington 11 Sep '12

11 Sep '12

We're in SAVVIS DC3 and wondering what the status of IPv6 is there. We submitted a request for IPv6, and we were told SAVVIS does not assign address space. Later emails we were told they will route IPv6 however. I haven't yet contacted sales... I think we lost our rep in the CenturyLink merger. I did see some blurbs from last year saying they weren't ready at that time. Was hoping this changed. We're not multihomed there, (except indirectly via through SAVVIS' own upstreams), so I don't think I can justify an ARIN assignment for that site. Replies on or off list welcome. Thanks much! -cjp

1 0