March 2012 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Spread Spectrum NANOG Operational Alert - Source Addresses with 240 to 255
by Guru NANOG 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

Adding four more bits to the Left of the Source Address and setting those bits to 1111 (0xF) can help to start the migration to "Regions" and more IPv4 Addresses - Using and Re-Using legacy spectrum <spectrumhttp://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-spa…>. The real Source Address is shifted 4 bits to the Right. The bits shifted off are placed in the Deprecated TOS field in the DDDD bits. The new TOS field has the SSSS.DDDD for the CPE. If a router attempts to reply or return to the Source Address it will hit one of the Regional Hubs. There are 16 of those. Agile CPE can reply in other ways to the Agile CPE that sent the Source Address with the 1111 bits. NANOG operators may want to study the evolution of 6to4 (2002:IPv4:0000) to 6RD (IPv4:IPv4) which tunnels using Re-Used legacy 32-bit addresses. The Legacy 32-bit Address Space will likely be around a long long time and be reused in many ways. That may increase the market value of /8s. Brokers are now selling /8s on the open market. http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txt <spectrumhttp://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-spa…> 16 /8s for "Future use" - it looks like the "Future" has arrived 240/8 Future use 1981-09 RESERVED [15] ... 255/8 Future use 1981-09 RESERVED [15] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-014.13.> 014.13. <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gundavelli-v6ops-community-wifi-svcs-014.13.> Overlapping IPv4 Address Support Wi-Fi Service Provider may segment the network into regions. Two regions may use overlap IPv4 address space. This is particularly important when the Internet is transitioning to IPv6. The Wi-Fi SP may not have enough unique public IPv4 addresses to globally address large number of Wi-Fi device.

2 1

AS209/CenturyLink NOC email?
by Jason Lixfeld 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

Anyone from AS209/CentryLink around to troubleshoot some routing weirdness? If not, anyone have a NOC email address for them? Google-fu and RADB searches came up empty. Thanks in advance.

5 4

.NA - North America or NAMIBIA ?
by Guru NANOG 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/na.html Namibian Network Information Center PO Box 1342 Swakopmund Namibia This gets confusing for the new Top Level Domains http://NA.NOG http://NANOG.GURU What happened to NEW.NOG ? There are only 256 members of NANOG ? http://www.nanog.org/membership_main.html#list Could (Does) each member *manage* a /8 ? http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txt Many /8s are not used and many others are wasted. Why is that ? Are people really paid $400,000 per year to manage that list ?

1 0

DiViNetworks experiences?
by Rafael Rodriguez 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

Hello list, Does anyone have experience (good or bad) with DiViNetworks and their DiViLink products? Off-list replies welcomed. Thanks.

1 0

BBC reports Kenya fiber break
by Marshall Eubanks 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Is anyone seeing this ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-17179544 "East Africa's high-speed internet access has been severely disrupted after a ship dropped its anchor onto fibre-optic cables off Kenya's coast." Regards Marshall

23 26

Re: Global Naps?
by Mark Stevens 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Seems some carriers ignored the fact GNAPs was shutting down and are still trying route calls to them which then causes a serious post dial delay while route advancing is taking place. I hope some carriers read this thread and check their routing. Mark On 3/5/2012 1:56 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > > On Mar 5, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Mark Stevens wrote: > >> Global NAPs seemingly shutdown all tandem services last week and it is causing major congestion issues with routing calls. Anyone have more information on this mess as it seems to be in it's 4th day? >> >> Thanks >> >> Mark Stevens > Mark: > > I'm not able to find anything with a google search on "GNAPS bankruptcy" but my understanding was that all equipment was to be shut down and offered for sale at the end of February. We had a router and some servers at the Boston IX, but they were inside a GNAPS cage, and we were told they'd be auctioned off if we didn't get them out by the end of February. > > In the absence of anything more concrete, please don't attribute this to me. > > Thanks, > > -Bill > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPVQxHAAoJEG+kcEsoi3+HYMQQAKnbKUuh/0+riq5AyDlvuDHW > ofqI4+256YuMV26uWC7s9h9UueJ4oM8AhpaJknjTE1ojlXQbCsIQTgYL7ugIY0gI > 4VICnJRvCxRL3MASwo8i736AzPJvOGb212oTgZDmY7aoSmV42ZfwgiYApU79UUkK > vCYsVtkWosUslkwOY7g6kL7ct7GSy3MCK3JImPXTc8gpYfaK+DDvWkVteIxfuTYN > yzBAfl2WmEwaQI6jNTry+G3lkrj+q3Sf/nNcRCZDpX3C8h8eyifKoL6t94lT2/L7 > orWDOVAhJ0Jpuo7z3mSsEpZ2kw5Xr+atR9uICTm5DwKqmiJuR/2FvI+1PaGouiB8 > mODDAtvk4CUM03NBKBx6QV3jeoeZhqvLHgbb63eaWQDjxlW9E13Tyq5XRyllL/4+ > g+DWspSWZCknJqr0izVGPXdaFm4BHLXrb+zG3gxbdYdQ63DC5UFzy6z52zgQqkhI > YXF5/QY6eXjzUPoo4FA3lRB83QsWoTFtOSLGT0DF07UeQiTYNMHD7G480MJ4vio7 > KfmHqVgoGfXUS/LHYETnE10uzfd0TPuO2KQzk35MddOYfOkTYRMjQkkQx87kHS/T > 8kgQZoyowmpZkxQAOZZDEto8q9QeQO8iWBetRO1uP1ylJAGnami598B0bidpwb/i > qCW3X+jYSYYxE4ZmYgj8 > =XJwh > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > >

1 0

Re: Global Naps?
by Alex Rubenstein 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Bankruptcy liquidation. ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Stevens <manager(a)monmouth.com> To: nanog(a)nanog.org <nanog(a)nanog.org> Sent: Mon Mar 05 13:46:15 2012 Subject: Global Naps? Global NAPs seemingly shutdown all tandem services last week and it is causing major congestion issues with routing calls. Anyone have more information on this mess as it seems to be in it's 4th day? Thanks Mark Stevens

1 0

IBM/BNT G8264, VMready, and OpenFlow
by Dan Weeks 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

My organization is looking into various software-defined switches for some dynamic firewall and virtualization applications. Can anyone here speak about experience with IBM/BNT VMready or OpenFlow or specifically about the BNT G8264? Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. -- Daniel M. Weeks

1 0

Evil Bit and Spread Spectrum IP Addressing - NANOG Source Address Shaping
by Guru NANOG 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Common Misconception: One additional bit of IPv4 Addressing will solve world hunger The Evil Bit (or spare unused bit) can be used to store (restore) one bit The Left-Most bit of the 32-bit Source Address Field can be SET to Zero no matter what the original value. The Evil bit can be set IFF the Left-Most bit is **changed**. Setting the Left-Most bit to zero **folds** this table in half. http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txt Setting the Left-Most bit to ONE would move return traffic to the upper half of the Spectrum which has vast quantities of unused /8s Wide-spread consensus shows that TWO bits can work. Three bits folds the table to 1/8th. Governments want a 4-bit Return Prefix to their Super-Hubs for IPv6-like intercept. The U.S.FCC is expected to issue the regulations on how Spread Spectrum Source Address Shaping will work in their licensed CPE wireless devices. There are 160-bits in the deprecated header so there are many ways to go. One-Way Broadcast IP Addressing is now available. The Source Address Field is used for the second half of the 64-bit Destination Address. The DF (Did Flip) bit near the Evil Bit is used to note the two halves of the Destination Address have been *flipped*. NANOGers simply route 32 and then 32 after the flip based only on the Destination Field. There is no Source Address, only a channel (port). Keywords: WRT DNSMASQ Tomato WIFI Linux CPE

6 5

which one a Technical Support or Help Desk
by Tarig Adam 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

I am working for a new Small ISP and we are trying to establish a center for receiving technical calls and inquires from customers and the technicians in this center may do some basics troubleshooting. What is the suitable title for this center and what we should call this people who do this job? Technical Support, Helpdesk, or Call Center. does each term has a specific meaning? And is there any standard structure of this center? And what is the relation of this people with other network/software Engineers? Thanks in advance. -- Tarig Adam

12 19