March 2012 - Test - lists.nanog.org

cable markers for marine environments
by Lyndon Nerenberg 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

I have a couple of wiring projects coming up on salt water-going vessels and I'm curious as to people's experiences with different types of cable marking products in a high-humidity / salt air / bilge environment None of the markers will be directly exposed to the outside elements, but quite a bit will be running below decks and will have to put up with the bilge. Anyone have any horror stories to share? My preference is for a direct printing system rather than stock card markers. --lyndon

7 8

Re: cable markers for marine environments
by Lyndon Nerenberg 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

On 2012-03-08, at 2:10 PM, George Herbert wrote: > Which fuel is present affects the label durability... Diesel.

1 0

[NANOG-announce] NANOG Meeting Updates
by Betty Burke <betty＠nanog.org> 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Colleagues: I am pleased to report, NANOG 54 is archived, visit http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog54/index.php Now posted are the attendance stats http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog54/documents/NANOG54Statistics_web.pdf and survey results http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog54/surveys.html The NANOG presentations have been updated. We do have a few outstanding, and we will post those slides as soon as received. Lastly, the presentation video files are now linked to the agenda page http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog54/agenda.php A final thank you to our Host, Speakers, Sponsors, and attendees. You ALL are valuable contributors to the NANOG community and very much appreciated. I welcome everyone to visit our NANOG 55 website. Meeting planning is already underway! Do not wait, visit: http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/callforpresentations.html http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/nanog55_registration.html http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/hotel.html Lastly, we welcome all our sponsors to join us in Vancouver. If you have not yet sent in your request, please visit our website and let us know of your interest. http://www.nanog.org/sponsors/sponsorform/index.php See you in June! Sincerely, Betty -- Betty Burke NewNOG/NANOG Executive Director 48377 Fremont Boulevard, Suite 117 Fremont, CA 94538 Tel: +1 510 492 4030 Office (810) 214-1218 _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

1 0

Juniper wlc8 vs HP ProCurve MSM710
by JoeSox 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Juniper WLC8 vs HP ProCurve MSM710 Any review to share? We are also looking at Cisco 5508 but spendy. Looking at 8 APs to start in one building then possible APs at 10 other locations. -- Thanks, Joe

1 0

Re: [c-nsp] ASR opinions..
by Christopher J. Pilkington 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Mark Tinka <mtinka(a)globaltransit.net> wrote: > Like the ASR1002-F, the ASR1001 is based on an ESP5 > forwarding processor. That comes with 512,000 FIB entries > maximum. > > As a side note, unlike the ASR1002-F, the ASR1001 can be > upgraded (software license) form the default 2.5Gbps > forwarding performance to 5Gbps. > >> To >> my knowledge this is not true as the 1001 has the Intel >> RP1.5... > > We're talking about FIB slots (the ESP) and not RIB slots > (the RP). Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I'm also confused on this ASR1001 FIB question. The Cisco ASR 1000 ESP data sheet (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps9343/data_sheet_c78-45…) lists the ASR1001 separately from the ASR1002-5G. It claims the ASR1001 does 1M IPv4 and 1M IPv6 routes. (Not to be confused with the numbers on the ASR 1000 RP data sheet, which say it can do up to 9M with 8GB RAM doing selective download.) Does anyone have a link to a definitive document clearly showing FIB numbers for the ASR1001? I've got an email into our Cisco SE, but I don't think they're motivated to sell us a lower-end box. :-) -cjp

5 8

did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
by John van Oppen 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

All - I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed from cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone know anything about this? We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic away from cogent for traffic to and from china telecom... Now cogent's path is _174_1239_4134_. In any case, was just wondering if anyone had noticed this. AS4134 is one that often generates NOC calls on our end due to their often saturated peers to any number of other upstreams and the cogent route had been remarkably uncongested previously so it is sad to see it disappear. Thanks, John @ AS11404.

8 9

RANCID script for monitoring the routes received from peers.
by Ajay Kumar 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Hello, We are running IX in India.Has some one written script for monitoring the routes announcement from peers?If yes,would you like to share code with me.It can be done via one script under the framework of RANCID.I want to know difference of routes,which has been added or removed. Thanks in advance. Regards, Ajay Kumar

3 2

facebook lost their A-record for www.facebook.com?
by Igor Ybema 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

[igor@vds ~]$ host -t A www.facebook.com ns1.facebook.com Using domain server: Name: ns1.facebook.com Address: 204.74.66.132#53 Aliases: www.facebook.com has no A record However: [igor@vds ~]$ dig A www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com ; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P2-RedHat-9.7.0-5.P2.el6_0.1 <<>> A www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 55657 ;; flags: qr rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2 ;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.facebook.com. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: www.facebook.com. 86400 IN NS glb2.facebook.com. www.facebook.com. 86400 IN NS glb1.facebook.com. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: glb2.facebook.com. 3600 IN A 69.171.255.10 glb1.facebook.com. 3600 IN A 69.171.239.10 ;; Query time: 11 msec ;; SERVER: 204.74.66.132#53(204.74.66.132) ;; WHEN: Wed Mar 7 08:42:44 2012 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 104 Not sure what is going wrong here. People @ facebook? regards, Igor

5 4

PLEASE don't feed the troll
by Jay Ashworth 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Nuff said? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274

3 2

Digi TS8 serial console server funkiness
by ML 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Hopefully someone here has wrestled with serial server oddities and can shed some light on this... I've got a serial console server made by Digi (TS8 PortServer) setup in a fairly vanilla mode: 9600-8-N-1....telnet to port 500X gets you to port X. Setup for a vt100 terminal type. Other VTs I tried didn't seem to make a difference. Problem is when attached to a Cisco switch I had laying around I get seemily random garble output when accessing the console of a remote Cisco device. (e.g. "show run" will get a few garbled lines halfway through, Holding down Enter will produce some garbled text every few lines). When attached to a Juniper device everything appears normal. The problem follows the port if I swap the Cisco device to the port the J-box was on. Other issues I've noticed..cannot use arrow keys to search command buffer. My Google-fu is failing me in coming up with the right name for the effect I'm seeing... Thanks

2 2