March 2010 - Test - lists.nanog.org

FastE iperf in Southeast US
by ML 04 Mar '10

04 Mar '10

Would anyone on list be kind enough to provide an iperf server for testing through a Level3 link in Miami? Atlanta or other close nodes should work as well. Throughput <100Mbps. Thanks in advance.

1 0

F5 contact
by J. Oquendo 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

Sorry for a non-NANOG related message. Anyone with a direct security contact at F5 please shoot me a message off-list. -- =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." - Warren Buffett 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E

1 0

Datacenter List for Rack&Stack in Europe, Switzerland
by Flint E. Barber 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

Anyone have a good source for finding contractors in Europe, specifically Switzerland, to do datacenter racking and cabling? A list or contractor site would be helpful. I am looking for 4 people, 2 in Berne and 2 in Zurich, for a small project in early April for about a week. Thanks, -Flint

1 0

SNMP, Static NAT and management systems including servers midwear and applications
by Bobby Mac 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

Hi All: I have been asked to extend the capabilities of my current monitoring and management system to another division of the company. All IP space is rfc1918 with no public routed space in the mix. Needless to say, and rightfully so, the network folks won't allow me to directly attach my management network to theirs. I use SNMP for system level monitoring for all servers via agents on the servers (WIN and NIX). Static NAT will be put into place but it breaks my SNMP gets used by the noc to validate CPU, disk util ect.. In a quick test NAT on my own network was set up and I can receive traps and parse them fine even with the NAT as the current trap receiver and visualization can handle incoming traps and NAT. I can see system IP and peer IP fulfilling the two sides. I know I can create an simple ALG via a Apache server with Perl to execute the SNMP get on the foreign network. Noc folks can see data and import it into the ticket (no blind escalations). My question is how have others handled SNMP and static NATs without a ground up re-architecture. I don't want to bring in new protocols and change my systems as they are today due to the heavy integration with provisioning, work flow and process flows. They have worked well to date besides the huge sunk $ investment in software and integration. I have been looking for a complex ALG but there doesn't seem to be much out there and I would rather not manipulate the payload, but map it correctly. Any suggestions? -Bob

2 1

Re: My email recived in incorrect date by hotmail
by Hank Nussbacher 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

At 01:17 03/02/2010 -0500, Tarig Y. Adam wrote: Your local PC has the date set incorrectly as Feb 3 rather than March 3. -Hank >Hi all >I notice all messages received by hotmail have wrong date header. for >example I sent a message at "2 Feb 2010 01:00:51 +03",but hotmail display >completely different. >mail.suin.edu.sd (DeskNow) is ours. Below headers captured by hotmail. > >Received: from mail.suin.edu.sd ([196.29.170.205]) by >snt0-mc4-f6.Snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); > > Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:23:03 -0800 > >Received: from internal > > by mail.suin.edu.sd (DeskNow) with SMTP ID 1268e8c8086_3AUH_2dc6; > > Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:00:51 +0300 (EAT) > >Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:00:51 -0500 (EST) > > > > >-- >Tarig Y. Adam >Chief Technical Officer >Sudanese Universities' Information Network (SUIN) >T: +249925659149 >w: www.suin.edu.sd > > > > >This message may contain confidential information from Sudanese >Universities Information Network (SUIN). If you have received this message >by mistake, please inform the sender by sending an e-mail reply. At the >same time please delete the message and any attachments from your system >without making, distributing or retaining any copies Although all our >e-mails messages and any attachments upon sending are automatically virus >scanned we assume no responsibility for any loss or damage arising >from the receipt. >Sudanese Universities Information Network (SUIN), P.O.Box 321/22, >University of >Khartoum, 11115, Khartoum, Sudan. www.suin.edu.sd >

1 0

Is there a gmail SMTP expert in the house?
by Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

Gmail just bounced some mail to the RFC822 From: address rather than the RFC821 MAIL FROM:. And http://mail.google.com/support/ won't let you report a problem unless you have a gmail account.

1 1

RE: [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
by Arjan van der Oest 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

CB3ROB scribbled: > let the riots commence 2.0.... Oh dear oh dear... >keep in mind, most telcos and ISPs (the founders and members of the >current IANA -> RIRS -> LIRs model resulting in a global internet which is >hard to censor) do not agree on this ITU proposal... I wonder who those ITU members are then? Are those all currently non-internet-offering telco's? > If we allow them to go forward, this WILL result in a "per country" > easy-to-filter internet in a few years when ipv6 is the only serious > protocol left. /me hands CB3ROB some tinfoil and mumbles : "believers, start your FOLDING!" > we only need to point out how easy it was for the DDR to simply route > all phonecalls to "the west" through a room where people monitored > telephone conversations, and this "country specific prefix" is just what > the ITU seems to want for the internet. Not comparing this to the former-DDR or Chinese situation (please refer to my tin-foil remark above) a per-country specific prefix is not necessarily a bad thing and may even have an upside. > In order to accomplish that they want to create their own address > registry, for now "secondary" to the ISP/telco run bottom-down RIR system > (RIPE,ARIN,APNIC,AFRINIC,APNIC) but ofcourse we can't expect it to take > long before repressive governments start to force "the internets" "in > their country" to use only the ITU registry... Why? > now -we- can always move our office to some other country and take our tax > money to some other resort, not a biggie, but don't come complaining to me > when germany at some point uses this to build their own chinese bigass > golden firewall with flames coming out of its ass to make it faster. Sven, I think several less-democratic nations have already proven that if they require total control of the internet within the boundaries of their country (sic) they can and will implement this anyhow. They don't require ITU nor the UN for this. They will just demand Cisco and Google to implement it and the corporate chiefs will just answer "How soon?"... > methods available to isps/telcos to stop this: > > - point out to governments that -we- own the internet You don't 'own' the internet, at most you own the infra within your own AS. At least you and others don't own my part of the internet :) >their economy runs >over it as a "courtesy" and that we can send them back to the stoneage at >any time we like by simply dropping 'their' traffic. Now that is a very smart thing to say. Another reason for the UN to gain total control... Go on, hand them more sticks. > (considering the fact that governments themselves are not capable of >running anything but a gray-cheese-with-a-dial telephone network Hm, I was under the impression that ARPANET was a government run network... > they need us, we don't need them If they install legislation that forbids anyone without a license to run a telecommunications network of ANY kind, surely you need them, with or without ITU and/or RIR's. > Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what has your country ever > done for you. Oh please Sven, let's not go there :) > we have the biggest stick in this matter. *bzzzz* Sorry, wrong again. The government ultimately draws the longest straw. Always... If they want to, they will. Now let's stop folding tin hats. -- Met vriendelijke groet / Kind Regards, Worldmax Operations B.V. Arjan van der Oest Network Design Engineer T.: +31 (0) 88 001 7912 F.: +31 (0) 88 001 7902 M.: +31 (0) 6 10 62 58 46 E.: arjan.van.der.oest(a)worldmax.nl W.:www.worldmax.nl W.:www.aerea.nl GPG: https://keyserver.pgp.com/ (Key ID: 07286F78, fingerprint: 2E9F 3AE2 0A8B 7579 75A9 169F 5D9E 5312 0728 6F78) Internet communications are not secure; therefore, the integrity of this e-mail cannot be guaranteed following transmission on the Internet. This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and erase this e-mail. Use of this e-mail by any person other than the addressee is strictly forbidden. This e-mail is believed to be free of any virus that might adversely affect the addressee's computer system; however, no responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. All the preceding disclaimers also apply to any possible attachments to this e-mail.

14 17

Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO?
by Raj Singh 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

We just lost all our Santa Monica links with XO. Anyone else seeing this? Thanks, Raj Singh | Director Network Engineering _________________________________ Demand Media | eNom, Inc. Direct: 425.974.4679 15801 NE 24th St. Bellevue, WA 98008 Raj.Singh(a)DemandMedia.com<mailto:Raj.Singh@DemandMedia.com>

2 1

RE: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO?
by Ray Sanders 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

We've been seeing issues with our XO connection in L.A as well. Mobile email powered by the force... ---- Original Message ---- From: "Carlos Alcantar" <carlos(a)race.com> Date: 3/2/10 4:28 pm To: "Raj Singh" <raj.singh(a)demandmedia.com> ; "NANOG" <nanog(a)nanog.org> Subj: RE: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO? I have 3 t1's that went down in the santa monica area at 1:47pm pst all off he same hub ds3. Carlos Alcantar Race Telecommunications, Inc. 101 Haskins Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 P: 650.649.3550 x143 F: 650.649.3551 E: carlos(a)race.com -----Original Message----- From: Raj Singh [mailto:raj.singh@demandmedia.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 2:25 PM To: NANOG Subject: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO? We just lost all our Santa Monica links with XO. Anyone else seeing this? Thanks, Raj Singh | Director Network Engineering _________________________________ Demand Media | eNom, Inc. Direct: 425.974.4679 15801 NE 24th St. Bellevue, WA 98008 Raj.Singh(a)DemandMedia.com<mailto:Raj.Singh@DemandMedia.com>

1 0

RE: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO?
by Carlos Alcantar 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

I have 3 t1's that went down in the santa monica area at 1:47pm pst all off he same hub ds3. Carlos Alcantar Race Telecommunications, Inc. 101 Haskins Way South San Francisco, CA 94080 P: 650.649.3550 x143 F: 650.649.3551 E: carlos(a)race.com -----Original Message----- From: Raj Singh [mailto:raj.singh@demandmedia.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 2:25 PM To: NANOG Subject: Anyone seeing any issues in LA area with XO? We just lost all our Santa Monica links with XO. Anyone else seeing this? Thanks, Raj Singh | Director Network Engineering _________________________________ Demand Media | eNom, Inc. Direct: 425.974.4679 15801 NE 24th St. Bellevue, WA 98008 Raj.Singh(a)DemandMedia.com<mailto:Raj.Singh@DemandMedia.com>

1 0