December 2010 - Test - lists.nanog.org

suggestion network devices
by adrian kok 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

Hi all I need high laten cy network devices products. eg: router/switch/firewall Can you share to me? and How can I test it also? Thank you so much

1 0

Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks
by Mark Kent 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

"Why do we install 120v instead of 208v?" was asked over a year ago either here or on cisco-nsp. It generated a long discussion, but it should have been cut short as early in the thread someone said all that had to be said: "because we are idiots." -mark

4 3

Re: AT&T to Level 3 routing issue?
by James Stahr 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

At 04:33 AM 12/2/2010, Harris Hui wrote: >Hi, > >Does anyone using AT&T seeing the routing issue to Level3? We saw some >issue with the end users using AT&T as a service provider having issue to >our upstream provider. Thanks > We saw issues with at&t last night as well. We called into Level3, but they "weren't aware of any issues". Not accepting that explanation for things, we eventually looked at Internet Health Report and saw a latency of 115ms and packet loss at 33% between at&t Chicago and Level 3 Detroit. So if anyone has more information, I'd appreciate it. thanks, -James

1 0

RE: Want to move to all 208V for server racks
by David Hubbard 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

We have run into some reasonably recent flat panel LCD's not running on 208v; we began having our colo build the new cages we order with 208v a few years ago and then found we couldn't use one of our crash carts in the newer cages until we replaced the monitor. If you're doing colo, some customers may have rack mounted LCD panels that could be an issue. And this was not a power brick monitor, straight plug. David > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Nakamura [mailto:zeusdadog@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 10:59 AM > To: NANOG > Subject: Want to move to all 208V for server racks > > I really want to move all newly installed internal and customer racks > over to all 208v power instead of 120v. As far as I can remember, I > can't remember any server/switch/router or any other equipment that > didn't run on 208v AC. (Other than you may need a different cable) > Anyone have any experience where some oddball equipment that couldn't > do 208v and regret going 208v? We won't have any TDM or SONET > equipment, all Ethernet switches, routers and servers. I have control > over internal equipment but sometimes customers surprises you. > > >

2 1

AT&T routing issues at 32.114.248.9 in Middletown US
by Harris Hui 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

Hi, Does anyone from AT&T can contact me off the list? We experienced a routing issues at 09:07GMT to 10:18GMT. The traffics to our subnet was stopped at one the AT&T router 32.114.248.9 in Middletown US. Tracing route to 74.220.121.100 over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 9.126.177.132 2 5 ms 5 ms 3 ms 9.182.248.14 3 4 ms 3 ms 4 ms 9.182.229.20 4 6 ms 3 ms 3 ms 9.64.194.210 5 9 ms 11 ms 14 ms 9.64.194.253 6 38 ms 34 ms 40 ms 9.64.193.214 7 40 ms 35 ms 32 ms 9.64.193.179 8 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms 9.182.211.22 9 34 ms 33 ms 35 ms 9.124.118.4 10 33 ms 32 ms 33 ms 122.248.182.2 11 241 ms 169 ms 252 ms 122.248.176.50 12 32.114.248.9 reports: Destination host unreachable.

1 0

Anyone here from CSX Transportation?
by Andy Ringsmuth 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

Having an issue with our mail being rejected on account of Microsoft Exchange security policies that I'd like to get resolved. --- Andy Ringsmuth andyring(a)inebraska.com

1 0

[NANOG-announce] Reminder: Today is the last day to register for NANOG 51 at the early bird rate
by David Meyer 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

Register today to get the early bird rate. Looking forward to seeing you in Miami. Dave (for the NANOG PC) _______________________________________________ NANOG-announce mailing list NANOG-announce(a)nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce

3 3

AT&T to Level 3 routing issue?
by Harris Hui 02 Dec '10

02 Dec '10

Hi, Does anyone using AT&T seeing the routing issue to Level3? We saw some issue with the end users using AT&T as a service provider having issue to our upstream provider. Thanks Tracing route to 74.220.121.100 over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 9.126.177.132 2 5 ms 5 ms 3 ms 9.182.248.14 3 4 ms 3 ms 4 ms 9.182.229.20 4 6 ms 3 ms 3 ms 9.64.194.210 5 9 ms 11 ms 14 ms 9.64.194.253 6 38 ms 34 ms 40 ms 9.64.193.214 7 40 ms 35 ms 32 ms 9.64.193.179 8 32 ms 32 ms 32 ms 9.182.211.22 9 34 ms 33 ms 35 ms 9.124.118.4 10 33 ms 32 ms 33 ms 122.248.182.2 11 241 ms 169 ms 252 ms 122.248.176.50 12 32.114.248.9 reports: Destination host unreachable. NetRange: 32.0.0.0 - 32.255.255.255 CIDR: 32.0.0.0/8 OriginAS: NetName: ATT-32-0-0-0-A NetHandle: NET-32-0-0-0-1 Parent: NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS.DE.PRSERV.NET NameServer: NS.UK.PRSERV.NET NameServer: NS.NL.PRSERV.NET RegDate: 1990-05-30 Updated: 2009-06-19 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-32-0-0-0-1 OrgName: AT&T Global Network Services, LLC OrgId: ATGS Address: 3200 Lake Emma Road City: Lake Mary StateProv: FL PostalCode: 32746 Country: US RegDate: Updated: 2009-05-04 Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/org/ATGS

1 0

Re: regional ASN's
by deleskie＠gmail.com 01 Dec '10

01 Dec '10

You can use one AS and communities to seperate your traffic/policies. -jim ------Original Message------ From: Ryan Finnesey To: NANOG list Subject: regional ASN's Sent: Dec 1, 2010 1:13 PM I see various people are recommending networks setup regional ASN's. I am in the process of setting up a new network which will serve as a transit network for all our operating units. I was planning on using one ASN for North America, Asia and Europe. Is this not recommended? Cheers Ryan Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network

4 6

Cage nuts/rack hw near SAVVIS DC3 (Sterling VA)
by Christopher J. Pilkington 01 Dec '10

01 Dec '10

Anyone know where I can buy cage nuts and rack screws locally near SAVVIS DC3 in Sterling, VA? They don't seem to have a local supply here, and somehow the racks we bought came with a 2:1 screw:nuts ratio. -cjp

15 15