Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks
"Why do we install 120v instead of 208v?" was asked over a year ago either here or on cisco-nsp. It generated a long discussion, but it should have been cut short as early in the thread someone said all that had to be said: "because we are idiots." -mark
"Why do we install 120v instead of 208v?" was asked over a year ago either here or on cisco-nsp. It generated a long discussion, but it should have been cut short as early in the thread someone said all that had to be said: "because we are idiots."
*GG* good old europp
On 12/2/10 9:20 AM, Mark Kent wrote:
"Why do we install 120v instead of 208v?" was asked over a year ago either here or on cisco-nsp. It generated a long discussion, but it should have been cut short as early in the thread someone said all that had to be said: "because we are idiots."
This one? http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2009-05/msg00649.html ~Seth
On 12/2/10 9:20 AM, Mark Kent wrote:
"Why do we install 120v instead of 208v?" was asked over a year ago either here or on cisco-nsp. It generated a long discussion, but it should have been cut short as early in the thread someone said all that had to be said: "because we are idiots."
This one?
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2009-05/msg00649.html
~Seth
No, this one. I knew it sounded familiar, it was me. http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2009-05/msg00650.html
participants (4)
-
Alex Rubenstein -
Ingo Flaschberger -
Mark Kent -
Seth Mattinen