November 2009 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Layer 2 vs. Layer 3 to TOR
by Raj Singh 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Guys, I am wondering how many of you are doing layer 3 to top of rack switches and what the pros and cons are. Also, if you are doing layer 3 to top of rack do you guys have any links to published white papers on it? Thanks, Raj Singh

27 31

SBC/AT&T Contact
by Stuart Kirk 18 Nov '09

18 Nov '09

Is anybody experiencing any issues with customer traffic originating from either of these carriers? If anybody from SBC or AT&T can contact me off-list I would appreciate it. Thank you. --Stuart

5 4

APNIC to issue from 175 /8 and 182 /8 soon
by brwatters＠absfoc.com 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

The following is a new meeting request: Subject: APNIC to issue from 175 /8 and 182 /8 soon Organizer: "Brian R. Watters" <brwatters(a)absfoc.com> Time: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 11:00:00 AM - 12:00:00 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Invitees: "Leslie Nobile" <leslien(a)arin.net>; "nanog" <nanog(a)nanog.org> *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* Forwarding at the request of APNIC... From: Secretariat <apnic-no-reply(a)apnic.net> Reply-To: "secretariat(a)apnic.net" <secretariat(a)apnic.net>, Secretariat <apnic-no-reply(a)apnic.net> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:31:42 -0500 To: APNIC-announce <apnic-announce(a)apnic.net> Subject: [Apnic-announce] APNIC to make allocations from 175/8 and 182/8 soon _______________________________________________________________________ APNIC to make allocations from 175/8 and 182/8 soon _______________________________________________________________________ Dear colleagues, In August 2009, APNIC received two IPv4 address blocks from IANA. These were: - 175/8 - 182/8 Reachability and routability testing is now complete and exceeds 96% for all prefixes. APNIC will soon be allocating from these prefixes. Please update your routing filters and network configurations accordingly. Please also double-check and release any blacklisted IP addresses from the above ranges, as they now represent fresh /8 blocks. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact the APNIC helpdesk: helpdesk(a)apnic.net Sincerely, -- APNIC Helpdesk helpdesk(a)apnic.net Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) Tel: +61 7 3858 3188 PO Box 2131 Milton, QLD 4064 Australia Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 Level 1, 33 Park Road, Milton, QLD http://www.apnic.net ________________________________________________________________________ * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary. _______________________________________________ Apnic-announce mailing list Apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce

2 1

What happened to Quick Eagle?
by Peter Hicks 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

All, I have a Quick Eagle DL087E here, but Quick Eagle's website has fallen off the planet: pwh@angel:~$ host -t any www.quickeagle.com Host www.quickeagle.com not found: 3(NXDOMAIN) Can anyone help me out with a firmware update and/or PDF manuals? It's been a little while since I had to use one of these. Cheers Peter

3 2

APNIC to issue from 175 /8 and 182 /8 soon
by Leslie Nobile 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Forwarding at the request of APNIC... From: Secretariat <apnic-no-reply(a)apnic.net> Reply-To: "secretariat(a)apnic.net" <secretariat(a)apnic.net>, Secretariat <apnic-no-reply(a)apnic.net> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:31:42 -0500 To: APNIC-announce <apnic-announce(a)apnic.net> Subject: [Apnic-announce] APNIC to make allocations from 175/8 and 182/8 soon _______________________________________________________________________ APNIC to make allocations from 175/8 and 182/8 soon _______________________________________________________________________ Dear colleagues, In August 2009, APNIC received two IPv4 address blocks from IANA. These were: - 175/8 - 182/8 Reachability and routability testing is now complete and exceeds 96% for all prefixes. APNIC will soon be allocating from these prefixes. Please update your routing filters and network configurations accordingly. Please also double-check and release any blacklisted IP addresses from the above ranges, as they now represent fresh /8 blocks. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact the APNIC helpdesk: helpdesk(a)apnic.net Sincerely, -- APNIC Helpdesk helpdesk(a)apnic.net Asia Pacific Network Information Centre (APNIC) Tel: +61 7 3858 3188 PO Box 2131 Milton, QLD 4064 Australia Fax: +61 7 3858 3199 Level 1, 33 Park Road, Milton, QLD http://www.apnic.net ________________________________________________________________________ * Sent by email to save paper. Print only if necessary. _______________________________________________ Apnic-announce mailing list Apnic-announce(a)lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-announce

1 0

Mauricio's FCP (was: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS)
by Jeffrey Lyon 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

> However, the truth is that we have outgrown our FCP. YMMV with the product... Why is that? What particular problems did you run into? -- Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team jeffrey.lyon(a)blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net Black Lotus Communications of The IRC Company, Inc. Platinum sponsor of HostingCon 2010. Come to Austin, TX on July 19 - 21 to find out how to "protect your booty."

2 1

RE: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
by Rodriguez, Mauricio 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Apologies -- That was supposed to be addressed to Rick only... However, the truth is that we have outgrown our FCP. YMMV with the product... From: Rodriguez, Mauricio Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:08 PM To: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Bandwidth Monitoring per AS Sure, Rick. Maybe they can buy ours off of us!! ;-) Regards, Mauricio Rodriguez Manager of IP/Data Engineering, FPL FiberNet Email: Mauricio.Rodriguez(a)fpl.com Office: 305-552-3418 Mobile: 786-236-2665 Pager: 786-236-2665

1 0

Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
by Rodriguez, Mauricio 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Sure, Rick. Maybe they can buy ours off of us!! ;-) Regards, Mauricio Rodriguez Manager of IP/Data Engineering, FPL FiberNet Email: Mauricio.Rodriguez(a)fpl.com Office: 305-552-3418 Mobile: 786-236-2665 Pager: 786-236-2665

1 0

Bandwidth Monitoring per AS
by Babak Pasdar 17 Nov '09

17 Nov '09

Could some of you share your recommendations on the best tools for monitoring per AS communications. I would like to track all source AS to Destination AS traffic utilization. Best Regards, Babak -- Babak Pasdar President & CEO | Certified Ethical Hacker Bat Blue Corporation | Integrity . Privacy . Availability (p) 212.461.3322 x3005 | (f) 212.584.9999 | (w) www.BatBlue.com Receive Bat Blue's Daily Security Intelligence Report Bat Blue's AS: 25885 | BGP Policy | Peering Policy Bat Blue's Legal Notice Reducing IT Security Budget, Burden & Risk - Video | Article

8 7

AH is pretty useless and perhaps should be deprecated
by Jack Kohn 16 Nov '09

16 Nov '09

Hi, Interesting discussion on the utility of Authentication Header (AH) in IPSecME WG. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg05026.html Post explaining that AH even though protecting the source and destination IP addresses is really not good enough. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg05056.html What do folks feel? Do they see themselves using AH in the future? IMO, ESP and WESP are good enough and we dont need to support AH any more .. Jack

13 18