September 2004 - Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: 30 Gmail Invites
by Robert Bonomi 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

> From owner-nanog(a)merit.edu Sat Sep 11 21:58:47 2004 > From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb(a)research.att.com> > To: Paul Vixie <vixie(a)vix.com> > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: 30 Gmail Invites > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:54:16 -0400 > > > In message <g38ybgi5nd.fsf(a)sa.vix.com>, Paul Vixie writes: > > > >i still can't understand why anyone would want a gmail account, free or not. > > > >not just "anyone on nanog". anyone, anywhere, ever. the reasons "why not" > >are compelling enough. but there are no counterbalancing reasons "why to", > >either compelling or otherwise. > > I agree. The privacy implications are *really* scary. (And they're > sufficiently worse for non-subscribers that I've contemplated blocking > gmail-bound messages from my (personal) systems.) > > --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb > > > From owner-nanog(a)merit.edu Sat Sep 11 21:58:47 2004 > From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb(a)research.att.com> > To: Paul Vixie <vixie(a)vix.com> > Cc: nanog(a)merit.edu > Subject: Re: 30 Gmail Invites > Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:54:16 -0400 > > > In message <g38ybgi5nd.fsf(a)sa.vix.com>, Paul Vixie writes: > > > >i still can't understand why anyone would want a gmail account, free or not. > > > >not just "anyone on nanog". anyone, anywhere, ever. the reasons "why not" > >are compelling enough. but there are no counterbalancing reasons "why to", > >either compelling or otherwise. > > I agree. The privacy implications are *really* scary. (And they're > sufficiently worse for non-subscribers that I've contemplated blocking > gmail-bound messages from my (personal) systems.) While we're on _that_ subject, what about Postini, or Brightmail, or -any- other big provider (e.g. SBC/Yahoo) that handles mail for multiple 'client' domains? Every one of those folks also reads and analyzes everybody's incoming mail, including correlating it with mail sent to other destination on their systems. AND correlating source (IP address and/or email address) with content.

4 3

Re: ISP Policies
by Rohit Gupta 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

On a related note : Do ISPs ever tweak around with Local Prefs and weights so as to select BGP paths with greater AS PATH length? Would it ever make sense for a provider to chose a longer AS PATH length BGP route against a shorter AS PATH length route? Rohit MTech Comp Sc. Institute of Technology Banaras Hindu University ----- Original Message ----- From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" To: Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 11:27 PM Subject: Re: ISP Policies At 11:04 AM +0530 9/9/04, Tulip Rasputin wrote: Hi Chris, Or, you just don't want to send traffic through Bill Manning's ASN because you dislike his hawiian T-Shirt Policy? There are probably a few hundred reasosn why you'd avoid an ASN... In general though I'd think that like Michel said: "It's a pain and its doing something that bgp should do for you without lots of messing about" That's why i explicitly asked for some "social/political/etc." reasons where an ISP may not want his traffic to traverse some particular AS number(s). Something which is beyond BGP to determine as of now ! :-) Indiatimes Email now powered by APIC Advantage. Help! HelpClick on the image to chat with me

3 2

Re: Untrustworthy Internet providers
by J. Oquendo 12 Sep '04

12 Sep '04

On Sat, 12 Sep 2004, Sean Donelan wrote: > The folks with the tinfoil hats are going to need extra shielding. http://www.politrix.org/mgz/tinfoil.jpg > If you believe your provider is untrustworthy, mail storage is a small > part of your problems. An untrustworthy provider doesn't need to run > the mail server to watch the traffic to and from it. Encryption helps a > little, but that's true even if you used a provider's mail server. > Encryption is difficult for most people to do well. If you put a > personal server in a co-lo, remember the co-lo provider potentially has > physical access to your equipment on their premises. In regards to having one's server in co-lo facilities, one can ensure their server is guarded by either having the machine startup with a password. Should some provider attempt to reboot into some form of shell it would still take some time to break a password and get in the machine. By the time (if the right measures were taken) your server went down, if you had proper monitoring on the machine, you would know and hopefully you would go on to auditing your machine. Otherwise it would take minutes to reproduce your disk which is threatening considering anyone possibly a competitor could access some sensitive information using tools small enough to hide under their arm. (http://ics.forensic.e-symposium.com/computerforensics/) This reminds me of the security at what used to be Exodus in Jersey City. Back in 1996 I worked for one company through 1999. In 99 I went to work elsewhere for a company with co-lo machines in the same facility. Of course I went through the rigorous ID'ing of proving who I was, where I worked along with all the fax information etc., and wouldn't you know it, short of stopping to take DNA samples, Exodus staff badged me with my previous employers information. When the keys were handed over I responded I no longer worked there. Go figure. > On the other hand, if your trust your provider enough to believe it will > conform to the law and contractural arrangements, you may make a > rational choice to rely on the service provider to maintain a mail > server instead of trying to maintain one yourself. Some people hide > their money in a mattress in their house, other people keep valuables in > a safe deposit box at a bank. If it's your own business, I personally feel you should take your own steps to ensure your data is protected. No one else will do the job you want. You might get all of the soupy sales talk, but the work will to some degree be subpar. One of my petpeeves with my current location is they're relying on Postini for filtering. Sure Postini does so and so filtering, but 1) they don't even use SSL, 2) they're configured to know our users' passwords and usernames which is horrible. I argued about doing our own RBL's and filtering even blocking entire subnets but some of our loony customers have called with even loonier comments such as "Is there a problem on your network today? I haven't gotten my spam" (not kidding) Being I'm just your *.Corp lacky and have become tired of rambling on, I laugh it off when poop hits the fan with a silent "told you so." > US law may still be developing in the area of stored electronic > information in comparison to physical storage. US Supreme Court > Justice Marshall said in Couch (1973) "Placing [records] in a safe > deposit box is different from letting them remain for many years with an > accountant." In the electronic world how different is storing a file > on a floppy disc in a physical safe deposit box of a bank for more > than 180 days different than storing the same file online in an > "electronic vault" of a Internet service provider for more than 180 > days? If I'm not mistaken Sarbanes Oxley placed some really harsh standards for providers. I started reading through some of the issues on the tech side of that law, but am still catching up on CALEA, CHIPs, and other fuzzy little acronym(aged) laws that sprout up like nasty weeds =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+ J. Oquendo GPG Key ID 0x51F9D78D Fingerprint 2A48 BA18 1851 4C99 CA22 0619 DB63 F2F7 51F9 D78D http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x51F9D78D sil @ politrix . org http://www.politrix.org sil @ infiltrated . net http://www.infiltrated.net "How can we account for our present situation unless we believe that men high in this government are concerting to deliver us to disaster?" Joseph McCarthy "America's Retreat from Victory"

1 0

Please *stop* with the GMAIL invites
by Etaoin Shrdlu 11 Sep '04

11 Sep '04

Trust me, anyone that has a gmail account now has invites. They're a dime a dozen, and it only comes across as spam, in my book. If you want to play the game of who's in, and who isn't, I suggest you go play on orkut, where there's still a pretense of exclusivity. Please consider the charter of the list when you post these things. Some of us read multiple mailing lists, and this sort of thing just adds to the noise. We now return to our regularly scheduled SPF flame fests. -- I cannot help fearing that men may reach a point where they look on every new theory as a danger, every innovation as a toilsome trouble, every social advance as a first step toward revolution, and that they may absolutely refuse to move at all. (Alexis de Toqueville)

1 0

Looking Glass Wiki & Route Server Wiki
by Janet Sullivan 11 Sep '04

11 Sep '04

The URL for the BGP4.net looking glass wiki has changed to simply "www.bgp4.net/lg". Likewise, the route server wiki can be found at "www.bgp4.net/rs". Thanks to those of you who have pitched in with wiki updates.

1 0

Re: Odd behavior from p4-0-0.MAR1.Austin-TX.us.xo.net
by rwcrowe＠comcast.net 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

The loop seems to be in AS 2828 (XO Communications) with router at 64.1.2.38. -- Rob Crowe rwcrowe(a)comcast.net -------------- Original message -------------- > > > We are originating traffic from AS11 and we are seeing an apparent loop > downstream from the router listed in the header when attempting to connect > to rsync1.spamhaus.org. > > Is this problem unique to us or are others seeing the same behavior. > Scott C. McGrath

3 3

Qwest engineer?
by andrew2＠one.net 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Sorry to bother the whole list with this...could someone involved in routing at Qwest ping me offlist? Thanks, Andrew

1 0

Weekly Routing Table Report
by Routing Table Analysis 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfs(a)cisco.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 11 Sep, 2004 Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 146736 Prefixes after maximum aggregation: 87224 Unique aggregates announced to Internet: 70017 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18024 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 15648 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 7294 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2376 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 78 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.8 Max AS path length visible: 22 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 39 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 16 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 1337060260 Equivalent to 79 /8s, 177 /16s and 235 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 36.1 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 58.3 Percentage of available address space allocated: 61.9 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 67256 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 28030 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 14146 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 26260 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 14223 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 2133 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 633 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 331 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.8 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 22 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 161753472 Equivalent to 9 /8s, 164 /16s and 41 /24s Percentage of available APNIC address space announced: 73.8 APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 23552-24575 APNIC Address Blocks 58/7, 60/7, 202/7, 210/7, 218/7, 220/7 and 222/8 ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 83838 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 51137 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 64173 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 22648 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 9534 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3401 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 927 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 18 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 231930912 Equivalent to 13 /8s, 210 /16s and 252 /24s Percentage of available ARIN address space announced: 69.1 ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647,29695-30719, 31744-33791 ARIN Address Blocks 24/8, 63/8, 64/6, 68/7, 70/7, 72/8, 198/7, 204/6, 208/7 and 216/8 RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 27170 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 18966 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 24008 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 15815 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 5804 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 3120 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 996 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 5.4 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 21 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 170824000 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 46 /16s and 145 /24s Percentage of available RIPE address space announced: 59.9 RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-34815 RIPE Address Blocks 62/8, 80/5, 88/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/7, 212/7 and 217/8 LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 6416 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 2282 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 6182 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 3543 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 393 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 119 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 78 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.2 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 15 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 15884544 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 242 /16s and 97 /24s Percentage of available LACNIC address space announced: 47.3 LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671 LACNIC Address Blocks 200/7 Emerging AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 1243 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 690 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 827 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 662 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 92 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 21 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 12 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.6 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 16 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 2060032 Equivalent to 0 /8s, 31 /16s and 111 /24s Percentage of available AfriNIC address space announced: 12.3 AfriNIC AS Blocks <none> AfriNIC Address Blocks 196/8 APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4134 832 4193 156 Data Communications Bureau 1221 811 1184 585 Telstra Pty Ltd 4766 558 3409 265 Korea Internet Exchange for " 9583 527 41 101 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 4755 366 133 50 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 9929 356 162 34 China Netcom Corp. 9443 355 70 81 Primus Telecommunications 2907 352 1840 326 SINET Japan 17676 348 5180 39 XTAGE CORPORATION 17557 314 22 155 Pakistan Telecom 703 312 341 241 UUNET 2764 285 274 233 connect.com.au pty ltd 7474 272 270 202 Optus Communications Pty Ltd 4802 232 28 142 Wantree Development 9942 231 73 127 COMindico Australia 9800 228 372 66 CHINA UNICOM 9498 226 49 51 BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD. 17974 202 61 10 PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA 4837 201 2256 105 chinanet IDC center beijing n 10036 201 18 184 C&M Communication Co. Ltd. ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 7018 1398 6751 967 AT&T WorldNet Services 701 1270 8423 913 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 1239 943 2866 629 Sprint 2386 825 561 589 AT&T Data Communications Serv 4323 779 633 216 Time Warner Telecom 18566 739 208 6 Covad Communications 6197 718 363 340 BellSouth Network Solutions, 721 715 21026 295 DLA Systems Automation Center 209 621 3431 495 Qwest 20115 583 418 295 Charter Communications 3356 581 10967 449 Level 3 Communications, LLC 6347 539 296 116 SAVVIS Communications Corpora 852 511 1141 398 Telus Advanced Communications 7843 488 674 104 Adelphia Corp. 3561 466 2390 348 Cable & Wireless USA 6198 455 401 210 BellSouth Network Solutions, 7132 436 8157 378 SBC Internet Services 705 428 163 270 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 22773 395 960 19 Cox Communications, Inc. Atla 5668 393 87 18 Century Telephone RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 702 642 2031 532 UUNET - Commercial IP service 3320 301 2470 238 Deutsche Telekom AG 3301 281 1098 271 TeliaNet Sweden 8220 276 444 262 COLT Internet - International 21502 268 40 3 NUMERICABLE is a cabled netwo 680 251 2025 239 DFN-IP service G-WiN 3246 217 475 214 Song Networks 13083 217 51 8 Mannesmann Datenverarbeitung 1257 213 747 182 SWIPnet Swedish IP Network 8708 203 113 182 Romania Data Systems S.A. 5515 199 842 145 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 3215 182 876 77 France Telecom Transpac 786 177 1794 177 The JANET IP Service 719 157 288 102 LANLINK autonomous system 5400 156 209 126 BT Ignite European Backbone 6746 154 29 131 Dynamic Network Technologies, 25186 153 154 109 France Telecom Transpac's Tra 3303 147 610 130 Swisscom Ltd 3269 145 1195 66 TELECOM ITALIA 8866 138 17 20 Bulgarian Telecommunication C LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6140 395 138 66 ImpSat 11172 355 83 52 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V 8151 285 406 131 UniNet S.A. de C.V. 16814 212 13 7 NSS, S.A. 6147 191 86 19 Telefonica Del Peru 11664 151 11 22 Keytech SA 6505 135 90 93 Global One Communicaoes Ltda 6503 134 187 90 AVANTEL, S.A. 7303 121 55 19 Telecom Argentina Stet-France 11992 90 9 31 Integrated Systems 14420 87 6 35 ANDINATEL S.A. 6535 84 5 18 Chilesat Servicios Empresari 10481 81 32 7 Prima S.A. 11556 81 41 3 Cable-Wireless Panama 11311 80 7 20 Sinectis S.A. 5639 77 8 8 Telecommunications Services o 15311 76 21 36 Telefonica Empresas 4270 70 18 9 Red de Interconexion Universi 14117 70 5 4 Telefonica del Sur S.A. 10292 68 6 26 TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF JAMAICA AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 3741 252 632 219 The Internet Solution 5536 114 16 4 Internet Egypt Network 2018 94 297 92 Tertiary Education Network 2905 92 276 81 The Internetworking Company o 20928 59 16 1 Noor Advanced Technologies AS 14988 48 16 1 Botswana Telecommunications C 24835 36 34 7 RAYA Telecom - Egypt 6713 31 42 10 Itissalat Al-MAGHRIB 5713 26 125 24 Telkom SA Ltd 8524 25 1 4 AUCEGYPT Autonomous System 9129 25 3 4 UUNET Kenya 16637 24 10 19 Johnnic e-Ventures 10798 18 1 12 Standard Bank of South Africa 12258 18 3 12 Vodacom Internet Company 12455 17 4 2 Jambonet Autonomous system 8346 15 7 14 SONATEL-AS Autonomous System 15706 15 4 2 Sudatel Internet Exchange Aut 21280 14 2 3 Swift Global Kenya Ltd.Is an 21491 14 1 3 UTL On-line is RF broadband I 15808 13 1 2 Communication Solutions Ltd i Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 18566 739 733 Covad Communications 4134 832 676 Data Communications Bureau 4323 779 563 Time Warner Telecom 9583 527 426 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 6347 539 423 SAVVIS Communications Corpora 721 715 420 DLA Systems Automation Center 7843 488 384 Adelphia Corp. 6197 718 378 BellSouth Network Solutions, 22773 395 376 Cox Communications, Inc. Atla 5668 393 375 Century Telephone 6467 390 360 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 701 1270 357 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 27364 365 346 Armstrong Cable Services 22909 365 330 Comcast Cable Corporation 6140 395 329 ImpSat 9929 356 322 China Netcom Corp. 4755 366 316 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Aut 1239 943 314 Sprint 17676 348 309 XTAGE CORPORATION 11172 355 303 Servicios Alestra S.A de C.V List of Unregistered ASNs (Global) ---------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 23456 UNALLOCATED 62.241.160.0/19 25346 Pipex Internet UK IS 23456 UNALLOCATED 81.86.0.0/16 25346 Pipex Internet UK IS 23456 UNALLOCATED 81.178.0.0/15 25346 Pipex Internet UK IS 65217 PRIVATE 192.102.236.0/24 217 University of Minnes 1877 UNALLOCATED 192.108.199.0/24 1876 Southern Methodist U 37799 UNALLOCATED 195.214.216.0/21 30799 VERANET Internet Ser 64572 PRIVATE 219.146.96.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64572 PRIVATE 219.146.104.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64573 PRIVATE 219.146.112.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64573 PRIVATE 219.146.120.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64576 PRIVATE 219.146.128.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64576 PRIVATE 219.146.136.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64582 PRIVATE 219.146.144.0/22 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64582 PRIVATE 219.146.148.0/22 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64584 PRIVATE 219.146.176.0/22 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64584 PRIVATE 219.146.180.0/22 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64575 PRIVATE 219.146.192.0/22 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64575 PRIVATE 219.146.196.0/22 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64580 PRIVATE 219.146.208.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64581 PRIVATE 219.146.216.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64585 PRIVATE 219.146.224.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64586 PRIVATE 219.146.232.0/21 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64582 PRIVATE 219.147.0.0/24 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64572 PRIVATE 222.173.128.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64572 PRIVATE 222.173.144.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64573 PRIVATE 222.173.160.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64573 PRIVATE 222.173.176.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64576 PRIVATE 222.173.192.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64576 PRIVATE 222.173.208.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64582 PRIVATE 222.173.224.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64582 PRIVATE 222.173.240.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64584 PRIVATE 222.174.96.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64584 PRIVATE 222.174.112.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64575 PRIVATE 222.174.160.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64575 PRIVATE 222.174.176.0/20 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64580 PRIVATE 222.174.224.0/19 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64581 PRIVATE 222.175.0.0/19 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64585 PRIVATE 222.175.32.0/19 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro 64586 PRIVATE 222.175.64.0/19 17633 ASN for Shandong Pro Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 132.0.0.0/10 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 137.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 158.0.0.0/13 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.43.230.0/24 4738 South Australian Academic Res 192.44.0.0/19 702 UUNET - Commercial IP service 192.70.164.0/24 25689 National Research Council of 192.83.16.0/20 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.32.0/19 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.96.0/22 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.83.100.0/24 5515 Sonera Solution Autonomous Sy 192.84.205.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.119.135.0/24 270 NASA 192.135.50.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Services 192.136.79.0/24 719 LANLINK autonomous system 192.172.0.0/19 721 DLA Systems Automation Center 192.172.11.0/24 721 DLA Systems Automation Center Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:19 /9:3 /10:6 /11:15 /12:63 /13:134 /14:304 /15:542 /16:8041 /17:2205 /18:3828 /19:9765 /20:10318 /21:7739 /22:10652 /23:12293 /24:80088 /25:238 /26:196 /27:103 /28:46 /29:24 /30:72 /31:0 /32:42 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 18566 724 739 Covad Communications 2386 592 825 AT&T Data Communications Serv 6197 570 718 BellSouth Network Solutions, 7018 544 1398 AT&T WorldNet Services 702 395 642 UUNET - Commercial IP service 6347 390 539 SAVVIS Communications Corpora 1239 371 943 Sprint 9583 369 527 Satyam Infoway Ltd., 4766 361 558 Korea Internet Exchange for " 701 357 1270 UUNET Technologies, Inc. 27364 349 365 Armstrong Cable Services 5668 343 393 Century Telephone 6198 334 455 BellSouth Network Solutions, 20115 301 583 Charter Communications 6467 287 390 E.Spire Communications, Inc. 9929 285 356 China Netcom Corp. 6517 269 296 Yipes Communications, Inc. 21502 265 268 NUMERICABLE is a cabled netwo 13609 261 304 Choice One Communications Inc 3320 247 301 Deutsche Telekom AG Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 4:4 8:3 12:1387 13:1 15:5 16:2 17:3 20:9 24:704 32:66 33:3 38:78 40:54 44:4 52:3 55:1 56:3 57:17 60:6 61:477 62:494 63:1847 64:2307 65:2065 66:2474 67:389 68:538 69:703 70:68 80:521 81:543 82:318 83:144 84:26 128:109 129:171 130:87 131:190 132:26 134:186 135:17 136:186 137:55 138:169 139:35 140:162 141:107 142:120 143:67 144:155 145:41 146:293 147:95 148:423 149:108 150:87 151:70 152:168 153:68 154:2 155:129 156:58 157:79 158:142 159:160 160:57 161:71 162:388 163:80 164:204 165:159 166:111 167:224 168:288 169:114 170:267 171:9 192:5599 193:2888 194:2127 195:1466 196:584 198:3675 199:3256 200:3752 201:16 202:4827 203:5643 204:3228 205:2092 206:2322 207:2545 208:2151 209:3060 210:1479 211:600 212:1070 213:1189 214:130 215:31 216:3753 217:993 218:193 219:86 220:249 221:37 222:43 End of report

1 0

OT: Anybody from RBC.com read this?
by Alon Tirosh 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

Please contact me offlist. We're an account client of yours with periodic trouble getting mail to you for almost a year now, and Id like to get it resolved.

1 0

Re: Spammers Skirt IP Authentication Attempts
by Paul Vixie 10 Sep '04

10 Sep '04

> > you could bet that by closing off this avenue, SPF will force > > spammers to use other methods that are more easily detected / > > filtered, and that if you play this cat&mouse game long enough, it > > will drive the cost of spam so high (or drive the volume benefit so > > low) that it'll just die out. > > Good summary. This is the right strategy. on the contrary. it has been a bad strategy and is still a bad strategy. > > but to me, SPF is just a way to rearrange the deck chairs on the > > Titanic. > > I can swim but I believe that the water under the Titanic was quite > too cold to stay. Any advice to the people on the NANOG mailing list > before the boat goes down? the boat will never go all the way down -- the internet, and e-mail, are "survivable". however, it will get very cold where you are, since you'll be floating in atlantic icewater while clinging to floating wreckage. if that fate does not appeal to you, then embrace change. specifically, the kind of change that makes you cringe in fear because it is so alien. i'm referring to whitelists, webs of trust, trusted introducers, micropayments, and bonding. if you insist on an inbox that's open to all comers no matter what their intentions or reputation, then get out your snorkle.

1 0