September 2001 - Test - lists.nanog.org

RE: Horrible world trade center crash, traffic effect
by Roeland Meyer 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

|> From: Robert Hough [mailto:rch@acidpit.org] |> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:44 PM |> Just curious, but are people going looney at the gas stations in your |> neck of the woods too? I was barely able to get into my apartment |> complex due to the line that extended two blocks away from the gas |> station... Not to mention the teller and ATM lines.

1 0

RE: OT: Give Blood
by Steve Smith 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

Same in Memphis, only type O being taken now, the rest should come back tomorrow -----Original Message----- From: Me [mailto:smentzer@mentzer.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 5:48 PM To: Jason Legate Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: OT: Give Blood Here in Denver most of the banks are asking that people wait until tomorrow, as there are already 5 hour lines to give blood. -- -sean Spoon! On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Jason Legate wrote: > Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:13:55 -0700 > From: Jason Legate <jlegate(a)evine.com> > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: OT: Give Blood > > This is a call to every able bodied person out there, please go out and give > blood as soon as you can, to help all those injured people on the east coast. > > Red Cross - 1-888-BLOOD-88, www.redcross.org > > I've also heard that 1-800-GIVE-LIFE reaches them. > > -j > >

1 0

RE: World Trade Center attack
by Kevin_Badeen＠harte-hanks.com 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

Been told by Worldcomm that 100ds3's are down in NYC. Furthermore they are under government control and will be directed in what to drop or leave up. |--------+-----------------------> | | Jim Popovitch| | | <jimpop@yahoo| | | .com> | | | Sent by: | | | owner-nanog@m| | | erit.edu | | | | | | | | | 09/11/2001 | | | 10:17 AM | | | | |--------+-----------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: nanog(a)merit.edu | | cc: | | Subject: RE: World Trade Center attack | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Phone lines are all tied up, but AIM and email are working great for me. --- "Youse, Chuck" <Chuck.Youse(a)ebone.com> wrote: > > I'm currently experiencing problems getting through to friends/family > in NYC > from London. > > Anybody else having the same issues ... ? > > Chuck Youse > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Pendergrass [mailto:greg@band-x.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:15 PM > To: 'Nanog@Merit. Edu' > Subject: World Trade Center attack > > > > Both towers of the World Trade Center are burning after planes flew > into > them in an apparent suicide attack. Many people are certainly dead. I > don't > give a damn what network disruption this causes, but please say a > prayer for > those killed. > > Greg Pendergrass > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com

2 1

From Navipath (update)
by Avi Freedman 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

FYI Avi To: Joe Lapolito <jlapolit(a)drama.navipath.com> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 22:29:51 -0400 (EDT) CC: Avi Freedman <freedman(a)freedman.net>, Joe Lapolito <jlapolit(a)navipath.com> If you could also post this: Furthur update: We just lost contact with all our equipment at 32 Old Slip. Joe Lapolito Dir. Network Eng. NaviPath

1 0

800 service affected?
by Roy 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

According to Genuity: "In response to today's tragic events, the Federal Communications Commission has shut down all non-critical 1-800 numbers around the country." I haven't seen any sign of this.

2 1

over the course of the day
by Alex Rubenstein 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

we've been compiling as many WTC pics as we can.. Lots of places we got them from were getting killed, so we mirrored them for faster access. http://wtc.nac.net We, in Parsippany, NJ (about 30 miles due west of WTC) were able to see the smoke plums from our roof: http://wtc.nac.net/www.liquid-dynamics.net/pics/WTC/Roof%2520of%2520NAC/MVC… Some operation content: We've lost 32 Old Slip; 25 B'way is running on generator, and they say they have at least 50 - 70 hours of fuel left. *all* circuits we have from 25 B'way to 111 8th, 60 Hudson, and many other buildings are still up. Many circuits which pass on MFN fiber are still OK. 32 Old Slip appears to be power related. So much for generators. Distance of 25 B'Way to 2 WTC: http://www.mapquest.com/cgi-bin/mqtrip?link=btwn%2Ftwn-ddir_na_basic_main&u… According to Mapquest, 700 meters by road. -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex(a)nac.net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --

1 0

OT: Give blood
by Jason Legate 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

This is a call to every able bodied person out there, please go out and give blood as soon as you can, to help all those injured people on the east coast. Red Cross - 1-888-BLOOD-88, www.redcross.org I've also heard that 1-800-GIVE-LIFE reaches them. -j -- Jason Legate Sr. Net/Sys Admin, eVine, Inc. work- jlegate(a)evine.com | home- jlegate(a)alienchick.com Key Fingerprint: 4FB4 2228 DE63 3BBA 7B72 40DD 13D5 2547 821D 2909

5 4

From Navipath
by Avi Freedman 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

Status update from Navipath (a large outsourced-dial provider). Avi Return-Path: <jlapolit(a)drama.navipath.com> Subject: Re: World Trade Center attack To: Avi Freedman <freedman(a)freedman.net> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 22:07:50 -0400 (EDT) CC: Joe Lapolito <jlapolit(a)navipath.com> Avi can you post this to nanog for me, my post access is gone: We have started to lose equipment at 32 Old Slip. The site is not currently off the air, but it is getting hot and several boxes have shut off due to heat. The site is currently (and understandably) unmanned, so we cannot get a status on the site from GNAPS our provider. We are a dial provider and have started to see a drastic reduction in inbound calls. It's unclear what is causing this at this point. -Joe

1 0

Re: Yes it's off topic but who cares right now.
by Avi Freedman 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

In article <101811.211856.534(a)avi.netaxs.com> you wrote: : Let's get something clear. Although there are Muslims that believe we = : should all live in peace and harmony the fundamentals of the Muslim = : faith state that Christians and Jews should be exterminated. The = : believe that it's ok to lie, cheat or do whatever it takes to achieve = : their goals. A Los Angeles radio station (broadcasting in Spanish) = : reported that a Palestinian community in Palos Verdes, CA was handing = : out candy to their kids and partying in the streets. 1) We don't KNOW Islamic terrorists were involved yet. 2) Religious extremism of all forms CAN (not does) lead to 'blessed' evil. 3) I'd like to personally torture a large number of terrorists - most of them Muslim, some of them not. But the blanket statement/flame-bait is false, and in any case really needs to be discussed somewhere else. Can everyone try to respond off-nanog? This is pretty far from related. obNanog Content: While Akamai had a record traffic day, we didn't see any major 'net meltdowns... Avi

1 0

Re: World Trade Center attack
by Mark C . Langston 12 Sep '01

12 Sep '01

On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 09:26:42PM -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Mark C . Langston wrote: > > > DEFCON 2 has been reached, I believe. > > > > DEFCON 1 does not necessarily equate automatically to war, however. It > > is merely the maximum level of force readiness. > > Wargames had it backwards. DEFCON 1 is peace, DEFCON 5 is war. The DoD Dictionary (http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp1_02.pdf) doesn't explicitly state the order, but does imply it progresses from 5 to 1. Army Regulation 2510 (http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:99rWu1xnDgQ:www.usapa.army.mil/pdffile…) implies that the restrictions on information transfer during an emergency increase as the DEFCON level decreases from 5 to 1, implying that 1 is the highest state of operational readiness, not the lowest. Further, most every reference available, military and non-military, recognizes DEFCON 5 as the state of lowest operational readiness. Were I so inclined to search further, I'm sure I could dig up a definitive military or governmental document that explicitly states the rank ordering of defense readiness conditions. However, I think the evidence above suffices. -- Mark C. Langston mark(a)bitshift.org Systems & Network Admin http://www.bitshift.org

1 0