- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Same day PDU and power cable suppliers for NYC / Newark
by Timothy Creswick 09 Feb '17

09 Feb '17

Hi All, We're after a couple of L5-30 to n * IEC C13 PDUs in the NYC / Newark area on short notice (i.e. same day). Can anyone recommend a local supplier who can help with this? Many thanks in advance, Tim - Timothy Creswick

1 0

GTT AS3257 router server
by Clinton Work 09 Feb '17

09 Feb '17

If anybody is reading the NANOG list from the GTT NOC, can you look at your route-server with the BGP session flapping every couple of minutes. route-server.as3257.net>show ip bgp sum Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 213.200.64.93 4 3257 68799843 331607 0 0 0 00:00:50 Active -- Clinton Work

2 1

Re: Bandwidth Savings (Keenan Singh)
by Keenan Singh 09 Feb '17

09 Feb '17

Hi Ramy I reached out to FB and they are looking for a min of 5G Traffic coming from your AS to qualify for a Cache. Not sure how they came up with 5G as normally everyone else would ask for 1G Traffic. Can anyone one else confirm, maybe some one from FB is here and can clarify? Keenan On Feb 9, 2017 6:32 AM, "Ramy Hashish" <ramy.ihashish(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hello Luke and all, I stumbled upon some news about Facebook edge network servers, does anybody know anything about the caches the FB use and the ISPs can host? and is Facebook a part of SVA alliance? Thanks, Ramy Hi Luke, > > Regarding HTTPS Streaming and Netflix... > > Netflix announced in the spring of 2015 that it would move to HTTPS > delivery by April of 2016. At the time of that first announcement, some > concluded Netflix might not be able to afford the capital investment > required to enable HTTPS delivery. > > Given Netflix did not complete the HTTPS project by their first deadline, > we believe they have been focused on other priorities such as their global > expansion, So, given this history, it's not clear just when or if Netflix > will make the move to majority HTTPS for delivery. Furthermore, Netflix is > under considerable pressure from investors to improve subscriber growth, > revenue growth and profitability. The HTTPS project does not support any of > these goals. In fact, Netflix reported net income is marginal and a move to > full HTTPS delivery would likely consume all profits for the year. > > Along with the rest of the industry, we recognize the need for Open > Caching systems to support HTTPS streaming from upstream content > providers. This is one of the reasons why we were a Founding Member, along > with 16 other streaming companies, in the Streaming Video Alliance in the > fall of 2014. The SVA now includes almost 50 member companies from across > the streaming ecosystem and around the world. More importantly, the Open > Caching Working Group has issued functional requirements, unanimously > approved by SVA members, which include support for HTTPS streams. > > The SVA Board has invited Netflix to join the Alliance and, in doing so, > endorse the Open Caching work underway. This would open up a path in the > short run to ensure any open cache can continue to support Netflix content > even if Netflix moves to HTTPS delivery. We expect to see Netflix become > more active in the SVA soon given other major streaming providers, such as > Hulu and Amazon, are joining now. > > In conclusion, the SVA has developed a solution for Open Cache support of > HTTPS streaming and we expect all streaming providers, including Netflix, > will align with the SVA's direction. > > http://www.streamingvideoalliance.org/ > > Let me know if you have any more questions. > > Regards, > > > > Luke Guillory > Network Operations Manager > > Tel: 985.536.1212 <(985)%20536-1212> > Fax: 985.536.0300 <(985)%20536-0300> > Email: lguillory(a)reservetele.com > > Reserve Telecommunications > 100 RTC Dr > Reserve, LA 70084 > > ____________________________________________________________ > _____________________________________ > > Disclaimer: > The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for > the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, > distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail > if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from > your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or > error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does > not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this > message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. . > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keenan Singh > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:09 PM > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: Bandwidth Savings > > Hi Guys > > We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and are faced with extremely high > Bandwidth costs, compared to the US, we currently use Peer App for Caching > however with most services now moving to HTTPS the cache is proving to be > less and less effective. We are currently looking at any way we can save on > Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have. We > do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing there > are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end and sort > of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I > have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this, what > results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic? > > If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want > we currently. > > Many thanks for any Help > > Keenan > >

1 0

Re: Bandwidth Savings (Keenan Singh)
by Ramy Hashish 09 Feb '17

09 Feb '17

Hello Luke and all, I stumbled upon some news about Facebook edge network servers, does anybody know anything about the caches the FB use and the ISPs can host? and is Facebook a part of SVA alliance? Thanks, Ramy Hi Luke, > > Regarding HTTPS Streaming and Netflix... > > Netflix announced in the spring of 2015 that it would move to HTTPS > delivery by April of 2016. At the time of that first announcement, some > concluded Netflix might not be able to afford the capital investment > required to enable HTTPS delivery. > > Given Netflix did not complete the HTTPS project by their first deadline, > we believe they have been focused on other priorities such as their global > expansion, So, given this history, it's not clear just when or if Netflix > will make the move to majority HTTPS for delivery. Furthermore, Netflix is > under considerable pressure from investors to improve subscriber growth, > revenue growth and profitability. The HTTPS project does not support any of > these goals. In fact, Netflix reported net income is marginal and a move to > full HTTPS delivery would likely consume all profits for the year. > > Along with the rest of the industry, we recognize the need for Open > Caching systems to support HTTPS streaming from upstream content > providers. This is one of the reasons why we were a Founding Member, along > with 16 other streaming companies, in the Streaming Video Alliance in the > fall of 2014. The SVA now includes almost 50 member companies from across > the streaming ecosystem and around the world. More importantly, the Open > Caching Working Group has issued functional requirements, unanimously > approved by SVA members, which include support for HTTPS streams. > > The SVA Board has invited Netflix to join the Alliance and, in doing so, > endorse the Open Caching work underway. This would open up a path in the > short run to ensure any open cache can continue to support Netflix content > even if Netflix moves to HTTPS delivery. We expect to see Netflix become > more active in the SVA soon given other major streaming providers, such as > Hulu and Amazon, are joining now. > > In conclusion, the SVA has developed a solution for Open Cache support of > HTTPS streaming and we expect all streaming providers, including Netflix, > will align with the SVA's direction. > > http://www.streamingvideoalliance.org/ > > Let me know if you have any more questions. > > Regards, > > > > Luke Guillory > Network Operations Manager > > Tel: 985.536.1212 > Fax: 985.536.0300 > Email: lguillory(a)reservetele.com > > Reserve Telecommunications > 100 RTC Dr > Reserve, LA 70084 > > ____________________________________________________________ > _____________________________________ > > Disclaimer: > The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for > the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain > confidential and/or privileged material which should not disseminate, > distribute or be copied. Please notify Luke Guillory immediately by e-mail > if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from > your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or > error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Luke Guillory therefore does > not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this > message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. . > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Keenan Singh > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:09 PM > To: nanog(a)nanog.org > Subject: Bandwidth Savings > > Hi Guys > > We are an ISP in the Caribbean, and are faced with extremely high > Bandwidth costs, compared to the US, we currently use Peer App for Caching > however with most services now moving to HTTPS the cache is proving to be > less and less effective. We are currently looking at any way we can save on > Bandwidth or to be more Efficient with the Bandwidth we currently have. We > do have a Layer 2 Circuit between the Island and Miami, I am seeing there > are WAN Accelerators where they would put a Server on either end and sort > of Compress and decompress the Traffic before it goes over the Layer 2, I > have never used this before, has any one here used anything like this, what > results would I be able to expect for ISP Traffic? > > If not any ideas on Bandwidth Savings, or being more Efficient with want > we currently. > > Many thanks for any Help > > Keenan > >

1 0

American Airlines down
by Michael Voity 09 Feb '17

09 Feb '17

Hello Stuck at DCA after NANOG because America airlines system are down. Anyone know anything? Mike Sent from my iPhone

4 4

ATT-Level 3 Peering
by david peahi 08 Feb '17

08 Feb '17

We're seeing frequent dropped packets between ATT and Level 3 in Atlanta with traffic sourced from an ATT user destined for Microsoft Office 365, making Office 365 apps unusable during critical business hours. Anyone else have this problem with ATT?

3 2

Re: Telia network quality
by John Zettlemoyer 08 Feb '17

08 Feb '17

We've been using Telia for about 3 years in Philly, and have great success. Most of our European customers noticed faster services right away when we turned them up. John Zettlemoyer Sr. Director of I.T. Infrastructure :: WCiT LLC 856.310.1375 x221 :: john(a)wcit.net :: www.wcit.net Philadelphia now has an IX! www.peering.exchange

1 0

Re: IoT security
by Michael Yoon 08 Feb '17

08 Feb '17

Very clear illustration, thanks for sharing. It would seem solution would involve non market regulation (EPA for pollution), or aligning with market forces such as aligning impact to buyer of security with risk of public access to compromised information (like videos from IP cameras). Michael Yoon On Feb 8, 2017 9:36 AM, "Ed Lopez" <ed.lopez(a)corsa.com> wrote: In a recent article ( https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2017/02/security_and_th.html) Bruce Schneier sums up the IoT security mitigation issue quite nicely in this paragraph: "The market can't fix this because neither the buyer nor the seller cares. The owners of the webcams and DVRs used in the denial-of-service attacks don't care. Their devices were cheap to buy, they still work, and they don't know any of the victims of the attacks. The sellers of those devices don't care: They're now selling newer and better models, and the original buyers only cared about price and features. There is no market solution, because the insecurity is what economists call an externality: It's an effect of the purchasing decision that affects other people. Think of it kind of like invisible pollution." - Ed Lopez -- Ed Lopez | Security Architect | Corsa Technology Email: ed.lopez(a)corsa.com Mobile: +1.703.220.0988 www.corsa.com sent from my iPad ... I apologize for any auto-correct errors

1 0

Data Plane open solutions available for BGP Prefix hijacking
by Nagarjun Govindraj 08 Feb '17

08 Feb '17

Hi All, Does there exists any open source implementations for detection of BGP prefix hijacking using data plane solutions. If not data plane, what are the methods used for detecting BGP IP prefix hijacking. Regards, Nagarjun

2 1

Brainstorming acceptance issues - WAN impediment
by Kasper Adel 07 Feb '17

07 Feb '17

Hi, I am in the process of testing an 'automation/sdn' kind of controller, it will be managing configuration on our routers and also deploying some VNFs too. Before accepting it, i'd like to perform some testing, to make sure of the behavior if there are network issues between the controller and the devices (routers or servers), during creation of services. >From the top of my head, I can think of the basic tests like introducing jitter and delay but i would appreciate more ideas or even test cases that i can re-use. Thanks

4 3