- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Steam and Fortnite network contacts
by Mehmet Akcin 12 Dec '18

12 Dec '18

hi there, i am looking for fortnite and steam network/performance team contacts to discuss a performance issue. thank you

1 0

Should ISP block child pornography?
by Lotia, Pratik M 12 Dec '18

12 Dec '18

Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on whether an ISP should block domains hosting CPE (child pornography exploitation) content? Interpol has a ‘worst-of’ list which contains such domains and it wants ISPs to block it. On one side we want the ISP to not do any kind of censorship or inspection of customer traffic (customers are paying for pipes – not for filtered pipes), on the other side morals/ethics come into play. Keep in mind that if an ISP is blocking it would mean that it is also logging the information (source IP) and law agencies might be wanting access to it. Wondering if any operator is actively doing it or has ever considered doing it? Thanks. With Gratitude, Pratik Lotia “Information is not knowledge.” E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited.

24 42

Re: Unsolicited LinkedIn requests
by M. Omer GOLGELI 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

Well, that must be my curse... Even when adblocker doesn't notify me, I have stuff blocking stuff... :) M. OMER GOLGELI --- AS202365 [1] https://as202365.peeringdb.com [2] https://bgp.he.net/AS202365 [1] NOC: Phone: +90-533-2600533 Email: omer(a)chronos.com.tr On 2018-12-12 00:57, Daniel Corbe wrote: > at 4:48 PM, M. Omer GOLGELI <omer(a)chronos.com.tr> wrote: > Well said... > > But I can't see that on his website... > > M. OMER GOLGELI > --- > AS202365 > > On 2018-12-12 00:39, Daniel Corbe wrote: > If you don't want people contacting you on Linkedin then why do you > have a link to your profile on your website? > at 4:08 PM, Alfie Pates <alfie(a)fdx.services> wrote: > Hi folks, > I'm not going to name-and-shame, but I just got a LinkedIn connection request completely out of the blue from somebody with the comment "Greetings from another NANOG user!" > I didn't recognise the name, and a quick search of my email history suggests we haven't interacted before. > Please don't do this: It's not very polite. > ~A Links: ------ [1] https://bgp.he.net/AS202365 [2] https://as202365.peeringdb.com/

1 0

Re: Unsolicited LinkedIn requests
by M. Omer GOLGELI 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

Well, that must be my curse... Even when adblocker doesn't notify me, I have stuff blocking stuff... :) M. OMER GOLGELI --- AS202365 [1] https://as202365.peeringdb.com [2] https://bgp.he.net/AS202365 [1] NOC: Phone: +90-533-2600533 Email: omer(a)chronos.com.tr On 2018-12-12 00:57, Daniel Corbe wrote: > at 4:48 PM, M. Omer GOLGELI <omer(a)chronos.com.tr> wrote: > Well said... > > But I can't see that on his website... > > M. OMER GOLGELI > --- > AS202365 > > On 2018-12-12 00:39, Daniel Corbe wrote: > If you don't want people contacting you on Linkedin then why do you > have a link to your profile on your website? > at 4:08 PM, Alfie Pates <alfie(a)fdx.services> wrote: > Hi folks, > I'm not going to name-and-shame, but I just got a LinkedIn connection request completely out of the blue from somebody with the comment "Greetings from another NANOG user!" > I didn't recognise the name, and a quick search of my email history suggests we haven't interacted before. > Please don't do this: It's not very polite. > ~A Links: ------ [1] https://bgp.he.net/AS202365 [2] https://as202365.peeringdb.com/

1 0

RE: Unsolicited LinkedIn requests
by Phillip Carroll 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

Don't complain about people adding you on social media when you sign-up for social media. I can only assume you are complaining to get more views on your social media. I help in your endeavors I have listed your social media's I could find in a quick search. https://www.alfiepates.me/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/alfiepates/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Alfie_Pates_Self-Portrait_2017.jpg https://github.com/alfiepates https://pgp.cs.uu.nl/stats/654a98a79ac41734.html https://www.instagram.com/alfiepates/?hl=en https://www.flickr.com/photos/alfiepates/ https://keybase.io/alfiepates https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCI_1D5aDl30EnvQI6JsOmBw https://soundcloud.com/alfie-pates https://wiki.edinburghhacklab.com/people:alfie https://twitter.com/AlfiePates https://foursquare.com/alfiepates v1apates(a)inf.ed.ac.uk alfie(a)alfiepates.me http://lmgtfy.com/?q=alfiepates -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces(a)nanog.org> On Behalf Of Alfie Pates Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 3:08 PM To: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Unsolicited LinkedIn requests Hi folks, I'm not going to name-and-shame, but I just got a LinkedIn connection request completely out of the blue from somebody with the comment "Greetings from another NANOG user!" I didn't recognise the name, and a quick search of my email history suggests we haven't interacted before. Please don't do this: It's not very polite. ~A

1 0

Monitoring service that has a human component?
by David H 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

Hey all, was curious if anyone knows of a website monitoring service that has the option to incorporate a human component into the decision and escalation tree? I’m trying to help a customer find a way around false positives bogging down their NOC staff, by having a human determine the difference between a real error, desired (but different) content, or something in between like “Hey it’s 3am and we’ve taken our website offline for maintenance, we’ll be back up by 6am.” Automated systems tend to only know if test A, or steps A through C, are failing, then this is ‘down’ and do my preconfigured thing, but that ends up needlessly taking NOC time if the customer themselves is performing work on their own site, or just changed it and whatever content was being watched, is now gone. So, the goal would be to have the end user be the first point of contact if it looks like more of a customer-side issue. If they can’t be reached to confirm, THEN contact NOC, and unlike email alerts, keep contacting until a human acknowledges receipt of the alert. Thanks

7 6

Security issues based on post RIR allocation rules
by Spurling, Shannon 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

Hey, I lurk a bit, and try to stay out of stuff if I can, but I've had a bout of problems that appear to have a common source. I work in the Educational networking area, and a lot of our members are pre-RIR formation internet users. They have IP ranges that were allocated from the 150/8 through 170/8 blocks. Unfortunately, a bunch of those are part of the legacy ranges handled by APNIC and AFRINIC. Here in the US, mention of either of those makes security people have dreams of Nigerian princes and Korean/Chinese hackers. Don't get me wrong, these are long term US based governmental and educational institutions. Bonified, accredited institutions. When I call a health care organization, or a web hosting provider, the first thing I get is that they think we are trying to pull one over on them and all these ranges must be in Africa or Asia. I show them the ARIN information for the specific /16, and sometimes I can make some headway. Sometimes there's no convincing them. This issue appears to be getting worse over time, so I was wondering if some misguided organization or group is going around pressing for the rules that are triggering these issues? Is there a public information forum that might be able to educate security administrators to not cut off wide swaths of the US internet from taking advantage of their products and services? It's very frustrating Thanks Shannon Spurling shannon(a)more.net

4 3

Empire Conduit System - NYC
by Rod Beck 11 Dec '18

11 Dec '18

Looking for someone who uses the system at the fiber pair level. Regards, Roderick. Roderick Beck Director of Global Sales United Cable Company www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com> New York City & Budapest rod.beck(a)unitedcablecompany.com 36-30-859-5144 [1467221477350_image005.png]

1 0

FCC Seeks Comment on Improving Wireless Network Resiliency
by Sean Donelan 10 Dec '18

10 Dec '18

This one is a chuckle. Wireless providers that want to keep their network outage information secret from the public and their customers want better details and coordination from their backhaul suppliers, which keep their network outage information secret from the public and their customers. PS Docket No. 11-60 Comment Date: January 9, 2019 Reply Date: January 24, 2019 This Public Notice is the first in a series that solicits input on the efficacy of the Wireless Resiliency Cooperative Framework (Framework). The Framework is a voluntary wireless industry commitment to promote resilient wireless communications and situational awareness during disasters. [...] A. Best Practices and Restoration Challenges [...] B. Coordination and Information-Sharing [...] C. Expanding the Scope of the Framework [...] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-18-1238A1.pdf

1 0

Spoofer Report for NANOG for Nov 2018
by CAIDA Spoofer Project 08 Dec '18

08 Dec '18

In response to feedback from operational security communities, CAIDA's source address validation measurement project (https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which we received packets with a spoofed source address. We are publishing these reports to network and security operations lists in order to ensure this information reaches operational contacts in these ASes. This report summarises tests conducted within usa, can. Inferred improvements during Nov 2018: ASN Name Fixed-By 396238 FAIRLAWNGIG-NET 2018-11-26 6461 ZAYO-6461 2018-11-27 Further information for the inferred remediation is available at: https://spoofer.caida.org/remedy.php Source Address Validation issues inferred during Nov 2018: ASN Name First-Spoofed Last-Spoofed 54825 PACKET 2016-04-15 2018-11-15 209 CENTURYLINK-US-LEGACY-QWEST 2016-08-16 2018-11-29 6128 CABLE-NET-1 2016-09-03 2018-11-28 20412 CLARITY-TELECOM 2016-09-30 2018-11-28 6181 FUSE-NET 2016-10-10 2018-11-30 15305 SYRINGANETWORKS 2016-10-21 2018-11-24 25787 ROWE-NETWORKS 2016-10-21 2018-11-26 174 COGENT-174 2016-10-21 2018-11-20 31857 PRIORITY-TERABIT 2016-10-25 2018-11-30 30341 SCTA-ASN 2016-10-31 2018-11-26 32440 LONI 2016-11-03 2018-11-26 33182 DimeNOC 2016-11-08 2018-11-30 12083 WOW-INTERNET 2016-11-09 2018-11-30 3549 LVLT-3549 2016-11-16 2018-11-29 21832 KELLINCOM-1 2017-02-03 2018-11-24 7122 MTS-ASN 2017-05-16 2018-11-09 6461 ZAYO-6461 2017-06-21 2018-11-30 63296 AMARILLO-WIRELESS 2017-09-01 2018-11-27 7233 YAHOO-US 2017-09-07 2018-11-27 33523 ROWANUNIVERSITY 2017-10-29 2018-11-26 546 PARSONS-PGS-1 2017-11-20 2018-11-29 12222 AKAMAI 2018-02-14 2018-11-29 29384 Qatar-Foundation 2018-03-08 2018-11-27 23148 TERRENAP 2018-03-15 2018-11-27 4201 ORST 2018-04-19 2018-11-26 11827 WSU 2018-04-19 2018-11-26 35911 BNQ-1 2018-06-06 2018-11-29 225 VIRGINIA 2018-06-18 2018-11-26 40911 L2NC 2018-08-31 2018-11-01 2381 WISCNET1 2018-09-04 2018-11-28 54804 CSMIII-BUNKIELA 2018-09-15 2018-11-26 33452 RW 2018-09-19 2018-11-29 20448 VPNTRANET-LLC 2018-09-20 2018-11-28 11996 LOBOIS 2018-09-24 2018-11-26 14031 SCXY 2018-10-18 2018-11-10 19919 VSW 2018-10-23 2018-11-26 36375 UMICH-AS-5 2018-11-13 2018-11-13 13825 TROYCABLE-NET 2018-11-21 2018-11-21 32329 MONKEYBRAINS 2018-11-28 2018-11-28 393422 NEWVISIONS-CNY 2018-11-28 2018-11-28 33363 BHN-TAMPA 2018-11-29 2018-11-29 54483 CALIFORNIA-INTERNET-SOLUTIONS 2018-11-30 2018-11-30 22282 COSMO-MAIN 2018-11-30 2018-11-30 Further information for these tests where we received spoofed packets is available at: https://spoofer.caida.org/recent_tests.php?country_include=usa,can&no_block… Please send any feedback or suggestions to spoofer-info(a)caida.org

1 0