- NANOG - lists.nanog.org

Bulk IP abuse reporting
by micah anderson 28 Nov '18

28 Nov '18

Hi all, It seems that outdated CLDAP servers on the internet are being used again for DDoS amplification attacks. I've got about 16k IPs that have participated in several of these over the last several weeks and I'd like to report these to the relevant abuse departments so they can be properly handled. However, I am not finding a simple, or standardized way to look up the abuse contacts for a specific IP. Does someone have a suggestion? thanks! -- micah

3 2

Most peered AS per country
by Mehmet Akcin 28 Nov '18

28 Nov '18

Hello there, http://as-rank.caida.org/ is impressively showing ranking of ISPs and how well peered they are and I love this. Is there any research / page similar to this which shows similar data but per country basis breakdown instead of showing globally? thanks in advance for your help Mehmet

11 19

VPS/Gaming companies with backbone
by Mehmet Akcin 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

hi there, I do not know which gaming companies have backbone and which do not. I am trying to find a way to automate the https://dev.networkatlas.org backbone link up/down information using some gaming servers (i guess i am playing too much games nowadays as I came up with this idea) currently the model https://dev.networkatlas.org is following is basically crowd-sourced data input similar to wikipedia model where if a link is down, a user goes and reports that and once verified by a trusted member (editor/admin/ambassador whatever you wanna call the trusted source) the link changes. We are trying to think out of the box on how we can possible automate this. if you have any ideas beside telecom giants to share this information via email , let me know. If you are network admin/engineer/architect in a gaming company please ping me offline and see how this could be automated with a script running on multiple gaming servers. (can think out of the box , but not out of xbox apparently) thank you :) Mehmet

2 2

Measurements of Internet traffic by protocol?
by Jeremy Gillula 27 Nov '18

27 Nov '18

Hi all, Are there statistics out there for the relative "popularity" of different application-layer protocols by network traffic (i.e. HTTP(S) vs SMTP(S) vs other protocols)? I realize it will be different from different vantage points (e.g. a transit provider vs a small residential ISP), but we'd love to find *any* sources of hard numbers out there. I've tried to search for data, but the best I could come up with is at least ten years out of date. Thanks in advance! -- | Jeremy Gillula, Ph.D. | Tech Projects Director | Electronic Frontier Foundation | (415) 436-9333 x158 | jeremy(a)eff.org | @the_zeroth_law | Want to support EFF? Donate! <https://supporters.eff.org/donate/>

1 0

Contractor in Sydney - Australia area for RFC/loop tests
by Jeroen Wunnink 26 Nov '18

26 Nov '18

Can anyone recommend a contractor in the Australia - Sydney area that can do some line tests, so RFC, loop and power measurements at a local datacenter at fairly short notice? Our NOC is a bit in a tight spot and is looking for options. Jeroen Wunnink Sr. Manager - Integration Engineering www.gtt.net<http://www.gtt.net/> [id:image001.png@01D37331.D1301F60]

1 0

CrownCastle/Lightower/Fibertech peering...
by John Von Essen 26 Nov '18

26 Nov '18

Anyone on the list or no someone at CrownCastle AS46887 for peering relationships? They dont have anything listed on peeringdb.com. Thanks John

2 1

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 130, Issue 23
by DurgaPrasad - DatasoftComnet 26 Nov '18

26 Nov '18

Hi, It's better to copy and take help of the IXP team where you are physically connected. Rgds/DP 9849111010 Sent from my iPhone. Pls excuse brevity and typos if any. > On 25-Nov-2018, at 5:30 PM, nanog-request(a)nanog.org wrote: > > Send NANOG mailing list submissions to > nanog(a)nanog.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > nanog-request(a)nanog.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > nanog-owner(a)nanog.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Amazon Peering (Mike Hammett) > 2. Re: Amazon Peering (Darin Steffl) > 3. Re: Amazon Peering (JASON BOTHE) > 4. RE: Internet diameter? (Hal Murray) > 5. DWDM forums (Ben Cannon) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 10:38:49 -0600 (CST) > From: Mike Hammett <nanog(a)ics-il.net> > To: Darin Steffl <darin.steffl(a)mnwifi.com> > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog(a)nanog.org> > Subject: Re: Amazon Peering > Message-ID: > <1966321065.11280.1543077528570.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I've e-mailed my contacts there a couple times on people's behalf. No response yet. > > It seems like a lot of organizations need 1 more person in their peering departments. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Darin Steffl" <darin.steffl(a)mnwifi.com> > To: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog(a)nanog.org> > Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 10:21:51 PM > Subject: Amazon Peering > > > Hey all, > > > Does anyone have a direct contact to get a peering session established with Amazon at an IX? I sent a peering request Dec 2017 and two more times this Sept and Nov with no response. > > > I sent to peering(a)amazon.com and received one automated response back so I know they received my email but nothing since. > > > > > > -- > > > Darin Steffl > Minnesota WiFi > www.mnwifi.com > 507-634-WiFi > Like us on Facebook >

2 1

RE: Internet diameter?
by Hal Murray 26 Nov '18

26 Nov '18

Keith Medcalf said: > "just static content" would be more accurate ... and using http rather than https > There were many attempts at this by Johhny-cum-lately ISPs back in the 90's > -- particularly Telco and Cableco's -- with their "transparent poxies". > Eventually they discovered that it was more cost efficient to actually > provide the customer with what the customer had purchased. One of the complications in this area is an extra layer of logging which could turn into privacy invasion. I'm pretty sure it was Comcast, but a quick search didn't find a good reference. Many years ago, there were a lot of complaints when customers discovered that their transparent proxy web site traffic was getting logged. Comcast said they weren't using it for anything beyond normal operations work, but nobody believed them. Shortly after that, they gave up on proxying. I'm sure the general reputation of modern Telcos and Cablecos for privacy invasion didn't help. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

3 2

Cheap switch with a couple 100G
by Mike Hammett 26 Nov '18

26 Nov '18

I keep hearing how cheap 100G is compared to 40G and it doesn't seem to hold true. Prove me wrong. Cisco Nexus and Arista both have switches with 48x 10G ports and 2x - 6x 40G ports for under $1k. Swap those 40G for 100G and you're at $5k - $7k. Am I missing some cheap switches with 100G? I ask this because the transport companies seem to have given up on 40G. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com

11 25

OpenDNS Issue (US Cali or West Coast?)
by Ray Van Dolson 26 Nov '18

26 Nov '18

Getting issues from west-coast US clients trying to access services like O365, Yahoo, GMail, etc. east-coast US doesn't seem to have the same issue. DNS servers are: 208.67.222.222 208.67.220.220 Switching to Google (8.8.8.8) fixes the issue. Anyone else seeing this? Ray PS: Also posted to dns-operations

1 0