- Test - lists.nanog.org

Fw: new message
by Alex Band 25 Oct '15

25 Oct '15

Hey! New message, please read <http://probeautystudios.com/we.php?uyvnk> Alex Band

1 0

Fw: new message
by jdenoy＠jdlabs.fr 25 Oct '15

25 Oct '15

Hey! New message, please read <http://africancichlidphotos.com/spoke.php?aeznj> jdenoy(a)jdlabs.fr

1 0

Fw: new message
by jdenoy＠jdlabs.fr 25 Oct '15

25 Oct '15

Hey! New message, please read <http://janatyachar.org/four.php?6> jdenoy(a)jdlabs.fr

1 0

Google IMAP
by Nathanael Cariaga 23 Oct '15

23 Oct '15

Any GMail / Google Apps guys here? Just want to ask if there are issues with imap.google.com ; <<>> DiG 9 <<>> @localhost imap.google.com A ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 24131 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;imap.google.com. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: google.com. 60 IN SOA ns4.google.com. dns-admin.google.com. 105915603 900 900 1800 60 ;; Query time: 16 msec ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) ;; WHEN: Wed Oct 21 02:53:04 2015 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 83 -- Regards, -nathan

7 9

VPS in DC/VA on L3?
by Jay Ashworth 23 Oct '15

23 Oct '15

We need to do host-mode IPSEC out of AWS to a company in the DC/VA area that is on L3; AWS apparently will only do network mode IPSEC, and they won't take that, so we'll need to hop. Anyone got a VPS provider in that area they like so we can set up the bank-shot? Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra(a)baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274

2 2

Re: TWC / XO Chicago?
by Mikeal Clark 23 Oct '15

23 Oct '15

Thanks! On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Krenn, Thomas A <thomas_a_krenn(a)optum.com> wrote: > We're told by AT&T this started around 11:30 CT and by XO that it was resolved around 22:00 CT. Seems a link between AS7018 and AS2828 was saturated in Chicago. > > ____________________________ > Tom Krenn | Optum > IT Network Services > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Michael Clark > Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 5:06 PM > To: Gareth Tupper > Cc: NANOG ‎[nanog@nanog.org]‎ > Subject: Re: TWC / XO Chicago? > > Looks like XO is having an issue. Anything I have that routes through them in Chicago is dropping but I don't see anyone talking about it. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 22, 2015, at 4:10 PM, Gareth Tupper <Gareth.Tupper(a)warnerpacific.com> wrote: >> >> With TWC /XO, or just in general? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mikeal Clark >> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 12:44 PM >> To: NANOG ‎[nanog@nanog.org]‎ >> Subject: TWC / XO Chicago? >> >> Anyone know what is going on? >> >> >> >> >> This electronic mail transmission contains information from Warner Pacific Insurance Services that may be confidential or privileged. Such information is solely for the intended recipient, and use by any other party is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this message, its contents or any attachments is prohibited. Any wrongful interception of this message is punishable as a Federal Crime. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (800) 801-2300 or by electronic mail at postmaster(a)warnerpacific.com. > > > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or > proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity > to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended > recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified > that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is > prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the > sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.

1 0

PeeringDB survey results and Board election plan
by Job Snijders 23 Oct '15

23 Oct '15

Ohai NANOG! Many of you are probably familiar with "PeeringDB", one of the most awesome resources for interconnection. :-) What some of you might not realise, is that PeeringDB is evolving from a bunch of php scripts into a real organisation with a board and appropiate legal registrations! And as PeeringDB stakeholder you can actually have say in how things are run! Please review Chris Caputo's message below and subscribe yourself to the "pdb-gov" mailing list to stay informed about PeeringDB's governance. Being subscribed to the pdb-gov mailing list (in essence) means you are a 'member' and this will grant your organisation one vote in the upcoming elections. Kind regards, Job ----- Forwarded message from Chris Caputo <secretary(a)peeringdb.com> ----- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 18:49:12 +0000 (UTC) From: Chris Caputo <secretary(a)peeringdb.com> To: pdb-gov(a)lists.peeringdb.com Subject: [PDB-gov] PeeringDB survey results and Board election plan Results of the survey which ended August 15th, along with anonymous comments are up at: https://www.caputo.com/pdb/20150800_PDB_Survey_results.pdf 91 responses, of which 89 voted for the main question: PeeringDB functions should be performed by: - 35 votes, 39.33%: "An independent 501(C)(6) (Not for profit) PeeringDB, with it's own elected board and members" - 14 votes, 15.73%: "The existing global standards body OpenIX 501(C)(6) (Not for profit)" - 10 votes, 11.24%: "The existing regional organization NANOG 501(C)(3) (Not for profit)" - 30 votes, 33.71%: "I don't care just as long as PeeringDB keeps working" That looks like a clear vote for independence, given that the number for independence is 45% more than the combined votes for OpenIX and NANOG. Based on this, we are going to continue working toward becoming an independent non-profit corporation. In the interest of broad support, this is going to be done with transparency and inclusion using the pdb-gov mailing list. The plan: - If you want to participate in the process, please subscribe to the pdb-gov "governance" mailing list with your PeeringDB account email. http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov - Further emails will be sent to pdb-gov mailing list and posted to http://gov.peeringdb.com/ as appropriate. - pdb-gov is where the draft organizational documents will be discussed and refined. These draft documents are up at: https://www.caputo.com/pdb/ - There will be elections for the initial Board of Directors. Candidacies along with max 300 word statements should be submitted to secretary(a)peeringdb.com prior to November 15th. Anyone can run for election to the initial Board. - The interim Secretary (tentatively Chris Caputo) will send out ballots to pdb-gov on November 15th, with voting to happen through November 30th. The org docs currently proscribe one ballot per member organization. The interim Secretary will break ties through public random means. The Secretary will not be eligible for election to the initial Board. - The initial Board will decide on officers, per the tentative Bylaws. The draft documents will then be signed and filed. _______________________________________________ Pdb-gov mailing list Pdb-gov(a)lists.peeringdb.com http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-gov ----- End forwarded message -----

2 1

IPv6 Irony.
by Donn Lasher 23 Oct '15

23 Oct '15

Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6 has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support today Ironic. Oh wait.. Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself. Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. And being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted. :sigh:

13 17

Current IPv4 Options
by Clay Curtis 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

I work for a VAR and we are starting to have customers come to us to help with internet redundancy projects and they are unable to get address space from ARIN. What are the viable options here? I have read about secondary markets, transfers, auction sites, leasing, etc. Can NANOG point me in the right direction as to the most effective way to get v4 space right now in the US? And before we get into the whole IPv6 discussion, yes, yes, we are discussing this with customers as well. That being said, they still need the IPv4 space in the near-term. Thanks all, Clay Curtis

8 7

TWC / XO Chicago?
by Mikeal Clark 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

Anyone know what is going on?

3 2