- Test - lists.nanog.org

Open-IX BCOP Committee Call for Volunteers
by Chris Grundemann 24 Oct '17

24 Oct '17

Pardon the interruption. There is a new effort underway to ensure that BCOP has a home in North America and your help is needed. Following the publication of the Open-IX Document Development Policy (OIX DDP) and the formation of the Best Current Operational Practices committee (BCOP) <http://www.open-ix.org/cpages/bcop-committee>, the Open-IX Board of Directors is now seeking volunteers to take on this valuable work. Open-IX Best Current Operational Practices (BCOP) Committee members are expected to seek out subject matter experts and encourage the documentation of BCOPs from the global network engineering community. This is typically done through activity on mailing lists, conversations at industry events, and leveraging personal relationships. Committee members are further expected to shepherd appropriate documents through the process from Appeal to published BCOP, including updates to existing documents as needed. If you share a passion for sharing knowledge, increasing the resiliency and efficiency of the global internet infrastructure, and have a few hours a month to dedicate to this effort, we encourage you to volunteer! Please send your name, email address, and a brief statement of interest to cgrundemann <at> open-ix.org. While we continuously seek new voices for all committees, this call is expected to close on 31 October, 2017. Please submit before that time to be considered for an immediate opening on the BCOP committee. Thank you, ~Chris

1 1

Chinese websites loading slower recently?
by Simon Lockhart 24 Oct '17

24 Oct '17

All, I know that access to Chinese websites from outside China is notorious for being slow or broken, but we seem to have had a major increase in support calls from our users over the last couple of weeks, complaining of slow or no access to major Chinese websites, such as www.baidu.com, www.youku.com and world.taobao.com. We can't find anything on our network that would be affecting this, and at various times can (and cannot!) reproduce it with off-net connections, which would indicate that it's an intermittent, but widespread issue. Is anyone else seeing an increase in problems related to Chinese websites? Thanks in advance, Simon

4 3

Re: AS-Path - ORF Draft
by Jakob Heitz (jheitz) 24 Oct '17

24 Oct '17

Even though the limit is applied before policy, the dropped prefixes don't count towards the limit. You can have a limit of 100 and receive 1000. If you drop 901 post policy, it will not kill the session, even when the limit is applied before policy. Thanks, Jakob. > Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:37:52 -0500 (CDT) > From: Mike Hammett <nanog(a)ics-il.net> > Their device goes through prefix limit before prefix filter, so their filters wouldn't even see the advertisements as the prefix limit already killed the session. Raise the prefix limit so that the filters can get to work and now you're vulnerable to someone else injecting a ton of routes and melting their router. >

1 0

facebook fna
by Aaron Gould 24 Oct '17

24 Oct '17

How long is typical for the newly installed fna server cache to stay in "testing" phase before moving to "in production" ? I've been watching ~100 mbps sustained towards mine since 6 p.m. last night and it's in "testing" mode according to the fna partner portal. .so I'm looking forward to it moving to production and wanted to know how long does it usually take? -Aaron

2 2

Fwd: [apops] APRICOT 2018 Call for Presentations
by Mark Tinka 24 Oct '17

24 Oct '17

Greetings - FYI. Mark. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [apops] APRICOT 2018 Call for Presentations Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 20:27:00 +1000 From: Philip Smith <pfsinoz(a)gmail.com> To: apops(a)apops.net Hi everyone, The call for presentations for APRICOT 2018 has now been published - a copy is below FYI. philip -- Asia Pacific Regional Internet Conference on Operational Technologies (APRICOT) 25th - 28th February 2018, Kathmandu, Nepal https://2018.apricot.net CALL FOR PAPERS =============== The APRICOT 2018 Programme Committee is now seeking contributions for Presentations and Tutorials for the APRICOT 2018 Conference. We are looking for presenters who would: - Offer a technical tutorial on an appropriate topic; - Participate in the technical conference sessions as a speaker; - Convene and chair panel sessions of relevant topics. Please submit on-line at: http://papers.apricot.net/user/login.php?event=63 CONFERENCE MILESTONES --------------------- Call for Papers Opens: Now Draft Program Published: As Papers Confirmed Final Deadline for Submissions: 26 January 2018 Final Program Published: 2 February 2018 Final Slides Received: 16 February 2018 *NOTE THAT REGARDLESS OF DEADLINES, SLOTS ARE FILLED ON A FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED BASIS* PROGRAMME MATERIAL ------------------ The APRICOT Conference Programme consists of three parts, these being the Peering Forum, Tutorials, and Conference Tracks. Topics proposed must be relevant to Internet Operations and Technologies: - IPv4 / IPv6 Routing and Operations - IPv6 deployment and transition technologies - Internet backbone operations - ISP and Carrier services - IXPs and Peering - Research on Internet Operations and Deployment - Software Defined Networking / Network Function Virtualisaton - Network security issues (NSP-SEC, DDoS, Anti-Spam, Anti-Malware) - DNS / DNSSEC - Internet policy (Security, Regulation, Content Management, Addressing, etc) - Access and Transport Technologies, including Cable/DSL, LTE/5G, wireless, metro ethernet, fibre, segment routing - Content & Service Delivery (Multicast, Voice, Video, "telepresence", Gaming) and Cloud Computing CfP SUBMISSION -------------- Draft slides for both tutorials and conference sessions MUST be provided with CfP submissions otherwise the Programme Committee will be unable to review the submission. For avoidance of doubt this means that submissions which do not include slides will be rejected immediately. For work in progress, the most current information available at time of submission is acceptable. All draft and complete slides must be submitted in PDF format only. Final slides are to be provided by the specified deadline for publication on the APRICOT website. Prospective presenters should note that the majority of speaking slots will be filled well before the final submission deadline. The PC may, at their discretion, retain a limited number of slots up to the final submission deadline for presentations that are exceptionally timely, important, or of critical operational importance. Every year we turn away submissions, due to filling up all available programme slots before the deadline. Presenters should endeavour to get material into the PC sooner rather than later. Any questions or concerns should be addressed to the Programme Committee by e-mail at: pc-chairs at apricot.net We look forward to receiving your presentation proposals. Mark Tinka, Jonny Martin & Philip Smith Co-Chairs, APRICOT 2018 Programme Committee -- _______________________________________________ apops mailing list apops(a)apops.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apops Website: www.apops.net .

1 0

RE: AS-Path - ORF Draft
by Jakob Heitz (jheitz) 23 Oct '17

23 Oct '17

IOS-XR does not have a pre-policy prefix limit. When the limit is reached, the session will not automatically re-establish. It needs to be manually cleared first. It has the extra options: warning-only - does not drop the session. discard-extra-paths - additionally, drops prefixes after the limit is reached. restart <minutes> - automatically re-establish the session after the timeout. I agree with Job that the use of warning-only can lead to unexpected routing, because there is no control over which prefixes are dropped. This is a big hammer that only comes down when the other hammers don't work. Thanks, Jakob. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 06:57:19 -0400 From: Greg Hankins <ghankins(a)mindspring.com> To: Job Snijders <job(a)ntt.net> Cc: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: AS-Path - ORF Draft Message-ID: <20171023105719.GH27694(a)nokia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Nokia SR OS defaults to pre-policy but can be configured to post-policy by adding "post-import". prefix-limit ipv4 100 // pre-policy prefix-limit ipv6 100 post-import // post-policy Greg -- Greg Hankins <ghankins(a)mindspring.com> -----Original Message----- Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:37:13 +0200 From: Job Snijders <job(a)ntt.net> To: nanog(a)nanog.org Subject: Re: AS-Path - ORF Draft On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 08:35:42AM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: > > or it could compare each additional prefix received to already learned > > prefixes and decide to drop one to make room for the new one. For > > example you could drop the most specific routes before less specific > > routes. > > The moment a BGP implementation can do such RIB compression, it may > indeed make sense to offer two types of limits: a 'pre-policy maximum > prefix limit' and a 'post-policy maximum prefix limit'. The former type > of limit would be useful in context of route leaks, the latter in > context of protecting against overflow of the FIB capability. Apparently this already exists and is widely available, Saku Ytti gave me some additional information. There are various keywords available, and they operate at different attachment points in the conceptual model. | IOS XR | Junos =============================================================== pre-policy keyword | ???? | prefix-limit --------------------+------------------+------------------------ post-policy keyword | maximum-prefix | accepted-prefix-limit (????? means the keyword does not exist) Now I wonder what Arista EOS, Nokia SR-OS, etc offer in this regard. :-) (screenshot here http://instituut.net/~job/screenshots/baf76f9c29a31d2e55454ddd.png for those of you who can't easily view ASCII tables) Kind regards, Job

1 0

AS-Path - ORF Draft
by Mike Hammett 23 Oct '17

23 Oct '17

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-aspath-orf-13 Not knowing anything about the draft\RFC process (and not really wanting to go beyond a 30k foot view), is this something with movement? Traction? This would have solved a situation I encountered a week ago. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP

5 14

Re: Puerto Rico: Lack of electricity threatens telephone and internet services
by Todd Underwood 22 Oct '17

22 Oct '17

This thread is mostly full of idle speculation, is at the least insensitive and verges on offensive. If you have operational information about Puerto Rico (see Sean Donelan's posts rather than these responses), please go ahead. If you would like to allocate blame, please go somewhere else to do it. The Internet is full of people who are blaming Puerto Rico for getting hit by a hurricane. I don't need it here. Thanks, T (From Humacao) El 19 oct. 2017 19:45, "Jean-Francois Mezei" <jfmezei_nanog(a)vaxination.ca> escribió: On 2017-10-19 18:18, Wayne Bouchard wrote: > Well, the problem as I understand it is that the infrastructure was > not all that great to begin with. Much of it was damaged in the first > storm and when this second one came through, what remained basically > disappeared. Being hit with a Cat 5 hurricane/cyclone in a caribeean island that hasn't been a direct hit from severe storms in decades will cause extensive damage no matter what state its infrastructure was in before. Vegetation that does not regular storms to "prune" it will grow to a point where it will cause major damage when a big storm hits. And a caribbean island who has never been "rich" will not have had, as a priority, increasing building codes to widthstand hurricanes. Building codes get updated after a big devastating hurricane, whether it is for Darwin in 1974 (Tracy) or ones like Andrew in Florida. It's easy for a state the size of Texas to send all of its electrical utility trucks to the Houson area to repair damage. But they too would be stretched thin if all of Texas had been leveled. If buildings were not built to widthstand a 5 or a 4, then the building itself becomes destructor of infrastructure as its materials become high speed projectiles throuwn at other buildings and especially teleohone/electrical lines. I went through a category 4 (Olivia, Australia 1996). While the town and building I was in (Karatha) were built to new standards and had little damage, I witnessed the power of it, and I can totally understand Puerto Rico being destroyed. I know a politician with tendancy to skew facts points to Puerto Rico having had terrible infrastructure. But consider that Darwin, a "rich" town" was wiped out in 1974 by Tracy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B89wBGydSvs Tracy was a 4. Maria was a 5. (note the alert sound at start of video still sends shivers down my spine because it was the same as I heard before Olivia hit). The population was evacuated by 747s because there was nothing there to support it. The road link to is (Stuart Highway) is so long that Darwin is tantamount to an island. (especially since Stuart wasn't fully paved back then). Also note: in Florida, the utilities positioned all their equipment in safe places so it could survive storm and be deployed when needed. But what happens when there is no safe place, or the safe places become isolated because roads become impassable? It is one thing when a state has some areas with high level of destruction. But when the whole state is destroyed, it is a truly different situation because its economy is also destroyed. Florida Power still has plenty of revenues from undamaged areas to pay for the repairs in damaged areas. The Utility in Puerto Rico doesn't. (and if it was finacially weak before, it makes things worse). When you see other states' utilities coming to help in a highly damaged area, don't think for a minute they do this for free. The local utility stll gets a bill at the end of the day for the work done. If the Puerto Rico company has no cash to pay, don't exopect other utilities to send crews.

3 2

Allstream/Zayo in the house?
by Jason Lixfeld 21 Oct '17

21 Oct '17

Having an issue where you’re caching announcements for my AS via a peering session that was turned down hours ago causing * * *, and my Saturday to suck :) Emails out to NOC/Peering contacts on peeringdb haven’t had a response yet. Hoping someone here can poke and/or prod. Thanks in advance.

2 2

Weekly Routing Table Report
by cscora＠apnic.net 20 Oct '17

20 Oct '17

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-stats(a)lists.apnic.net For historical data, please see http://thyme.rand.apnic.net. If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <pfsinoz(a)gmail.com>. Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 21 Oct, 2017 Report Website: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net Detailed Analysis: http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/ Analysis Summary ---------------- BGP routing table entries examined: 664841 Prefixes after maximum aggregation (per Origin AS): 259627 Deaggregation factor: 2.56 Unique aggregates announced (without unneeded subnets): 321831 Total ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 58796 Prefixes per ASN: 11.31 Origin-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 50787 Origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 22389 Transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 8009 Transit-only ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 235 Average AS path length visible in the Internet Routing Table: 4.3 Max AS path length visible: 30 Max AS path prepend of ASN (206156) 26 Prefixes from unregistered ASNs in the Routing Table: 87 Number of instances of unregistered ASNs: 87 Number of 32-bit ASNs allocated by the RIRs: 20331 Number of 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 16153 Prefixes from 32-bit ASNs in the Routing Table: 66379 Number of bogon 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 21 Special use prefixes present in the Routing Table: 0 Prefixes being announced from unallocated address space: 386 Number of addresses announced to Internet: 2856852064 Equivalent to 170 /8s, 72 /16s and 26 /24s Percentage of available address space announced: 77.2 Percentage of allocated address space announced: 77.2 Percentage of available address space allocated: 100.0 Percentage of address space in use by end-sites: 98.7 Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 219481 APNIC Region Analysis Summary ----------------------------- Prefixes being announced by APNIC Region ASes: 183270 Total APNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 52668 APNIC Deaggregation factor: 3.48 Prefixes being announced from the APNIC address blocks: 182323 Unique aggregates announced from the APNIC address blocks: 75594 APNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 8418 APNIC Prefixes per ASN: 21.66 APNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 2341 APNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1206 Average APNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.4 Max APNIC Region AS path length visible: 29 Number of APNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 3261 Number of APNIC addresses announced to Internet: 765538528 Equivalent to 45 /8s, 161 /16s and 48 /24s APNIC AS Blocks 4608-4864, 7467-7722, 9216-10239, 17408-18431 (pre-ERX allocations) 23552-24575, 37888-38911, 45056-46079, 55296-56319, 58368-59391, 63488-64098, 64297-64395, 131072-137529 APNIC Address Blocks 1/8, 14/8, 27/8, 36/8, 39/8, 42/8, 43/8, 49/8, 58/8, 59/8, 60/8, 61/8, 101/8, 103/8, 106/8, 110/8, 111/8, 112/8, 113/8, 114/8, 115/8, 116/8, 117/8, 118/8, 119/8, 120/8, 121/8, 122/8, 123/8, 124/8, 125/8, 126/8, 133/8, 150/8, 153/8, 163/8, 171/8, 175/8, 180/8, 182/8, 183/8, 202/8, 203/8, 210/8, 211/8, 218/8, 219/8, 220/8, 221/8, 222/8, 223/8, ARIN Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by ARIN Region ASes: 199937 Total ARIN prefixes after maximum aggregation: 96532 ARIN Deaggregation factor: 2.07 Prefixes being announced from the ARIN address blocks: 201429 Unique aggregates announced from the ARIN address blocks: 94119 ARIN Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 18008 ARIN Prefixes per ASN: 11.19 ARIN Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 6655 ARIN Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1776 Average ARIN Region AS path length visible: 3.8 Max ARIN Region AS path length visible: 23 Number of ARIN region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 2232 Number of ARIN addresses announced to Internet: 1110528800 Equivalent to 66 /8s, 49 /16s and 83 /24s ARIN AS Blocks 1-1876, 1902-2042, 2044-2046, 2048-2106 (pre-ERX allocations) 2138-2584, 2615-2772, 2823-2829, 2880-3153 3354-4607, 4865-5119, 5632-6655, 6912-7466 7723-8191, 10240-12287, 13312-15359, 16384-17407 18432-20479, 21504-23551, 25600-26591, 26624-27647, 29696-30719, 31744-33791 35840-36863, 39936-40959, 46080-47103 53248-55295, 62464-63487, 64198-64296, 393216-397212 ARIN Address Blocks 3/8, 4/8, 6/8, 7/8, 8/8, 9/8, 11/8, 12/8, 13/8, 15/8, 16/8, 17/8, 18/8, 19/8, 20/8, 21/8, 22/8, 23/8, 24/8, 26/8, 28/8, 29/8, 30/8, 32/8, 33/8, 34/8, 35/8, 38/8, 40/8, 44/8, 45/8, 47/8, 48/8, 50/8, 52/8, 53/8, 54/8, 55/8, 56/8, 57/8, 63/8, 64/8, 65/8, 66/8, 67/8, 68/8, 69/8, 70/8, 71/8, 72/8, 73/8, 74/8, 75/8, 76/8, 96/8, 97/8, 98/8, 99/8, 100/8, 104/8, 107/8, 108/8, 128/8, 129/8, 130/8, 131/8, 132/8, 134/8, 135/8, 136/8, 137/8, 138/8, 139/8, 140/8, 142/8, 143/8, 144/8, 146/8, 147/8, 148/8, 149/8, 152/8, 155/8, 156/8, 157/8, 158/8, 159/8, 160/8, 161/8, 162/8, 164/8, 165/8, 166/8, 167/8, 168/8, 169/8, 170/8, 172/8, 173/8, 174/8, 184/8, 192/8, 198/8, 199/8, 204/8, 205/8, 206/8, 207/8, 208/8, 209/8, 214/8, 215/8, 216/8, RIPE Region Analysis Summary ---------------------------- Prefixes being announced by RIPE Region ASes: 178718 Total RIPE prefixes after maximum aggregation: 87403 RIPE Deaggregation factor: 2.04 Prefixes being announced from the RIPE address blocks: 174719 Unique aggregates announced from the RIPE address blocks: 105434 RIPE Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 24515 RIPE Prefixes per ASN: 7.13 RIPE Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 11223 RIPE Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 3506 Average RIPE Region AS path length visible: 4.5 Max RIPE Region AS path length visible: 30 Number of RIPE region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 6286 Number of RIPE addresses announced to Internet: 713571968 Equivalent to 42 /8s, 136 /16s and 62 /24s RIPE AS Blocks 1877-1901, 2043, 2047, 2107-2136, 2585-2614 (pre-ERX allocations) 2773-2822, 2830-2879, 3154-3353, 5377-5631 6656-6911, 8192-9215, 12288-13311, 15360-16383 20480-21503, 24576-25599, 28672-29695 30720-31743, 33792-35839, 38912-39935 40960-45055, 47104-52223, 56320-58367 59392-61439, 61952-62463, 64396-64495 196608-207259 RIPE Address Blocks 2/8, 5/8, 25/8, 31/8, 37/8, 46/8, 51/8, 62/8, 77/8, 78/8, 79/8, 80/8, 81/8, 82/8, 83/8, 84/8, 85/8, 86/8, 87/8, 88/8, 89/8, 90/8, 91/8, 92/8, 93/8, 94/8, 95/8, 109/8, 141/8, 145/8, 151/8, 176/8, 178/8, 185/8, 188/8, 193/8, 194/8, 195/8, 212/8, 213/8, 217/8, LACNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------ Prefixes being announced by LACNIC Region ASes: 85162 Total LACNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 19053 LACNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.47 Prefixes being announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 86402 Unique aggregates announced from the LACNIC address blocks: 39199 LACNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 6493 LACNIC Prefixes per ASN: 13.31 LACNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 1818 LACNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1190 Average LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 5.1 Max LACNIC Region AS path length visible: 25 Number of LACNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 4015 Number of LACNIC addresses announced to Internet: 172256992 Equivalent to 10 /8s, 68 /16s and 110 /24s LACNIC AS Blocks 26592-26623, 27648-28671, 52224-53247, 61440-61951, 64099-64197, 262144-268700 + ERX transfers LACNIC Address Blocks 177/8, 179/8, 181/8, 186/8, 187/8, 189/8, 190/8, 191/8, 200/8, 201/8, AfriNIC Region Analysis Summary ------------------------------- Prefixes being announced by AfriNIC Region ASes: 17665 Total AfriNIC prefixes after maximum aggregation: 3897 AfriNIC Deaggregation factor: 4.53 Prefixes being announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 19582 Unique aggregates announced from the AfriNIC address blocks: 7168 AfriNIC Region origin ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 1090 AfriNIC Prefixes per ASN: 17.97 AfriNIC Region origin ASes announcing only one prefix: 351 AfriNIC Region transit ASes present in the Internet Routing Table: 215 Average AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 4.6 Max AfriNIC Region AS path length visible: 21 Number of AfriNIC region 32-bit ASNs visible in the Routing Table: 359 Number of AfriNIC addresses announced to Internet: 94459904 Equivalent to 5 /8s, 161 /16s and 88 /24s AfriNIC AS Blocks 36864-37887, 327680-328703 & ERX transfers AfriNIC Address Blocks 41/8, 102/8, 105/8, 154/8, 196/8, 197/8, APNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4538 5278 4192 76 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 7545 4000 408 405 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 17974 2787 900 77 TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indo 4766 2776 11126 751 KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom, KR 9829 2763 1499 541 BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone, IN 9808 2360 8699 32 CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication 9394 2173 4931 27 CTTNET China TieTong Telecommunications 4755 2104 422 221 TATACOMM-AS TATA Communications formerl 45899 2097 1482 150 VNPT-AS-VN VNPT Corp, VN 7552 2074 1180 84 VIETEL-AS-AP Viettel Corporation, VN Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-APNIC ARIN Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 6327 3359 1325 84 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 22773 3304 2952 158 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 18566 2175 405 107 MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath Corporation, US 6389 2045 3671 39 BELLSOUTH-NET-BLK - BellSouth.net Inc., 20115 2045 2272 429 CHARTER-NET-HKY-NC - Charter Communicat 209 1951 5067 651 CENTURYLINK-US-LEGACY-QWEST - Qwest Com 16509 1863 4032 561 AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US 30036 1834 329 296 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS - Mediacom 701 1679 10589 626 UUNET - MCI Communications Services, In 11492 1630 240 563 CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC., US Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-ARIN RIPE Region per AS prefix count summary --------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 39891 3387 186 23 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 20940 2809 839 2026 AKAMAI-ASN1, US 8551 2508 378 42 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Interne 34984 2064 333 428 TELLCOM-AS, TR 12389 1864 1675 722 ROSTELECOM-AS, RU 12479 1796 1063 72 UNI2-AS, ES 9121 1775 1691 17 TTNET, TR 13188 1604 100 52 TRIOLAN, UA 6849 1225 355 21 UKRTELNET, UA 8402 1213 544 14 CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom", RU Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-RIPE LACNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ----------------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 10620 3545 538 287 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 8151 3217 3467 585 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 11830 2327 367 41 Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad 6503 1580 437 53 Axtel, S.A.B. de C.V., MX 7303 1479 1013 195 Telecom Argentina S.A., AR 6147 1274 377 27 Telefonica del Peru S.A.A., PE 3816 1031 509 103 COLOMBIA TELECOMUNICACIONES S.A. ESP, C 28573 999 2304 179 CLARO S.A., BR 11172 912 126 86 Alestra, S. de R.L. de C.V., MX 18881 901 1058 25 TELEFÔNICA BRASIL S.A, BR Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-LACNIC AfriNIC Region per AS prefix count summary ------------------------------------------ ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 24863 1209 398 48 LINKdotNET-AS, EG 37611 776 91 8 Afrihost, ZA 36903 706 355 139 MT-MPLS, MA 36992 668 1383 31 ETISALAT-MISR, EG 24835 515 850 15 RAYA-AS, EG 8452 509 1730 17 TE-AS TE-AS, EG 29571 428 36 10 CITelecom-AS, CI 37492 416 354 77 ORANGE-, TN 15399 356 35 7 WANANCHI-, KE 2018 298 327 73 TENET-1, ZA Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet-AFRINIC Global Per AS prefix count summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets /20 equiv MaxAgg Description 4538 5278 4192 76 ERX-CERNET-BKB China Education and Rese 7545 4000 408 405 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 10620 3545 538 287 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 39891 3387 186 23 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 6327 3359 1325 84 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 22773 3304 2952 158 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communi 8151 3217 3467 585 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 20940 2809 839 2026 AKAMAI-ASN1, US 17974 2787 900 77 TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indo 4766 2776 11126 751 KIXS-AS-KR Korea Telecom, KR Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-ASnet Global Per AS Maximum Aggr summary ---------------------------------- ASN No of nets Net Savings Description 7545 4000 3595 TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom Limited, AU 39891 3387 3364 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 6327 3359 3275 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 10620 3545 3258 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 22773 3304 3146 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communications 17974 2787 2710 TELKOMNET-AS2-AP PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia, I 8151 3217 2632 Uninet S.A. de C.V., MX 8551 2508 2466 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Internet Backbo 9808 2360 2328 CMNET-GD Guangdong Mobile Communication Co.Ltd. 11830 2327 2286 Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad y Telec Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-CIDRnet List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global) ----------------------------------------- Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description 65602 UNALLOCATED 8.225.192.0/24 30372 SUNESYS2 - Sunesys, LLC, US 65456 PRIVATE 31.171.126.0/23 199311 AZRT-LX Local Internet Exchang 64525 PRIVATE 45.119.143.0/24 133275 GIGANTIC-AS Gigantic Infotel P 64525 PRIVATE 45.125.62.0/24 133275 GIGANTIC-AS Gigantic Infotel P 65530 PRIVATE 45.249.40.0/24 133720 SOFTCALLCOC-AS SOFT CALL CUST- 65001 PRIVATE 46.237.40.0/21 13118 ASN-YARTELECOM PJSC Rostelecom 65534 PRIVATE 58.68.109.0/24 10201 DWL-AS-IN Dishnet Wireless Lim 64513 PRIVATE 62.150.101.0/24 9155 QNET Kuwait, KW 290012147 UNALLOCATED 63.65.43.0/24 7046 RFC2270-UUNET-CUSTOMER - MCI C 65538 DOCUMENT 64.27.253.0/24 1273 CW Vodafone Group PLC, GB Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-badAS Advertised Unallocated Addresses -------------------------------- Network Origin AS Description 14.128.14.0/23 10247 NETLINE, ZA 14.192.50.0/23 10247 NETLINE, ZA 14.192.58.0/23 10247 NETLINE, ZA 27.100.7.0/24 56096 UNKNOWN 36.255.250.0/23 10247 NETLINE, ZA 41.78.180.0/23 37265 -Reserved AS-, ZZ 43.228.144.0/22 9829 BSNL-NIB National Internet Backbone, IN 43.251.20.0/22 9381 WTT-AS-AP WTT HK Limited, HK 43.251.84.0/22 133676 PNPL-AS Precious netcom pvt ltd, IN 43.251.84.0/23 133676 PNPL-AS Precious netcom pvt ltd, IN Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-add-IANA Number of prefixes announced per prefix length (Global) ------------------------------------------------------- /1:0 /2:0 /3:0 /4:0 /5:0 /6:0 /7:0 /8:15 /9:13 /10:36 /11:106 /12:285 /13:553 /14:1050 /15:1866 /16:13398 /17:7739 /18:13627 /19:25100 /20:38989 /21:42822 /22:80447 /23:65685 /24:370901 /25:842 /26:621 /27:646 /28:35 /29:21 /30:15 /31:2 /32:27 Advertised prefixes smaller than registry allocations ----------------------------------------------------- ASN No of nets Total ann. Description 6327 3157 3359 SHAW - Shaw Communications Inc., CA 39891 2946 3387 ALJAWWALSTC-AS, SA 22773 2525 3304 ASN-CXA-ALL-CCI-22773-RDC - Cox Communications 18566 2070 2175 MEGAPATH5-US - MegaPath Corporation, US 8551 1972 2508 BEZEQ-INTERNATIONAL-AS Bezeqint Internet Backbo 11830 1697 2327 Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad y Telec 30036 1609 1834 MEDIACOM-ENTERPRISE-BUSINESS - Mediacom Communi 10620 1532 3545 Telmex Colombia S.A., CO 11492 1449 1630 CABLEONE - CABLE ONE, INC., US 34984 1367 2064 TELLCOM-AS, TR Complete listing at http://thyme.rand.apnic.net/current/data-sXXas-nos Number of /24s announced per /8 block (Global) ---------------------------------------------- 1:1566 2:838 4:18 5:2471 6:38 7:1 8:1070 9:1 12:1849 13:163 14:1709 15:29 16:3 17:175 18:76 20:59 23:2458 24:1651 25:2 27:2357 29:1 31:1933 32:89 35:21 36:418 37:2386 38:1411 39:74 40:98 41:3046 42:496 43:1927 44:85 45:3110 46:2837 47:172 49:1328 50:1015 51:19 52:868 54:353 55:2 56:4 57:43 58:1562 59:993 60:355 61:2025 62:1736 63:1848 64:4590 65:2225 66:4450 67:2311 68:1189 69:3169 70:1161 71:610 72:2114 74:2623 75:388 76:411 77:1498 78:1563 79:1950 80:1419 81:1413 82:1024 83:750 84:983 85:1931 86:467 87:1213 88:829 89:2254 90:171 91:6217 92:1032 93:2315 94:2402 95:2645 96:650 97:352 98:963 99:97 100:153 101:1303 102:1 103:15969 104:3065 105:208 106:564 107:1686 108:829 109:2902 110:1485 111:1744 112:1286 113:1253 114:1063 115:1569 116:1666 117:1837 118:2148 119:1650 120:911 121:1069 122:2429 123:1864 124:1493 125:1817 128:934 129:670 130:443 131:1499 132:602 133:193 134:794 135:227 136:359 137:497 138:1963 139:536 140:381 141:677 142:740 143:915 144:785 145:186 146:1108 147:704 148:1514 149:600 150:705 151:1007 152:722 153:301 154:923 155:750 156:695 157:739 158:595 159:1569 160:773 161:730 162:2500 163:509 164:984 165:1438 166:387 167:1310 168:3039 169:818 170:3498 171:379 172:994 173:1898 174:810 175:758 176:1867 177:3967 178:2483 179:1130 180:2212 181:2076 182:2461 183:817 184:899 185:11159 186:3272 187:2281 188:2596 189:1886 190:8150 191:1354 192:9692 193:5831 194:4735 195:3968 196:2191 197:1264 198:5534 199:5874 200:7220 201:4630 202:10331 203:9950 204:4520 205:2857 206:3010 207:3120 208:3967 209:3961 210:3932 211:2084 212:2856 213:2586 214:856 215:66 216:5723 217:2097 218:915 219:598 220:1672 221:941 222:722 223:1298 End of report

1 0