- Test - lists.nanog.org

NANOG Attendee List
by William B. Norton 23 Feb '96

23 Feb '96

Hi all - Some folks asked for the NANOG attendee list, electronic (much like the IETF attendee list) or otherwise. I'd like to find out if you all have a problem with this. The options appear to be: a) On-Line (WWW) Attendee list updated and available as people register b) On-Line (WWW) Attendee list installed after the meeting c) Attendee list handed out only in paper form at the site d) Attendee list unavailable Please respond directly to me if you have strong feelings one way or the other. Thanks, Bill ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- William Norton <wbn(a)merit.edu> (313) 936-2656

1 0

NANOG Announce: CIX NANOG Date Changes!
by William B. Norton 22 Feb '96

22 Feb '96

Hi all - Looks like the next NANOG dates have been changed and finalize (see note below). The next NANOG is now scheduled for May 30-31. See you there. More detailed logistics to follow.... Bill ------------------ >Bill, > >Unfortunately I received word today from George Washington University >that the May 23-24 dates are wrong, and the correct dates are May 30-31. > >Apparently we had a major miscommunication! May 30-31 are absolutely >the correct dates and I hope that you will be able to communicate this >to the people in San Diego today. We will update our members. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- William Norton <wbn(a)merit.edu> (313) 936-2656

3 2

"Stephen Peters": (Fwd)
by Peter Berger 22 Feb '96

22 Feb '96

In light of the recent discussions about auctioning off domain names, I found this to be very interesting -- personal solicitations to -sell- domain names trademarked by other organizations..... ------- Forwarded Message From: "Stephen Peters" <sbp(a)halcyon.com> Message-Id: <960221203958.ZM11269208(a)ppp-dialup11.3rdplanet.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 20:35:25 -0800 Reply-To: sbp(a)halcyon.com To: peterb(a)psc.edu, dug(a)lm.com, myke(a)cyberport.net Subject: (Fwd) Cc: amazing(a)halcyon.com, kevingo(a)microsoft.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii The scum is beginning to seep out of the internet. Check out the mail someone left on our corporate web site today. This is almost the equivalent of someone opening his overcoat to you on a crowded city street to sell you a wristwatch. Hey buddy! Wanna buy a domain name?! - --- Forwarded mail from nobody <nobody(a)www1.wa.com> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 19:27:31 -0800 From: nobody <nobody(a)www1.wa.com> To: amazing(a)halcyon.com Incoming Feedback to Amazing name = Brian Cimins title = Manager company = Cimins Corp. email address = AgentWeb(a)aol.com comments = NICE PAGE!!! I was wondering if you guys were interested in obtaining some big names on the internet. Some examples are: >>>http://www.capitolrecords.com<<< GREAT FOR YOU GUYS!!! http://www.canadadry.com http://www.bauschlomb.com If you are interested in obtaining any of these sites please send a bid for what you are willing to pay for the transfer of these names over to your names and over to your server. Thank you for your time!!! Sincerely, Brian Cimins 609-652-7116 P.S. I have already sold such names as http://www.billclinton.com, http://www.powerrangers.com, and readersdigest.com, bdalton.com, and barnes-noble.com!!! These corporations will pay big bucks for these names!!! - ---End of forwarded mail from nobody <nobody(a)www1.wa.com> - -- sbp(a)amz.com http://www.amz.com/ Amazing Online Marketing For all your Web advertising needs Fax: 503.768.3865 Custom Web Sites, Soup to Nuts ------- End of Forwarded Message

1 0

Re: [NIC-960209.1757] Routing Problem (fwd)
by Walter O. Haas 22 Feb '96

22 Feb '96

> > Creating a consortium [akin to the NAP model] of small ISP's could > > easily resolve this problem, if all address space allocated to each > > ISP was contiguous and could be aggregated to a larger prefix. > > But, this would require working with your direct competition in your > local geographic area. > > Ain't gonna happen. > > No way, No How. Why not? We already have competing TV stations sharing an antenna site, and competing newspapers sharing a printing press and distribution mechanism. I don't see why ISPs couldn't do something similar where it's in everybody's interest. -- Walt

5 5

None
by jroberts＠teir.com 22 Feb '96

22 Feb '96

help

2 1

looking for suggestions on a PD work ticketing system to give to ISPs
by scharf＠vix.com 21 Feb '96

21 Feb '96

In my CIX work I have identified the need to provide a public domain or otherwise freely redistributable work ticketing system. Since many of the people using this will be ISPs, I thought I would ask this group for any recommendations that people may have on this, I hope this message isn't to far afield of what the list is for. Please send all responses/flames just to me. Thanks, Jerry

7 7

Re: NANOG Announce: CIX NANOG Date Changes!
by sob＠academ.com 21 Feb '96

21 Feb '96

The notes page for the last meeting does have the correct dates on it. -- Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob(a)academ.com Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.

1 0

Resources regarding use of RFC 1597 addresses
by Michael Dillon 21 Feb '96

21 Feb '96

I've been experimenting with 10/8 addressing on m home LAN connected to the Internet via a single static IP address. So far I've verified that it is possible to use such a scenario for a small corporate LAN which mainly needs basic WWW access and email, but I would like to find out how far I can go with this. So, does anyone know of any resources on the net for building firewalls using RFC1597 addressing? Michael Dillon Voice: +1-604-546-8022 Memra Software Inc. Fax: +1-604-546-3049 http://www.memra.com E-mail: michael(a)memra.com

3 3

Re: NANOG Announce: CIX NANOG Date Changes!
by pj＠place.org 21 Feb '96

21 Feb '96

>> Hi all - >> >> Looks like the next NANOG dates have been changed and finalize (see note >> below). The next NANOG is now scheduled for May 30-31. >> > A strong showing for our communities disregard for > US holidays! How many other nanog'ites have nothing > else to do on Memorial Day (real)? That doesn't bother me as much as dates jumping around... Can the nanog webpages be updated with a 'future nanog' page listing future dates and sites? --Paul

1 0

Re: NANOG Announce: CIX NANOG Date Changes!
by Randall S. Benn 21 Feb '96

21 Feb '96

At 07:51 AM 2/21/96 -0800, you wrote: >> >> Hi all - >> >> Looks like the next NANOG dates have been changed and finalize (see note >> below). The next NANOG is now scheduled for May 30-31. >> >> See you there. More detailed logistics to follow.... >> >> Bill >> ------------------ >> >Bill, >> > >> >Unfortunately I received word today from George Washington University >> >that the May 23-24 dates are wrong, and the correct dates are May 30-31. >> > >> >Apparently we had a major miscommunication! May 30-31 are absolutely >> >the correct dates and I hope that you will be able to communicate this >> >to the people in San Diego today. We will update our members. >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > A strong showing for our communities disregard for > US holidays! How many other nanog'ites have nothing > else to do on Memorial Day (real)? > >-- >--bill My calendar for 1996 shows Monday, May 27 as Memorial Day. Randy Benn

1 0