- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: Sprint's route filters and Europe
by sob＠academ.com 02 Jun '96

02 Jun '96

At the NANOG meeting just past, Sprintlink made a presentation indicating that they were altering their filtering policies over the course of this month such that all networks 206 and above would be filtered at /19. They said this was to be consistent with the new revision to RFC 1466 that is in the works. [Note to NANOG readers: please correct me if my notes on this was wrong, but this is what I recorded.] -- Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob(a)academ.com Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.

1 0

Re: MAE-West is up again (Sun's & Alphas)
by Daniel W. McRobb 02 Jun '96

02 Jun '96

> On Sat, 1 Jun 1996, Paul A Vixie wrote: > > > Warning: this is irrelevant to the stated charter of NANOG. Hit "D" now. > > > > I mean it. Don't read this. It's not about network operations. > > > > My experience differs significantly, but then my P/Pro is 200MHz and my > > Alpha is 333MHz. Microsoft probably has older Alphas and newer P/Pro's. > > However, since Pentium processors are CISC and Alphas are RISC, the > difference in clock speed may _still_ yield similar performance since > the Alphas have to execute _more_ instructions to accomplish similar > amounts of "work" (on the average since some tasks are simple and some > more complex). Don't get me wrong -- we love our Alphas (so far) and > feel it's probably a more stable platform at this point since the Pro's > are still fairly new. > > Northwest Nexus Inc. (206) 455-3505 (voice) > Professional Internet Services > edm(a)nwnexus.WA.COM > Before we continue on a path of naive CPU arguments (or worse, delve into 32-bit vs. 64-bit, MMU path width, cache, pipelining and stages, etc. etc.), can we take this offline please? Daniel ~~~~~~

3 2

Sprint's route filters and Europe
by Michael Dillon 02 Jun '96

02 Jun '96

Any comments on the following? > Yeah, but maybe they'll do it right. Sprint's current policy would > you believe is apparently causing UUNet some problems in setting up > the Microsoft Network in Europe. > > Sprint and RIPE appear to have a disagreement on what the minimum > size of allocated address space should be, and folks like us are > stuck in the middle. Michael Dillon ISP & Internet Consulting Memra Software Inc. Fax: +1-604-546-3049 http://www.memra.com E-mail: michael(a)memra.com

1 0

Complaint and other court papers available regarding second Network Solutions lawsuit
by Carl Oppedahl 02 Jun '96

02 Jun '96

For those who are following the lawsuits against Network Solutions Inc regarding its trademark domain name policy ... the Infolawalert web site has obtained and scanned in the Complaint and related legal papers in the DCI v. NSI case, and has made them available on its web site. Twice now (once in the Roadrunner case, and again now in the DCI case) we have seen a situation where a company was in danger of losing its domain name under NSI's trademark policy, and in which the only reasonable way to keep from losing the domain name is to sue NSI and ask a judge to order NSI not to cut it off. The information is at <http://infolawalert.com/source/src061496_dc_intro.html>. The NSI policy and its problems are also described in some detail in my Network World column at <http://www.patents.com/pubs/nw1.sht>.

1 0

RS1.MAE-WEST.RA.NET
by bmanning＠isi.edu 31 May '96

31 May '96

Hi, This node is back on its feet and is peering with 30+ peers. Thanks again for all your patience. We will now be working on RS2 and give it an ETA of 3 to 4 hours. -- --bill

1 0

RS2.MAE-WEST.RA.NET
by bmanning＠isi.edu 31 May '96

31 May '96

Hi, This one seems to be mostly up as well. It does not yet have a current RSd version running, so your peerings won't be quite ready yet. There is also a minor problem with an Out of Band cable. Still, its a healthy machine again. --bill

1 0

Re: NANOG meeting mulicasted?
by sob＠academ.com 30 May '96

30 May '96

I have rebooted the mbone router. Let's see if that clears the problem. -- Stan | Academ Consulting Services |internet: sob(a)academ.com Olan | For more info on academ, see this |uucp: {mcsun|amdahl}!academ!sob Barber | URL- http://www.academ.com/academ |Opinions expressed are only mine.

1 0

NANOG meeting mulicasted?
by Scott Mace 30 May '96

30 May '96

We are not seeing any video or audio from the NANOG meeting session. Is there some sort of problem with the transmission? Scott -- smace(a)neosoft.com - KC5NUA - Scott Mace - Network Engineer - Neosoft Inc. Any opinions expressed are mine.

4 7

Re: Two of us tomorrow
by owen＠DeLong.SJ.CA.US 30 May '96

30 May '96

> > > > | I don't know how formal NANOG meetings [are] > > > > Very formal. Wear a suit. > > > > Sean. > > > > is this a joke ? > I will attend for the first time. Someone tell me, so I don't > make an ass out of myself with sneakers, T-shirt and baseballcap > worn backwards :) > > bye,Kai > Sean wasn't wearing the baseball cap backwards last time I saw him at NANOG, but otherwise, you just described his attire. Owen

1 0

Re: Two of us tomorrow
by owen＠DeLong.SJ.CA.US 30 May '96

30 May '96

> | I don't know how formal NANOG meetings [are] > > Very formal. Wear a suit. > > Sean. > Now I'm sorry I have to miss this one. I'd love to see Sean in a suit! Owen

1 0