- Test - lists.nanog.org

NANOG Meeting Registration
by Pam Ciesla 20 Jan '97

20 Jan '97

The attendee list on the web page has been updated. If you have registered already and are planning on faxing, mailing or calling in your payment info please do so as soon as possible. This will help to defer any delays at the meeting. Thanks Pam

1 0

Romanian Hacker makes the local news for hacking NASA, Pentagon, and USAF systems
by Chris A. Icide 20 Jan '97

20 Jan '97

It's not much, but seems it's getting more and more news in Europe. Take a peek. http://www.expres.ro/press/evzilei/english/Welcome.htm#miscellaneous Chris

1 0

Re: A New Spawning...
by Bill Woodcock 19 Jan '97

19 Jan '97

Robert Mathews <mathews(a)gold.chem.hawaii.edu> writes: > For those of you who have not see this, I include the following > Bogus Messages Snarling the 'Net > http://techweb.cmp.com/cw/cwi/netnews/011397/news0117-4.html "For example, Viacom Inc. is working to ensure acceptable access-speed levels for its Web sites' visitors through special service arrangements with its ISP, Uunet..." Wow! I wanna hire the UUnet sales guy that dreamed that up! Wow. "Sign here, it'll make all your Internet access problems go away!" :-) -Bill ______________________________________________________________________________ bill woodcock woody(a)zocalo.net woody(a)nowhere.loopback.edu user(a)host.domain.com

1 0

A New Spawning...
by Robert Mathews 19 Jan '97

19 Jan '97

Hello All: For those of you who have not see this, I include the following for your examination and critique. It reads as follows: Bogus Messages Snarling the 'Net http://techweb.cmp.com/cw/cwi/netnews/011397/news0117-4.html By JEFF CARUSO and AMY ROGERS Experiencing Internet delays? You can probably feel safe blaming the Net. Best, Robert. -------

1 0

Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors?
by Vadim Antonov 19 Jan '97

19 Jan '97

>> Well, AS 666 is owned by the ARMY Weapons Systems Test Center. >And they actually *do* have lots of black helicopters, too, but >I digress. >- paul Ah, kidding. Have you ever seen a live communist? For me, that stuff is all too real. Taking some vacations in North Korea would be a nice cure for infantilism. The technology we're playing with lost it virginity years ago, and it is our duty to remember than it can be an immensely powerful tool in politics and military. We're not in a sandbox anymore. --vadim

5 4

Gullibility
by Paul Ferguson 19 Jan '97

19 Jan '97

At 07:58 PM 1/18/97 -0600, Ronald Barron Yokubaitis wrote: > >Bay sells to the PRC; Cisco buys from the PRC. > Haven't you figured it out yet? It's a router vendor conspiracy. Boy, have we got you guys fooled. - paul

1 0

Re: Bay Networks in bed with commie censors?
by Paul Ferguson 19 Jan '97

19 Jan '97

At 05:33 PM 1/15/97 -0800, Vadim Antonov wrote: > >The technology we're playing with lost it virginity years ago, and >it is our duty to remember than it can be an immensely powerful tool >in politics and military. We're not in a sandbox anymore. > Not everything is a freeking conspiracy either. - paul

3 2

Re: Filtering on RFC1918 cruft
by Sean Donelan 18 Jan '97

18 Jan '97

>deny ip 198.32.146.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (543 matches) >deny ip 198.32.176.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (10 matches) >deny ip 192.157.69.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (96 matches) >deny ip 198.32.128.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (335 matches) > > ya, ya, teh last four aren't rfc1918 but i filter them anyway (nap >dmz's) :) lot's of people announcing them. the first two are the >only rfc1918 nets i see announced on our nap routers. I used to wonder about announcing them too. I came up with reasons on both sides, and in the end decided it didn't matter for real traffic. Real traffic isn't sourced or destined for the exchange point networks. On the other hand, the users most likely to send traffic to or from an exchange point network are also the network engineers configuring the announcements. Announcing the networks make network debugging (and other network hacking) a lot easier. -- Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO Affiliation given for identification not representation

3 3

BGP4
by Derek Elder 18 Jan '97

18 Jan '97

Who has the best WWW pages outlining BGP tricks of the trade? And don't tell me Cisco :) I've read them... | Derek Elder http://www.accessus.net V.P., CIO | | djelder(a)accessus.net accessU.S., Inc. 888-637-3638 Ext. 222 |

3 2

Re: Filtering on RFC1918 cruft
by Brett D. Watson 18 Jan '97

18 Jan '97

i wondered the same thing. here's what i see at mae-east being announed by some (i filter): deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 255.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 (227 matches) deny ip 192.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (603 matches) deny ip 198.32.146.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (543 matches) deny ip 198.32.176.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (10 matches) deny ip 192.157.69.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (96 matches) deny ip 198.32.128.0 0.0.0.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.255 (335 matches) ya, ya, teh last four aren't rfc1918 but i filter them anyway (nap dmz's) :) lot's of people announcing them. the first two are the only rfc1918 nets i see announced on our nap routers. -brett > Why aren't people actively filter on RFC1918 announcements?? > > - paul > > >Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 15:00:03 GMT > >Subject: 01/16/97 Internet Routing Problems > > > >Reserved Network and Host Announcements > >--------------------------------------- > >10/8 at Mae-East from DIALnet (5552) ASPATH=5552 3549 Incomplete > >10/8 at Mae-East from INAP.net (5646) ASPATH=5646 3549 Incomplete > >10/8 at Mae-East from PRIMENET (3549) ASPATH=3549 Incomplete > >10/8 at Mae-East from CAIS (3491) ASPATH=3491 3549 Incomplete > >10/8 at Mae-West from PRIMENET (3549) ASPATH=3549 Incomplete > >10/8 at Mae-West from INAP.net (5646) ASPATH=5646 3549 Incomplete > >10/8 at AADS from INAP.net (5646) ASPATH=5646 3549 Incomplete > >10/8 at AADS from 198.32.130.55 ASPATH=3549 Incomplete >

1 0