- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: operational problems at mae-west?
by Paul Ferguson 25 Jan '97

25 Jan '97

At 02:48 PM 1/24/97 -0700, Brett D. Watson wrote: >2. ios version 11.1.8 early deployment (which i'm told by isp-team i >shouldn't run unless i *really* feel the need) > Don't know why there should be any issues here; 11.1(x)CA contains the knobs, is running in several other large production networks, and is readily available. - paul

1 0

Re: operational problems at mae-west?
by Paul Ferguson 25 Jan '97

25 Jan '97

At 04:21 PM 1/24/97 -0500, John Hawkinson wrote: > >SPD (IP precedence) will not affect the prioritzation that the >gigaswitch applies (which is no prioritization). > Quite true. ;-) - paul

1 0

Re: operational problems at mae-west?
by Vadim Antonov 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

There's a hack around it (not pretty...) -- use physically different LAN to propagate routing updates, with NEXT-HOPs pointing to the "data LAN" interfaces. The problem with that solution is that if data LAN fails, there's no way to learn about it at BGP level. That is due to the unfortunate property of BGP (and many other routing protocols) that it uses the same transport to propagate keepalives and routing updates. --vadim > > i wasnt' aware that bgp keepalives had a queuiing priority... or > >are you talking about spd? > > > > Yes, SPD. SPD (IP precedence) will not affect the prioritzation that the gigaswitch applies (which is no prioritization). --jhawk

1 0

Re: operational problems at mae-west?
by Sanjay Dani 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

> We're having air conditioning problems in the room where the MFS Gigaswitches > are. One of the Gigaswitch ATM line cards is being flaky, so I've rearranged > connections onto the other card for now. They tell me the air conditioning > should be back on line in a few minutes, and I'll keep checking. > Steve Funny, it's pleasant 60 degrees out, fairly dry. Only if they built structures around here to let fresh air in naturally when needed. --breathing recirculated air in Cupertino

2 1

Re: random thoughts on how I can prevent spammers from using my net
by MarkG 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

Alan, Will fully support your efforts any way we can. BTW thanks for the R.O.D.... Mark Guagliardo CEO(a)NetConcept.com Postmaster(a)USemail.net 805-676-9490 ---------- From: ALAN DORN HETZEL JR <dorn(a)atlanta.net> To: NANOG(a)merit.edu Cc: dorn(a)atlanta.net Subject: random thoughts on how I can prevent spammers from using my net >I have been trying to figure out ways to prevent spammers from using my >net as a sending location (even once). >emails sent, with a charge of $0.05 (or other number) per excess >If we make the terms and conditions obvious, and get a signature before

1 0

Re: operational problems at mae-west?
by Brett D. Watson 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

> At 11:52 AM 1/24/97 -0700, Brett D. Watson wrote: > > > > > i wasnt' aware that bgp keepalives had a queuiing priority... or > >are you talking about spd? > > > > Yes, SPD. oh sure, if you run: 1. beta/experimental code (which i can't run) 2. ios version 11.1.8 early deployment (which i'm told by isp-team i shouldn't run unless i *really* feel the need) -brett

1 0

Re: operational problems at mae-west?
by Paul Ferguson 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

At 11:52 AM 1/24/97 -0700, Brett D. Watson wrote: > > i wasnt' aware that bgp keepalives had a queuiing priority... or >are you talking about spd? > Yes, SPD. - paul

2 1

Re: operational problems at mae-west?
by Jim Rowh 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

just got off the phone with the MFS NOC. Seems they are having problems now and are looking into it... jim

3 2

More Information
by Ali Dorji 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

Helo, I am working in internetworking and I was interested in recieving more information about NANOG. Please email me with more information. Ali Dorji email address: adorji(a)on.bell.ca

1 0

operational problems at mae-west?
by Brett D. Watson 24 Jan '97

24 Jan '97

is anyone aware of problems at mae-west? i've not seen anything on the mailing list but the following peers are getting reset every 15-30 minutes on my border router there: 198.32.136.1 4 4553 5640 35253 1009761 0 0 04:38:02 198.32.136.2 4 4553 6222 35267 1009761 0 0 02:37:47 198.32.136.5 4 1740 4957 35247 1009761 0 0 02:36:57 198.32.136.10 4 2041 3330 35168 1009761 0 0 00:09:51 198.32.136.11 4 1239 83187 35106 1009761 1 0 00:09:51 198.32.136.12 4 3561 46357 35154 1009761 5 0 00:09:51 it's *only* these peers and they keep resetting consistantly. the problem started happening after midnight last night i think. i believe at least mci and sprint have dedicated ports on the switch so i dont' understand what's happening. anyone else seeing something similar? -brett

6 5