- Test - lists.nanog.org

Re: High capacity wireless WAN equipment.
by Douglas Kerry 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

By far the most comprehensive site on wireless LANs/MANs I've found is http://hydra.carleton.ca/info/wlan.html Doug Kerry Sr Network Engineer SuperNet, Inc., a Qwest Company kerry(a)sni.net

1 0

Re:High capacity wireless WAN equipment.?
by Trevor Izsak 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

This may be of interest to you, Nortel bought BNI ( a leader in broadband wireless tech.) and they are supplying broadband LMDS products to Teligent. Check out www.nortel.com or www.broadbandnetworks.com (good site for product info) Trevor...

1 0

Re: FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet
by Charles Sprickman 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

Hi, I just wanted to thank all the people that responded to my question. I received about 30 replies saying "Fast Ethernet, baby", and one saying FDDI is good. Thanks again, Charles ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ Charles Sprickman Internet Channel INCH System Administration Team (212)243-5200 spork(a)inch.com access(a)inch.com

1 0

Re: High capacity wireless WAN equipment.
by bkanner＠caiwireless.net 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

In what city are you located? We provide broadband bandwidth to local ISPs for sale to their customers. As well we work with other wireless companies on these projects. Let me know where you are and we can try to answer your questions. Thanks. At 11:41 AM 2/6/98 -0500, Jeff Studds wrote: >>Date: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 16:14:43 -0600 >>From: "Louis A. Destree" <destree(a)flash.net> >>Organization: FlashNet Communications >>To: nanog(a)merit.edu >>Subject: High capacity wireless WAN equipment. >>Sender: owner-nanog(a)merit.edu >>X-UIDL: b5c2d72f350ef6173d23ad4bc62b7bab >> >>Greetings, >> >>I'm trying to round up information on wireless WAN equipment. I need T1 >>and above speeds. If anyone has some information on products or >>experience I'd be interested in hearing it. >> >>Thanks, >>Louis >>-- >>Louis A. Destree >>Senior Network Engineer >>FlashNet Communications >>destree(a)flash.net >> >> > >Jeff Studds Internet at Warp Speed >jstudds(a)warp.net phone +1 301 699 1840 >Fax +1 301 699 7957 mobile +1 301 580 8552 >The Internet: It's not just an adventure... it's a job:-) > > =====+++++=====+++++=====+++++=====+++++=====+++++=====+++++===== Bruce M. Kanner bkanner(a)caiwireless.net CAI WIRELESS SYSTEMS, INC. (direct) 301-977-2023 (pager) 888-556-6176 (fax) 301-975-0172 =====+++++=====+++++=====+++++=====+++++=====+++++=====+++++=====

1 0

NLRI Origin verification
by Yakov Rekhter 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

Folks, ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/yakov/draft-bates-bgp4-nlri-orig-verif-00.txt may be of interest to you. Yakov.

1 0

FDDI or 100Mb Ethernet
by Charles Sprickman 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

Hi, We colocate with our upstream, so we (thankfully) don't have to deal with Bell Atlantic for our main Internet connection. We are currently running a 10Mb ethernet link to our provider, but our contract allows for more than that should we ever need it. Since the Bay ASN we now use will soon be history and will be replaced by a shiny new(?) Cisco, I'm thinking of upgrading the link now rather than later. We have a choice of FDDI or 100Mb ethernet. I'm thinking FDDI is better, and not too much more expensive for our side. Are there any negatives with FDDI? How does the 4000(?) Byte MTU affect things? All of our outgoing links, T1 and ether are all 1500. Does the work of fragmenting the packets down to 1500 amount to anything? All this talk about MTUs has got me wondering. Thanks, Charles ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ Charles Sprickman Internet Channel INCH System Administration Team (212)243-5200 spork(a)inch.com access(a)inch.com

2 1

Gated on Solaris on Intel
by Eric Germann 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

Looking for privately shared war stories of using Gated on Solaris X86. The good, the bad and the ugly. Thanx, Eric ekgermann(a)cctec.com

1 0

MTU of the Internet?
by Peter Ford 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

Several people have noted to the Microsoft Support and Product groups that they want the Windows 95 PPP MTU to be set to 576 (down from 1500). this change is in Windows 98. The reason for this change cited by many customers is that many ISPs have 576 MTUs set "inside" their networks and packets get fragmented. How prevelant is this fragmentation and how prevelant is this MTU in ISPs? Are there statistics that can be shared on how much traffic they see on their networks that are IP fragments? Why do ISPs set their MTUs to 576 instead of ~1500 or even ~4K? thanks in advance for your responses, peter

25 32

Re: High capacity wireless WAN equipment.
by Pat Darisme 06 Feb '98

06 Feb '98

Would LMDS meet your needs ? http://www.wireless-one.com/ http://www.insight-corp.com/lmds.html Or a web search on LMDS ... Once upon a time, Louis A. Destree arranged the electrons in @Home's private scaleable, ATM, OC3 BackBone to write: > Subject: High capacity wireless WAN equipment. > (Feb 5, 4:14pm) > Greetings, > > I'm trying to round up information on wireless WAN equipment. I need T1 > and above speeds. If anyone has some information on products or > experience I'd be interested in hearing it. > > Thanks, > Louis > -- > Louis A. Destree > Senior Network Engineer > FlashNet Communications > destree(a)flash.net > End of included message written by Louis A. Destree on Feb 5, 4:14pm, >

1 0

High capacity wireless WAN equipment.
by Louis A. Destree 05 Feb '98

05 Feb '98

Greetings, I'm trying to round up information on wireless WAN equipment. I need T1 and above speeds. If anyone has some information on products or experience I'd be interested in hearing it. Thanks, Louis -- Louis A. Destree Senior Network Engineer FlashNet Communications destree(a)flash.net

5 5