- Test - lists.nanog.org

Shared cache servers on an island's IXP
by Jérôme Nicolle 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

Hello, I'm trying to find out the best way to consolidate connectivity on an island. The current issues are : - Low redundancy of old cables (2) - Low system capacity of said cables (<=20Gbps) - Total service loss when both cables are down because of congestion on satelite backups - Sheer price of bandwidth On the plus side, there are over 5 AS on the island, an IXP and small-ish collocation capacity (approx 10kW available, could be upgraded, second site available later this year). We'd like to host cache servers and/or VMs on the IXP, with an option to anycast many services - without hijacking them, that goes without saying - such as quad-whatever DNS resolvers, NTP servers and whatever else could be useful for weather-induced disaster-recovery and/or offload cables. Do you think most CDNs, stream services and CSPs could accommodate a scenario where we'd host their gear or provide VMs for them to announce on the local route-servers ? If not, what could be a reasonable technical arrangement ? Thanks ! -- Jérôme Nicolle +33 6 19 31 27 14

6 8

Re: Shared cache servers on an island's IXP
by Jérôme Nicolle 18 Jan '24

18 Jan '24

Hi Gael, Le 18/01/2024 à 13:48, Gael Hernandez a écrit : > Friends from PCH (www.pch.net <http://www.pch.net>) operate backend > services for DNS authoritative ccTLDs and the Quad9 DNS resolver. They > would be very happy to help. I'm sure they would, I'm a big fan of their work BTW. Though hosting them in a densely connected area isn't the same as it will in remote locations, I guess there could be some work to be done to get it running properly, as Stephane wrote. How would you think we could work on that ? I mean, disconnected or extremely high latency scenarii should be on a research roadmap by SpaceX' standards, right ? ;-) Best regards, -- Jérôme Nicolle +33 6 19 31 27 14

2 1

Re: "Hypothetical" Datacenter Overheating
by Clayton Zekelman 17 Jan '24

17 Jan '24

At 09:08 AM 2024-01-15, Mike Hammett wrote: >Let's say that hypothetically, a datacenter you're in had a cooling >failure and escalated to an average of 120 degrees before >mitigations started having an effect. What are normal QA procedures >on your behalf? What is the facility likely to be doing? >What should be expected in the aftermath? One would hope they would have had disaster recovery plans to bring in outside cold air, and have executed on it quickly, rather than hoping the chillers got repaired. All our owned facilities have large outside air intakes, automatic dampers and air mixing chambers in case of mechanical cooling failure, because cooling systems are often not designed to run well in extreme cold. All of these can be manually run incase of controls failure, but people tell me I'm a little obsessive over backup plans for backup plans. You will start to see premature failure of equipment over the coming weeks/months/years. Coincidentally, we have some gear in a data centre in the Chicago area that is experiencing that sort of issue right now... :-(

10 13

Operational contact asrank.caida.org
by lsolis＠entelnet.bo 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

Hello Community, I am looking for an operational contact for asrank.caida.org, I urgently need them to modify an inconsistency identified in the published ranking, I have sent messages to the feedback emails indicated on the website and I didn't receive a response. Thank you very much for your help. Lia Solis

2 1

Singtel NOC Contact
by Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

Subject: Singtel NOC Contact Good day from Singapore, Anyone knows the email address for Singtel NOC? Regards, Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming

1 0

Re: "Hypothetical" Datacenter Overheating
by Jay Hennigan 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

On 1/15/24 10:37, Pennington, Scott wrote: > yes but.... it has been -8 in Chicago plenty of times before this. > Very interested in root cause... Absolutely. My point was that claiming "Global warming" isn't going to fly as an excuse. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* NANOG <nanog-bounces+scott.pennington=cinbell.com(a)nanog.org> on > behalf of Jay Hennigan <jay(a)west.net> > *Sent:* Monday, January 15, 2024 1:31 PM > *To:* nanog(a)nanog.org <nanog(a)nanog.org> > *Subject:* Re: "Hypothetical" Datacenter Overheating > On 1/15/24 07:21, Mel Beckman wrote: >> Easy. Climate change. Lol! > > It was -8°F in Chicago yesterday. > >>> On Jan 15, 2024, at 7:17 AM, sronan(a)ronan-online.com wrote: >>> >>> >>> I’m more interested in how you lose six chillers all at once. -- Jay Hennigan - jay(a)west.net Network Engineering - CCIE #7880 503 897-8550 - WB6RDV

3 2

Searching for technical contact at Aptum AS13768
by Eric Dugas 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

Hello, I'm searching for a technical contact, either Ops or Eng at Aptum AS13768 to remove stale route objects created by their NOC from IRR(s). Contacting their nsc.global@ group yielded no response at all. Thanks Eric

2 1

Contact at GoDaddy domains
by Greg Joosse - MySupport IT 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

Hoping someone has a contact at GoDaddy (Domains) as I have a big client with a clientHold 30 day suspension and their support doesn't seem to know what this means. Have spend 7hrs and have got nowhere..... Failing this, is it possible to transfer a domain with this status? Cheers, Greg -- This electronic message together with any attachments is for exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify *info(a)mysupport.com.au <mailto:info@mysupport.com.au>* by return e-mail immediately and delete the message from your computer without making any copies.

2 1

Re: How threading works (was Re: Root Cause Re: 202401102221.AYC Re: Streamline The CG-NAT Re: 202401100645.AYC Re: IPv4 address block)
by James R Cutler 14 Jan '24

14 Jan '24

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 12:58 PM Bryan Fields <Bryan(a)bryanfields.net <mailto:Bryan@bryanfields.net>> wrote: > On 1/12/24 3:04 PM, Mu wrote: >> Would it be possible for you to reply in-thread, rather than creating a new thread with a new subject line every time you reply to someone? >> >> Trying to follow the conversation becomes very difficult for no reason. > > Threading has nothing to do with subject lines. RFC822 (now 5822) specifies > how this works based on message ID. This thread displays fine in threaded > mode in my MUA and in the archives. Bryan, My personal use of email agents involves ordering incoming messages by date sent. Many others order their inbox by date received. I don't use MUA ordering by thread or conversation because I must use MUAs on many diverse systems. So for many decades, I have continued to use my own mental programming to sort and group messages by subject. This, by the way, is akin to aural conversations between persons where announcing a change of subject is expected to be followed by a new topic. For those of us on OCD, ADD, or Autism spectrums, multiple subjects lines cause cognitive dissonance - sometimes damaging comprehension of the continuing thread (conversation). I don't claim it violates the ADA, but it should especially when willfully continued after requests for amended behavior. Lazarus Long would probably express this more cogently. In the interest of polite conversation, - James R. Cutler james.cutler(a)consultant.com

1 0

Feds seek to seize funds from lv.net ISP bank accounts and allege $3+ million fraud in bitcoin
by Eric Kuhnke 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.590823/gov.uscour… https://www.google.com/search?q=lv.net+ISP+nevada It's a fairly well known regional ISP...

2 1